Differentiating anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa with absolute weight cut-offs results in a skewed distribution for premorbid weight among youth.

OBJECTIVE: Anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical AN are conceptualized as distinct illnesses, despite similar characteristics and sequelae. Whereas DSM-5 differentiates youth with AN and atypical AN by the presence of clinical 'underweight' (i.e., 5th BMI percentile for age-and-sex (BMI%)), we hypothesized that using this weight cut-off to discern diagnoses creates a skewed distribution for premorbid weight. METHOD: Participants included hospitalized youth with AN (n = 165, 43.1%) and atypical AN (n = 218, 56.9%). Frequency analyses and chi-square tests assessed the distribution of premorbid BMI z-scores (BMIz) for diagnosis. Non-parametric Spearman correlations and Stepwise Linear regressions examined relationships between premorbid BMIz, admission BMIz, and weight loss in kg. RESULTS: Premorbid BMIz distributions differed significantly for diagnosis (p < .001), with an underrepresentation of 'overweight/obesity' (i.e., BMI% ≥ 85th) in AN. Despite commensurate weight loss in AN and atypical AN, patients with premorbid 'overweight/obesity' were 8.31 times more likely to have atypical AN than patients with premorbid BMI% < 85th. Premorbid BMIz explained 57% and 39% of the variance in admission BMIz and weight loss, respectively. DISCUSSION: Findings support a homogenous model of AN and atypical AN, with weight loss predicted by premorbid BMI in both illnesses. Accordingly, premorbid BMI and weight loss (versus presenting BMI) may better denote the presence of an AN-like phenotype across the weight spectrum. Findings also suggest that differentiating diagnoses with BMI% < 5th requires that youth with higher BMIs lose disproportionately more weight for an AN diagnosis. This is problematic given unique treatment barriers experienced in atypical AN. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical AN are considered distinct conditions in youth, with differential diagnosis hinging upon a presenting weight status of 'underweight' (i.e., BMI percentile for age-and-sex (BMI%) < 5th). In our study, youth with premorbid 'overweight/obesity' (BMI% ≥ 85th) disproportionately remained above this threshold, despite similar weight loss. Coupled with prior evidence for commensurate characteristics and sequelae in both diagnoses, we propose that DSM-5 differentiation of AN and atypical AN inadvertently reinforces weight stigma and may contribute to treatment disparities in atypical AN.

Disparities in treatment modalities and survival among older patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Undertreatment of ovarian cancer is common among older women. We aimed to evaluate the treatment modalities offered to older patients and their impact on overall survival (OS). METHODS: The study identified 5,055 patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer and 3584 patients with advanced stage (IIIC + IV) disease from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017. We performed comparisons of OS and ovarian cancer-specific survival (OCSS) across age groups using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Very elderly patients (≥ 75 years old) received treatment with significantly less surgical complexity, such as no lymphadenectomy (59.7% vs. 48.6%; p < 0.001) and a lower rate of optimal debulking surgery (44.0% vs. 52.7%; p < 0.001), as well as lower rates of chemotherapy (78.2% vs. 89.4%; P<0.001) and standard treatment (70.6% vs. 85%; p < 0.001). High proportions of both very elderly and elderly patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), with no significant difference (38.7% vs. 36.2%; P = 0.212). Patients aged ≥ 75 years had significantly worse OS and OCSS. CONCLUSION: With increasing age, the survival rate of women with ovarian cancer decreases significantly. Noticeably fewer ovarian cancer patients aged over 75 years receive standard treatments, and more very elderly patients are treated with NACT.

Spatial and Environmental Correlates of Prevalence of Treatment for Substance Use Disorders, Retention, and SUD Services Utilization in South Sardinia.

This study explored the economic, social, and spatial correlates of treatment prevalence, retention, and service utilization for substance use disorder (SUD) in South Sardinia. Data from 1,667 patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of SUD were extracted from the medical records of individuals assisted by three public addiction services in 2019. We used a spatial autoregressive model, a parametric proportional hazard model, and Poisson regression to examine the associations of spatial factors and residents' socioeconomic status with the prevalence of treatment at the census block level, treatment retention, and SUD service utilization at the individual level. The prevalence was higher among residents of areas closer to competent treatment centers, with the worst building conservation status, a lower percentage of high school and university graduates, and a higher percentage of unemployed, divorced, separated, or widowed residents. Men who were older at the time of their first treatment access; primary users of cocaine, cannabis, and alcohol; had higher education level; and who lived far from competent treatment centers and closer to drug trafficking centers interrupted their treatment earlier. Primary heroin users experienced more SUD treatment encounters. Living in economically and socially disadvantaged areas and near treatment facilities was associated with a higher prevalence, whereas living near drug-dealing centers and far from competent treatment centers was associated with a decrease in treatment retention.

