One Year Outcomes of Zilver PTX Versus Eluvia for Femoropopliteal Disease in Real-World Practice: REALDES Study.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, prospective, observational study aimed to compare Zilver PTX and Eluvia stents in real-world settings for treating femoropopliteal lesions as the differences in the 1-year outcomes of these stents have not been elucidated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 200 limbs with native femoropopliteal artery disease were treated with Zilver PTX (96 limbs) or Eluvia (104 limbs) at 8 Japanese hospitals between February 2019 and September 2020. The primary outcome measure of this study was primary patency at 12 months, defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio of ≤2.4, without clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or stenosis ≤50% based on angiographic findings. RESULTS: The baseline clinical and lesion characteristics of Zilver PTX and Eluvia groups were roughly comparable (of all limbs analyzed, approximately 30% presented with critical limb-threatening ischemia, approximately 60% presented with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C-D, and approximately half had total occlusion), except for the longer lesion lengths in the Zilver PTX group (185.7±92.0 mm vs 160.0±98.5 mm, p=0.030). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of primary patency at 12 months were 84.9% and 88.1% for Zilver PTX and Eluvia, respectively (log-rank p=0.417). Freedom from clinically-driven TLR rates were 88.8% and 90.9% for Zilver PTX and Eluvia, respectively (log-rank p=0.812). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the Zilver PTX and Eluvia stents were not different regarding primary patency and freedom from clinically-driven TLR at 12 months after treating patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease in real-world settings. CLINICAL IMPACT: This is the first study to reveal that the Zilver PTX and Eluvia have similar results in real-world practice when the proper vessel preparation is performed. However, the type of restenosis in the Eluvia stent may differ from that in the Zilver PTX stent. Therefore, the results of this study may influence the selection of DES for femoropopliteal lesions in routine clinical practice.

Outcomes of Zilver PTX stent implantation for the treatment of complex femoropopliteal artery disease.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Zilver PTX, the first drug-eluting stent, in patients with complex femoropopliteal (FP) artery disease. Between July 2012 and March 2013, 60 consecutive patients (39 males; mean age: 72.5 ± 8.6 years) with complex risk factors including TASC II C/D lesions, in-stent restenosis (ISR) and/or on haemodialysis underwent successful Zilver PTX implantation for symptomatic FP artery disease. The primary outcome was primary patency, which was defined as freedom from restenosis at 12 months, as verified by duplex ultrasound. Secondary outcomes included the technical success rate, the freedom from target lesion revascularisation (TLR) rate and the amputation-free survival (AFS) rate. The average follow-up period was 13.2 ± 5.3 months. 62 % of the patients had TASC II C/D lesions, 35.0 % experienced ISR, and 41.6 % were on haemodialysis. The mean lesion length was 188 ± 96 mm. The technical success rate was 98.3 %. The primary patency rate was 50.2 %, the freedom from clinically driven TLR rate was 68.6 %, and the AFS rate was 83.2 % at 12 months. In conclusion, Zilver PTX stent implantation for complex FP artery disease did not affect long-term durability.

Indications, technical aspects, and outcomes of stent placement in chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Iliofemoral venous stent placement (IVS) has evolved to a well-established endovascular treatment modality for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO). Dedicated venous stents gained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 and solidified IVS as a defined intervention with clear indications, contraindications, risks, benefits, and procedural management principles. This review focuses on the indications, technical aspects and outcomes of stenting for CIVO. Other aspects pertaining to IVS are covered in other articles that are a part of this series. METHODS: This study conducted a literature search limited to English articles. Three search strategies were used, and references were managed in Covidence software. Four investigators screened and evaluated articles independently, excluding meta-analyses, clinical trial protocols, and nonrelevant studies. Eligible studies, focused on clinical outcomes and stent patencies, underwent thorough review. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 1704 studies, with 147 meeting eligibility criteria after screening and evaluation. Exclusions were based on duplicates, irrelevant content, and noniliac vein stent placement. CONCLUSIONS: Successful IVS for CIVO relies on meticulous patient selection, consistent use of intravascular ultrasound examination during procedures and attention to the technical details of IVS.

