Induction of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis by enrofloxacin in the context of the safety issue of its use in poultry.

The overuse of antibiotics in both humans and livestock has led to the antibiotic resistance phenomenon which is now considered one of the biggest problems in the modern world. Some antibiotics used to control or prevent infections in livestock poultry were registered a long time ago, and as a result, data on the possible side effects of their use, both for birds and humans, are incomplete and should be updated. An example of such an antibiotic is enrofloxacin which has been widely used in poultry since 1989. Data in recent years have begun to indicate that this antibiotic induces the process of apoptosis in diverse types of eukaryotic cells. Unfortunately, such studies have never been conducted on chicken models even though it is in poultry that this antibiotic is most commonly used. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to investigate whether enrofloxacin induces apoptosis in chicken cells of the UMNSAH/DF-1 line and to study the molecular mechanism of its action. The results of these experiments indicated that enrofloxacin induces apoptosis in chicken cells but not in human HEK-293 and PC3 cells. This induction was accompanied by changes in the morphology and size of mitochondria, the process of apoptosome formation and activation of executive caspases, which clearly indicates the role of the mitochondrial pathway in the induction of apoptosis by enrofloxacin. This study is the first to show the toxicity of enrofloxacin against chicken cells and to demonstrate the exact mechanism of its action. The results presented in this work show the need to monitor the concentration of antibiotic residues in poultry foods as well as to study their impact on public health to guarantee consumer safety and prevent the phenomenon of antibiotic resistance in bacteria.

Thorough QT/QTc study to evaluate the effect of a single supratherapeutic dose of islatravir on QTc interval prolongation in healthy adults.

Islatravir is a deoxynucleoside analog being developed for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Clinical studies are being conducted to evaluate islatravir, administered in combination with other antiretroviral therapies, at doses of 0.25 mg once daily and 2 mg once weekly. In multiple previous clinical studies, islatravir was generally well tolerated, with no clear trend in cardiac adverse events. A trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of islatravir on cardiac repolarization. A randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled phase 1 trial was conducted, in which a single dose of islatravir 0.75 mg, islatravir 240 mg (supratherapeutic dose), moxifloxacin 400 mg (active control), or placebo was administered. Continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram monitoring was performed before dosing through 24 hours after dosing. QT interval measurements were collected, and safety and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. Sixty-three participants were enrolled, and 59 completed the study. Fridericia's QT correction for heart rate was inadequate; therefore, a population-specific correction was applied (QTcP). The placebo-corrected change from baseline in QTcP (ΔΔQTcP) interval at the observed geometric mean maximum plasma concentration associated with islatravir 0.75 mg and islatravir 240 mg was <10 ms at all time points. Assay sensitivity was confirmed because the use of moxifloxacin 400 mg led to a ΔΔQTcP >10 ms. The pharmacokinetic profile of islatravir was consistent with that of previous studies, and islatravir was generally well tolerated. Results from the current trial suggest that single doses of islatravir as high as 240 mg do not lead to QTc interval prolongation.

Fluoroquinolones in orthopaedic infection: balancing risks and rewards.

This article discusses the recent regulatory restrictions on the use of fluoroquinolones and their impact on treating orthopaedic infections. We focus on the balance between the benefits and risks of fluoroquinolones in scenarios involving severe infections where alternative antibiotics may be less effective. The discussion includes a summary of recent evidence on adverse effects and the implications for clinical practice.

Deleterious effects of a combination therapy using fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines for the treatment of Japanese spotted fever: a retrospective cohort study based on a Japanese hospital database.

