APOLLO: neo-adjuvant pembrolizumab for primary vulvar squamous cell carcinoma-a multicenter, single-arm, phase II, clinical proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is a rare cancer for which the cornerstone of treatment is surgery with high complication rates. The unmet need is a less radical and more effective treatment for VSCC. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of mono-immunotherapy pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant treatment for primary resectable VSCC patients. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Some primary VSCC patients display a specific immune profile which is associated with better survival. In other tumors, this profile is associated with a better response to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) checkpoint blockade which may reinvigorate tumor-specific T cells. This potentially results in a reduced tumor load and less radical surgery and/or adjuvant treatment in patients with this immune profile. TRIAL DESIGN: This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with VSCC clinical stage International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) I-III (2021) eligible for primary surgery, with at least one measurable lesion of at least one dimension ≥10 mm in the largest diameter, are included in this study. MAIN EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients not suitable for surgery and/or previously treated with immunomodulatory agents, and/or who suffer from comorbidities that may interfere with PD-1 blockade, are excluded from the study. ENDPOINTS: The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in VSCC is measured by an objective change in tumor size according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and documented by calipers using standardized digital photography with a reference ruler. In addition, the activation, proliferation, and migration of T cells in the tumor will be studied. The secondary endpoints are pathological complete responses at the time of surgery, feasibility, and safety. SAMPLE SIZE: 40 patients with FIGO I-III (2021) primary VSCC will be enrolled. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: The intervention phase started in July 2023 and will continue until July 2025. The expected completion of the entire study is July 2026. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05761132.

Preoperative prediction model of lymph node metastasis in the inguinal and femoral region based on radiomics and artificial intelligence.

OBJECTIVE: To predict preoperative inguinal lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer patients using a machine learning model based on imaging features and clinical data from pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: 52 vulvar cancer patients were divided into a training set (n=37) and validation set (n=15). Clinical data and MRI images were collected, and regions of interest were delineated by experienced radiologists. A total of 1688 quantitative imaging features were extracted using the Radcloud platform. Dimensionality reduction and feature selection were applied, resulting in a radiomics signature. Clinical characteristics were screened, and a combined model integrating the radiomics signature and significant clinical features was constructed using logistic regression. Four machine learning classifiers (K nearest neighbor, random forest, adaptive boosting, and latent dirichlet allocation) were trained and validated. Model performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC), as well as decision curve analysis. RESULTS: The radiomics score significantly differentiated between lymph node metastasis positive and negative patients in both the training and validation sets. The combined model demonstrated excellent discrimination, with AUC values of 0.941 and 0.933 in the training and validation sets, respectively. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis confirmed the model's high predictive accuracy and clinical utility. Among the machine learning classifiers, latent dirichlet allocation and random forest models achieved AUC values >0.7 in the validation set. Integrating all four classifiers resulted in a total model with an AUC of 0.717 in the validation set. CONCLUSION: Radiomics combined with artificial intelligence can provide a new method for prediction of inguinal lymph node metastasis of vulvar cancer before surgery.

Primary chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery as treatment strategy for locally advanced vulvar carcinoma (VULCANize2).

BACKGROUND: Current treatment options for patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer are limited and associated with high morbidity. Therefore, it is important to develop new and safe treatment strategies for this vulnerable patient group. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with definitive chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery is oncologically safe, potentially more effective than primary chemoradiation in establishing long lasting locoregional control, and associated with an improved quality of life. TRIAL DESIGN: This study is a multicenter, prospective, phase II randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the standard treatment arm (primary chemoradiation, consisting of a tumor dose of 64.5 Gy in 30 fractions of external beam radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin for 6 weeks) or the experimental treatment arm (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel in a 3 weekly scheme, followed by surgery). MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Eligible patients must have a histologically confirmed primary or recurrent locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages Ib-Iva; Lesions larger than 2 cm in size or stromal invasion larger than 1 mm (T1b or higher), any status of lymph node involvement (any N), no distant metastasis including pelvic lymph nodes (M0)) with the size or localization of the tumor requiring treatment through primary chemoradiation or extensive surgery. Patients with documented metastases of the pelvic lymph nodes will be excluded from participation in this study. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Locoregional control at 24 months. SAMPLE SIZE: 98 patients will be included in the study. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Expected complete accrual in 2028 with presentation of results by 2030. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05905315.