Twelve-month end point results from the evaluation of the Zilver Vena venous stent in the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction (VIVO clinical study).

BACKGROUND: In the present study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Zilver Vena venous stent in the treatment of patients with symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction. METHODS: The VIVO clinical study was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study that enrolled patients with symptomatic obstruction of one iliofemoral venous segment. Included were patients with Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological (CEAP) clinical classification of ≥3 or a Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) pain score of ≥2. All patients received a self-expanding venous stent (Zilver Vena venous stent; Cook Ireland Ltd, Limerick, Ireland). The primary safety end point was 30-day freedom from major adverse events. The primary effectiveness end point was the 12-month rate of primary quantitative patency by venography as determined by the core laboratory. The secondary end point was the change in the VCSS from baseline to 1 and 12 months. Additional measures included freedom from clinically driven reintervention; change in the CEAP C classification, Venous Disability Score (VDS), and Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ) scores from baseline to 12 months; and stent durability measures. RESULTS: Between December 2013 and October 2016, 243 patients (70% female; mean age, 53 ± 15 years; 67.5% with current or previous deep vein thrombosis) were enrolled at 30 institutions. Iliac vein compression by the iliac artery (n = 191; 78.6%) was the primary indication for stent placement. The mean lesion length was 98.6 ± 69.8 mm. The 30-day freedom from major adverse events rate was 96.7%, greater than the literature-defined performance goal of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.5%-98.6%; P < .0001). The 12-month primary quantitative patency rate was 89.9%, greater than the literature-defined performance goal of 76% (95% CI, 85.1%-93.4%; P < .0001). The change in the VCSS from baseline was -3.0 (95% CI, -3.5 to -2.6; P < .0001) at 1 month and -4.2 (95% CI, -4.7 to -3.7; P < .0001) at 12 months, demonstrating clinical improvement. Similarly, significantly (P < .0001) fewer symptoms over time (from preprocedure through 12 months) were measured using the clinical measures of VDS, CEAP C classification, and CIVIQ. The 12-month rate of freedom from clinically driven reintervention was 95.8% ± 1.3%. Through 12 months, no stent fractures and one clinical migration (Clinical Events Committee adjudicated the latter as technique-related due to device undersizing at placement) had occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The 12-month results of the VIVO study have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the Zilver Vena venous stent for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction, including clinical symptom improvement compared with baseline.

Cost-effectiveness of a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Eluvia) compared to Zilver PTX for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention.

OBJECTIVES: Antiproliferative therapies based on paclitaxel have been developed to extend the durability of endovascular interventions for lower-extremity atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease, resulting in improved primary vessel patency and fewer target lesion revascularizations. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the sustained-release, paclitaxel-eluting Eluvia stent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) versus the paclitaxel-coated Zilver PTX stent (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) for endovascular intervention in the superficial femoral or proximal popliteal artery. DESIGN: A microsimulation model was constructed from a United States Medicare perspective with a 24-month time horizon. Patients entering the model were assigned to initial endovascular intervention with either Eluvia or Zilver PTX. Each month patients were exposed to the risks of primary vessel patency loss, target lesion revascularization, amputation, and death. Clinical input parameters were taken from a randomized trial (IMPERIAL) comparing the two interventions at 24-months follow-up. Cost parameters were obtained from analyses of Medicare administrative and claims data. Cost-effectiveness analysis entailed sampling a complete set of clinical and cost parameters from their respective distributions, and then running cohorts of 10,000 patients through each intervention arm of the model. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the base case microsimulation, at 24 months, the modeled target lesion revascularization was 11.6% for Eluvia and 19.0% for Zilver PTX, and the mean total direct costs were $20,010 and $21,356, respectively (Eluvia average savings=$1,346). In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, Eluvia was cost-effective in 87.8% of all simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $10,000 per target lesion revascularization prevented. Eluvia was more effective and less costly (dominant) than Zilver PTX in 73.6% of simulations. CONCLUSIONS: In this comparison of a paclitaxel-eluting to a paclitaxel-coated stent for endovascular femoropopliteal intervention, Eluvia was more effective and less costly (dominant) than Zilver PTX from a US Medicare perspective. These findings should be considered when formulating reimbursement policy and clinical practice guidelines.

