Positional relationships between a tracheal diverticulum and the tracheal tube under general anesthesia: a single-center observational and simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Incomplete sealing of tracheal diverticula by a tracheal tube cuff during positive-pressure ventilation causes barotrauma but the concrete possibility of incomplete sealing has not been indicated. We aimed to assess the possibility of incomplete sealing in a simulated situation of tracheal intubation for patients with tracheal diverticula with tube fixation where the tracheal tube's vocal cord guide overlaps with the patient's vocal cord. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the characteristics of tracheal diverticula based on thoracic computed tomography data in our institution from January 2018 to July 2020. Then, we assessed the structural parameters of three single-lumen tracheal tubes (Parker Flex-Tip [Parker Medical, Bridgewater, CT, USA], Portex Soft Seal [ICU Medical, San Clemente, CA, USA], and Shiley TaperGuard [Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland]; 6.0-8.0 mm inner diameter size) and simulated the positional relationships between tracheal diverticula and the tracheal tube during tracheal intubation where the vocal cord guide overlaps with the patient's vocal cord. We assessed each tube product's possibility of incompletely sealing tracheal diverticula and the possibility of unintended bronchial intubation. RESULTS: In 5,854 patients, the prevalence of tracheal diverticula was 5.7%. The mean (SD) length from the vocal cord to the distal end of the tracheal diverticula was 52.2 (12.8) mm. Tracheal tubes with length from the distal end of the tracheal cuff to the vocal cord guide of ≥ 70 mm had a low risk of incompletely sealing tracheal diverticula (< 5%) and length from the distal end of the tube to the vocal cord guide of ≤ 95 mm had a low risk of unintended bronchial intubation (< 5%). No products in this study satisfied both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Tube fixation, where the vocal cord guide overlaps with the patient's vocal cord, is associated with risk of incompletely sealing of tracheal diverticula depending on the tube's manufacturer and tube's inner diameter size, although it was not a high risk. The use of small inner diameter sized tube relative to patient's body size is high risk of incomplete sealing of tracheal diverticula. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered at University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN). CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY URL: UMIN000043317 (URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000048055 ).

Supraglottic airway device versus tracheal tube for pediatric laparoscopic surgery-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conventionally, tracheal tubes have been used for general anesthesia in pediatric laparoscopic surgeries. Recently, supraglottic devices are being used for the same. The performance of supraglottic devices versus tracheal tubes in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery is uncertain. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared supraglottic devices versus tracheal tubes in patients ≤18 years undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia was conducted. The outcomes were peak airway pressures (cm H2 O), end-tidal carbon dioxide during pneumoperitoneum (mm Hg), recovery time (min), postoperative sore throat and adverse events. Mean difference and odds ratio, with 95% confidence intervals were reported using a random effect model. RESULTS: Eight trials (n = 591) were included in the final meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the peak airway pressures (MD 0.58, 95% CI: -0.65 to 1.8; p = .36) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (MD -0.60, 95% CI: -2.00 to 0.80; p = .40) during pneumoperitoneum in the supraglottic device and the tracheal tube group. The tracheal tube group had higher odds of sore throat (OR 3.30, 95% CI: 1.69-6.45; p = .0005) and the supraglottic airway group had faster recovery time (MD 4.21, 95% CI: 3.12-5.31; p < .0001), which were statistically significant. The certainty of evidence is graded low. CONCLUSION: There is low quality evidence to suggest that for pediatric laparoscopic surgeries of short duration, supraglottic devices could provide comparable intraoperative ventilation in terms of peak airway pressures and end tidal carbon dioxide, with lower odds of postoperative sore throat and faster recovery time when compared to tracheal tubes.

