Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.143
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Care ; 62(9): 624-627, 2024 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986112

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Collaborative care integrates mental health treatment into primary care and has been shown effective. Yet even in states where its use has been encouraged, take-up remains low and there are potential financial barriers to care. OBJECTIVE: Describe patient out-of-pocket costs and variations in referral patterns for collaborative care in Colorado. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective observational study using administrative medical claims data to identify outpatient visits with collaborative care. For individuals with ≥1 visit, we measure spending and visits at the month level. Among physicians with billings for collaborative care, we measure prevalence of eligible patients with collaborative care utilization. SUBJECTS: Patients with Medicare, Medicare Advantage, or commercial health insurance in Colorado, 2018-2019. OUTCOMES: Out-of-pocket costs (enrollee payments to clinicians), total spending (insurer+enrollee payments to clinicians), percent of patients billed collaborative care. RESULTS: Median total spending (insurer+patient cost) was $48.32 (IQR: $41-$53). Median out-of-pocket cost per month in collaborative care was $8.35 per visit (IQR: $0-$10). Patients with commercial insurance paid the most per month (median: $15); patients with Medicare Advantage paid the least (median: $0). Among clinicians billing for collaborative care (n=193), a mean of 12 percent of eligible patients utilized collaborative care; family practice and advanced practice clinicians' patients utilized it most often. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care remains underused with fewer than 1 in 6 potentially eligible patients receiving care in this setting. Out-of-pocket costs varied, though were generally low; uncertainty about costs may contribute to low uptake.


Assuntos
Custo Compartilhado de Seguro , Gastos em Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Humanos , Colorado , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/economia , Estados Unidos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Adulto , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 189: 119-124, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096589

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: "Financial Toxicity" (FT) is the financial burden imposed on patients due to disease and its treatment. Approximately 50% of gynecologic oncology patients experience FT. This study describes the implementation and outcomes of a novel financial navigation program (FNP) in gynecologic oncology. METHODS: Patients presenting for initial consultation with a gynecologic oncologist from July 2022 to September 2023 were included. A FNP was launched inclusive of hiring a financial navigator (FN) in July 2022, and implementing FT screening in October 2022. We prospectively captured patient referrals to the FN, collecting clinical, demographic, financial and social needs information, along with FN interventions and institutional support service referrals. Referrals to the FN and support services were quantified before and after screening implementation. RESULTS: There were 1029 patients with 21.6% seen before and 78.4% after screening initiation. Median age was 58 (IQR 46-68). The majority were non-Hispanic white (60%) with private insurance (61%). A total of 10.5% patients were referred to the FN. Transportation (32%), financial assistance (20.5%) and emotional support (15.4%) were the most common needs identified. A higher proportion of patients referred to the FN identified as Black, had government-funded insurance or diagnoses of uterine or cervical cancers (p < 0.05). Post-screening referrals to FN increased (5% vs. 12.9%, p < 0.001), while referrals to other support services decreased (9.5% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the FNP was feasible, though presence of both a FN and FT screening maximized its effectiveness. Further investigation is needed to understand screening barriers and evaluate longer-term impact.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/economia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/terapia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Navegação de Pacientes/economia , Navegação de Pacientes/organização & administração , Estudos Prospectivos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença
3.
Am J Perinatol ; 41(10): 1290-1297, 2024 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423122

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 10% of pregnant individuals report a penicillin allergy, yet most are not truly allergic. Allergy verification during pregnancy is safe and recommended; however, many hospitals lack the infrastructure to execute testing. Our aim was to evaluate the cost of developing and implementing a penicillin allergy referral program for pregnant individuals at an academic institution and to compare costs of care between patients who were referred and not referred through the program. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an economic analysis of our institution's antepartum penicillin allergy referral program. We prospectively collected detailed resource utilization data and conducted the analysis from the program's perspective, accounting for costs related to program development, allergy verification, antibiotic cost, and delivery hospitalization. Costs were compared between patients who were referred for evaluation versus patients who were not referred using bivariate tests as well as quantile regression adjusting for baseline differences. A sensitivity analysis was performed for allergy testing cost. All cost estimates were inflation adjusted to 2021 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: The startup cost of program development and educational initiatives was $19,920, or 86 per patient. The median allergy evaluation cost was $397 (interquartile range: $303-663). There was no significant difference in maternal (median: $13,579 vs. 13,999, p = 0.94) or neonatal (median: $3,565 vs. 3,577, p = 0.55) delivery hospitalization cost or antibiotic cost (median: $1.57 vs. 3.87, p = 0.10) between referred and nonreferred patients. Overall, the total cost per person did not differ significantly between study groups (median: $18,931 vs. 18,314, p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: The cost of developing a penicillin allergy referral program in pregnancy was modest and did not significantly alter short-term cost of care with potential for long-term cost benefit. Verification of a reported penicillin allergy is an integral part of antibiotic stewardship, and the pregnancy period should be utilized as an important opportunity to perform this evaluation. KEY POINTS: · The cost of developing and implementing an antepartum penicillin allergy referral program is modest.. · Program cost did not significantly alter short-term cost with a potential for long-term cost benefit.. · Penicillin allergy verification is an important part of antibiotic stewardship and should be expanded..