Notable surgical trials in gynecologic oncology: a 10-year overview.

In the last decade, we have witnessed important advances in novel therapeutics in the management of gynecologic cancers. These studies have built on the findings from preexisting data and have provided incremental contributions leading to changes that have not only impacted the accuracy of cancer detection and its metastatic components but also led to improvements in oncologic outcomes and quality of life. Key landmark trials have changed the standard of care in cervix, uterine, and ovarian cancer. A number of these have been controversial and have generated significant debate among gynecologic oncologists. The main objective of this review was to provide an overview on each of these trials as a reference for immediate and consolidated access to the study aims, methodology, results, and conclusion.

Staging by imaging in gynecologic cancer and the role of ultrasound: an update of European joint consensus statements.

In recent years the role of diagnostic imaging by pelvic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of gynecological cancers has been growing exponentially. Evidence from recent prospective multicenter studies has demonstrated high accuracy for pre-operative locoregional ultrasound staging in gynecological cancers. Therefore, in many leading gynecologic oncology units, ultrasound is implemented next to pelvic MRI as the first-line imaging modality for gynecological cancer. The work herein is a consensus statement on the role of pre-operative imaging by ultrasound and other imaging modalities in gynecological cancer, following European Society guidelines.

Role of V-Y flap reconstruction in vulvar cancer patients: multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if the use of a V-Y reconstructive flap after excisional radical surgery positively influences the surgical outcomes in patients with vulvar cancer. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, controlled study. Surgical outcomes and complication rates of women with invasive vulvar cancer who underwent radical surgery and vulvar reconstruction and those who underwent radical surgery without the reconstruction step were compared. Only patients who underwent bilateral or unilateral V-Y advancement fascio-cutaneous flaps were included in the reconstruction group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze predicting variables for their association with complication rates. RESULTS: Overall, 361 patients were included: 190 (52%) underwent the reconstructive step after the excisional radical procedure and were compared with 171 (47.4%) who did not undergo the reconstructive step. At multivariate analysis, body mass index >30 kg/m2 (odds ratio (OR) 3.36, p=0.007) and diabetes (OR 2.62, p<0.022) were independently correlated with wound infection. Moreover, increasing age (OR 1.52, p=0.009), body mass index >30 kg/m2 (OR 3.21, p=0.002,) and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III-IV (OR 2.25, p=0.017) were independent predictors of wound dehiscence. A significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative wound complications among patients who underwent V-Y reconstructive flaps was demonstrated. This was correlated more significantly in women with lesions >4 cm. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of V-Y flaps in vulvar surgery was correlated with reduced surgical related complications, particularly in vulnerable patients involving large surgical defects following excisional radical procedures.

ESTRO/ESGO/SIOPe Guidelines for the management of patients with vaginal cancer.

Primary vaginal malignancies are rare, comprising only 2% of all female genital tract malignancies in adults and 4.5% in children. As part of its mission to improve the quality of care for women with gynecological cancers across Europe, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) jointly with the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOPe) developed evidence-based guidelines in order to improve the management of patients with vaginal cancer within a multidisciplinary setting.ESTRO/ESGO/SIOPe nominated practicing clinicians who are involved in the management of vaginal cancer patients and have demonstrated leadership through their expertise in clinical care and research, their national and international engagement and profile as well as dedication to the topics addressed to serve on the expert panel (13 experts across Europe comprising the international development group). To ensure that the statements were evidence based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised.In the case of absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the international development group. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 112 independent international practitionners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives and their comments and input were incorporated and addressed accordingly.These guidelines cover comprehensively the diagnostic pathways as well as the surgical, radiotherapeutical and systemic management and follow-up of adult patients (including those with rare histological subtypes) and pediatric patients (vaginal rhabdomyosarcoma and germ cell tumours) with vaginal tumours.

European Society of Gynaecological Oncology Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Vulvar Cancer - Update 2023.

