Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 661
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Eixos temáticos
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med ; 22(1): 170, 2024 Apr 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649867

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The stalling global progress in malaria control highlights the need for novel tools for malaria elimination, including transmission-blocking vaccines. Transmission-blocking vaccines aim to induce human antibodies that block parasite development in the mosquito and mosquitoes becoming infectious. The Pfs48/45 protein is a leading Plasmodium falciparum transmission-blocking vaccine candidate. The R0.6C fusion protein, consisting of Pfs48/45 domain 3 (6C) and the N-terminal region of P. falciparum glutamate-rich protein (R0), has previously been produced in Lactococcus lactis and elicited functional antibodies in rodents. Here, we assess the safety and transmission-reducing efficacy of R0.6C adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide with and without Matrix-M™ adjuvant in humans. METHODS: In this first-in-human, open-label clinical trial, malaria-naïve adults, aged 18-55 years, were recruited at the Radboudumc in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Participants received four intramuscular vaccinations on days 0, 28, 56 and 168 with either 30 µg or 100 µg of R0.6C and were randomised for the allocation of one of the two different adjuvant combinations: aluminium hydroxide alone, or aluminium hydroxide combined with Matrix-M1™ adjuvant. Adverse events were recorded from inclusion until 84 days after the fourth vaccination. Anti-R0.6C and anti-6C IgG titres were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Transmission-reducing activity of participants' serum and purified vaccine-specific immunoglobulin G was assessed by standard membrane feeding assays using laboratory-reared Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes and cultured P. falciparum gametocytes. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants completed four vaccinations and were included in the analysis. Administration of all doses was safe and well-tolerated, with one related grade 3 adverse event (transient fever) and no serious adverse events occurring. Anti-R0.6C and anti-6C IgG titres were similar between the 30 and 100 µg R0.6C arms, but higher in Matrix-M1™ arms. Neat participant sera did not induce significant transmission-reducing activity in mosquito feeding experiments, but concentrated vaccine-specific IgGs purified from sera collected two weeks after the fourth vaccination achieved up to 99% transmission-reducing activity. CONCLUSIONS: R0.6C/aluminium hydroxide with or without Matrix-M1™ is safe, immunogenic and induces functional Pfs48/45-specific transmission-blocking antibodies, albeit at insufficient serum concentrations to result in transmission reduction by neat serum. Future work should focus on identifying alternative vaccine formulations or regimens that enhance functional antibody responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT04862416.


Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas , Malária Falciparum , Glicoproteínas de Membrana , Plasmodium falciparum , Proteínas de Protozoários , Adolescente , Adulto , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Malária Falciparum/transmissão , Malária Falciparum/imunologia , Países Baixos , Plasmodium falciparum/imunologia , Proteínas de Protozoários/imunologia
2.
Bull Exp Biol Med ; 177(2): 248-251, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090461

RESUMO

We compared the immunogenicity of recombinant S. pneumoniae pneumolysin (rPly) when administered with and without Al(OH)3 adjuvant, and evaluated the protective properties of recombinant protein in the active defense experiment. It was shown that double immunization with rPly+Al(OH)3 increases the levels of IgG antibodies in comparison with the control (p<0.01), while triple immunization results in a more significant increase in IgG antibody levels (p<0.001). Double immunization with rPly without Al(OH)3 does not induce a significant increase in antibody levels in comparison with the control, while triple immunization results in a slight but significant increase in antibody levels (p<0.05). The active defense test proved the protective activity of rPly against S. pneumoniae serotype 3 at intranasal infection.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos , Proteínas de Bactérias , Imunoglobulina G , Proteínas Recombinantes , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Estreptolisinas , Estreptolisinas/imunologia , Estreptolisinas/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Streptococcus pneumoniae/imunologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética , Animais , Proteínas Recombinantes/imunologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Camundongos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Hidróxido de Alumínio/imunologia , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Feminino
3.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 44(9): 628-636, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33248174

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The 13C-urea breath test (UBT) is the most widely used non-invasive diagnostic test for Helicobacter pylori. Debate continues to surround the possible interference of antacid intake on its result. This study aims to confirm the non-interference of almagate in the determination of H. pylori by UBT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, multicentre study in adult patients treated with almagate in whom a UBT (TAUKIT®) was indicated. When the UBT result was negative, use of almagate was stopped for 30 days and the UBT was repeated. When the result was positive, no further determinations were made. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who, having had a negative result in the first breath test, were positive in the second after having stopped taking almagate (UBT false negatives, possibly attributable to almagate). RESULTS: Of the 167 evaluable patients, 59% were female, average age was 49 and 97% had gastrointestinal symptoms. The result of the first UBT was negative in 71% of cases. Of these, in the second UBT test after stopping the almagate, the negative result was confirmed in 97.5%. Out of the total number of cases evaluated, the rate of false negatives was 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Taking almagate has minimal or no interference in the result of UBT for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. It can therefore be used in the weeks prior to a UBT.