OBJECTIVES: Tetracyclines are the standard treatment for rickettsiosis, including Japanese spotted fever (JSF), a tick-borne rickettsiosis caused by Rickettsia japonica. While some specialists in Japan advocate combining fluoroquinolones with tetracyclines for treating JSF, the negative aspects of combination therapy have not been thoroughly evaluated. Whether fluoroquinolones should be combined with tetracyclines for JSF treatment is controversial. The study aimed to evaluate the disadvantages of fluoroquinolones combined with tetracyclines for JSF treatment. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using a Japanese database comprising claims data from April 2008 to December 2020. The combination therapy group (tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones) was compared with the monotherapy group (tetracycline only) regarding mortality and the incidence of complications. RESULTS: A total of 797 patients were enrolled: 525 received combination therapy, and 272 received monotherapy. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for mortality was 2.30 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-18.77] in the combination therapy group with respect to the monotherapy group. According to the subgroup analysis, patients undergoing combination therapy with ciprofloxacin experienced higher mortality rates compared with those receiving monotherapy (adjusted OR = 25.98, 95% CI = 1.71-393.75). Additionally, 27.7% of the combination therapy group received NSAIDs concurrently with fluoroquinolones. The combination therapy with NSAIDs group was significantly more likely to experience convulsions than the monotherapy without NSAIDs group (adjusted OR: 5.44, 95% CI: 1.13-26.30). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence that combination therapy improves mortality outcomes and instead uncovered its deleterious effects. These findings facilitate a fair assessment of combination therapy that includes consideration of its disadvantages.

Fluoroquinolones and the risk for incidental seizures: a comparative retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Over the years, reports have associated fluoroquinolones (FQ) with seizures. The incidence and whether FQ compared to non-epileptogenic antibiotic are associated with increased risk of seizures has yet to be examined. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of hospitalized patients treated with FQ (ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) or macrolides (MA: azithromycin or roxithromycin) between January 2009 and January 2021 in a large tertiary academic medical centre. The outcome was the occurrence of a seizure during treatment. The Naranjo scale was used to assess causality between FQ treatment and seizures. Comparative analysis was conducted using propensity score matching to correct for possible bias due to non-random selection, followed by inverse probability weighting (IPW) to estimate the difference in seizure risk between FQ and MA. RESULTS: Overall, 52 722 patients were treated with FQ during a total of 178 982 days. Mean age was 65 (±19) years and 47% were females. Thirty-three patients (0.06%) experienced a seizure, yielding an incidence of 1:5422 treatment days. Causality was deemed probable and possible among 9/33 and 24/33, respectively. The MA group composed of 8522 patients treated during 17 954 treatment days. Mean age was 65 (±21) years, 49% were females. Six (0.07%) patients experienced each a single seizure. IPW estimated OR for seizures among the FQ versus MA group was 1.44 (95%CI 0.59-3.5, P = 0.42). DISCUSSION: The incidence of FQ associated seizures among hospitalized patients is low and the risk did not significantly exceed that under macrolides. Our results provide evidence for clinicians and decision-makers when balancing fluoroquinolones risks and benefits.

Fluoroquinolones and the risk of severe hypoglycaemia among sulphonylurea users: Population-based cohort study.

AIM: Fluoroquinolone-related hypoglycaemia is rare but may become clinically relevant in individuals at high baseline hypoglycaemic risk, such as patients with diabetes using sulphonylureas. Our population-based cohort study assessed whether fluoroquinolones are associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia compared with amoxicillin among patients treated with sulphonylureas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum linked to hospitalization and vital statistics data, we assembled a base cohort of patients who initiated second-generation sulphonylureas (1998-2020). The study cohort included patients initiating either fluoroquinolones or amoxicillin while on sulphonylureas. Using an intent-to-treat exposure definition, we assessed the 30-day risk of severe hypoglycaemia (hospitalization with or death because of hypoglycaemia) associated with fluoroquinolones compared with amoxicillin. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of severe hypoglycaemia after 1:5 matching on previous sulphonylurea use and propensity scores. Secondary analyses were stratified by demographics and glycated haemoglobin. RESULTS: Overall, 143 417 patients initiated fluoroquinolones (n = 13 123) or amoxicillin (n = 130 294) while on sulphonylureas. Compared with amoxicillin, fluoroquinolones were not associated with the risk of severe hypoglycaemia (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.91-1.50). Fluoroquinolones were associated with an increased risk in patients <65 years (HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.41-5.97) but not in those ≥65 years (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79-1.35) in stratified analyses. There was no evidence of effect modification by sex or glycated haemoglobin. CONCLUSIONS: In patients using second-generation sulphonylureas, fluoroquinolones were not associated with an increased risk of severe hypoglycaemia compared with amoxicillin. An increased risk among younger adults is possible.

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension secondary to fluoroquinolone therapy: French pharmacovigilance data review.