Paclitaxel is a drug used in the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD) to help maintain primary vessel patency and reduce the need for revascularization procedures. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the paclitaxel-eluting Eluvia stent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) versus the paclitaxel-coated Zilver PTX stent (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) in Medicare patients with PAD. Cost-effectiveness is defined as the degree to which a particular treatment option is effective relative to its costs. Therefore, this study compared both the effectiveness, in terms of target lesion revascularization rates, and the costs of Eluvia versus Zilver PTX over 24 months.A microsimulation model was developed from a United States Medicare perspective with a 24-month time horizon. Simulated patients entered the model and were assigned to receive either Eluvia or Zilver PTX. Monthly, patients were exposed to the risks of primary vessel patency loss, target lesion revascularization (TLR), amputation, and death. These risks were taken from a randomized controlled trial that compared Eluvia and Zilver PTX over 24 months. Patients also accrued costs over time. The costs used in the model were obtained from Medicare administrative and claims data analyses.In health economics, a treatment is considered to be the dominant treatment option if it is both more effective and less costly than the alternative treatment. In this case, Eluvia was found to be dominant over Zilver PTX because it was associated with lower TLR rates and lower costs. These findings should be considered when formulating reimbursement policy and clinical practice guidelines.

One Year Outcomes of the VIVO-EU Study of Treatment of Symptomatic Iliofemoral Outflow Obstruction with the Zilver Vena Venous Self-Expanding Stent.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Zilver® Vena™ Venous Stent in the treatment of patients with symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction. METHODS: Between August 2012 and January 2015, 35 patients (mean age of 45.1 ± 15.5 years; 77.1% female) with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction were treated with the Zilver Vena Venous Stent (Cook Ireland, Ltd.) as part of this prospective, single arm, multicenter study. Study assessments included procedural success, major adverse events (MAEs), freedom from occlusion and qualitative patency at 6 and 12 month post-procedure, clinical symptoms of venous insufficiency, and reintervention with the treated venous segment. RESULTS: The rate of freedom from occlusion at 6 month and 12 month was 88.2%. The rate of qualitative patency was 88.2% at 6 month and 85.2% at 12 month. Three MAEs were reported: one symptomatic pulmonary embolism and two clinically-driven reinterventions. Following stenting, clinical symptoms of venous insufficiency improved significantly from baseline at each follow-up, as measured by VDS (p < 0.0001), CEAP "C" (p ≤ 0.0001), VCSS (p < 0.0001), and CIVIQ (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Clinical results with the Zilver Vena Venous Stent were favorable through 12 month, with high patency rates, reduction of venous insufficiency symptoms, and low morbidity.

Clinical outcomes of venous self-expanding stent placement for iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we evaluated the feasibility of a self-expanding venous stent for treating iliofemoral venous obstruction. METHODS: The present retrospective study reviewed the data from 49 patients who had undergone Zilver Vena (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) stent placement for treatment of iliofemoral venous obstruction from September 2017 to March 2019. All patients had undergone received follow-up duplex ultrasound examinations to assess for stent patency. The Villalta scores and Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSSs) were also calculated to stratify the postoperative improvement in disease. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients, 19 had had acute deep vein thrombosis, 7, nonthrombotic iliac venous lesions, and 23, post-thrombotic syndrome. At 1 year after Zilver Vena stent placement, the primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 93.8%, 95.9%, and 97.9%, respectively. The baseline median Villalta score before treatment for those with post-thrombotic syndrome was 19 (range, 11-30), and the median VCSS for the patients with post-thrombotic syndrome and nonthrombotic iliac venous lesions was 11 (range, 6-25). At 1 year after stent placement, the median Villalta score for the post-thrombotic syndrome patients was 4.0 (range, 2-18), and the median VCSS for the post-thrombotic syndrome and nonthrombotic iliac venous lesions patients was 3.0 (range, 2-12). CONCLUSIONS: Venous placement of self-expanding stents offers excellent 1-year patency rates and improved the outcomes of patients with iliofemoral venous obstruction caused by acute deep vein thrombosis, nonthrombotic iliac venous lesions, and post-thrombotic syndrome.