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Antiácidos/administração & dosagem , Testes Respiratórios/métodos , Carbonatos/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Antiácidos/efeitos adversos , Testes Respiratórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Isótopos de Carbono , Carbonatos/efeitos adversos , Dispepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo , Ureia
4.
Int J Cancer ; 147(1): 170-174, 2020 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31736068

RESUMO

We studied effectiveness of the AS04-adjuvanted HPV-16/18 (AS04-HPV-16/18) vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) oropharyngeal infections associated with the increase of head/neck cancers in western countries. All 38,631 resident adolescents from 1994 to 1995 birth cohorts of 33 Finnish communities were invited in this community-randomized trial (NCT00534638). During 2008-2009, 11,275 girls and 6,129 boys were enrolled in three arms of 11 communities each. In Arm A, 90% of vaccinated girls/boys, and in Arm B, 90% of vaccinated girls received AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine. Other Arm A/B and all Arm C vaccinated participants received control vaccine. All Arm A participants and Arm B female participants were blinded to vaccine allocation. Oropharyngeal samples were analyzed from 4,871 18.5-year-old females who attended follow-up visit 3-6 years postvaccination. HPV DNA prevalence was determined by SPF-10 LiPA and Multiplex type-specific PCR. Total vaccine effectiveness (VE) was defined as relative reduction of oropharyngeal HPV prevalence in pooled Arms A/B HPV-vaccinated females vs. all Arm C females. VE against oropharyngeal HPV-16/18, HPV-31/45 and HPV-31/33/45 infections were 82.4% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 47.3-94.1), 75.3% (95%CI: 12.7-93.0) and 69.9% (95% CI: 29.6-87.1), respectively. In conclusion, the AS04-HPV-16/18 vaccine showed effectiveness against vaccine and nonvaccine HPV-types oropharyngeal infections in adolescent females up to 6 years postvaccination.


Assuntos
Papillomavirus Humano 16/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 18/imunologia , Orofaringe/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Doenças Faríngeas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lipídeo A/administração & dosagem , Lipídeo A/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/imunologia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virologia , Orofaringe/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Doenças Faríngeas/imunologia , Doenças Faríngeas/prevenção & controle , Doenças Faríngeas/virologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 181(2): 94-102, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31865326

RESUMO

Only few data on safety during high-dose, accelerated escalation schedules during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (AIT) are available. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of an accelerated dose escalation schedule of AIT in adult patients with moderate to severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis in a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II trial. The dose escalation scheme for patients in Group I (1 strength) included 3 injections with 1 strength, B (10,000 TU/mL), whereas the dose escalation scheme for Group II (standard) included 7 injections with 2 strengths, A (1,000 TU/mL) and B (10,000 TU/mL), of an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed allergoid grass pollen preparation. Overall, 72 of 87 randomized patients (83.7%) reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; 82.2 [Group I] vs. 85.4% [Group II]); 58.8% of all reported TEAEs were assessed as being related to AIT (60.0 vs. 48.8%). The most frequently reported AIT-related TEAEs were swelling (46.7 vs. 34.1%), erythema (28.9 vs. 36.6%), and pruritus (31.1 vs. 17.1%) at the site of the injection. Systemic allergic reactions occurred in 5 (5.8%) patients overall, with more being reported in the 1-strength group (4 [8.9%] vs. 1 [2.4%]). All systemic allergic reactions were classified as World Allergy Organization (WAO) Grade 1 or Grade 2 reactions. Accelerated high-dose escalation with an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed grass pollen allergoid can be initiated with a safety and tolerability profile comparable to the standard dose escalation schedule in patients with allergic rhinitis with or without asthma.