BACKGROUND: As part of its mission to improve the quality of care for women with gynecological cancers across Europe, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) first published in 2017 evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with vulvar cancer. OBJECTIVE: To update the ESGO guidelines based on the new evidence addressing the management of vulvar cancer and to cover new topics in order to provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment of vulvar cancer. METHODS: The ESGO Council nominated an international development group comprised of practicing clinicians who provide care to vulvar cancer patients and have demonstrated leadership through their expertize in clinical care and research, national and international engagement and profile as well as dedication to the topics addressed to serve on the expert panel (18 experts across Europe). To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, new data identified from a systematic search were reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the international development group. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 206 international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. RESULTS: The updated guidelines cover comprehensively diagnosis and referral, staging, pathology, pre-operative investigations, surgical management (local treatment, groin treatment, sentinel lymph node procedure, reconstructive surgery), (chemo)radiotherapy, systemic treatment, treatment of recurrent disease (vulvar, inguinal, pelvic, and distant recurrences), and follow-up. Management algorithms are also defined.

Role of immunotherapy for lymph node positive vulvar melanoma: utilization and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utilization and outcomes of adjuvant immunotherapy for patients with vulvar melanoma and inguinal lymph node metastases. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients with vulvar melanoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 who did not have distant metastases, underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, had positive lymph nodes, and at least 1 month of follow-up were identified. Administration of immunotherapy was evaluated and clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Median overall survival was compared with the log-rank test. Stratified analysis based on clinical status of lymph nodes was performed. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were identified; the rate of immunotherapy use was 25% (75 patients). Patients who received immunotherapy were younger (median 58 vs 70 years, p<0.001); however, the two groups were comparable in terms of clinical lymph node status, rate of positive tumor margins, presence of tumor ulceration, tumor size, Breslow thickness, and performance of comprehensive lymphadenectomy. There was no overall survival difference between patients who did (median 31.08 months) and did not (median 22.77 months) receive immunotherapy (p=0.18). Following stratification by clinical lymph node status, immunotherapy did not improve overall survival of patients with clinically negative (median 35.35 vs 33.22, p=0.75) or positive lymph nodes (median 23.33 vs 16.99, p=0.64). After controlling for confounders, administration of immunotherapy was not associated with better overall survival (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14). CONCLUSIONS: In this study approximately one in four patients received adjuvant immunotherapy. Immunotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival.

Time to extend the indication for sentinel node biopsy in vulvar cancer? Results from a prospective nationwide Swedish study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess detection rates and negative predictive values of sentinel node biopsy in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with tumors ≥4 cm, multifocal tumors, and in locally recurrent disease. METHODS: Between December 2019 and December 2022, patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma with tumors ≥4 cm (group 1), multifocal tumors (group 2), or a first local recurrence without or with previous groin treatment (groups 3 and 4, respectively) were included in a prospective, nationwide multicenter interventional pilot study. The participants underwent a sentinel node biopsy followed by inguinofemoral lymph node dissection. Detection rates, negative predictive values, the proportion of micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells were determined separately for each group. RESULTS: In all, 64 women were included, 36 women in group 1 (56%), and 17 women in group 2 (27%). Due to the small number and heterogeneity of the 11 women in groups 3 and 4, they were excluded from further analyses. In groups 1 and 2, 25 women (47%) were diagnosed with node-positive disease, and in 16 women (64%) only in the sentinel nodes. The detection rates varied between 94.1-100% per patient and 84.1-85.3% per groin. No false-negative sentinel nodes were identified, giving a negative predictive value of 100% for group 1 (95% CI 91.2% to 100%) and for group 2 (95% CI 83.9% to 100%). Of the node-positive patients, 32% had micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells only. One third of the metastases were detected by ultrastaging. In 27% of the non-mapping groins, metastases were found in the lymphadenectomy specimen, and in 75% the metastases showed extranodal growth. CONCLUSION: In this small cohort of patients, we provide further data that may widen the indication of the sentinel node technique to women with tumors ≥4 cm and multifocal tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04147780.

The microbiome and gynecologic cancer: cellular mechanisms and clinical applications.