Cuffed versus uncuffed tracheal tubes in a rabbit training model for establishing an emergency front-of-neck airway in infants: a prospective trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence regarding the optimal type of tracheal tube to be advanced over a Frova catheter when performing a 'bougie' emergency front-of-neck airway (eFONA) technique in infants during a 'cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate' situation. METHODS: A prospective non-inferiority trial in a rabbit cadaver surgical tracheotomy model to assess the performance of the eFONA technique with an uncuffed 3.5 mm ID tracheal tube vs a cuffed 3.0 mm ID tracheal tube. Queried outcomes include success rate, performance time, and severe secondary airway injuries among tracheal tube types. RESULTS: In 60 tracheostomies performed by 30 participants, the overall success rate was 98%. Performance time was independent from tracheal tube choice (uncuffed: 61 s [95% confidence interval (CI), 52-76], cuffed: 64 s [95% CI, 55-79]; P = 0.82). No tracheal tube type was preferred in terms of usability by participants. The cuffed tracheal tube required increased force to be advanced over the Frova catheter and was associated with a risk ratio of 2.5 (95% CI, 0.53-11.9; number needed to harm, 10) for severe secondary airway injuries when compared with the uncuffed tracheal tube. CONCLUSION: In performing eFONA in the rabbit cadaver model, an ID 3.5 uncuffed is non-inferior to an ID 3.0 cuffed tracheal tube regarding performance time and preference by the operator. Greater force application to advance the cuffed tube over the Frova catheter and more severe airway injuries may argue for the standardised performance of the eFONA technique with a uncuffed tracheal tube in infants.

Bench testing of tracheostomy tube-related insults using an instrumented manikin.

PURPOSE: Choosing the right tracheal tube for the right patient is a daily preoccupation for intensivists and emergency physicians. Tracheal tubes can generate severe complications, which are chiefly due to the pressures applied by the tube to the trachea. We designed a bench study to assess the frequency of pressure levels likely to cause tracheal injury. METHODS: We tested the pressure applied on the trachea by 17 tube models of a given size range. To this end, we added a pressure sensor to the posterior tracheal wall of a standardized manikin. RESULTS: Only 2 of the 17 tubes generated pressures under the threshold likely to induce tracheal injury (30 mmHg/3.99 kPa). The force exerted on the posterior wall of the trachea varied widely across tube models. CONCLUSION: Most models of tracheal tubes resulted in forces applied to the trachea that are usually considered capable of causing tracheal tissue injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence: How common is the problem?: step 1; Is this diagnostic or monitoring test accurate? (Diagnosis) step 5; What will happen if we do not add a therapy? (Prognosis) n/a; Does this intervention help? (Treatment Benefits) step 5; What are the COMMON harms?(Treatment Harms) step 5; What are the RARE harms? (Treatment Harms) step 5; Is this (early detection) test worthwhile? (Screening) step 5.

Prediction of endotracheal tube size in the pediatric age group by ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anatomical differences in the airway in pediatric patients, compared to adults pose many challenges during endotracheal intubation, such as selecting the proper sized endotracheal tube (ETT) during intubation. Our primary objective was to assess how accurate is ultrasound (US) co-relation in comparison to standard age-based formulas in pediatric patients. Meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO 2020, CRD42020220041. Online literature available in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, Goggle scholar was searched from year 2000 till November 30, 2020, using relevant Mesh terms, ('airway US' OR (('airway'/exp OR airway) AND ('US'/exp OR US))) AND ('endotracheal intubation'/exp OR 'endotracheal intubation') AND ('pediatric'/exp OR pediatric)" to Predict endotracheal tube size/placement in pediatric age (neonate till 18 years) by the US. Bibliographic cross-references of selected publications were further manually screened. The full texts of each article were studied, once the abstract was found appropriate independently by two reviewers. A total of 48 papers published between 2010 and 2020 were identified as relevant and read in detail. Average numbers of patients were 86 and total numbers of patients were 1978. Most of the studies included pediatric patients posted for elective surgeries under general anesthesia and excluded emergency procedures, known laryngeal or tracheal pathology, high-risk patients, recent upper respiratory tract infections or allergy to ultrasound gel. A total of 18 independent correlations were analyzed. Final combined r value calculated from all the included articles was 0.824 (95% CI 0.677, 0.908) with a P < 0.00001 {strong co-relation (r > 0.80)}. Q statistic of 756.484, and I2 statistics of 97.53% showed a large degree of heterogeneity in the effect size across the studies. Use of US for upper airway in pediatric patients is an effective modality and can effectively predict endotracheal tube size estimations in comparison to standard age-based or height-based formulae in the pediatric age group. US is a non-invasive, cost-effective, portable, and reproducible technique as compared to CT and MRI. It also takes less time with increasing expertise and experience.

Supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation and the risk of emergent postoperative intubation after general anaesthesia in adults: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We examined the association between emergent postoperative tracheal intubation and the use of supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) vs tracheal tubes. METHODS: We included data from adult noncardiac surgical cases under general anaesthesia between 2008 and 2018. We only included cases (n=59 991) in which both airways were deemed to be feasible options. Multivariable logistic regression, instrumental variable analysis, propensity matching, and mediation analysis were used. RESULTS: Use of a tracheal tube was associated with a higher risk of emergent postoperative intubation (adjusted absolute risk difference [ARD]=0.80%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.64-0.97; P<0.001), and a higher risk of post-extubation hypoxaemia (ARD=3.9%; 95% CI, 3.4-4.4; P<0.001). The effect was modified by the use of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs); mediation analyses revealed that 28.9% (95% CI, 14.4-43.4%; P<0.001) of the main effect was attributable to NMBA. Airway management modified the association of NMBA and risk of emergent postoperative intubation (Pinteraction=0.02). Patients managed with an SGA had higher odds of NMBA-associated reintubation compared to patients managed with a tracheal tube (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=3.65, 95% CI, 1.99-6.67 vs aOR=1.68, 95% CI, 1.29-2.18 [P<0.001], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing procedures under general anaesthesia that could be managed with either SGA or tracheal tube, use of an SGA was associated with lower risk of emergent postoperative intubation. The effect can partly be explained by use of NMBAs. Use of NMBAs in patients with an SGA appears to increase the risk of emergent postoperative intubation.

Dimensional compatibility and limitations of tracheal intubation through supraglottic airway devices: a mannequin-based in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Flexible bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation through supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) is a well-established element of difficult intubation algorithms. Success can be limited by dimensional incompatibilities between tracheal tubes (TTs) and SGAs. METHODS: In this in vitro study, we tested the feasibility of TT passage through SGAs, removal of SGAs over TTs, and the ability to guide the flexible bronchoscope with 13 TT brands (internal diameter, 6.5-8.0 mm) and ten different SGAs (#4 and #5) in an intubation mannequin. RESULTS: We tested 1,040 combinations of SGAs and TTs. Tracheal tube passage failed in 155 (30%) combinations of the five tested first-generation SGAs (117 [46%] with SGA #4, 38 [15%] with SGA #5) and in three (0.6%) combinations of the five tested second-generation SGAs (two [0.8%] with SGA #4 and one [0.4%] with SGA #5). The reason for failed passage of a TT through a first-generation SGA consistently was a too-narrow SGA connector. Removal of the SGA over the TT in the 882 remaining combinations was impossible for all sizes of reinforced TTs, except the Parker Reinforced TT, and was possible for all non-reinforced TTs. Only one combination with SGA #4 and 84 combinations with SGA #5 were not ideal to adequately guide the flexible bronchoscope. CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant combinations of adult-size TTs and SGAs can be incompatible, rendering flexible bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation through an SGA impossible. Additional limitations exist regarding removal of the SGA and maneuverability of the flexible bronchoscope.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: L'intubation endotrachéale guidée par bronchoscope flexible via un dispositif supraglottique (DSG) est un élément établi des algorithmes utilisés pour les intubations difficiles. La réussite de l'intubation peut être limitée par des incompatibilités dimensionnelles entre les tubes endotrachéaux (TET) et les DSG. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude in vitro, nous avons testé la faisabilité de faire passer un TET par un DSG, le retrait du DSG par-dessus le TET et la possibilité de guider un bronchoscope flexible avec 13 marques de TET (diamètre interne, 6,5-8,0 mm) et dix DSG différents (#4 et #5) sur un mannequin d'intubation. RéSULTATS: Nous avons testé 1040 combinaisons de DSG et de TET. Le passage du tube endotrachéal a échoué dans 155 (30 %) combinaisons avec les cinq DSG de première génération testés (117 [46 %] avec DSG #4, 38 [15 %] avec DSG #5) et dans trois (0,6 %) combinaisons avec les cinq DSG de deuxième génération testés (deux [0,8 %] avec DSG #4 et une [0,4 %] avec DSG #5). La raison de l'échec du passage d'un TET à travers un DSG de première génération était systématiquement liée à un connecteur de DSG trop étroit. Dans les 882 combinaisons restantes, le retrait du DSG par-dessus le TET s'est avéré impossible avec toutes les tailles de TET armés, à l'exception du TET armé Parker, et était possible avec tous les TET non armés. Une seule combinaison avec le DSG #4 et 84 combinaisons avec le DSG #5 n'étaient pas idéales pour guider le bronchoscope flexible de manière adéquate. CONCLUSION: Les combinaisons cliniquement pertinentes de TET et de DSG de tailles adultes peuvent être incompatibles, rendant impossible l'intubation endotrachéale guidée par bronchoscope flexible via un DSG. D'autres limites existent en ce qui concerne le retrait du DSG et la maniabilité du bronchoscope flexible.