Social determinants of health and CDK4/6 inhibitor use and outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have improved due to novel agents such as CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Nevertheless, Black patients and patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) continue to bear a disproportionate mortality burden. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of EHR-derived data from the Flatiron Health Database (FHD). A dataset was constructed to include Black/African-American (Black/AA) and White patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative MBC. Outcomes included CDK4/6i use (overall and first-line), and rates of leukopenia, dose reduction, and time on treatment for first-line CDK4/6i. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with use and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 6802 patients with MBC were included, of which 5187 (76.3%) received CDK4/6i. Of those, 3186 (61.4%) received CDK4/6i first-line. Overall, 86.7% of patients were categorized as White and 13.3% as Black/AA; 22.4% were > 75 years old; 12.6% were treated at an academic site; 3.3% had Medicaid insurance. In addition to advanced age and poorer performance status, lower use of CDK4/6i was associated with Black/AA vs White race (72.9% vs 76.8%; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, p = 0.04) and Medicaid vs commercial insurance (69.6% vs 77.4%; OR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95, p = 0.02). Odds of CDK4/6i use were twofold higher for patients treated at an academic center (p < 0.001). Rates of CDK4/6i-induced leukopenia and dose reductions did not differ significantly by race, insurance type, or treatment site. Time on CDK4/6i was significantly lower among Medicaid patients (395 days) than patients with commercial insurance (558 days) or Medicare (643 days) (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This analysis of real-world data suggests that Black race and lower SES are associated with decreased CDK4/6i use. However, among patients treated with CDK4/6i, subsequent toxicity outcomes are similar. Efforts to ensure access to these life-prolonging medications are warranted.

Breast cancer treatment disparities in patients with severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer in individuals with pre-existing severe mental illness (SMI), such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression, are higher than in the general population. Reduced screening is one factor but there is less information on possible barriers to subsequent treatment following diagnosis. METHODS: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis on access to guideline-appropriate care following a diagnosis of breast cancer in people with SMI including the receipt of surgery, endocrine, chemo- or radiotherapy. We searched for full-text articles indexed by PubMed, EMBASE, PsycInfo and CINAHL that compared breast cancer treatment in those with and without pre-existing SMI. Study designs included population-based cohort or case-control studies. RESULTS: There were 13 studies included in the review, of which 4 contributed adjusted outcomes to the meta-analyses. People with SMI had a reduced likelihood of guideline-appropriate care (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.77-0.90). Meta-analyses were not possible for the other outcomes but in adjusted results from a single study, people with SMI had longer wait-times to receiving guideline-appropriate care. The results for specific outcomes such as surgery, hormone, radio- or chemotherapy were mixed, possibly because results were largely unadjusted for age, comorbidities, or cancer stage. CONCLUSIONS: People with SMI receive less and/or delayed guideline-appropriate care for breast cancer than the general population. The reasons for this disparity warrant further investigation, as does the extent to which differences in treatment access or quality contribute to excess breast cancer mortality in people with SMI.

Factors associated with failure to operate and its impact on survival in early-stage pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Curative intent for localized pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]) requires surgery, but despite improved perioperative outcomes, surgery remains underutilized. This study analyzed the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) to identify resectable PDAC patients who underwent curative-intent surgery in Texas between 2004 and 2018. We then evaluated demographic and clinical factors associated with failure to operate and survival (OS). METHODS: We identified patients with localized PDAC or regional lymph node spread between 2004 and 2018 in the TCR. Resection rates were determined and multivariable regression and cox proportional hazards were used to identify factors associated with failure to OS. RESULTS: Of 4274 patients, 22% underwent resection, 57% were not offered surgery, 6% had comorbidities precluding surgery, and 3% refused. Resection rates decreased from 31% in 2004 to 22% in 2018. Increasing age was associated with failure to operate (odds ratio [OR] 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-3.61; p < 0.0001) while treatment at a Commission on Cancer (CoC) center correlated with reduced failure to operate (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.50-0.78; p < 0.0001). Resection correlated with survival (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.31-0.38; p < 0.0001) as did treatment at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated center (hazard ratio 0.79; 95% CI 0.70-0.89; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is underutilized for the treatment of resectable PDAC in Texas with decreasing utilization, annually. Evaluation at CoC was associated with improved resection rates and NCI was associated with increased survival. Expanding access to multidisciplinary care including trained hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgeons may improve outcomes for PDAC patients.