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Penicilinas , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Penicilinas/economia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/economia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Antibacterianos/economia , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos
4.
Can J Surg ; 67(4): E295-E299, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39089817

RESUMO

SummaryCentralized referral systems have been successfully implemented to shorten and equalize surgical wait times; however, ongoing expenses make sustaining these projects challenging. We trialed a low-cost centralized booking project for hernia surgery in a community hospital from July to November 2019. Eligible patients (i.e., those with visible or palpable inguinal or umbilical hernias who were agreeable to an open mesh repair) were booked with the first available surgeon after initial consultation. Centrally booked patients with either inguinal or umbilical hernias waited a mean of 82 (standard deviation [SD] 32) and 80 (SD 66) days, respectively, while those who did not use the centralized system waited 137 (SD 89) and 181 (SD 92) days, respectively. Centralized booking increased operating room utilization as a larger pool of patients was available to call when last-minute cancellation occurred; centralized booking also effectively equalized wait-lists among 6 surgeons. Selective centralized booking is a promising concept that led to more efficient utilization of available operating room time with a significant decrease in wait times; this system could potentially improve access for all patients awaiting general surgery without requiring additional funding.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Hérnia Inguinal , Herniorrafia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Herniorrafia/economia , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Hérnia Inguinal/economia , Hérnia Umbilical/cirurgia , Hérnia Umbilical/economia , Salas Cirúrgicas/economia , Salas Cirúrgicas/organização & administração , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 78(6): 497-506, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875018

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Brief Admission by self-referral (BA) is a crisis-management intervention standardized for individuals with self-harm at risk of suicide. We analyzed its health-economic consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BA plus treatment as usual (TAU) was compared with TAU alone in a 12-month randomized controlled trial with 117 participants regarding costs for hospital admissions, coercive measures, emergency care and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years; QALYs). Participants were followed from 12 months before baseline to up to five years after. RESULTS: Over one year BA was associated with a mean annual cost reduction of 4800 or incremental cost of 4600 euros, depending on bed occupancy assumption. Cost-savings were greatest for individuals with >180 admission days in the year before baseline. In terms of health outcomes BA was associated with a QALY gain of 0.078. Uncertainty analyses indicated a significant QALY gain and ambiguity in costs, resulting in BA either dominating TAU or costing 59 000 euros per gained QALY. CONCLUSION: BA is likely to produce QALY gains for individuals living with self-harm and suicidality. Cost-effectiveness depends on targeting high-need individuals and comparable bed utilization between BA and other psychiatric admissions. Future research should elaborate the explanatory factors for individual variations in the usage and benefit of BA.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Intervenção em Crise , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Comportamento Autodestrutivo , Humanos , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/economia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Suécia , Adulto , Intervenção em Crise/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevenção do Suicídio , Hospitalização/economia , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Suicídio/economia
6.
Int J Cancer ; 149(10): 1809-1816, 2021 11 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34233015

