Comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of quality of life, body image, and cosmesis.

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies indicate that single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has many advantages over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC), such as improved cosmesis, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospital stay. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life, body image, and cosmesis between single-incision laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic approaches in patients undergoing cholecystectomies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study between SILC and CLC and was conducted among 58 patients undergoing SILC and CLC from January 2011 to March 2013 in Turkey. After the surgery, the EuroQol-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D™), and body image questionnaire (BIQ) were administered to the patients. RESULTS: Differences between the early and late postoperative scores in the EQ-5D were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Differences between most BIQ areas favored SILC, especially regarding cosmesis (P = 0.016); SILC patients had higher satisfaction with their scar's appearance. CONCLUSION: SILC is a promising alternative to traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in selected patients.

Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate improvements in cosmetic results and postoperative morbidity for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) in comparison with multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC). METHODS: A literature search was undertaken for RCTs comparing SILC with MLC in adult patients with benign gallbladder disease. Primary outcomes were body image and cosmesis scores at different time points. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative pain and frequency of port-site hernia. RESULTS: Thirty-seven RCTs were included, with a total of 3051 patients. The body image score favoured SILC at all time points (short term: mean difference (MD) -2·09, P < 0·001; mid term: MD -1·33, P < 0·001), as did the cosmesis score (short term: MD 3·20, P < 0·001; mid term: MD 4·03, P < 0·001; long-term: MD 4·87, P = 0·05) and the wound satisfaction score (short term: MD 1·19, P = 0·03; mid term: MD 1·38, P < 0·001; long-term: MD 1·19, P = 0·02). Duration of operation was longer for SILC (MD 13·56 min; P < 0·001) and SILC required more additional ports (odds ratio (OR) 6·78; P < 0·001). Postoperative pain assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) was lower for SILC at 12 h after operation (MD in VAS score -0·80; P = 0·007). The incisional hernia rate was higher after SILC (OR 2·50, P = 0·03). All other outcomes were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: SILC is associated with better outcomes in terms of cosmesis, body image and postoperative pain. The risk of incisional hernia is four times higher after SILC than after MLC.

Cosmesis and Body Image in Patients Undergoing Single-port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Multicenter Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (SPOCC-trial).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cosmesis, body image, pain, and quality of life (QoL) after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (4PLC). BACKGROUND: The impact of SPLC on improving cosmesis, body image, pain, and QoL has not been evaluated in double-blinded randomized controlled trials (RCT). This approach therefore remains controversial. METHODS: Between October 2011 and February 2014, 110 patients from 2 centers were randomly assigned to SPLC (n = 55) or 4PLC (n = 55). Primary endpoints were a validated cosmesis (3-24 points) and body image (5-20 points) score after 3 and 12 months. Secondary endpoints included operative duration, postoperative pain, complications, QoL, and length of hospital stay. Patients, physicians, and nurses were blinded until the seventh postoperative day. RESULTS: Demographics were equally distributed between both groups (mean age: 46 years, SD: 14, 62 females, 34 males). The SPLC-group showed superior mean cosmesis and body image compared with the 4PLC-group at 12-weeks (21 vs 16, P < 0.001 and 5 vs 6, P = 0.013, respectively) and at 1-year (24 vs 16, P < 0.001 and 5 vs 6, P < 0.017, respectively). Operation duration was longer in the SPLC-group (mean 101 vs 90 minutes, p = 0.031). Although postoperative pain was less in the SPLC-group (mean VAS 1 vs 2, p = 0.005), there were no differences in complications, and length of hospital-stay. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicenter double-blinded RCT reporting superior short- and long-term cosmetic and body image, postoperative pain, and QoL in SPLC compared with 4PLC. Although cost-effectiveness is still a subject of ongoing debate, SPLC should be offered to patients undergoing surgery for benign gallbladder disease.

[Hypomotor dysfunction of gallbladder: connection between clinical symptomatic and psychovegetative state].

Article presents data on connection between disorders of psychovegetative state and clinical symptomatic in the patients with hypomotor dysfunction of gallbladder. Participation of disorders of psychovegetative state in the development clinical symptomatic of hypomotor dysfunction of gallbladde was confirmed.

Efficacy of Hand and Foot Massage in Anxiety and Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Controlled Randomized Study.

This study was planned and performed to evaluate the effect of foot and hand massage on pain and anxiety management, which is one of the nonpharmacological pain relief methods in patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The present study was designed and conducted in the randomized controlled manner to determine the impacts of foot and hand massage on postoperative pain and anxiety scores of patients who receive laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The universe of the study consisted of the patients who received laparoscopic cholecystectomy between April 2018 and January 2019. The study was completed with 196 patients as 63 patients in the foot massage group, 65 patients in the hand massage group, and 68 patients in the control group. To collect the data, the "Descriptive Characteristics Form," "Visual Analog Scale," and "State-Trait Anxiety Inventory" were used. The pain intensity of patients in the foot massage group and hand massage group were less than in the control group at 90 and 150 minutes after intervention (P<0.05). A significant reduction was determined in the need for analgesics for the patients in the foot massage group and hand massage group compared with the control group (P<0.05). A significant positive relationship was found between pain intensity and state anxiety levels in patients of the foot massage group and hand massage group. Foot and hand massage are influential in decreasing pain and anxiety levels after surgeries for patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Scar Pain, Cosmesis and Patient Satisfaction in Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient-satisfaction, scar-pain and cosmesis between laparoscopic and open-cholecystectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, from August 2012 to May 2014. METHODOLOGY: A total of 400 patients, who had undergone open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy in all units of the Surgical Department, were included. Data was collected on questionnaires given and read to the patients along with counselling and information regarding scar-pain using visual analog score, and satisfaction and cosmesis on a 0 - 10 scale, by a medical professional in the patients' native language. This was done postoperatively on patients' follow-up visits at 1 and 4 weeks. RESULTS: Mean scar pain score at 1 and 4 weeks postoperatively was higher for open-cholecystectomy; 4.96 ±1 and 0.96 ±1, compared to 2.24 ±0.6 and 0, respectively for laparoscopic-cholecystectomy (p < 0.001 and < 0.001). Cosmesis was higher for laparoscopic-group; 8.6 ±1.2 vs. 6.2 ±1.46 for open-cholecystectomy (p < 0.001). Patient-satisfaction was higher for laparoscopic-cholecystectomy; 9.28 ±1.5 vs. 8.32 ±2.3 for open-cholecystectomy (p < 0.001). Mean-cosmesis score was higher for laparoscopic-cholecystectomy for those younger than 40, females and unmarried. Mean patient-satisfaction score was higher for those older than 40 years who had undergone open-cholecystectomy, women who had undergone laparoscopic-cholecystectomy and for unmarried patients who had laparoscopic-cholecystectomy. CONCLUSION: Overall patient-satisfaction and cosmesis scoring was higher for laparoscopic-cholecystectomy especially among females, unmarried and younger than 40 years. Patients of 40 years and older had greater satisfaction scoring for open-cholecystectomy. Therefore, laparoscopic-cholecystectomy should be favoured in females and unmarried patients and those younger than 40 years.

Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has undergone many refinements including reductions in port size and number. This study attempts to determine whether further reduction in port size from that previously reported by us can reduce postoperative pain without compromising the efficacy of the surgery. METHODS: In this study, 159 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three ports: one 5-mm umbilical port, one 3-mm subxiphoid port, and one 3-mm port in the right subcostal position. Data were collected prospectively for each patient on the duration of analgesic use, quantity of analgesic tablets consumed, postoperative pain, most painful incision, and days of recovery required before return to activity and work. These measures were compared with those collected from a group of 100 patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three 5-mm ports in a previous study. RESULTS: Patients in the current study group required analgesics for a longer duration (4 vs 2.9 days; p = 0.001), used more analgesic tablets (10.7 vs 8.1; p = 0.007), and reported greater postoperative discomfort (5 vs 4.1; p = 0.016) as compared with all in the 5-mm port group. The 3-mm port group needed more days for recovery before leaving the house (2.9 vs 2.7; p = 0.504), but they returned to work earlier (5.1 vs 5.9; p = 0.065) than the group that had undergone cholecystectomy with three 5-mm ports, although there was not a significant difference between the groups. Operative time increased from 18.5 to 20.9 min (p = 0.054) in the group with two 3-mm ports. Five patients (3.1%) in the current group required enlargement of a port to complete the procedure, as compared with none in the comparison group. There was one complication (0.6%), as compared with two complications (2.0%) in the previous group. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate a reduction in postoperative pain or a consistent improvement in recovery when the port size was reduced at the subcostal and subxiphoid positions. It did, however, show that ports could safely be reduced in size without a negative impact on the surgeon's ability to perform a cholecystectomy. Reducing port size can be a tool in the surgeon's armamentarium for use in the attempt to optimize cosmetic results.

Transvaginal cholecystectomy: effect on quality of life and female sexual function.

IMPORTANCE: Transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) is the leading natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery to date and has the potential to offer improved cosmesis, less pain, and shorter recovery times for female patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate quality of life and female sexual function in our patients undergoing TVC. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study from August 14, 2009, to June 12, 2012, of TVCs performed at our institution to date. SETTING: Tertiary academic referral center. PARTICIPANTS: The first 47 consecutive female patients (aged 18-65 years) who received a TVC by a single surgeon. INTERVENTIONS: A hybrid TVC was performed by a 5-mm umbilical trocar and a 12-mm transvaginal trocar with standard laparoscopic instruments. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Quality-of-life index (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) and female sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index) scores. RESULTS: A total of 47 TVCs were performed, with a mean age of 39 years, mean body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 31, and mean operative time of 65 minutes. No difference was noted in overall female sexual function from preoperatively to 1 and 3 months postoperatively. When comparing quality of life preoperatively vs 1 and 3 months postoperatively, there were significant improvements in physical function (P = .02), energy and fatigue (P = .001), emotional well-being (P = .01), pain (P < .001), and general health (P = .03). No significant changes were noted in physical limitations (P = .18), emotional problems (P = .72), and social function (P = .12). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In our experience to date, female sexual function is unchanged and quality of life either is unchanged or improves at 1 and 3 months following TVC. Undergoing TVC does not appear to negatively affect female sexual function or quality of life in the short term.

Concept of alexithymia. II. The consistency of alexithymia.

The stability of alexithymia in acute and nonacute disease was studied in 69 patients with 'psychosomatic' digestive disease and in 47 control patients. Methods used were the Beth Israel Hospital Questionnaire, Lazare's Personality Test, and the Rorschach Test. Subjects were interviewed to assess their somatic well-being and the psychological meaning of the illness. Three different alexithymia groups were found. The first consisted of the nonalexithymic patients who scored low in both testings and who seemed to be 'average persons' in the light of personality tests. The second comprised the patients who developed alexithymia as a reaction to illness. They had good cognitive control but a tendency to hypochondriac worry. The last consisted of patients whose alexithymia decreased during an acute disease. They were egocentric and rigid personalities who enjoyed being ill because they then felt that they were loved and noticed. This division was found to be independent of the patients' medical diagnosis.