The microbiome plays a vital function in maintaining human health and homeostasis. Each microbiota has unique characteristics, including those of the gastrointestinal and female reproductive tract. Dysbiosis, or alterations to the composition of the microbial communities, impacts the microbiota-host relationship and is linked to diseases, including cancer. In addition, studies have demonstrated that the microbiota can contribute to a pro-carcinogenic state through altered host immunologic response, modulation of cell proliferation, signaling, gene expression, and dysregulated metabolism of nutrients and hormones.In recent years, the microbiota of the gut and female reproductive tracts have been linked to many diseases, including gynecologic cancers. Numerous pre-clinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that specific bacteria or microbial communities may contribute to the development of gynecologic cancers. Further, the microbiota may also impact the toxicity and efficacy of cancer therapies, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy in women with gynecologic malignancies. The microbiota is highly dynamic and may be altered through various mechanisms, including diet, exercise, medications, and fecal microbiota transplantation. This review provides an overview of the current literature detailing the relationship between gynecologic cancers and the microbiota of the female reproductive and gastrointestinal tracts, focusing on mechanisms of carcinogenesis and strategies for modulating the microbiota for cancer prevention and treatment. Advancing our understanding of the complex relationship between the microbiota and gynecologic cancer will provide a novel approach for prevention and therapeutic modulation in the future.

Electrochemotherapy with intravenous bleomycin for heavily pre-treated vulvar cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: The management of vulvar cancer recurrences is complicated by patients' advanced age and comorbidities. Bleomycin-based electrochemotherapy is a potential treatment option in this setting. However, no data on long-term outcomes are available. Therefore, a multicenter observational study was designed to evaluate the 5-year results in these patients. METHODS: Data about patients and tumor characteristics, electrochemotherapy cycles, clinical response, and follow-up were recorded. Treatment procedures were performed according to the European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy (ESOPE) guidelines. Response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (mean age 82.31±7.28 years) with squamous cell vulvar cancer underwent electrochemotherapy (median number of sessions 1; range 1-4). 20 patients had complete response and 32% of these were disease-free after 2 years (median progression-free survival 16.8 months). In 13 patients with partial response the median progression-free survival was 15.36 months, while patients with stable or progressive disease showed tumor relapse after 6.95 and 3.26 months, respectively (p<0.001). Median overall survival was 18.77, 13.07, 6.73, and 11.13 months in patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up of vulvar cancer patients showed reasonable tumor control after electrochemotherapy and improved progression-free survival and overall survival in responder subjects compared with non-responders. Further studies aimed at improving local response after electrochemotherapy are warranted. Thus, this approach represents a potential alternative for these patients.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) consensus statement on the management of vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.

The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD), and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) developed consensus statements on pre-invasive vulvar lesions in order to improve the quality of care for patients with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN). The management of VaIN varies according to the grade of the lesion: VaIN 1 (low grade vaginal squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL)) can be subjected to follow-up, while VaIN 2-3 (high-grade vaginal SIL) should be treated. Treatment needs individualization according to the patient's characteristics, disease extension and previous therapeutic procedures. Surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment and should be performed if invasion cannot be excluded. Total vaginectomy is used only in highly selected cases of extensive and persistent disease. Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser may be used as both an ablation method and an excisional one. Reported cure rates after laser excision and laser ablation are similar. Topical agents are useful for persistent, multifocal lesions or for patients who cannot undergo surgical treatment. Imiquimod was associated with the lowest recurrence rate, highest human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance, and can be considered the best topical approach. Trichloroacetic acid and 5-fluorouracil are historical options and should be discouraged. For VaIN after hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3, laser vaporization and topical agents are not the best options, since they cannot reach epithelium buried in the vaginal scar. In these cases surgical options are preferable. Brachytherapy has a high overall success rate but due to late side effects should be reserved for poor surgical candidates, having multifocal disease, and with failed prior treatments. VaIN tends to recur and ensuring patient adherence to close follow-up visits is of the utmost importance. The first evaluation should be performed at 6 months with cytology and an HPV test during 2 years and annually thereafter. The implementation of vaccination against HPV infection is expected to contribute to the prevention of VaIN and thus cancer of the vagina. The effects of treatment can have an impact on quality of life and result in psychological and psychosexual issues which should be addressed. Patients with VaIN need clear and up-to-date information on a range of treatment options including risks and benefits, as well as the need for follow-up and the risk of recurrence.

Updates in the treatment of vaginal cancer.