We investigate spontaneous reports of IIH related to fluoroquinolones recorded in the French national pharmacovigilance database in order to detect a possible pharmacovigilance signal. The association between IIH risk and fluoroquinolone exposure was assessed using a case/non-case study. Between 1985 and July 2023, 17 reports of IIH after fluoroquinolone exposure were recorded. No specific fluoroquinolone was predominant. IIH led to death in one case and blindness in one case. The Reporting Odds Ratio was 2.58 (95% confidence interval 1.59-4.19). We highlight statistically significant disproportionality, which constitutes a pharmacovigilance signal. IIH risk after fluoroquinolone exposure is a class effect.

Association Between Oral Fluoroquinolones and Neuropsychiatric Events: Self-Controlled Case Series With Active Comparator Design.

PURPOSE: The evidence of the neuropsychiatric effects associated with fluoroquinolones is mainly supported by case reports. Population-based evidence remains largely limited. We aimed to investigate the association between the use of fluoroquinolones and hospitalization or Accident & Emergency department visits for acute neuropsychiatric events using a self-controlled case series (SCCS) and active comparator to reduce confounding. METHODS: We conducted a SCCS with a recently described active comparator design using all public outpatient clinics, hospitalization, and Accident and Emergency department records from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System, Hong Kong from 2001 to 2013. Among 166 325 people with an oral fluoroquinolone prescription, 4287 people who had an incident neuropsychiatric event were included. We then estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of acute neuropsychiatric events during periods before and after fluoroquinolone prescription, versus baseline. We repeated the analysis for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid users as an active comparator. We then estimated the comparator-adjusted estimates by dividing the IRR for fluoroquinolone by the IRR for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. The primary outcome was neuropsychiatric events. Secondary outcomes were psychotic events and cognitive impairment. RESULTS: An increased risk of neuropsychiatric events was observed in the current use of fluoroquinolone [IRR: 2.11 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58-2.83)] and 1-7 days after the end of fluoroquinolone prescription [IRR: 1.90 (95% CI: 1.30-2.75)] versus baseline. No increased risk was observed in other risk periods versus baseline. Similar patterns were observed in the current use of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid [IRR: 1.92 (95% CI: 1.19-3.11)] and 1-7 days after the end of fluoroquinolone prescription [IRR: 1.81 (95% CI: 1.11-2.97)] versus baseline. Similar results were found for secondary outcomes. Using the active comparator design, comparator-adjusted estimates were 1.10 (95% CI: 0.63-1.93) in current use of fluoroquinolones and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.57-1.95) in 1-7 days postexposure to fluoroquinolones versus baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Although our study showed a higher incidence of neuropsychiatric events in the current use of fluoroquinolones and 7 days after the end of fluoroquinolones prescriptions compared with baseline, a similar temporal pattern was also found for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid users. Using amoxicillin/clavulanic acid as the active comparator, we found no difference in the risk of neuropsychiatric events associated with fluoroquinolone compared with baseline. Therefore, the risk of neuropsychiatric events may not need to influence the decision to prescribe either fluoroquinolones or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid based on the evidence in this study.

Efficacy and safety of lascufloxacin for nursing- and healthcare-associated pneumonia: A single-arm, open-label clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Nursing- and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) constitutes most of the pneumonia in elderly patients including aspiration pneumonia in Japan. Lascufloxacin (LSFX) possesses broad antibacterial activity against respiratory pathogens, such as Streptococcus spp. And anaerobes inside the oral cavity. However, the efficacy and safety of LSFX in NHCAP treatment remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LSFX tablets in the treatment of patients with NHCAP. METHODS: In this single-arm, open-label, uncontrolled study, LSFX was administered to patients with NHCAP at 24 facilities. The study participants were orally administered 75 mg LSFX once daily for 7 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical efficacy at the time of test of cure (TOC). The secondary endpoints included clinical efficacy at the time of end of treatment (EOT), early clinical efficacy, microbiological efficacy, and safety analysis. RESULT: During the study period, 75 patients provided written informed consent to participate and were included. Finally, 56 and 71 patients were eligible for clinical efficacy and safety analyses, respectively. The median age of the patients was significantly high at 86 years. All patients were classified as having moderate disease severity using the A-DROP scoring system. LSFX tablets demonstrated high efficacy rates of 78.6 % at TOC and 89.3 % at EOT. The risk factors for resistant bacteria or aspiration pneumonia did not affect clinical efficacy. No severe adverse events associated with the study drugs were observed. CONCLUSION: Oral LSFX is an acceptable treatment option for moderate NHCAP in elderly patients who can take oral medications.