Assessment of Vascular Patency and Inflammation with Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients with Superficial Femoral Artery Disease Treated with Zilver PTX Stents.

PURPOSE: Zilver PTX nitinol self-expanding drug-eluting stent with paclitaxel coating is effective for treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease. However, as with any stent, it induces a measure of vascular inflammatory response. The current clinical trial (NCT02734836) aimed to assess vascular patency, remodeling, and inflammatory markers with intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with SFA disease treated with Zilver PTX stents. METHODS: Serial OCT examinations were performed in 13 patients at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Variables evaluated included neointimal area, luminal narrowing, thrombus area, stent expansion as well as measures of inflammation including, peri-strut low-intensity area (PLIA), macrophage arc, neovascularization, stent strut apposition and coverage. RESULTS: Percentage of malapposed struts decreased from 10.3 ±â€¯7.9% post-intervention to 1.1 ±â€¯2.2% at 12-month follow-up, but one patient showed late-acquired stent malapposition (LASM). The percent of uncovered struts at follow-up was 3.0 ±â€¯4.5%. Average expansion of stent cross-sectional area from baseline to follow-up was 35 ±â€¯19%. The average neointimal area was 7.8 ±â€¯3.8 mm2. Maximal luminal narrowing was 61.1 ±â€¯25.0%, and average luminal narrowing was 35.4 ±â€¯18.2%. Average peri-strut low-intensity area (PLIA) per strut was 0.017 ±â€¯0.018 mm2. Average number of neovessels per mm of stent was 0.138 ±â€¯0.181. Average macrophage angle per frame at follow-up was 7 ±â€¯11°. Average thrombus area at follow-up was 0.0093 ±â€¯0.0184 mm2. CONCLUSION: At 12-month follow-up, OCT analysis of Zilver PTX stent shows outward remodeling and minimal neointimal growth, but evidence of inflammation including PLIA, neovessels, thrombus and macrophages. SUMMARY: Thirteen patients with PAD had paclitaxel-coated stents implanted in their SFAs and were then imaged with OCT at baseline and 12-month follow-up. OCT proxy metrics of inflammation were quantified.

A Polymer-Free Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Versus a Bare-Metal Stent for De Novo Femoropopliteal Lesions: The BATTLE Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the BATTLE (Bare Metal Stent vs. Paclitaxel Eluting Stent in the Setting of Primary Stenting of Intermediate-Length Femoropopliteal Lesions) trial is to demonstrate the clinical superiority of the Zilver PTX stent over the Misago stent in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. BACKGROUND: No randomized studies have compared self-expanding paclitaxel-eluting stents with bare-metal stents in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: BATTLE is a multicenter randomized controlled trial in patients with symptomatic (Rutherford category 2 to 5) de novo lesions of the superficial femoral or proximal popliteal artery. The primary endpoint is freedom from in-stent restenosis (ISR) at 1 year, with restenosis defined as a peak systolic velocity index >2.4 at the target lesion. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate time-to-event data for freedom from ISR over the 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Between March 2014 and August 2016, 186 patients were enrolled; 91 were assigned to the Misago arm and 90 to the Zilver PTX arm. Kaplan-Meier 1-year estimates of freedom from ISR were 88.6% for Misago and 91% for Zilver PTX (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6 to 2.4; p = 0.64). Comparing Misago with Zilver PTX, 2-year estimates were 6.4% and 1.2% (HR: 7.3; 95% CI: 0.9 to 59.3; p = 0.0632) for mortality, 74.6% and 78.8% (HR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.6 to 2.1; p = 0.62) for patency, and 14.4% and 12.4% (HR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.5 to 2.8; p = 0.69) for target lesion revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions, the Zilver PTX stent failed to show superiority over the Misago stent in freedom from ISR at 1 year.

Vascular response to paclitaxel-eluting nitinol self-expanding stent in superficial femoral artery lesions: post-implantation angioscopic findings from the SHIMEJI trial (Suppression of vascular wall Healing after IMplantation of drug Eluting peripheral stent in Japanese patients with the Infra inguinal lesion: serial angioscopic observation).