Assuntos
Alergoides/química , Alergoides/imunologia , Hidróxido de Alumínio/química , Poaceae/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Adulto , Alérgenos/imunologia , Alergoides/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/imunologia , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Asma/imunologia , Conjuntivite Alérgica/imunologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pólen/imunologia
6.
JAMA ; 324(10): 951-960, 2020 09 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32789505

RESUMO

Importance: A vaccine against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is urgently needed. Objective: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine in China. Interventions: In the phase 1 trial, 96 participants were assigned to 1 of the 3 dose groups (2.5, 5, and 10 µg/dose) and an aluminum hydroxide (alum) adjuvant-only group (n = 24 in each group), and received 3 intramuscular injections at days 0, 28, and 56. In the phase 2 trial, 224 adults were randomized to 5 µg/dose in 2 schedule groups (injections on days 0 and 14 [n = 84] vs alum only [n = 28], and days 0 and 21 [n = 84] vs alum only [n = 28]). Design, Setting, and Participants: Interim analysis of ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 and 2 clinical trials to assess an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. The trials were conducted in Henan Province, China, among 96 (phase 1) and 224 (phase 2) healthy adults aged between 18 and 59 years. Study enrollment began on April 12, 2020. The interim analysis was conducted on June 16, 2020, and updated on July 27, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary safety outcome was the combined adverse reactions 7 days after each injection, and the primary immunogenicity outcome was neutralizing antibody response 14 days after the whole-course vaccination, which was measured by a 50% plaque reduction neutralization test against live severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Results: Among 320 patients who were randomized (mean age, 42.8 years; 200 women [62.5%]), all completed the trial up to 28 days after the whole-course vaccination. The 7-day adverse reactions occurred in 3 (12.5%), 5 (20.8%), 4 (16.7%), and 6 (25.0%) patients in the alum only, low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose groups, respectively, in the phase 1 trial; and in 5 (6.0%) and 4 (14.3%) patients who received injections on days 0 and 14 for vaccine and alum only, and 16 (19.0%) and 5 (17.9%) patients who received injections on days 0 and 21 for vaccine and alum only, respectively, in the phase 2 trial. The most common adverse reaction was injection site pain, followed by fever, which were mild and self-limiting; no serious adverse reactions were noted. The geometric mean titers of neutralizing antibodies in the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups at day 14 after 3 injections were 316 (95% CI, 218-457), 206 (95% CI, 123-343), and 297 (95% CI, 208-424), respectively, in the phase 1 trial, and were 121 (95% CI, 95-154) and 247 (95% CI, 176-345) at day 14 after 2 injections in participants receiving vaccine on days 0 and 14 and on days 0 and 21, respectively, in the phase 2 trial. There were no detectable antibody responses in all alum-only groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this interim report of the phase 1 and phase 2 trials of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, patients had a low rate of adverse reactions and demonstrated immunogenicity; the study is ongoing. Efficacy and longer-term adverse event assessment will require phase 3 trials. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000031809.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Betacoronavirus/genética , COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Relação Dose-Resposta Imunológica , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Propiolactona , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(3): 466-474, 2019 01 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29945169

RESUMO

Background: P27A is an unstructured 104mer synthetic peptide from Plasmodium falciparum trophozoite exported protein 1 (TEX1), the target of human antibodies inhibiting parasite growth. The present project aimed at evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of P27A peptide vaccine in malaria-nonexposed European and malaria-exposed African adults. Methods: This study was designed as a staggered, fast-track, randomized, antigen and adjuvant dose-finding, multicenter phase 1a/1b trial, conducted in Switzerland and Tanzania. P27A antigen (10 or 50 µg), adjuvanted with Alhydrogel or glucopyranosil lipid adjuvant stable emulsion (GLA-SE; 2.5 or 5 µg), or control rabies vaccine (Verorab) were administered intramuscularly to 16 malaria-nonexposed and 40 malaria-exposed subjects on days 0, 28, and 56. Local and systemic adverse events (AEs) as well as humoral and cellular immune responses were assessed after each injection and during the 34-week follow-up. Results: Most AEs were mild to moderate and resolved completely within 48 hours. Systemic AEs were more frequent in the formulation with alum as compared to GLA-SE, whereas local AEs were more frequent after GLA-SE. No serious AEs occurred. Supported by a mixed Th1/Th2 cell-mediated immunity, P27A induced a marked specific antibody response able to recognize TEX1 in infected erythrocytes and to inhibit parasite growth through an antibody-dependent cellular inhibition mechanism. Incidence of AEs and antibody responses were significantly lower in malaria-exposed Tanzanian subjects than in nonexposed European subjects. Conclusions: The candidate vaccine P27A was safe and induced a particularly robust immunogenic response in combination with GLA-SE. This formulation should be considered for future efficacy trials. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01949909, PACTR201310000683408.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Malária Falciparum/prevenção & controle , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Feminino , Glucosídeos/administração & dosagem , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Lipídeo A/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Antimaláricas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Plasmodium falciparum , Suíça , Tanzânia , Vacinas Sintéticas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 85: 44-51, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29017943