Lack of association between fluoroquinolone and aortic aneurysm or dissection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: An increased risk of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection (AA/AD) has been reported with fluoroquinolone (FQ) use. However, recent studies suggested confounding factors by indication. This study aimed to investigate the risk of AA/AD associated with FQ use. METHODS: This nationwide population-based study included adults aged ≥20 years who received a prescription of oral FQ or third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) during outpatient visits from 2005 to 2016. Data source was the National Health Insurance Service reimbursement database. The primary outcome was hospitalization or in-hospital death with a primary diagnosis of AA/AD. A self-controlled case series (SCCS) and Cox proportional hazards model were used. Self-controlled case series compared the incidence of the primary outcome in the risk period vs. the control periods. RESULTS: A total of 954 308 patients (777 109 with FQ and 177 199 with 3GC use) were included. The incidence rate ratios for AA/AD between the risk period and the pre-risk period were higher in the 3GC group [11.000; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.420-85.200] compared to the FQ group (2.000; 95% CI 0.970-4.124). The overall incidence of AA/AD among the patients who received FQ and 3GC was 5.40 and 8.47 per 100 000 person-years. There was no significant difference in the risk between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.752; 95% CI 0.515-1.100) in the inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis showed consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the risk of AA/AD in patients who were administered oral FQ compared to those administered 3GC. The study findings suggest that the use of FQ should not be deterred when clinically indicated.

Oral Antibiotics and Risk of Serious Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions.

Importance: Serious cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) are potentially life-threatening drug hypersensitivity reactions involving the skin and internal organs. Antibiotics are a recognized cause of these reactions, but no studies have compared relative risks across antibiotic classes. Objectives: To explore the risk of serious cADRs associated with commonly prescribed oral antibiotics, and to characterize outcomes of patients hospitalized for them. Design, Setting, and Participants: Nested case-control study using population-based linked administrative datasets among adults aged 66 years or older who received at least 1 oral antibiotic between 2002 and 2022 in Ontario, Canada. Cases were those who had an emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization for serious cADRs within 60 days of the prescription, and each case was matched with up to 4 controls who did not. Exposure: Various classes of oral antibiotics. Main Outcomes and Measures: Conditional logistic regression estimate of the association between different classes of oral antibiotics and serious cADRs, using macrolides as the reference group. Results: During the 20-year study period, we identified 21 758 older adults (median age, 75 years; 64.1% female) who had an ED visit or hospitalization for serious cADRs following antibiotic therapy and 87 025 matched controls who did not. In the primary analysis, sulfonamide antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.9; 95% CI, 2.7-3.1) and cephalosporins (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.5-2.8) were most strongly associated with serious cADRs relative to macrolides. Additional associations were evident with nitrofurantoin (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 2.1-2.4), penicillins (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.5), and fluoroquinolones (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4). The crude rate of ED visits or hospitalization for cADRs was highest for cephalosporins (4.92 per 1000 prescriptions; 95% CI, 4.86-4.99) and sulfonamide antibiotics (3.22 per 1000 prescriptions; 95% CI, 3.15-3.28). Among the 2852 case patients hospitalized for cADRs, the median length of stay was 6 days (IQR, 3-13 days), 9.6% required transfer to a critical care unit, and 5.3% died in the hospital. Conclusion and Relevance: Commonly prescribed oral antibiotics are associated with an increased risk of serious cADRs compared with macrolides, with sulfonamides and cephalosporins carrying the highest risk. Prescribers should preferentially use lower-risk antibiotics when clinically appropriate.

Landmarking for Left-Truncated Competing Risk Data.