Disparities in the Use of Intravenous t-PA among Ischemic Stroke Patients: Population-based Recent Temporal Trends.

OBJECTIVE: To explore a 5-year comparison of disparities in intravenous t-PA (IV t-PA) use among acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients based on race, gender, age, ethnic origin, hospital status, and geographic location. METHODS: We extracted patients' demographic information and hospital characteristics for 2010 and 2014 from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). We compared disparities in IV t-PA use among AIS patients in 2010 to that in 2014 to estimate temporal trends. Multiple logistic regression was performed to compare disparities based on demographic variables, hospital designation, and geographic location. RESULTS: Overall, there was approximately a 2% increase in IV t-PA from 2010 to 2014. Blacks were 15% less likely to receive IV t-PA compared to Whites in 2014, but in 2010, there was no difference. Patients aged 62-73 had lower odds of receiving IV t-PA than age group ≤61 in both 2010 and 2014. Designated stroke centers in the Lower New York State region were associated with reduced odds of IV t-PA use in 2010 while those located in the Upper New York State region were associated with increased odds of IV t-PA use in both 2010 and 2014, compared to their respective nondesignated counterparts. Gender, ethnic origin, and insurance status were not associated with IV t-PA utilization in both 2010 and 2014. CONCLUSION: Overall IV t-PA utilization among AIS patients increased between 2010 and 2014. However, there are evident disparities in IV t-PA use based on patient's race, age, hospital geography, and stroke designation status.

Gender Differences in Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment of Hypertension.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to examine gender differences in both the epidemiology and pathophysiology of hypertension and to explore gender peculiarities on the effects of antihypertensive agents in decreasing BP and CV events. RECENT FINDINGS: Men and women differ in prevalence, awareness, and control rate of hypertension in an age-dependent manner. Studies suggest that sex hormones changes play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of hypertension in postmenopausal women. Estrogens influence the vascular system inducing vasodilatation, inhibiting vascular remodeling processes, and modulating the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system and the sympathetic system. This leads to a protective effect on arterial stiffness during reproductive age that is dramatically reversed after menopause. Data on the efficacy of antihypertensive therapy between genders are conflicting, and the underrepresentation of aged women in large clinical trials could influence the results. Therefore, further clinical research is needed to uncover potential gender differences in hypertension to promote the development of a gender-oriented approach to antihypertensive treatment.

Disparities in treatment and survival among elderly ovarian cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine correlation between race and receipt of optimal treatment for ovarian cancer and the impact of this on overall survival. METHODS: Using SEER-linked Medicare database, women 66 and older diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer between 2002 and 2011 were identified. Patients with unclear histology, diagnosed on autopsy and without Medicare Parts A and B were excluded. We used Chi-square test for categorical variables, F test for continuous variables, and multivariable logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with receipt of surgery and chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare overall survival rates. Cox Proportional Hazards regression was performed to identify factors associated with 5-year survival. RESULTS: 9016 ovarian cancer patients were included. 2638 had primary chemotherapy, 4854 had primary surgery, and 1524 had no treatment. 7653 (84.9%) were white, 572 (6.3%) black, 479 (5.3%) Hispanic, and 312 (3.5%) were of other race/ethnicity. More white patients (57.2%) received both chemotherapy and surgery compared to black (39.9%), Hispanic (48.9%), or other (54.2%) (p < .001). Receipt of either only surgery or chemotherapy, or receipt of neither, resulted in higher risk of death when compared to receipt of both. On multivariable analysis, black (OR 0.58 [0.46-0.73]) and Hispanic (0.69 [0.54-0.88]) patients were less likely to receive both chemotherapy and surgery. Being of black race was significantly correlated with worse overall survival [HR 1.13 (1.03-1.23); p = .02]. CONCLUSIONS: Non-white women are less likely to receive the standard of care treatment for ovarian cancer and more likely to die from their disease than white women.