The aim of this study was to elucidate the vascular responses to paclitaxel-eluting stent (Zilver PTX stent) in superficial femoral artery lesion at different elapsed times using angioscopy. Patients who received Zilver PTX stent implantation from five centers were enrolled. We performed angioscopic examinations at 2, 6, and 12 months after implantation and evaluated neointimal coverage (NIC) grade, intra-stent thrombus (IS-Th) grade, and presence of yellow plaque. NIC grade 0 was defined as stent struts exposed; grade 1, struts transparently visible although covered; grade 2, struts embedded in the neointima, but translucent; and grade 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. IS-Th was graded as follows: grade 0 (none), 1 (focal), and 2 (diffusely spread). Angioscopic follow-up evaluation was performed at 2 months (25 patients, 42 lesions), 6 months (18 patients, 23 stents), and 12 months (14 patients, 24 stents) after stent implantation. Dominant NIC grade significantly increased over time; however, 16.3% of the cases had NIC grade 1 or 2 at 12 months. IS-Th grade decreased; however IS-Th and yellow plaque were persistently observed in 62.5% and 83.3% cases, respectively, at 12 months. An ongoing healing response was observed at 12 months after implantation; however, thrombogenic findings were noted. Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy could potentially enhance the clinical utility of Zilver PTX.

The efficacy of drug-eluting stent for recurrent central venous restenosis in a patient undergoing hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent central venous restenosis is problematic in patients with ipsilateral arteriovenous fistula. We report our experience using a drug-eluting stent for the treatment of recurrent central vein restenosis. CASE REPORT: A 60-year-old man consulted our hospital because of recurrent swelling of his left upper limb with radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistula that originated in the distal forearm. More than 3 years prior, two bare-metal stents were placed for the obstructed lesions in the left subclavian and brachiocephalic venous lesions, and repeated balloon angioplasty for recurrent in-stent stenosis was performed approximately every 3 months. Angiography with iodinated contrast agents revealed an approximately 3-cm-long restenosis at the distal part of the bare-metal stents. One drug-eluting stent (Zilver PTX Drug-Eluting Peripheral Stent; Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) was deployed at the narrowing lesion, followed by balloon angioplasty. The stenotic lesion was successfully and safely dilated. The patient consulted our hospital 5.5 months after drug-eluting stent placement because of restenosis at the distal part of the drug-eluting stent, but only in a shorter segment than before. Freedom from clinically driven target-lesion revascularization (TLR) extended from 3.1 to 5.5 months after drug-eluting stent placement. Although additional implantation of the second drug-eluting stent was required 14.6 months after the first drug-eluting stent placement, freedom from TLR before/after the second drug-eluting stent placement extended from 4.4 months to more than 8.6 months. CONCLUSION: Drug-eluting stent placement is an effective strategy for recurrent central venous stenosis in patients with ipsilateral arteriovenous fistula. To our knowledge, this is the first report of drug-eluting stent placement for recurrent venous stenosis in a patient undergoing hemodialysis.

Comparative Effectiveness Study of Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Peripheral Artery Stents in Endovascular Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: Paclitaxel drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been shown to improve primary patency of femoropopliteal lesions compared to plain balloon angioplasty with provisional bare-metal stents (BMSs) in randomized controlled studies. However, data are lacking on patency outcomes of real-world DES use relative to BMS use. This study compared clinically driven target-lesion revascularization (TLR), target-vessel revascularization (TVR), and target-limb revascularization outcomes at 1 year between DES and BMS treatments in a real-world setting. METHODS: The study identified 174 DES (Zilver PTX; Cook Medical) and 784 BMS femoropopliteal interventions from the available 969 Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry patients between October 2013 and December 2016. We analyzed both unmatched (174 DES and 784 BMS) and propensity score (PS)-matched datasets (174 for each). RESULTS: This study found that patients who underwent DES femoropopliteal endovascular revascularization had significantly lower TLR rates in both unmatched (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.91; P=.02) and matched data (HR, 0.50 95% CI, 0.27-0.91; P=.02). The DES group had a 43% lower TVR risk than the BMS group in the PS matched cohort (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.98; P=.04). Mortality rate in the DES group (5%) was significantly higher than the BMS group in both unmatched (2%; P=.04) and matched groups (1%; P=.046) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with DES had higher lesion and vessel patency than BMS after adjusting for confounding, which included complexity of lesion characteristics and operators' clinical decision-making regarding selection of treatment modalities, in femoropopliteal endovascular interventions in a real-world registry.