Simulated dimensional compatibility of uncuffed and cuffed tracheal tubes for selective endobronchial intubation in children.

BACKGROUND: Cuffed tracheal tubes have recently been recommended for selective endobronchial intubation to establish single-lung ventilation even in smaller children. This implies that, compared with uncuffed tracheal tubes, the cuffed tracheal tubes selected will be smaller and therefore have a shorter length. We hypothesized that cuffed tracheal tubes might be of insufficient length for selective endobronchial intubation if the tube cuff were fully immersed in the left or right mainstem bronchus. METHODS: The distance from the proximal end of the tracheal tube to the upper border of the cuff in cuffed tracheal tubes and to the upper margin of the Murphy eye in uncuffed tracheal tubes, respectively, was assessed in sizes 3.0-7.0 mm internal diameter. The raw data sets of two previously performed studies obtained from 337 children aged from birth to 16 years, including the distances "teeth to tracheal tube tip" and "tracheal tube tip to carina," were used to calculate age-, weight-, and height-related data for the distance from "teeth to carina." Tracheal tube dimensions were compared with age-related distances from "teeth to carina," applying published recommendations for the selection of uncuffed and cuffed tracheal tubes for selective endobronchial intubation in children. RESULTS: The differences between the length of the age-related tracheal tube and the tracheal tube insertion length required to guarantee full insertion of the tracheal tube cuff or the Murphy eye within the mainstem bronchus ranged from -3.5 to 52.6 mm in cuffed tracheal tubes and from 42.3 to 83.3 mm in uncuffed tracheal tubes. CONCLUSIONS: For many age groups of patients requiring selective endobronchial intubation, the lengths of cuffed tracheal tubes, in contrast to those of uncuffed tracheal tubes, were revealed to be critically short for safe taping outside the oral cavity with the cuff placed completely within the right or left mainstem bronchus.

Impact of Tracheal Tube on Swallowing in Post-Operative Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Scintigraphic Analysis.

Dysphagia is common in tracheostomized patients who underwent head and neck surgery for cancer treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate, by means of oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy (OPES), the impact of an occluded tracheal tube (TT) on swallowing in patients treated for head and neck cancer before hospital discharge, to provide further information to the benefit of out-patient care management. From October 2018 to November 2019, we enrolled 19 tracheostomized patients (6 females and 13 males; mean age 61 years) who underwent primary surgical resection of head and neck tumor and swallowing rehabilitation during hospitalization. All subjects underwent a double-standard OPES, one with occluded tracheal tube and the other without TT, with their tracheal stoma being closed directly by a plaster. For each study, we assessed and compared the following quantitative parameters: oral transit time (OTTsec), pharyngeal transit time (PTTsec), esophageal transit time (ETTsec), oral retention index (ORI%), pharyngeal retention index (PRI%), esophageal retention index (ERI%), and aspiration percentage (AP%). The mean values of OTT, PTT, ORI%, PRI%, and ERI% were abnormal during OPES both with TT and without TT and did not statistically differ between the two tests (p > 0.05). Aspiration was detected in 4 cases out of 19 (21.05%) cases during OPES with TT and in 4/19 (21.05%) cases without TT who showed a mean AP% of 11.4% and 11.5% respectively (p > 0.05). Patients with abnormal AP% (> 0%) during OPES with TT showed aspiration signs without TT. Our study showed that the mere presence of a closed tracheal tube does not impact significantly the oropharyngeal transit of bolus during swallowing. This result suggests the possibility to maintain a small-diameter occluded tracheal tube in place for the postsurgical management of head and neck cancer patients.