Disparities in cancer treatment among patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer who are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are less likely to receive cancer treatment compared with HIV-uninfected individuals. However, to the authors' knowledge, the impact of insurance status and comorbidities is unknown. METHODS: Data from the National Cancer Data Base were used to study nonelderly adults diagnosed with several common cancers from 2003 to 2011. Cancer treatment was defined as chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, or any combination during the first course of treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine associations between HIV status and lack of cancer treatment, and identify predictors for lack of treatment among HIV-infected patients. RESULTS: A total of 10,265 HIV-infected and 2,219,232 HIV-uninfected cases were included. In multivariate analysis, HIV-infected patients with cancer were found to be more likely to lack cancer treatment for cancers of the head and neck (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.09-2.01), upper gastrointestinal tract (aOR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.04-3.37), colorectum (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.17-2.48), lung (aOR, 2.46; 95% CI, 2.19-2.76), breast (aOR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.16-3.98), cervix (aOR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.77-4.45), prostate (aOR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.69-2.76), Hodgkin lymphoma (aOR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.66-2.22), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.65-2.00). Predictors of a lack of cancer treatment among HIV-infected individuals varied by tumor type (solid tumor vs lymphoma), but black race and a lack of private insurance were found to be predictors for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, HIV-infected patients with cancer appear to be less likely to receive cancer treatment regardless of insurance and comorbidities. To the authors' knowledge, the current study is the largest study of cancer treatment in HIV-infected patients with cancer in the United States and provides evidence of cancer treatment disparities even after controlling for differences with regard to insurance status and comorbidities. Further work should focus on addressing differential cancer treatment. Cancer 2016;122:2399-2407. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Impact of race and sex on pain management by medical trainees: a mixed methods pilot study of decision making and awareness of influence.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research suggests female and black patients receive less optimal treatment for their chronic pain compared with male and white patients. Provider-related factors are hypothesized to contribute to unequal treatment, but these factors have not been examined extensively. This mixed methods investigation examined the influence of patients' demographic characteristics on providers' treatment decisions and providers' awareness of these influences on their treatment decisions. METHODS: Twenty medical trainees made treatment decisions (opioid, antidepressant, physical therapy) for 16 virtual patients with chronic low back pain; patient sex and race were manipulated across patients. Participants then indicated from a provided list the factors that influenced their treatment decisions, including patient demographics. Finally, individual interviews were conducted to discuss the role of patient demographics on providers' clinical decisions. RESULTS: Individual regression analyses indicated that 30% of participants were reliably influenced by patient sex and 15% by patient race when making their decisions (P < 0.05 or P < 0.10). Group analyses indicated that white patients received higher antidepressant recommendations, on average, than black patients (P < 0.05). Half of the medical trainees demonstrated awareness of the influence of demographic characteristics on their decision making. Participants, regardless of whether they were influenced by patients' demographics, discussed themes related to patient sex and race; however, participants' discussion of patient demographics in the interviews did not always align with their online study results. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest there is a considerable variability in the extent to which medical trainees are influenced by patient demographics and their awareness of these decision making influences.

Reasons for failure to deliver National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-adherent care in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer at an NCCN cancer center.

OBJECTIVE: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has established guidelines for treating epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) which includes cytoreductive surgery and platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy (CT). The objective of this study was to determine the reasons for failure to deliver NCCN-adherent care at an NCCN cancer center serving a diverse racial and socioeconomic population. METHODS: Medical records of women with EOC diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 were reviewed for demographic, clinical, tumor, treatment, and survival data. Independent reviewers determined if their treatment met criteria for being NCCN-adherent. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: 367 patients were identified. 79 (21.5%) did not receive NCCN-adherent care. Non-adherent CT in 75 patients was the most common reason for failure to receive NCCN-adherent care. 39 patients did not complete CT due to treatment toxicities or disease progression. 12 patients received single agent CT only and 4 received no CT due to comorbidities. 2 patients declined CT. 18 patients died in the postoperative period without receiving CT. 8 patients did not undergo cytoreduction due to disease progression or comorbidities. PFS and OS were improved in the NCCN-adherent cohort (PFS: 5.7 vs. 18.3 months, p<.005) (OS: 11.4 vs. 49.5 months, p<.005). CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients at an NCCN cancer center received NCCN-adherent treatment. Reasons for failure to receive NCCN-adherent care were variable, but most did not receive chemotherapy in accordance with guidelines due to comorbidities or disease progression.