RESUMO

Expanded access is a treatment use of investigational drugs, biologicals or medical devices outside of clinical trials. The purpose of our study was to assess self-reported conflicts of interest (COIs) in oncology expanded access studies. One hundred fifty-eight oncology expanded access studies published from 2013 through 2020 were included. The pharmaceutical industry funded either completely or in part 94 studies (59.49%). The authors disclosed mostly financial COIs, while the number of the reported nonfinancial conflicts was relatively small (3528 and 57 COIs, respectively). The number of articles in which at least one author had a financial COI was 118 (74.68%). The most common financial COI types included advisory board membership/consulting (1471 COIs; 41.7%), followed by honoraria (570 COIs; 16.16%) and research funding (441 COIs; 12.5%). Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of disclosing financial COIs and positive study's conclusions. On univariate analysis, financial COIs were more likely to occur in studies with at least one center located in the United States (odds ratio [OR], 5.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-35.98; P = .02). We also found that positive conclusions about the studied treatments were less likely in studies without industry funding (OR, 0.26; CI, 0.08-0.77; P = .01). Most of the research on COIs in oncology performed to date focused on other types of studies, especially clinical trials. To our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate COIs in oncology expanded access studies.


Assuntos
Ensaios de Uso Compassivo/economia , Conflito de Interesses/economia , Revelação/estatística & dados numéricos , Oncologia/economia , Neoplasias/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Ensaios de Uso Compassivo/métodos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Oncologia/métodos , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias/terapia , Autorrelato
7.
J Surg Res ; 259: 420-430, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33092860

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Abundant studies have associated colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment delay with advanced diagnosis and worse mortality. Delay in seeking specialist is a contributor to CRC treatment delay. The goal of this study is to investigate contributing factors to 14-d delay from diagnosis of CRC on colonoscopy to the first specialist visit in the state of Kentucky. METHODS: The Kentucky Cancer Registry (KCR) database linked with health administrative claims data was queried to include adult patients diagnosed with stage I-IV CRC from January 2007 to December 2012. The dates of the last colonoscopy and the first specialist visit were identified through the claims. Bivariate and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with delay to CRC specialist visit. RESULTS: A total of 3927 patients from 100 hospitals in Kentucky were included. Approximately, 19% of patients with CRC visited a specialist more than 14 d after CRC detection on colonoscopy. Delay to specialist (DTS) was found more likely in patients with Medicaid insurance (OR 3.1, P < 0.0001), low and moderate education level (OR 1.4 and 1.3, respectively, P = 0.0127), and stage I CRC (OR 1.5, P < 0.0001). There was a higher percentage of delay to specialist among Medicaid patients (44.0%) than Medicare (18.0%) and privately insured patients (18.8%). CONCLUSIONS: We identified Medicaid insurance, low education attainment, and early stage CRC diagnosis as independent risk factors associated with 14-d delay in seeking specialist care after CRC detection on colonoscopy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente/economia , Assistência ao Convalescente/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Escolaridade , Feminino , Gastroenterologia/organização & administração , Gastroenterologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Kentucky , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/organização & administração , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Oncologia/economia , Medicare/economia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo para o Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
8.
BJOG ; 128(3): 573-582, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32638462

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the cost-effectiveness of the old cytology programme with the new high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) screening programme, using performance indicators from the new Dutch hrHPV screening programme. DESIGN: Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: The Netherlands. POPULATION: Dutch 30-year-old unvaccinated females followed up lifelong. METHODS: We updated the microsimulation screening analysis (MISCAN) model using the most recent epidemiological and screening data from the Netherlands. We simulated both screening programmes, using the screening behaviour and costs observed in each programme. Sensitivity analyses were performed on screening behaviour, utility losses and discount rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates, number of screening tests and repeat tests, colposcopy referrals by lesion grade, costs from a societal perspective, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The new Dutch cervical cancer screening programme decreased the cervical cancer mortality by 4% and the incidence by 1% compared with the old programme. Colposcopy referrals of women without cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, increased by 172%, but 13% more QALYs were still achieved. Total costs were reduced by 21%, mainly due to fewer screening tests. Per QALY gained, the hrHPV programme cost 46% less (€12,225) than the cytology programme (€22,678), and hrHPV-based screening remained more cost-effective in all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The hrHPV-based screening programme was found to be more effective and cost-effective than the cytology programme. Alternatives for the current triage strategy should be considered to lower the number of unnecessary referrals. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: First results after implementation confirm that HPV screening is more cost-effective than cytology screening.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Modelos Teóricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Adulto , Colo do Útero/virologia , Colposcopia/economia , Simulação por Computador , Análise Custo-Benefício , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia
9.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 43(8): e1069-e1072, 2021 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33902065