RESUMO

Flavobacterium psychrophilum is the causative agent of Rainbow Trout Fry Syndrome which has had a major impact on global salmonid aquaculture. Recent outbreaks in Atlantic salmon in Scotland and Chile have added to the need for a vaccine to protect both salmon and trout. At present no licensed vaccines are available in Europe, leaving antibiotics as the only course of action to contain disease outbreaks. Outbreaks generally occur in fry at temperatures between 10 and 15 °C. Recently outbreaks in larger fish have given added impetus to the development of a vaccine which can provide long term protection from this highly heterogeneous pathogen. Most fish injectable vaccines are formulated with oil emulsion adjuvants to induce strong and long lasting immunity, but which are known to cause side effects. Alternative adjuvants are currently sought to minimise these adverse effects. The current study was performed to assess the efficacy of a polyvalent, whole cell vaccine containing formalin-inactivated F. psychrophilum to induce protective immunity in Atlantic salmon. The vaccine was formulated with an adjuvant containing squalene and aluminium hydroxide, and was compared to a vaccine formulated with a traditional oil adjuvant, Montanide ISA 760VG, and a non-adjuvanted vaccine. Duplicate groups of salmon (23.5 ± 6.8 g) were vaccinated with each of the vaccine formulations or phosphate buffered saline by intraperitoneal injection. Fish were challenged by intramuscular injection with F. psychrophilum six weeks post-vaccination to test the efficacy of the vaccines. Cumulative mortality reached 70% in the control salmon, while the groups of salmon that received vaccine had significantly lower mortality than the controls (p = 0.0001), with no significant difference in survival between vaccinated groups. The squalene/alum adjuvant was safe, more readily metabolised by the fish and induced less histopathological changes than the traditional oil adjuvant.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/farmacologia , Vacinas Bacterianas/farmacologia , Doenças dos Peixes/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Flavobacteriaceae/veterinária , Flavobacterium/imunologia , Salmo salar/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/farmacologia , Animais , Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , Doenças dos Peixes/imunologia , Doenças dos Peixes/microbiologia , Infecções por Flavobacteriaceae/imunologia , Infecções por Flavobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Infecções por Flavobacteriaceae/prevenção & controle , Distribuição Aleatória , Esqualeno/administração & dosagem , Esqualeno/farmacologia
9.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 34(12): 2077-2085, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31117149

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Treatment options for functional dyspepsia (FD) refractory to pharmacological treatments are limited but the effectiveness of electroacupuncture (EA) is uncertain. We assessed the effectiveness of EA combined with on-demand gastrocaine. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, assessor-blind, randomized parallel-group 2-arm trial on Helicobacter pylori negative FD patients of the postprandial distress syndrome subtype refractory to proton pump inhibitor, prokinetics, or H2 antagonists. Enrolled participants were block randomized in a 1:1 ratio, with concealed random sequence. The treatment and control groups both received on-demand gastrocaine for 12 weeks, but only those in treatment group were offered 20 sessions of EA over 10 weeks. The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in proportion of patients achieving adequate relief of symptoms at week 12. RESULTS: Of 132 participants randomly assigned to EA plus on-demand gastrocaine (n = 66) or on-demand gastrocaine alone (n = 66), 125 (94.7%) completed all follow-up at 12 weeks. The EA group had a compliance rate 97.7%. They had a significantly higher likelihood in achieving adequate symptom relief at 12 weeks, with a clinically relevant number needed to treat (NNT) value of 2.36 (95% CI: 1.74, 3.64). Among secondary outcomes, statistically and clinically significant improvements were observed among global symptom (NNT = 3.85 [95% CI: 2.63, 7.69]); postprandial fullness and early satiation (NNT = 5.00 [95% CI: 2.86, 25.00]); as well as epigastric pain, epigastric burning, and postprandial nausea (NNT = 4.17 [95% CI: 2.56, 11.11]). Adverse events were minimal and nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: For refractory FD, EA provides significant, clinically relevant symptom relief when added to on-demand gastrocaine (ChiCTR-IPC-15007109).