Racial and gender differences in stroke severity, outcomes, and treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has indicated that women and blacks have worse outcomes after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Little research has been done to investigate the combined influence of race and gender in the presentation, treatment, and outcome of patients with AIS. We sought to determine the association of race and gender on initial stroke severity, thrombolysis, and functional outcome after AIS. METHODS: AIS patients who presented to 2 academic medical centers in the United States (2004-2011) were identified through prospective registries. In-hospital strokes were excluded. Stroke severity, measured by admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, treatment with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), neurologic deterioration (defined by a ≥2-point increase in NIHSS score), and functional outcome at discharge, measured by the modified Rankin Scale, were investigated. These outcomes were compared across race/gender groups. A subanalysis was conducted to assess race/gender differences in exclusion criteria for tPA. RESULTS: Of the 4925 patients included in this study, 2346 (47.6%) were women and 2310 (46.9%) were black. White women had the highest median NIHSS score on admission (8), whereas white men had the lowest median NIHSS score on admission (6). There were no differences in outcomes between black men and white men. A smaller percentage of black women than white women were treated with tPA (27.6% versus 36.6%, P < .0001), partially because of a greater proportion of white women presenting within 3 hours (51% versus 45.5%, P = .0005). Black women had decreased odds of poor functional outcome relative to white women (odds ratio [OR] = .85, 95% confidence interval [CI] .72-1.00), but after adjustment for baseline differences in age, NIHSS, and tPA use, this association was no longer significant (OR = 1.2, 95% CI .92-1.46, P = .22). Black women with an NIHSS score less than 7 on admission were at lower odds of receiving tPA than the other race/gender groups, even after adjusting for arriving within 3 hours and admission glucose (OR = .66, 95% CI .44-.99, P = .0433). CONCLUSION: Race and gender were not significantly associated with short-term outcome, although black women were significantly less likely to be treated with tPA. Black women had more tPA exclusions than any other group. The primary reason for tPA exclusion in this study was not arriving within 3 hours of stroke symptom onset. Given the growth in incident strokes projected in minority groups in the next 4 decades, identifying factors that contribute to black women not arriving to the emergency department in time are of great importance.

Prognosis and Adjusting Factors in Elderly Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Comparing With Young and Middle Age Groups.

PURPOSE: Proper breast cancer screening and treatment should be considered in the elderly population; however, some tend to be less proactive. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of old age on treatment and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHOD: The study included patients with primary TNBC stage I-III diagnosed from 2002 to 2019 in single institution and retrospectively analyzed. We defined young (< 40 years), middle and old (> 70 years) groups. Clinicopathological factors, treatment, and prognosis were analyzed according to age group of TNBC patients. RESULT: TNBC patients aged 70 and above were 3.3 times more likely (P = .019) to have lymph node metastasis at the time of diagnosis compared to younger patients, but were found to be 0.24 times less likely to receive chemotherapy. (P = .003) Old TNBC patients have an expected likelihood 2.2 times higher of undergoing mastectomy rather than breast-conserving surgery. (P = .042) The 5-year prognosis is poorer in young and old group. (61%, 86%, and 65% in young, middle, and old groups). (P < .001). In subanalysis, old group of stages I and II received fewer chemotherapy compared to youngers (P < .05), but not in stage III. In Cox regression analysis, age and stage had significant impact on prognosis (hazard ratio 2-3), but treatment factors did not. However, in stratified analysis of adjuvant therapy and stage, prognosis of Old TNBC patients in stage II was improved when they underwent neo or adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: TNBC presents challenges in older patients, who receive less aggressive treatment and have poorer outcomes. The primary cause of poor prognosis in old TNBC patients is the high disease stage at diagnosis, underscoring the need for promotion and education on early screening. Additionally, it is suggested that a more proactive approach to adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for stage II old TNBC patients.