Landmarking is an alternative to complex multistate models when the aim is to calculate dynamic predictions. We develop the concept of landmarking for the case of left truncation and competing risks from the application background of drug safety assessment in pregnancy. The method is illustrated with a cohort study of the German Embryotox Pharmacovigilance Institute in Berlin to assess if the risk or the cumulative incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, like spontaneous abortions (SABs), is increased in fluoroquinolone-exposed women. Furthermore, we conduct an extensive simulation study to compare the dynamic predictions and coefficient estimates obtained by landmarking to those from nonparametric multistate models and classical time-dependent covariate Cox regression. The results from the simulation study indicate that attenuation of the effects is present in the landmark estimates, also in the complex setting considered here, but the estimates are still close to those from the multistate models. Regarding the Berlin fluoroquinolone data, the fluoroquinolone exposure of a pregnant woman in the first trimester seems to increase her cumulative incidence of elective termination of pregnancy over women never exposed before, but there is no evidence of a significantly increased risk or cumulative incidence in exposed women for SABs. This supports previous results on the same data, which were driven from an analysis without landmarking methods.

In-Class Cross-Reactivity among Hospitalized Patients with Hypersensitivity Reactions to Fluoroquinolones.

Results from this large, multicenter study suggest that patients with a confirmed ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, or levofloxacin hypersensitivity reaction are likely to tolerate other fluoroquinolones. Avoiding different fluoroquinolones in patients labeled with a ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, or levofloxacin allergy may not always be mandatory. This was a study of patients with a ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, or levofloxacin hypersensitivity reaction and a documented electronic medical record administration of a different fluoroquinolone. Numerically, the most common reaction risk occurred with a challenge to moxifloxacin (2/19; 9.5%), followed by ciprofloxacin (6/89; 6.3%), and levofloxacin (1/44; 2.2%).

Antibiotic use and development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A population-based case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Antibiotics affect the gut microbiome. Preclinical studies suggest a role of gut dysbiosis in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but data from large cohorts with liver histology are lacking. METHODS: In this nationwide case-control study, Swedish adults with histologically confirmed early-stage NAFLD (total n = 2584; simple steatosis n = 1435; steatohepatitis (NASH) n = 383; non-cirrhotic fibrosis n = 766) diagnosed January 2007-April 2017 were included and matched to ≤5 population controls (n = 12 646) for age, sex, calendar year and county of residence. Data for cumulative antibiotic dispensations and defined daily doses were accrued until 1 year before the matching date. Using conditional logistic regression, multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. In a secondary analysis, NAFLD patients were compared with their full siblings (n = 2837). RESULTS: Previous antibiotic use was seen in 1748 (68%) NAFLD patients versus 7001 (55%) controls, corresponding to 1.35-fold increased odds of NAFLD (95% CI = 1.21-1.51) in a dose-dependent manner (pfor trend < .001). Estimates were comparable for all histologic stages (p > .05). The highest risk of NAFLD was observed after treatment with fluoroquinolones (aOR 1.38; 95% CI = 1.17-1.59). Associations remained robust when patients were compared with their full siblings (aOR 1.29; 95% CI = 1.08-1.55). Antibiotic treatment was only linked to NAFLD in patients without metabolic syndrome (aOR 1.63; 95% CI = 1.35-1.91) but not in those with metabolic syndrome (aOR 1.09; 95% CI = 0.88-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic use may be a risk factor for incident NAFLD, especially in individuals without the metabolic syndrome. The risk was highest for fluoroquinolones and remained robust in sibling comparisons with whom individuals share genetic and early environmental susceptibilities.

A randomized, double-blind, crossover study of the effect of the fluoroquinolone moxifloxacin on glucose levels and insulin sensitivity in young men and women.