RESUMO

One in 40 pediatric office visits in the United States result in referral to subspecialty care, mostly for secondary opinion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity of pediatric hematology referrals from Eastern New Mexico and West Texas to a tertiary university hospital. Retrospective data was obtained from chart review based on referrals made to the Southwest Cancer Center in Lubbock, TX for abnormal complete blood count or coagulation tests. Necessity of referrals were assessed according to patient laboratory values before referral, at initial visit, and whether therapy was started by the primary care physician (PCP). One hundred one patients met the study criteria during the period in review. The most common reasons of referral were iron deficiency anemia, leukopenia or leukocytosis and other types of anemia. About 33% of the referrals were determined to be manageable by a PCP as either the correct therapy had been already started before referral and/or the laboratory values were back to normal at the time of the first subspecialty visit. The total estimated cost of unnecessary referrals, including clinic visits and laboratories were $82,888 excluding mileage costs, days of work-school missed, and child care. Incorporation of referral guidelines, improving communication between PCP and subspecialties, and utilizing age-sex appropriate values in the interpretation of results could prevent excessive subspecialty referrals.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Deficiências de Ferro/terapia , Leucopenia/terapia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/psicologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Lactente , Deficiências de Ferro/economia , Leucopenia/economia , Masculino , Prognóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 773-777, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34698640

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: While the role of palliative care in the emergency department is recognized, barriers against the effective integration of palliative interventions and emergency care remain. We examined the association between goals-of-care and palliative care consultations and healthcare utilization outcomes in older adult patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with sepsis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 197 patients aged 65 years and older who presented to the ED with sepsis or septic shock. Healthcare utilization outcomes were compared between patients divided into 3 groups: no palliative care consultation, palliative care consultation within 4 days of admission (i.e., early consultation), and palliative care consultation after 4 days of admission (i.e., late consultation). RESULTS: 51% of patients did not receive any palliative consultation, 39% of patients underwent an early palliative care consultation (within 4 days), and 10% of patients underwent a late palliative care consultation (after 4 days). Patients who received late palliative care consultation had a significantly increased number of procedures, total length of stay, ICU length of stay, and cost (p < .01, p < .001, p < .05, p < .001; respectively). Regarding early palliative care consultation, there were no statistically significant associations between this intervention and our outcomes of interest; however, we noted a trend towards decreased total length of stay and decreased healthcare cost. CONCLUSION: In patients aged 65 years and older who presented to the ED with sepsis, early palliative consultations were associated with reduced healthcare utilization as compared to late palliative consultations.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Sepse/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Mid-Atlantic Region , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
11.
Scott Med J ; 66(3): 142-147, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966512

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In 2010, a virtual sarcoma referral model was implemented, which aims to provide a centralised multidisciplinary team (MDT) to provide rapid advice, avoiding unnecessary appointments and providing a streamlined service. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of this screening tool in reducing the service burden and expediting patient journey. METHODS AND RESULTS: All referrals made to a single tertiary referral sarcoma unit from January 2010 to December 2018 were extracted from a prospective database. Only 26.0% events discussed required review directly. 30.3% were discharged back to referrer. 16.5% required further investigations. 22.5% required a biopsy prior to review. There was a reduction in the rate of patients reviewed at the sarcoma clinic, and a higher discharge rate from the MDT in 2018 versus 2010 (p < 0.001). This gives a potential cost saving of 670,700 GBP over the 9 year period. CONCLUSION: An MDT meeting which triages referrals is cost-effective at reducing unnecessary referrals. This can limit unnecessary exposure of patients who may have an underlying diagnosis of cancer to a high-risk environment, and reduces burden on services as it copes with increasing demands during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Oncologia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Sarcoma/terapia , Triagem/métodos , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Serviço Hospitalar de Oncologia/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Oncologia/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Sarcoma/economia , Escócia/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Triagem/economia , Comunicação por Videoconferência
12.
J Surg Res ; 255: 71-76, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32543381