Racial/Ethnic Trends in Virtual Mental Health Care Utilization Among Undergraduate Students: A Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: Undergraduate students are particularly in need of mental health support, but demand has far surpassed resources. This gap between mental health diagnoses and support is particularly large among Asian, Hispanic/Latinx, and Black students. Supplementing on-campus care with a virtual-only behavioral health partner may shift these trends. OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at comparing the number of undergraduate students from different racial/ethnic groups (White, Asian, Islander, Hispanic/Latinx, Black, Native, and Multiracial) engaging in virtual mental health visits as part of a partnership with a company providing virtual-only care, with the total enrolled undergraduate students at the same 113 institutions. METHODS: We used de-identified visit data and self-reported race/ethnicity to define the "patient" population of undergraduates accessing care. We compared that to the full "student" population of undergraduates among the same schools, available as part of the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). RESULTS: Patient population race/ethnicity (N = 14,870) differed significantly from student population race/ethnicity (N = 619,459). A significant effect ( χ 26 = 2258, P < .001) indicated that patient demographics differed from student demographics. We found proportionally more Asian, Black, and Multiracial patients than students. At the same time, we found proportionally fewer White and Hispanic/Latinx patients than students. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in contrast to prior literature in traditional mental health care, some racial/ethnic minority undergraduates (Asian, Black, and Multiracial) may actually access care at a higher rate under a fully virtual model. On the other hand, White and Hispanic/Latinx students may access care less frequently.

Substance use and treatment disparities among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The increasing relevance of substance use disorder (SUD) within the Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AA&NH/PI) communities, particularly amidst rising anti-Asian hate incidents and the disproportionate health and economic challenges faced by the NH/PI community during the COVID-19 pandemic, underscores the urgency of understanding substance use patterns, treatment disparities, and outcomes. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, 37 out of 231 studies met the search criteria. Study characteristics, study datasets, substance use rates, SUD rates, treatment disparities, treatment quality, completion rates, and analyses disaggregated by the most specific AA&NH/PI ethnic group reported were examined. RESULTS: Despite increased treatment admissions over the past two decades, AA&NH/PI remain underrepresented in treatment facilities and underutilize SUD care services. Treatment quality and completion rates are also lower among AA&NH/PI. Analyses that did not disaggregate AA and NHPI as distinct groups from each other or that presented aggregate data only within AA or NHPI as a whole were common, but available disaggregated analyses reveal variations in substance use and treatment disparities among ethnic groups. There is also a lack of research in exploring within-group disparities, including specific case of older adults and substance use. CONCLUSION: To address disparities in access to substance use treatment and improve outcomes for AA&NH/PI populations, targeted interventions and strategic data collection methods that capture diverse ethnic groups and languages are crucial. Acknowledging data bias and expanding data collection to encompass multiple languages are essential for fostering a more inclusive approach to addressing SUD among AA&NH/PI populations.

Impact of age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy on receipt of systemic therapy in advanced cancers: A retrospective population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer incidence, comorbidity, and polypharmacy increase with age, but the interplay between these factors on receipt of systemic therapy (ST) in advanced cancer has rarely been studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 with multiple myeloma (MM) (all stages), lung cancer (stage IV), and stage III-IV non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), breast, colorectal (CRC), prostate, or ovarian cancer in Manitoba, Canada. Clinical and administrative health data were used to determine demographic and cancer characteristics, treatment history, comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] and Resource Utilization Band [RUB]), and polypharmacy (≥6 medications). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate variable associations with receipt of ST and interaction with age. RESULTS: In total, 17,228 patients were diagnosed with advanced cancer. Ages were distributed as follows: 7% <50 years, 16% 50-59 years, 26% 60-69, 26% 70-79, 24% ≥80 years. ST was administered to 50% of patients. Increased age, polypharmacy, and comorbidity each independently decreased the likelihood of receiving ST. Significant interaction effects were found between age at diagnosis with stage of cancer and cancer type. Differences in probability of ST by cancer stage converged as age increased. In multivariable analysis, adjusting for covariates, patients with MM had the highest odds and lung cancer the lowest odds to receive ST. The impact of comorbidity and polypharmacy did not differ meaningfully with increasing age. DISCUSSION: Increased age, polypharmacy, and comorbidity were each independently associated with decreased receipt of ST in people with advanced cancers. The impact of comorbidity and polypharmacy did not differ meaningfully with increasing age, while age meaningfully interacted with stage and cancer type.

Neighborhood social vulnerability and disparities in time to kidney cancer surgical treatment and survival in Arizona.

BACKGROUND: Hispanics and American Indians (AI) have high kidney cancer incidence and mortality rates in Arizona. This study assessed: (1) whether racial and ethnic minority patients and patients from neighborhoods with high social vulnerability index (SVI) experience a longer time to surgery after clinical diagnosis, and (2) whether time to surgery, race and ethnicity, and SVI are associated with upstaging to pT3/pT4, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Arizona Cancer Registry (2009-2018) kidney and renal pelvis cases (n = 4592) were analyzed using logistic regression models to assess longer time to surgery and upstaging. Cox-regression hazard models were used to test DFS and OS. RESULTS: Hispanic and AI patients with T1 tumors had a longer time to surgery than non-Hispanic White patients (median time of 56, 55, and 45 days, respectively). Living in neighborhoods with high (≥75) overall SVI increased odds of a longer time to surgery for cT1a (OR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.02-2.31) and cT2 (OR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.13-4.73). Race and ethnicity were not associated with time to surgery. Among cT1a patients, a longer time to surgery increased odds of upstaging to pT3/pT4 (OR 1.95, 95% CI: 0.99-3.84). A longer time to surgery was associated with PFS (HR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.17-1.99) and OS (HR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.26-2.11). Among patients with cT2 tumor, living in high SVI neighborhoods was associated with worse OS (HR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.07-2.57). CONCLUSIONS: High social vulnerability was associated with increased time to surgery and poor survival after surgery.

Gender differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors, treatments and complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: the RIACE Italian multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: Poorer control of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been reported in diabetic women, as compared with diabetic men. It has been proposed that this finding is due to gender disparities in treatment intensity. We investigated this hypothesis in a large contemporary cohort of subjects with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes from the Renal Insufficiency And Cardiovascular Events (RIACE) Italian multicentre study (n = 15 773), attending 19 hospital-based diabetes clinics in 2007-2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Traditional CVD risk factors, macro- and microvascular complications and current glucose-, lipid- and blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatments were assessed. RESULTS: Although CVD was more prevalent in men, women showed a less favourable CVD risk profile and worse performance in achieving treatment targets for haemoglobin A1c , LDL, HDL and non-HDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (BP) and in particular obesity [body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference], but not for triglycerides and diastolic BP. However, women were more frequently receiving pharmacological treatment for hypertension and to a lesser extent hyperglycaemia and dyslipidaemia than men, and female gender remained an independent predictor of unmet therapeutic targets after adjustment for confounders such as treatments, BMI, duration of diabetes and, except for the systolic BP goal, age. CONCLUSIONS: In women with type 2 diabetes from the RIACE cohort, a more adverse CVD risk profile and a higher likelihood of failing treatment targets, compared with men, were not associated with treatment differences. This suggests that factors other than gender disparities in treatment intensity are responsible.

Perspectives on Why Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Might Receive Fewer Cardiovascular Disease Treatments than Patients with Normal Cognition.

BACKGROUND: People with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) receive fewer guideline-concordant treatments for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than people with normal cognition (NC). OBJECTIVE: To understand physician perspectives on why patients with MCI receive fewer CVD treatments than patients with NC. METHODS: As part of a mixed-methods study assessing how patient MCI influences physicians' decision making for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke treatments, we conducted a qualitative study using interviews of physicians. Topics included participants' reactions to data that physicians recommend fewer CVD treatments to patients with MCI and reasons why participants think fewer CVD treatments may be recommended to this patient population. RESULTS: Participants included 22 physicians (8 cardiologists, 7 neurologists, and 7 primary care physicians). Most found undertreatment of CVD in patients with MCI unreasonable, while some participants thought it could be considered reasonable. Participants postulated that other physicians might hold beliefs that could be reasons for undertreating CVD in patients with MCI. These beliefs fell into four main categories: 1) patients with MCI have worse prognoses than NC, 2) patients with MCI are at higher risk of treatment complications, 3) patients' cognitive impairment might hinder their ability to consent or adhere to treatment, and 4) patients with MCI benefit less from treatments than NC. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that most physicians do not think it is reasonable to recommend less CVD treatment to patients with MCI than to patients with NC. Improving physician understanding of MCI might help diminish disparities in CVD treatment among patients with MCI.