Vaginal cancer is a rare cancer. A lot of the data used in the treatment of this cancer are extrapolated from cervical cancer data. Radiation therapy plays a significant role in the treatment of vaginal cancer. The advances in radiation therapy in both external beam and brachytherapy have improved local control, survival, and toxicity. Brachytherapy plays an important role in treating vaginal cancer, but treatment should be individualized to each tumor. Imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, plays an essential role in the management of patients with vaginal cancer, from diagnosis to staging to treatment management to surveillance.

HPV-independent and HPV-associated vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: two different cancers.

OBJECTIVES: We report the disease-specific survival of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and HPV-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinomas and determine whether differences exist and are independent of stage and age at diagnosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study with case note and pathology slide review of 265 consecutive women with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. These patients were treated over a 15 year period (2001-2016) at a centralized cancer center covering half the population of New Zealand. The women's cancers were categorized dependent on their adjacent pathology, immunohistochemistry and HPV status following expert slide review. Disease-specific survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier univariable and Cox proportional hazard (adjusting for stage, age, and HPV dependence) multivariable methods. RESULTS: The survival analysis included 236 women with follow-up to 96 months; 124 of them were HPV-associated, 95 HPV-independent, and 17 were unclassifiable. Of the 236 women, 146 were stage 1 (92 HPV-associated, 49 HPV-independent, 5 unclassifiable), 13 stage II (7 HPV-associated, 6 HPV-independent), 62 stage III (20 HPV-associated, 34 HPV-independent, 8 unclassifiable) and 15 stage IV (5 HPV-associated, 6 HPV-independent, 4 unclassifiable). HPV-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinomas had significantly worse survival than HPV-associated vulvar squamous cell carcinomas independent of stage and age at diagnosis (HR 3.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6 to 8.2)). Tumors that were unclassifiable by HPV type also had significantly worse survival than HPV-associated tumors independent of stage and age at diagnosis (HR 6.2 (95% CI: 2.4 to 16.0)). CONCLUSIONS: HPV-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinomas present more frequently in older women than HPV-associated tumors. However, the poorer prognosis is independent of age and stage, with worse outcomes even in early stage disease.

Clinical impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with vulvar cancer: the Gemelli Vul.Can multidisciplinary team.

BACKGROUND: 'Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2' (SARS-CoV-2) infection has dramatically affected the management of patients with cancer, who are most vulnerable to the consequences of the infection. Patients with vulvar cancer are frequently elderly and affected by multiple co-morbidities, thus representing a particularly frail population. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients scheduled for treatment for active vulvar cancer. METHODS: Data on patients with vulvar tumors referred to Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS between February 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in nasopharyngeal swab were considered as positive for SARS-Cov-2. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-one patients with vulvar cancer were evaluated and scheduled for treatment. The median age was 72 years (range 35-94). Seven (3.7%) patients were diagnosed with SARS-Cov-2 infection: three (42.9%) had their treatment delayed, with no apparent consequences, two (28.6%) had their treatment delayed and later abandoned because of clinical worsening due to oncologic disease progression, and two (28.6%) contracted the infection in the post-operative period and died due to respiratory complications. CONCLUSIONS: In most cases the infection had major clinical implications, being associated with significant delays in oncologic treatments and extremely high mortality when contracted in the post-operative period.

Trans-inguinal pelvic lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer patients: TRIPLE pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a retrograde extraperitoneal trans-inguinal novel approach to pelvic lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer patients. The secondary objectives were to assess complications (early and late) and oncological outcomes. METHODS: In this pilot study, all patients referred to our institution from November 2019 to May 2021 were evaluated. The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with primary/recurrent vulvar cancer and who were candidates for concomitant groin and pelvic lymph node dissection. A consecutive sampling was planned during the study period. After conventional inguino-femoral lymph nodal dissection, ipsilateral extraperitoneal trans-inguinal pelvic lymphadenectomy (TRIPLE) was performed through a groin incision. Clinical data, type of treatment, perioperative complications, and follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: 13 patients (8 primary, 5 recurrent vulvar cancer) underwent 16 TRIPLE procedures (10 unilateral, 3 bilateral). The median age was 69 years (range 58-93 years); 8 patients had comorbidities (61.5%). Up front locoregional radiotherapy was previously performed in two cases (15.4%). The pathology report showed metastatic lymph nodes in 20 (87%) groins and 11 (68.8%) pelvic sites; the mean number of removed and metastatic pelvic lymph nodes was 12.1 (range 5-33) and 2.9 (range 0-18), respectively. No intra-operative site-specific complications occurred. One (5.9%) post-operative site-specific complication was reported (pelvic abscess, grade 2), which was treated with antibiotics. One patient died due to concomitant pneumonia. No unilateral pelvic lymph node recurrence occurred during follow-up (median 13 months, range 2-43 months); 3 patients (23.1%) had distant site recurrence (median disease-free survival 9 months). CONCLUSIONS: TRIPLE seems to be a feasible and safe technique, providing adequate lymph node dissection. Despite being a high-risk and fragile population, morbidity was similar to previously reported data for conventional mini-invasive approaches. Prospective larger comparative series are necessary.