Intravenous lidocaine to prevent postoperative airway complications in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In surgical patients undergoing general anaesthesia, coughing at the time of extubation is common and can result in potentially dangerous complications. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of i.v. lidocaine administration during the perioperative period to prevent cough and other airway complications. METHODS: We searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System, Excerpta Medica database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for RCTs comparing the perioperative use of i.v. lidocaine with a control group in adult patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. The RCTs were assessed using risk-of-bias assessment, and the quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). RESULTS: In 16 trials (n=1516), the administration of i.v. lidocaine compared with placebo or no treatment led to large reductions in post-extubation cough (risk ratio [RR]: 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.86) and in postoperative sore throat at 1 h (RR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.32-0.67). There was no difference in incidence of laryngospasm (risk difference [RD]: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.03) or incidence of adverse events related to the use of lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: The use of i.v. lidocaine perioperatively decreased airway complications, including coughing and sore throat. There was no associated increased risk of harm.

Tracheal tube size in adults undergoing elective surgery - a narrative review.

Tracheal tubes are routinely used in adults undergoing elective surgery. The size of the tracheal tube, defined by its internal diameter, is often generically selected according to sex, with 7-7.5 mm and 8-8.5 mm tubes recommended in women and men, respectively. Tracheal diameter in adults is highly variable, being narrowest at the subglottis, and is affected by height and sex. The outer diameter of routinely used tracheal tubes may exceed these dimensions, traumatise the airway and increase the risk of postoperative sore throat and hoarseness. These complications disproportionately affect women and may be mitigated by using smaller tracheal tubes (6-6.5 mm). Patient safety concerns about using small tracheal tubes are based on critical care populations undergoing prolonged periods of tracheal intubation and not patients undergoing elective surgery. The internal diameter of the tube corresponds to its clinical utility. Tracheal tubes as small as 6.0 mm will accommodate routinely used intubation aids, suction devices and slim-line fibreoptic bronchoscopes. Positive pressure ventilation may be performed without increasing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury or air trapping, even when high minute volumes are required. There is also no demonstrable increased risk of aspiration or cuff pressure damage when using smaller tracheal tubes. Small tracheal tubes may not be safe in all patients, such as those with high secretion loads and airflow limitation. A balanced view of risks and benefits should be taken appropriate to the clinical context, to select the smallest tracheal tube that permits safe peri-operative management.

Effects of tracheal intubation and tracheal tube position on regional lung ventilation: an observational study.

Anaesthesia and positive pressure ventilation cause ventral redistribution of regional ventilation, potentially caused by the tracheal tube. We used electrical impedance tomography to map regional ventilation during anaesthesia in 10 patients with and without a tracheal tube. We recorded impedance data in subjects who were awake, during bag-mask ventilation, with the tracheal tube positioned normally, rotated 90° to each side and advanced until in an endobronchial position. We recorded the following measurements: ventilation of the right lung (proportion, %); centre of ventilation (100% = entirely ventral); global inhomogeneity (0% = homogenous); and regional ventilation delay, an index of temporal heterogeneity. We compared the results using Student's t-tests. Relative to subjects who were awake, anaesthesia with bag-mask ventilation reduced right-sided ventilation by 5.6% (p = 0.002), reduced regional ventilation delay by 1.6% (p = 0.025), and moved the centre of ventilation ventrally from 51.4% to 58.2% (p = 0.0001). Tracheal tube ventilation caused a further centre of ventilation increase of 1.3% (p = 0.009). With the tube near the carina, right-sided ventilation increased by 3.2% (p = 0.031) and regional ventilation delay by 2.8% (p = 0.049). Tube rotation caused a 1.6% increase in right-sided ventilation compared with normal position (p = 0.043 left and p = 0.031 right). Global inhomogeneity remained mostly unchanged. Ventral ventilation with positive pressure ventilation occurred with bag-mask ventilation, but was exacerbated by a tracheal tube. Tube position influenced ventilation of the right and left lungs, while ventilation overall remained homogenous. Tube rotation in either direction resulted in ventilation patterns being closer to when awake than either bag-mask ventilation or a normally positioned tube. These results suggest that even ideal tube positioning cannot avoid the ventral shift in ventilation.