Venous Stents: Current Status and Future Directions.

Venous outflow obstruction is a dominant contributor to chronic venous disease. Treatment of venous disease has historically been limited by available vascular stent technology not specifically designed for the venous system. The ideal venous stent must provide requisite flexibility, strength, and accurate deployment for the anatomical and pathophysiological conditions of chronic venous disease. Venous stent technology is advancing with multiple dedicated venous stents currently available in Europe and with investigational device exemption studies ongoing in the United States. These technological advancements are promising for patients suffering from chronic venous disease. This article discusses the current status and future directions of venous stents.

Critical evaluation of stents in the peripheral arterial disease of the superficial femoral artery - focus on the paclitaxel eluting stent.

The endovascular management of obstructive disease of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) is challenging due to unique anatomical and biomechanical forces. Obstructive lesions of the SFA make up the largest proportion of lesions leading to symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Accordingly, endovascular treatment of SFA disease is becoming increasingly common and, in many cases, is the preferred initial therapy. The use of self-expanding nitinol stents have proven superior to percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty in the treatment of intermediate length SFA stenosis. However, achieving durable results, as well as attaining adequate therapy for long occlusions typically seen in clinical practice, remains problematic. Newer technologies, such as paclitaxel eluting stents, seem promising in improving outcomes.

Zilver stent implantation through 4.5 French guiding sheath in iliac vein compression syndrome complicated with acute deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Downsized devices for less invasive endovascular treatment are gaining more attention. CASE REPORT: An 82-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with pain and swelling in left lower extremity. Ultrasonography showed much thrombus at the left common femoral, superficial femoral, and popliteal veins, confirming a diagnosis of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). For lack of therapeutic effect of systemically administered anticoagulative and thrombolytic agents, we performed catheter intervention against DVT. After insertion of a 4.5 French guiding sheath (Parent Plus, Medikit, Tokyo, Japan) into left popliteal vein, venography showed a total occlusion of the common femoral vein. Even after thrombectomy by aspiration catheter, balloon dilation, and catheter-induced thrombolysis, severe stenosis at the proximal site of the left common iliac vein remained. After confirming the presence of iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) by intravascular ultrasound imaging, we successfully implanted a Zilver® stent (Cook Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA) in the common-external iliac vein through a 4.5 French guiding sheath, leading to an optimal venous-return flow. CONCLUSIONS: The present case suggests that in addition to thrombus aspiration, Zilver stent implantation using a 4.5 French guiding sheath has the potential to serve as a minimally invasive strategy for the treatment of IVCS complicated with iliofemoral DVT..

A Preliminary Study on the Usefullness of a Zilver Stent for Bilateral Stenting in Patients withAdvanced Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hilar cholangiocarcinomas have an extremely poor prognosis. Although endoscopic bilateral metal stenting with the "stent in stent" technique using a Y stent is currently employed to treat patients with an unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma, this method has limited application in cases of tight strictures. Furthermore, insertion of stents into the Y stent side (first stent side) is problematic in cases of tumor recurrence. We evaluated the clinical efficacy of the use of endoscopic bilateral metal stenting with the Zilver stent. METHODS: Seven patients with an unresectable Bismuth type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma were included in this study. For endoscopic bilateral metal stenting, we first inserted a Y stent with a central wide-open mesh. The Zilver stent was placed into the contralateral hepatic duct through the central portion of the Y stent. RESULTS: Both technical and functional success was achieved in seven patients (100%). The early complication rate was 0%, and late complications due to tumor recurrence occurred in 2 out of 7 (28.6%) patients. These patients were managed by the placement of additional stents or with the use of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that a combination technique using Y and Zilver stents improves bilateral stenting for patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma and facilitates stent reinsertion in cases of tumor recurrence.