AIM: The voltage-gated potassium channel Kv 11.1 is important for repolarizing the membrane potential in excitable cells such as myocytes, pancreatic α- and ß-cells. Moxifloxacin blocks the Kv 11.1 channel and increases the risk of hypoglycaemia in patients with diabetes. We investigated glucose regulation and secretion of glucoregulatory hormones in young people with and without moxifloxacin, a drug known to block the Kv 11.1 channel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effect of moxifloxacin (800 mg/day for 4 days) or placebo on glucose regulation was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study of young men and women (age 20-40 years and body mass index 18.5-27.5 kg/m2 ) without chronic disease, using 6-h oral glucose tolerance tests and continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: Thirty-eight participants completed the study. Moxifloxacin prolonged the QTcF interval and increased heart rate. Hypoglycaemia was more frequently observed with moxifloxacin, both during the 8 days of continuous glucose monitoring and during the oral glucose tolerance tests. Hypoglycaemia questionnaire scores were higher after intake of moxifloxacin. Moxifloxacin reduced the early plasma-glucose response (AUC0-30 min ) by 7% (95% CI: -9% to -4%, p < .01), and overall insulin response (AUC0-360 min ) decreased by 18% (95% CI: -24% to -11%, p < .01) and plasma glucagon increased by 17% (95% CI: 4%-33%, p = .03). Insulin sensitivity calculated as the Matsuda index increased by 11%, and MISI, an index of muscle insulin sensitivity, increased by 34%. CONCLUSIONS: In young men and women, moxifloxacin, a drug known to block the Kv 11.1 channel, increased QT interval, decreased glucose levels and was associated with increased muscle insulin sensitivity and more frequent episodes of hypoglycaemia.

Bleeding events among patients concomitantly treated with direct oral anticoagulants and macrolide or fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

Fluoroquinolones and macrolides may, due to a potential drug-drug interaction, increase the concentration of any concomitantly administered direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and thereby increase the risk of severe bleeding. However, clinical evidence for such an effect is scarce. The present study aimed to evaluate the association between the use of fluoroquinolones or macrolides and bleeding events in patients with concomitant DOAC use. This was a nationwide cohort study including 19 288 users of DOACs in 2008-2018 using information from Swedish national health registers. We compared the incidence of bleeding events associated with use of fluoroquinolones or macrolides using doxycycline as a negative control. Cox regression was used to calculate crude and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) in time windows of various length of follow-up after the start of antibiotic use. The incidence rates for fluoroquinolones and macrolides ranged from 12 to 24 and from 12 to 53 bleeding events per 100 000 patients in the investigated time windows. The aHRs (95% confidence interval) for use of fluoroquinolones and macrolides were 1.29 (0.69-2.44) and 2.60 (0.74-9.08) at the concomitant window, 1.31 (0.84-2.03) and 1.79 (0.75-4.29) at 30 days, and 1.34 (0.99-1.82) and 1.28 (0.62-2.65) at 150 days, respectively. With regard to fluoroquinolones, the present study suggests that the risk of bleeding when combined with DOACs, if any, is small. Codispensation of macrolides in patients on DOACs was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding. However, due to the small number of macrolide users, the results must be interpreted with caution.

Long-term Cardiovascular Adverse Events Induced by Fluoroquinolones: A Retrospective Case-control Study.

ABSTRACT: A correlation is already established between fluoroquinolones (FQs) use and cardiovascular events (CVEs), such as QT prolongation; however, serious events such as aortic aneurysm and valve regurgitation have also been reported with FQs. Several unstudied factors could contribute to the development of different CVEs that were not previously evaluated with FQ therapy. Therefore, we aimed to assess the incidence of different serious CVEs after completion of FQ therapy and potential associating factors. This was a retrospective case-control study of inpatients who received ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or moxifloxacin for ≥3 days. Patients' echocardiograms were evaluated for the development of aortic or valvular disease or worsening of an existing condition after completion of therapy. Of 373 included patients, 83 developed new valvular disease or worsening of an existing disease, where tricuspid valve regurgitation was the most common CVE (50/83; 60.2%), followed by mitral valve diseases (48/83; 57.8%). Aortic valve regurgitation occurred more commonly with moxifloxacin compared with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin (17.8% vs. 6.7% and 10.7%, respectively; P = 0.01). Median time to CVE detection ranged 93-166 days for all FQs. The receipt of moxifloxacin and elevated baseline QT interval were associated with an increased CVEs risk (adjusted odds ratio 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-8.11 and adjusted odds ratio 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.04, respectively). Other factors did not show such association. The lack of association of different factors with the occurrence of CVEs indicates that all patients receiving FQ therapy, especially moxifloxacin, should be monitored during the first-year after therapy. Alternatively, other antibiotics with a better safety profile may be considered.