Inguinofemoral sentinel lymph node biopsy by scar injection in vulvar cancer: an assessment of feasibility and long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Performing inguinofemoral sentinel lymph node biopsy for vulvar cancer following a previous vulvar excision, often referred to as 'scar injection', is debated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy following scar injection and the long-term outcomes in patients undergoing this procedure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with vulvar cancer. We assessed detection rates and outcomes in patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy by scar injection and compared them with patients who had injection around a visible tumor and with patients who had an inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy following previous vulvar excision. Sentinel node detection rates are described per patient and per groin and are compared using Χ2 analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association of recurrence and survival with surgical technique and recognized pathological variables. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 173 groins in 97 patients. At least one sentinel lymph node was detected in 162 (94%) groins examined, and detection rate did not differ whether the groin was assessed following tumor injection (n=122, 94%) or scar injection (n=40, 93%; p=0.85). Patients in the scar-injection group had less frequent lymph node metastases (p<0.02), smaller tumors (p<0.001), and more superficial invasion (p<0.02). Median follow-up was 34.7 months (range 0-108). Scar injection was not independently associated with recurrence or death on multivariable analysis, and depth of invasion was the only independent predictor of disease recurrence (hazards ratio (HR)=1.14, p=0.03). Recurrence and survival were also comparable for patients who had a sentinel lymph node biopsy or inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy following previous vulvar excision (log rank p=0.30; p=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy by scar injection is feasible and demonstrates similar long-term outcomes in patients having scar or tumor injections, and in patients following previous tumor excision undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy or lymphadenectomy.

Definitive chemoradiation or radiation therapy alone for the management of vulvar cancer.

Vulvar cancer is rare, and unresectable disease provides a therapeutic conundrum. Although definitive surgery remains the mainstay for curative treatment of vulvar cancer, a minority of patients present with advanced disease for which surgical resection would be extraordinarily morbid. Pre-operative and definitive radiation with radiosensitizing systemic therapy allows such patients an opportunity for cure. In this review, we explore the origins of pre-operative radiation, current treatment standards for pre-operative and definitive chemoradiation, and future directions.

Imaging to optimize gynecological radiation oncology.

Gynecological cancers have particularly benefited from the increasing use of imaging to guide radiation treatment planning for both external beam radiation and brachytherapy. While the different gynecological cancers have varying use of imaging, certain trends predominate. CT represents an economical choice for evaluating initial disease extent or potential metastasis at follow-up, particularly for endometrial and ovarian cancers. F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT is particularly useful for assessing the initial disease extent and longer term treatment response of squamous predominant cancers, including cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers. With its excellent pelvic soft tissue discrimination, MRI provides the greatest assistance in evaluating the local extent of gynecological tumors, including initial evaluation for non-operative endometrial and vulvar cancer, and assessment before, after and during brachytherapy for cervix, locally recurrent endometrial, and primary vaginal cancers. With more limited availability of MRI, ultrasound can also help guide brachytherapy, particularly during procedures. The benefits of using imaging to better spare bone marrow or earlier assessment of treatment response are topics still being explored, in particular for cervical cancer. As imaging along with radiation oncology technologies continue to evolve and develop, such as with MRI-linacs and ultra high dose rate (FLASH) radiation, we may continue to see increasing use of imaging for advancing gynecological radiation oncology.