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) provide medical care to uninsured, and surgical issues are often outside the normal scope of care of these clinics. The Shade Tree Clinic (STC) is an SRFC serving 300 patients with complex medical conditions. This study describes the implementation and efficacy of a General Surgery Specialty Clinic in this setting. METHODS: This descriptive study examines the demographics and referral patterns of patients seen in two pilot Specialty Clinics and other patients evaluated for general surgical issues from December 2017 to January 2020. Providers were surveyed regarding their experience in clinic. RESULTS: Twenty patients were evaluated by six general surgeons during 22 separate encounters (n = 20). Nine patients were seen in two pilot Specialty Clinics for biliary colic, hernia, hemorrhoids, anal mass, toenail lesion, surgical weight loss, and venous insufficiency. Referrals from these clinics to affiliated Vanderbilt University Medical Center included six ultrasounds; referrals to vascular surgery and podiatry clinics; and referrals for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and anal mass excision. STC also directly referred eight patients for colonoscopies and five patients for major operations through primary care clinic. Hundred percent of care was cost-free to patients. Providers reported a median satisfaction score of five with the Specialty Clinics (Very Satisfied; [4, 5]). Hundred percent of providers felt that the concerns of patients were addressed. CONCLUSIONS: A surgery specialty clinic in the setting of an SRFC is an effective way to provide surgical care to underserved populations with the potential to reduce unplanned hospital utilization.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/educação , Centros de Cuidados de Saúde Secundários/estatística & dados numéricos , Clínica Dirigida por Estudantes/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Implementação de Plano de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Clínica Dirigida por Estudantes/economia , Clínica Dirigida por Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/educação , Cirurgiões/organização & administração , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/educação
13.
Ann Fam Med ; 18(6): 503-510, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33168678

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To identify components of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model of care that are associated with lower spending and utilization among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Regression analyses of changes in outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries in practices that engaged in particular PCMH activities compared with beneficiaries in practices that did not. We analyzed claims for 302,719 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries linked to PCMH surveys completed by 394 practices in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' 8-state Multi-Payer Advanced Primary Care Practice demonstration. RESULTS: Six activities were associated with lower spending or utilization. Use of a registry to identify and remind patients due for preventive services was associated with all 4 of our outcome measures: total spending was $69.77 less per beneficiary per month (PBPM) (P = 0.00); acute-care hospital spending was $36.62 less PBPM (P = 0.00); there were 6.78 fewer hospital admissions per 1,000 beneficiaries per quarter (P1KBPQ) (P = 0.003); and 11.05 fewer emergency department (ED) visits P1KBPQ (P = 0.05). Using a patient registry for pre-visit planning and clinician reminders was associated with $29.31 lower total spending PBPM (P = 0.05). Engaging patients with chronic conditions in goal setting and action planning was associated with 4.62 fewer hospital admissions P1KBPQ (P = 0.01) and 11.53 fewer ED visits P1KBPQ (P = 0.00). Monitoring patients during hospital stays was associated with $22.06 lower hospital spending PBPM (P = 0.03). Developing referral protocols with commonly referred-to clinicians was associated with 11.62 fewer ED visits P1KBPQ (P = 0.00). Using quality improvement approaches was associated with 13.47 fewer ED visits P1KBPQ (P =0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Practices seeking to deliver more efficient care may benefit from implementing these 6 activities.


Assuntos
Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/economia , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/economia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Regressão , Estados Unidos
14.
Vasc Med ; 25(2): 150-156, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31804152

RESUMO

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis in adults. However, comprehensive analyses of the healthcare burden are still scarce. The aim of the study is to report the healthcare burden and cost of illness of GCA in the Friuli Venezia Giulia (FVG) region of Italy, based on a data linkage analysis. To this end, a retrospective study was conducted through the integration of many administrative health databases of the FVG region as the source of information. Cases were identified from two verified, partially overlapping sources (the rare disease registry and medical exemption database). From 2001 to 2017, 208 patients with GCA were registered. The prevalence of GCA in the population aged ⩾ 45 years as of December 31, 2017 was 27.2/100,000 inhabitants (95% CI 23.5-31.4). The mean time of observation was 4.5 ± 3.6 years. A total of 3182 visits (338 per 100 patient-years) was recorded. The most frequent specialty visits were rheumatology (n = 610, 19.2%), followed by internal medicine (n = 564, 17.7%). A total of 287 hospitalizations (30 per 100 patient-years) were reported. A total of 13,043 prescriptions (1386 per 100 patient-years) were registered. More than half of the patients were prescribed an immunosuppressive agent. The overall estimated direct healthcare cost was €2,234,070, corresponding to €2374 per patient-year. Overall, GCA is a rare disease which implies a high healthcare cost.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Arterite de Células Gigantes/economia , Arterite de Células Gigantes/terapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitalização/economia , Imunossupressores/economia , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Registro Médico Coordenado , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Arterite de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico , Arterite de Células Gigantes/epidemiologia , Nível de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Medicina Interna/economia , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico/economia , Prevalência , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reumatologia/economia , Fatores de Tempo
16.
Surg Endosc ; 34(2): 988-995, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31190227