Fluoroquinolones and Risk of Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection in Patients With Congenital Aortic Disease and Marfan Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolone use can be associated with an increased risk of aortic aneurysm (AA) or aortic dissection (AD). The US Food and Drug Administration recently warned against fluoroquinolone use for high-risk patients, such as those with Marfan syndrome. However, the association between fluoroquinolone use and AA/AD risk was unknown in these high-risk patients and therefore it was studied in this work.Methods and Results: Data were collected from a national database between 2000 and 2017 for 550 patients with AA/AD and any congenital aortic disease (mean age 41.5 years; 415 with Marfan syndrome). A case cross-over study was conducted to compare the risk of aortic events (AA/AD) associated with fluoroquinolone and amoxicillin use between the hazard period (from -60 days to -1 day) and a randomly selected reference period (-180 to -121 days; -240 to -181 days; and -300 to -241 days). Compared to the reference period without fluoroquinolone use, fluoroquinolone use during the hazard period was not associated with a greater risk of AA/AD (1.09% vs. 1.09%; odds ratio [OR] 1.000; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-3.10), AA (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.11-3.99), or AD (OR 1.33; 95% CI 0.30-5.96) in patients with congenital aortic disease or Marfan syndrome. This lack of association was maintained in subgroup analysis, including Marfan syndrome or not, age (≤50 vs. >50 years) and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolone use was not associated with an increased risk of AA/AD in patients with congenital aortic disease, including Marfan syndrome. More evidence is required for a fluoroquinolone pharmacovigilance plan in these patients.

Fluoroquinolones increase susceptibility to aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection: Molecular mechanism and clinical evidence.

Aortic aneurysm (AA) and aortic dissection (AD) are prevalent severe cardiovascular diseases that result in catastrophic complications and unexpected deaths. Owing to the lack of clinically established and effective medications, the only treatment options are open surgical repair or endovascular therapy. Most researchers have focused on the development of innovative medications or therapeutic targets to slow the progression of AA/AD or lower the risk of malignant consequences. Recent studies have shown that the use of fluoroquinolones (FQs) may increase susceptibility to AA/AD to some extent, especially in patients with aortic dilatation and those at a high risk of AD. Therefore, it is crucial for doctors, particularly those in cardiovascular specialties, to recognize the dangers of FQs and adopt alternatives. In the present review, the main clinical observational studies on the correlation between FQs and AA/AD in recent years are summarized, with an emphasis on the relative physiopathological mechanism incorporating destruction of the extracellular matrix (ECM), phenotypic transformation of vascular smooth muscle cells, and local inflammation. Although additional data are required, it is anticipated that the rational use of FQs will become the standard of care for the treatment of aortic diseases.

Use of Fluoroquinolones or Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim Compared to Β-Lactams for Oral Step-Down Therapy in Hospitalized Patients With Uncomplicated Enterobacterales Bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated Enterobacterales bacteremia from a urinary source has traditionally consisted of fluoroquinolones (FQs) and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT). However, adverse events associated with FQs and emerging antimicrobial resistance have led to alternative agents, specifically oral Β-lactams (OBLs), being utilized despite concern of subtherapeutic serum concentrations related to their low relative bioavailability. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy of antibiotic therapies with bioavailability differences in patients with uncomplicated bacteremia from a urinary source. METHODS: This was a retrospective study comparing clinical efficacy in hospitalized adult patients receiving OBL or FQ/SXT. Patients were required to receive at least 48 hours of appropriate intravenous antibiotic therapy and at least one dose of oral therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes included readmission with recurrent infectious etiology and readmission due to Clostridioides difficile infection. RESULTS: Of 210 eligible patients, 91 received FQ/SXT and 119 received OBL. There was no difference between the groups in all-cause hospital readmission (FQ/SXT: 16.5%; OBL: 14.3%) (P = 0.660 [95% confidence interval, CI = -0.076, 0.120]) or readmission with recurrent bacteremia (FQ/SXT: 0%; OBL: 3.4%) (P = 0.135). There was a significant difference in repeat hospital admission with recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) (FQ/SXT: 0%, OBL: 5.0%) (P = 0.037). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: OBLs appear to be non-inferior to FQ/SXT in the rate of all-cause hospital readmission within 30 days. However, OBLs may be associated with increased readmissions with recurrent UTI.