Efficacy of topical agents for prevention of postoperative sore throat after single lumen tracheal intubation: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal choice of prophylactic drugs to decrease postoperative sore throat is unclear. The objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare and rank 11 topical agents used to prevent postoperative sore throat. METHODS: Various databases were searched independently for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical agents used for the prevention of postoperative sore throat. Inclusion criteria were parallel group studies comparing intervention with active or inactive control and reporting postoperative sore throat. The primary outcome was postoperative sore throat at 24 hr. Secondary outcomes were early sore throat at 4-6 hr, cough, and hoarseness at 24 hr. RESULTS: Evidence was synthesized from 70 RCTs reporting 7,141 patients. Topical application of lidocaine, corticosteroids, ketamine, magnesium, benzydamine, water-based lubricant, and liquorice applied along the tracheal tube, to the tracheal tube cuff, gargled or sprayed were compared with intracuff air and each other. Bayesian NMA showed that magnesium (odds ratio [OR], 0.10; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.03 to 0.26), liquorice (OR, 0.14; 95% CrI, 0.03 to 0.55), and steroid application (OR, 0.11; 95% CrI, 0.06 to 0.22) most effectively prevented postoperative sore throat at 24 hr. Topical lidocaine was the least effective intervention. CONCLUSION: Topical application of magnesium followed by liquorice and corticosteroids most effectively prevented postoperative sore throat 24 hr after endotracheal intubation.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Le choix optimal des médicaments prophylactiques pour réduire les maux de gorge postopératoires n'est pas clair. L'objectif de cette méta-analyse en réseau (NMA) était de comparer et classifier 11 agents topiques utilisés pour prévenir les maux de gorge postopératoires. MéTHODE: Des recherches ont été réalisées dans plusieurs bases de données de façon indépendante afin d'en extraire les études randomisées contrôlées (ERC) comparant des agents topiques utilisés pour la prévention des maux de gorge postopératoires. Nos critères d'inclusion étaient des études de groupes parallèles comparant une intervention à un témoin actif ou inactif sur des résultats de maux de gorge postopératoires. Le critère d'évaluation principal était les maux de gorge postopératoires à 24 h. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient les maux de gorge précoces à 4-6 h, la toux et l'enrouement à 24 h. RéSULTATS: Les données probantes ont été synthétisées à partir de 70 ERC portant sur 7141 patients. L'application topique de lidocaïne, de corticostéroïdes, de kétamine, de magnésium, de benzydamine, d'un lubrifiant à base d'eau et de la réglisse, appliqués le long du tube endotrachéal, sur le ballonnet du tube endotrachéal, en gargarisme ou en vaporisation, ont été comparées à l'air intra-ballonnet et entre les divers agents. La NMA bayésienne a démontré que l'application de magnésium (rapport de cotes [RC], 0,10; intervalle de crédibilité [CrI] 95 %, 0,03 à 0,26), de réglisse (RC, 0,14; CrI 95 %, 0,03 à 0,55) et de stéroïdes (RC, 0,11; CrI 95 %, 0,06 à 0,22) étaient les méthodes plus efficaces pour prévenir les maux de gorge postopératoires à 24 h. La lidocaïne topique était l'intervention la moins efficace à 24 h. CONCLUSION: L'application topique de magnésium, suivie de celle de réglisse et de corticostéroïdes, est l'approche qui prévient le plus efficacement les maux de gorge postopératoires 24 h après une intubation endotrachéale.

GlideScope® versus C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for double lumen endotracheal intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial.

BACKGROUND: The double lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) is the most widely-used device for single lung ventilation in current thoracic anesthesia practice. In recent years, the routine application of the videolaryngoscope for single lumen endotracheal intubation has increased; nevertheless there are few studies of the use of the videolaryngoscope for DLT. We wondered whether there were benefits to using the videolaryngoscope for DLT placement in patients with predicted normal airways. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the performances of the GlideScope®, the C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in DLT intubation. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled, prospective study. We randomly allocated 90 adult patients with predicted normal airways into three groups. All patients underwent routine anesthesia using different laryngoscopes according to group allocation. We compared DLT insertion times, first-pass success rates, numerical rating scales (NRS) of DLT delivery and DLT insertion, Cormack-Lehane degrees (C/L), hemodynamic changes and incidences of intubation complications. All outcomes were analyzed using SPSS13.0. RESULTS: Compared with the GlideScope, the Macintosh gave shorter times for DLT insertion (median: 96 (IQR: 51 [min-max: 62-376] s vs 73 (26 [48-419] s, p = 0.003); however, there was no difference between the Macintosh and C-MAC(D) (p = 0.610). The Macintosh had a significantly higher successful first attempt rate than did the GlideScope or C-MAC(D) (p = 0.001, p = 0.028, respectively). NRS of DLT delivery and insertion were significantly lower in the Macintosh than in the others (p < 0.001). However, the C/L degree in the Macintosh was significantly higher than in the others (p < 0.001). The incidences of oral bleeding, hoarseness, sore throat and dental trauma were low in all groups (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in DLT misplacement, fiberoptic time or hemodynamic changes among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the GlideScope® and C-MAC®(D) videolaryngoscopes may not be recommended as the first choice for routine DLT intubation in patients with predicted normal airways. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (no. ChiCTR1900025718); principal investigator: Z.L.H.; date of registration: September 6, 2019.

Impact of changes in head position during head and neck surgery on the depth of tracheal tube intubation in anesthetized children.

BACKGROUND: The classic formula has been used to estimate the depth of tracheal tube intubation in children for decades. However, it is unclear whether this formula is applicable when the head and neck position changes intraoperatively. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed the data of 172 well-developed children aged 2-12 years (64.0% boys) who underwent head and neck surgery under general anesthesia. The distances from the tracheal carina to the endotracheal tube tip (CT), from the superior margin of the endotracheal tube tip to the vocal cord posterior commissure (CV), and from the tracheal carina to the posterior vocal commissure (TV) were measured in the sniffing position (maximum), neutral head, and maximal head flexion positions. RESULTS: Average CT and CV in the neutral head position were 4.33 cm and 10.4 cm, respectively. They increased to 5.43 cm and 11.3 cm, respectively, in the sniffing position, and to 3.39 cm and 9.59 cm, respectively, in the maximal flexion position (all P-values < 0.001). TV remained unchanged and was only dependent on age. After stratifying patients by age, similar results were observed with other distances. CT and CV increased by 1.099 cm and 0.909 cm, respectively, when head position changed from neutral head to sniffing position, and decreased by 0.947 cm and 0.838 cm, respectively, when head position changed from neutral head to maximal flexion. CONCLUSION: Change in head position can influence the depth of tracheal tube intubation. Therefore, the estimated depth should be corrected according to the surgical head position.

Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator.

BACKGROUND: Applying excessive force during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is associated with several complications, including dental trauma and hemodynamic alterations. A gum-elastic bougie (GEB), a type of tracheal tube introducer, is a useful airway adjunct for patients with poor laryngoscopic views. However, how the use of a GEB affects the force applied during laryngoscopy is unclear. We compared the force applied on the oral structures during ETI performed by novices using the GEB versus an endotracheal tube + stylet. METHODS: This prospective crossover study was conducted from April 2017 to March 2019 in a public medical university in Japan. In total, 209 medical students (4th and 5th grade, mean age of 23.7 ± 2.0 years) without clinical ETI experience were recruited. The participants used either a Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL) or C-MAC video laryngoscope (VL) in combination with a GEB or stylet to perform ETI on a high-fidelity airway management simulator. The order of the first ETI method was randomized to minimize the learning curve effect. The outcomes of interest were the maximum forces applied on the maxillary incisors and tongue during laryngoscopy. The implanted sensors in the simulator quantified these forces automatically. RESULTS: The maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors was significantly lower when using a GEB than when using an endotracheal tube + stylet both with the Macintosh DL (39.0 ± 23.3 vs. 47.4 ± 32.6 N, P < 0.001) and C-MAC VL (38.9 ± 18.6 vs. 42.0 ± 22.1 N, P < 0.001). Similarly, the force applied on the tongue was significantly lower when using a GEB than when using an endotracheal tube + stylet both with the Macintosh DL (31.9 ± 20.8 vs. 37.8 ± 22.2 N, P < 0.001) and C-MAC VL (35.2 ± 17.5 vs. 38.4 ± 17.5 N, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the use of an endotracheal tube + stylet, the use of a GEB was associated with lower maximum forces on the oral structures during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy performed by novices. Our results suggest the expanded role of a GEB beyond an airway adjunct for difficult airways.

Comparison of conventional with Parker flex-tip tracheal tube for intubation through air-Q intubating laryngeal airway.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The problem of difficult and failed intubation led to increased development of equipment for airway management. A number of supraglottic airways have now been developed to facilitate the passage of tracheal tubes. Conventional PVC tracheal tubes are recommended for intubation through the air-Q ILA. No study has compared different PVC tubes for blind intubation through air-Q ILA. Thus, we undertook this prospective, randomised, single blind study to compare two PVC tracheal tubes with different designs viz. conventional PVC tracheal tube (TT) and Parker flex-tip TT with regards to success rate, ease of intubation and total time required for successful intubation through air-Q ILA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I and II scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation were included in the study. Blind intubation using conventional PVC TT and Parker flex-tip tube was done in group A (n = 50) and group B (n = 50), respectively. RESULTS: The first attempt success rate in Parker flex-tip TT was significantly more as compared to conventional PVC TT (P = 0.002). Success rate of intubation was significantly more in Parker flex-tip TT as compared to conventional PVC TT (P = 0.004). The intubation was significantly easy in Parker flex-tip tube as compared to conventional PVC TT (P = 0.002). Total time of intubation was less in Parker flex-tip tube as compared to PVC TT (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Unique design of the Parker Flex-tip TT resulted in increase in success rate, first attempt success rate and ease of intubation in group B in present study.

Comparison of conventional C-MAC video laryngoscope guided intubation by anesthesia trainees with and without Frova endotracheal introducer: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Successful intubation with video laryngoscopes necessitates good hand-eye coordination and the use of intubation adjuncts like bougie and stylet. We proposed this study to find whether using Frova introducer with C-MAC video laryngoscope will reduce the intubation time in trainee anesthesiologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 140 adults without any difficult airway predictors. They were randomly assigned to undergo C-MAC video laryngoscope guided intubation by anesthesia residents using tracheal tube preloaded over Frova introducer (n = 70) or without Frova introducer (n = 70). Primary outcome was the intubation time. Secondary outcomes were the number of redirections of tracheal tube or Frova introducer toward glottis, need for external laryngeal maneuvers (ELMs), first attempt intubation success rate, and ease of intubation. RESULTS: The median actual intubation time (IQR) in Frova and non-Frova group, respectively, were 25.46 (28.11-19.80) and 19.96 (26.59-15.52) s (P = 0.001). The number of redirections of TT or Frova introducer toward glottis, first attempt success rate, and ease of intubation were comparable. The need for ELMs [n (%)] was 15 (21.4) and 26 (37.1) in Frova and non-Frova group, respectively (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Frova introducer guided endotracheal intubation with C-MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with normal airways had a marginally prolonged intubation time with a significant reduction in the need of external laryngeal manoeuvres but with a comparable number of redirections and attempts. Further research is needed to generalize these findings to patients with difficult airways.

Ultrasound-guided lung sliding sign to confirm optimal depth of tracheal tube insertion in young children.

BACKGROUND: The tip of the tracheal tube should lie at the mid-tracheal level after tracheal intubation in paediatric patients. Auscultation does not guarantee optimal positioning of the tracheal tube. We compared auscultation and the ultrasound-guided lung sliding sign to confirm optimal positioning of the tracheal tube in paediatric patients. METHODS: We studied 74 paediatric patients aged 0-24 months of ASA physical status 1-3 who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia. All were randomly assigned to one of two groups: depth of tracheal tube confirmed by auscultation (Group A) or using the ultrasound-guided lung sliding sign (Group S). RESULTS: Optimal positioning of the tracheal tube was observed in 32 of 37 (87%) subjects in Group S and 24 of 37 (65%) subjects in Group A (difference in proportion, 22%; 95% confidence interval, 2-39%; P=0.030). Optimal depth correlated with patient height (adjusted coefficient=0.888, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In paediatric patients younger than 24 months, use of the ultrasound-guided lung sliding sign was more accurate than auscultation for optimal positioning of the tracheal tube. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: KCT 0003015.