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is in high demand and patients generally undergo an extensive work-up process to maximize the success of surgery, especially in universal healthcare systems. Although valuable, this work-up process can lead to attrition before surgery. Therefore, we aim to assess patient and health system factors associated with attrition after bariatric surgery referral in a universal healthcare system. METHODS: This was a population-based study of all patients aged ≥ 18 referred for bariatric surgery in Ontario, Canada from 2009 to 2015. Primary outcome was patients who dropped out of bariatric surgery after referral. Predictors of attrition after referral included patient demographics, clinical, institutional, and socioeconomic variables. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were estimated by multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: From 17,703 patients that were referred for bariatric surgery, 4122 patients dropped after the initial referral. Male patients, increasing age, and longer wait times for surgery were significantly (P < 0.0001) associated with higher odds of attrition. Additionally, smoker status, immigration status, unemployment, and disability were significant factors (P < 0.0001) predicting attrition. Patients who lived in lowest income quintile neighborhoods, when compared to those from the richest neighborhoods, had significantly higher odds of attrition (P = 0.02). Sleep apnea was associated with lower odds of attrition while diabetes and heart failure both with higher odds of attrition. CONCLUSION: Even in a universal healthcare system, there are various factors that could lead to increased odds of attrition before bariatric surgery. Clear disparities exist for certain marginalized populations. Further studies are warranted to ensure equitable utilization of bariatric surgery for all patients.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/economia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Assistência de Saúde Universal , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cirurgia Bariátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/economia , Ontário , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
17.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 682, 2020 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33176732

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: sub-Saharan African Low and Lower-Middle Income Countries (sSA LLMICs) have the highest burden of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in the world. Timely and appropriate maternal referral to a suitable health facility is an indicator of effective health systems. In this systematic review we aimed to identify which referral practices are delivered according to accepted standards for pregnant women and newborns in sSA LLMICs by competent healthcare providers in line with the needs of pregnant women. METHODS: Six electronic databases were systematically searched for primary data studies (2009-2018) in English reporting on maternal referral practices and their effectiveness. We conducted a content analysis guided by a framework for assessing the quality of maternal referral. Quality referral was defined as: timely identification of signal functions, established guidelines or standards, adequate documentation, staff accompaniment and prompt care by competent healthcare providers in the receiving facility. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were included in the study. Most studies were quantitative (n = 11). Two studies reported that women were dissatisfied due to delays in referral processes that affected their health. Most articles (10) reported that women were not accompanied to higher levels of care, delays in referral processes, transport challenges and poor referral documentation. Some healthcare providers administered essential drugs such as misoprostol prior to referral. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve maternal health in LLMICs should aim to enhance maternity care providers' ability to identify conditions that demand referral. Low cost transport is needed to mitigate barriers of referral. To ensure quality maternal referral, district level health managers should be trained and equipped with the skills needed to monitor and evaluate referral documentation, including quality and efficiency of maternal referrals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration CRD42018114261 .


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação Pessoal , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , África Subsaariana , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Serviços de Saúde Materna/economia , Gravidez , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia
18.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(6): 1097-1101, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31451302

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is defined as Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 14 or 15. Despite good outcomes, patients are commonly transferred to trauma centers for observation and/or neurosurgical consultation. The aim of this study is to assess the value of redefining mTBI with novel radiographic criteria to determine the appropriateness of interhospital transfer for neurosurgical evaluation. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with blunt head injury with GCS 13-15 and CT head from Jan 2014-Dec 2016 was performed. A novel criteria of head CT findings was created at our institution to classify mTBI. Outcomes included neurosurgical intervention and transfer cost. RESULTS: A total of 2120 patients were identified with 1442 (68.0%) meeting CT criteria for mTBI and 678 (32.0%) classified high risk. Two (0.14%) patients with mTBI required neurosurgical intervention compared with 143 (21.28%) high risk TBI (p < 0.0001). Mean age (55.8 years), and anticoagulation (2.6% vs 2.8%) or antiplatelet use (2.1% vs 3.0%) was similar between groups (p > 0.05). Of patients with mTBI, 689 were transferred without receiving neurosurgical intervention. Given an average EMS transfer cost of $700 for ground and $5800 for air, we estimate an unnecessary transfer cost of $733,600. CONCLUSION: Defining mTBI with the described novel criteria clearly identifies patients who can be safely managed without transfer for neurosurgical consultation. These unnecessary transfers represent a substantial financial and resource burden to the trauma system and inconvenience to patients.


Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Custos Hospitalares , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Centros de Traumatologia , Triagem/economia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Triagem/métodos
19.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 205, 2020 Mar 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32164713

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the absence of adequate and reliable external funding, eye care programs in developing countries need a high level of financial self-sustainability for maintenance and growth. To cope with these cost pressures, an eye care program in Sava, Madagascar adopted a Time-Driven Activity Based Costing (TDABC) methodology to better manage the cost of, and to improve revenue associated with, their three principle activities: consultation visits, cataract operations, and sale of glasses. METHODS: Direct (variable) and indirect (fixed) cost estimates and revenue sources were gathered by activity (consultation, cataract operation, sale of glasses) and location (hospital or outreach) and TDABC models were established. Estimates were made of the proportion of the ophthalmologist's time (by far the scarcest and most expensive resource) dedicated to consultation, cataract operation, or sale of glasses. These proportions were used to attribute costs by activity. The hospital manager and medical director modified staff roles, program activities, and infrastructure investments to reduce costs and expand revenue sources by activity while monitoring activity specific efficiency and profit. RESULTS: The TDABC model for patient consultations showed that they were time consuming for the ophthalmologist and only resulted in net profit for the institution if the ophthalmologist converted most cataract patients into accepting surgery and refractive error patients into purchasing glasses from the hospital optical shop. The TDABC model for cataract surgery showed the programs needed to reduce the cost of imported consumable surgical products, reduce operation time, and, most importantly, reduce the number of very costly surgical camps providing essentially free surgery. In addition the model pushed the hospital to train staff in marketing skills so that a higher proportion of cataract cases come directly to the hospital willing to pay for surgery. The TDABC model provided the optical shop manager, for the first time, data on both the cost of supplies (frames and lenses) and the price of glasses sold resulting in strategies to maximize profit through preferential product presentation and customer experience. The eye program in the Sava region in northern Madagascar improved its cost recovery from 68 to 102% through patient revenue. CONCLUSIONS: TDABC models helped the Sava eye care program develop more efficient service delivery and increase revenue in excess of steadily increasing costs.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata/economia , Óculos/economia , Oftalmologia/economia , Oftalmologia/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Eficiência Organizacional , Humanos , Madagáscar , Modelos Econômicos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fatores de Tempo
20.
J Hum Nutr Diet ; 33(6): 758-766, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32816367

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder. International research suggests dietary intervention as a first-line approach, although dietetic services are struggling to cope with demand. Digital technology may offer a solution to deliver appropriate patient education. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability and cost efficiency of using webinars to deliver first-line IBS advice to patients as part of a dietetic-led gastroenterology service in primary care. METHODS: Patients were directed to an IBS First Line Advice webinar on a specialist NHS website. Data were collected from patients pre- and post-webinar use using an online survey. RESULTS: In total, 1171 attendees completed the pre-webinar survey and 443 completed the post-webinar survey. Attendees ranged from under 17 years to over 75 years. Of the attendees, 95% found the webinar easy to access and 91% were satisfied with the content of the webinar. Those with excellent or good knowledge rose from 25% pre-webinar to 67% post-webinar, and confidence in managing their condition improved for 74% of attendees. Using the webinars led to a 44% reduction in referrals for one-to-one appointments with a specialist dietitian in the first year of use. The value of the clinical time saved is estimated at £3593 per annum. The one-off cost of creating the webinar was £3597. CONCLUSIONS: The use of webinars is a feasible, acceptable and cost-efficient way of delivering first-line patient education to people suffering with Irritable Bowel Syndrome as part of a dietetic-led gastroenterology service in primary care.


Assuntos
Dietética/métodos , Gastroenterologia/métodos , Intervenção Baseada em Internet , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/dietoterapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dietética/economia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Gastroenterologia/economia , Humanos , Intervenção Baseada em Internet/economia , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa