Healing of Endosseous Implants Having Different Surface Characteristics in the Alveolar Bone: A Clinical Study.

Background Total treatment time in implant placement can be significantly reduced by placing immediate implants into the freshly extracted sockets. Also, immediate implant placement can act as a guide for proper and accurate implant placement. Additionally, in immediate implant placement, the resorption of bone associated with the healing of the extraction socket is also reduced. This clinical study aimed to clinically and radiographically assess the healing of endosseous implants having different surface characteristics in nongrafted and grafted bone. Methodology In 68 subjects, 198 implants were placed, including 102 oxidized (TiUnite, Göteborg, Sweden) and 96 turned surface implants (Nobel Biocare Mark III, Göteborg) were placed. Survival was considered with clinical stability and acceptable function with no discomfort and no radiographic or clinical signs of pathology/infection. Rest cases that showed no healing and implant no osseointegration were considered failures. Clinical and radiographic examination was done by two experts after two years of loading based on bleeding on probing (BOP) mesially and distally, radiographic marginal bone levels, and probing depth (mesial and distal). Results Five implants failed in total where four implants were with the turned surface (Nobel Biocare Mark III) and one was from the oxidized surface (TiUnite). The one oxidized implant was in a 62-year-old female and was placed in the region of mandibular premolar (44) of length 13 mm and was lost within five months of placement before functional loading. Mean probing depth had a nonsignificant difference between oxidized and turned surfaces with the mean values of 1.6 ± 1.2 and 1.5 ± 1.0 mm, respectively, with P = 0.5984; mean BOP in oxidized and turned surfaces was 0.3 ± 0.7 and 0.4 ± 0.6, respectively (P = 0.3727). Marginal bone levels, respectively, were 2.0 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.7 mm (P = 0.1231). In marginal bone levels related to implant loading, a nonsignificant difference was seen in early loading and one-stage loading with P-values of 0.06 and 0.09, respectively. However, in two-stage placement, significantly higher values were seen for oxidized surfaces (2.4 ± 0.8 mm) compared to turned surfaces (1.9 ± 0.8 mm), with P = 0.0004. Conclusions This study concludes that nonsignificantly higher survival rates are associated with oxidized surfaces compared to turned surfaces after two years of follow-up. Higher marginal bone levels were seen in oxidized surfaces for single implants and implants placed in two stages.

Comparison of surface aspects of turned and anodized titanium dental implant, or abutment material for an optimal soft tissue integration.

Objectives: Soft tissue integration of dental implants lags behind natural biological integration of teeth mainly because of non-optimal surface features. Peri-implant infections resulting in loss of supporting bone jeopardize the success of implants. Our aim was to compare an anodized surface design with a turned one for a more optimal surface. Methods: Morphological and chemical structures of turned and anodized Ti surfaces (grade 5: Ti6Al4V) discs were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDS), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The hydrophilic or hydrophobic features of the surfaces were determined by dynamic contact angle measurement. Results: SEM and AFM revealed significant differences in the morphology and roughness (Ra) of the samples. Anodized discs presented a granular structure, while turned ones had circular grooves. The roughness was significantly higher for the anodized samples compared to the turned ones. XPS and EDS confirmed typical elements for both Ti6Al4V samples. Due to anodization, the amount of Ti (IV) had increased and Ti (III) had decreased in the thicker oxide layer. Anodized samples resulted in a more hydrophilic surface than the turned ones. Significance: The results suggest that the tested anodized samples present optimal surface characteristics to be used as abutment material for an optimal soft tissue integration.

Turned surface implants in patients treated for periodontitis: Preliminary 10- to 20-year results of a long-term cohort study.

PURPOSE: This long-term cohort study investigated the prevalence of mucositis, peri-implantitis, bone loss and survival of turned surface implants in partially edentulous patients treated for periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 19 patients treated for generalised chronic periodontitis (GCP) and 20 patients treated for generalised aggressive periodontitis (GAP) were orally rehabilitated with a total of 126 dental implants. Examinations were performed before implant insertion, at the time of superstructure insertion, and in the subsequent years during a 3-month recall schedule over a 10- to 20-year period. At every session, clinical parameters were recorded. Intraoral radiographs were taken after insertion of superstructures and 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 years later. RESULTS: In total, nine implants were lost during the 20-year observation period. The implant survival rate was 92.1% (GCP patients) and 90.1% (GAP patients). After 10 years, mucositis was present in 21.9% and 21.2% of implants in GCP and GAP patients, respectively. The risk of mucositis was significantly lower in patients with a removable superstructure (OR = 0.061 with P = 0.001). Peri-implantitis was present in 12.2% implants (GCP patients) and 14.1% implants (GAP patients). Implants inserted in bone quality grade 3 showed a significantly higher risk of peri-implantitis (OR = 5.658 with P = 0.003). After 10 years, implants in GAP patients did not show a significant higher bone loss (1.87 ± 1.40 mm) compared with implants in GCP patients (1.50 ± 1.30 mm). After 20 years, the total mean peri-implant bone loss was 1.98 ± 1.64 mm, almost every fifth implant revealed a bone loss > 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The implant survival rate in both patient groups was > 90%, and implants showed a moderate mucositis (< 30%) and peri-implantitis (< 25%) rate. Bone quality and type of superstructure seem to have had an influence on peri-implant health. These results suggest that patients with a history of periodontitis treated in a tight recall schedule can be successfully rehabilitated with turned surface implants for a follow-up period of 10 to 20 years.

A retrospective comparison of oxidized and turned implants with respect to implant survival, marginal bone level and peri-implant soft tissue conditions after at least 5 years in function.

BACKGROUND: Long-term clinical follow-up studies comparing different implant surfaces with regard to survival and marginal conditions are rare. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical performance of turned and oxidized implants after more than 5 years of loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred three patients (43 men, 60 women; mean age 67.4 years, range 32-90) previously treated with 287 implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), 133 with turned surface (MKIII, Nobel Biocare AB) and 154 with an oxidized surface (MKIII, TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB) were examined after at least 5 years of loading (mean 82 months, range 60-93 months). The implants had been used for support of single crowns (33 patients/36 implants), partial bridges (39 patients/103 implants), or full bridges (31 patients/148 implants) following an early loading protocol (14 patients /54 implants), a one-stage protocol (32 patients/59 implants) or a two-stage protocol (57 patients/174 implants). Clinical examinations of bleeding on probing (BoP) and pocket depth (PD) were performed. Intraoral radiographs were used for assessments of marginal bone levels (MBLs). RESULTS: Seven turned implants and one oxidized implant failed, giving overall cumulative survival rates of 94.7 and 99.4%, respectively. There were no differences for BoP scores (0.5 ± 0.7 vs 0.4 ± 0.6) and PD measurements (1.7 ± 0.8 mm vs 1.8 ± 1.0 mm) parameters when comparing turned and oxidized implants, respectively. The mean MBL was 1.8 ± 0.8 mm and 2.0 ± 0.9 mm for turned and oxidized implants, respectively, after more than 5 years in function (NS). Frequency distribution of MBL loss showed no statistically significant differences between the two surfaces. A total of four implants (1.4%) (three oxidized and one turned) showed a PD > 3 mm, MBL > 4 mm, and BoP. However, none of these were associated with suppuration on examination. CONCLUSION: The present study does not state any differences in implant failure, MBL, presence of bleeding or PD around implants when comparing turned and oxidized titanium implants after at least 5 years of function.