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Alumínio/uso terapêutico , Aminobenzoatos/uso terapêutico , Atropina/uso terapêutico , Dispepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Eletroacupuntura/métodos , Compostos de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Aminobenzoatos/administração & dosagem , Atropina/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Esquema de Medicação , Combinação de Medicamentos , Eletroacupuntura/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Compostos de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Arch Toxicol ; 93(10): 2787-2796, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31522239

RESUMO

Aluminium (Al) toxicokinetics after intramuscular (IM) injection of Al-adjuvanted vaccines is unknown. Since animal data are required for modeling and extrapolation, a rat study was conducted measuring Al in plasma and tissues after IM injection of either plain Al-hydroxide (pAH) or Al-phosphate (pAP) adjuvant (Al dose 1.25 mg), single human doses of three Al-adjuvanted vaccines (V1, V2, and V3; Al doses 0.5-0.82 mg), or vehicle (saline). A significant increase in Al plasma levels compared to controls was observed after pAP (AUC(0-80 d), mean ± SD: 2424 ± 496 vs. 1744 ± 508 µg/L*d). Percentage of Al dose released from injected muscle until day 80 was higher after pAP (66.9%) and AP-adjuvanted V3 (85.5%) than after pAH and AH-adjuvanted V1 (0 and 22.3%, resp.). Estimated absolute Al release was highest for pAP (836.8 µg per rat). Al concentration in humerus bone was increased in all groups, again strongest in the pAP group [3.35 ± 0.39 vs. 0.05 ± 0.06 µg/g wet weight (ww)]. Extrapolated amounts in whole skeleton corresponded to 5-12% of the released Al dose. Very low brain Al concentrations were observed in all groups (adjuvant group means 0.14-0.29 µg/g ww; control 0.13 ± 0.04 µg/g ww). The results demonstrate systemically available Al from marketed vaccines in rats being mainly detectable in bone. Al release appears to be faster from AP- than AH-adjuvants. Dose scaling to human adults suggests that increase of Al in plasma and tissues after single vaccinations will be indistinguishable from baseline levels.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Fosfatos/administração & dosagem , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/farmacocinética , Compostos de Alumínio/farmacocinética , Hidróxido de Alumínio/farmacocinética , Animais , Área Sob a Curva , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Fosfatos/farmacocinética , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Distribuição Tecidual , Vacinas/farmacocinética
11.
Gut ; 67(2): 372-379, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27797937

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although HCV is a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide, there is currently no prophylactic vaccine for this virus. Thus, the development of an HCV vaccine that can induce both humoural and cellular immunity is urgently needed. To create an effective HCV vaccine, we evaluated neutralising antibody induction and cellular immune responses following the immunisation of a non-human primate model with cell culture-generated HCV (HCVcc). DESIGN: To accomplish this, 10 common marmosets were immunised with purified, inactivated HCVcc in combination with two different adjuvants: the classically used aluminum hydroxide (Alum) and the recently established adjuvant: CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) wrapped by schizophyllan (K3-SPG). RESULTS: The coadministration of HCVcc with K3-SPG efficiently induced immune responses against HCV, as demonstrated by the production of antibodies with specific neutralising activity against chimaeric HCVcc with structural proteins from multiple HCV genotypes (1a, 1b, 2a and 3a). The induction of cellular immunity was also demonstrated by the production of interferon-γ mRNA in spleen cells following stimulation with the HCV core protein. These changes were not observed following immunisation with HCVcc/Alum preparation. No vaccination-related abnormalities were detected in any of the immunised animals. CONCLUSIONS: The current preclinical study demonstrated that a vaccine included both HCVcc and K3-SPG induced humoural and cellular immunity in marmosets. Vaccination with this combination resulted in the production of antibodies exhibiting cross-neutralising activity against multiple HCV genotypes. Based on these findings, the vaccine created in this study represents a promising, potent and safe prophylactic option against HCV.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Hepacivirus/imunologia , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite C/sangue , Vacinação , Vacinas contra Hepatite Viral/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/imunologia , Animais , Callithrix , Células HEK293 , Antígenos da Hepatite C/imunologia , Humanos , Imunidade Celular , Interferon gama/genética , Camundongos , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Baço/citologia , Proteínas do Core Viral/imunologia
12.
J Viral Hepat ; 25(9): 1048-1056, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29660190

RESUMO

Approximately 5% of the healthy adult population respond inadequately to the commercial recombinant hepatitis B vaccines. As the recombinant vaccines all have an aluminium-based adjuvant, we tried to enhance the immune response by adding a cytokine-based adjuvant. This new adjuvant AI20, containing 20 µg recombinant human IL-2 attached to 20 µg aluminium hydroxide, was added to HBVaxPro©-10 µg (HBAI20). In a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), 24 naïve subjects were randomized to receive either HBAI20 or commercial HBVaxPro©-10 µg vaccine. In an open-label study, 10 nonresponders received HBAI20 vaccine. All participants received 3 vaccinations (0, 1 and 6 months). In the RCT, the occurrence of any adverse events or severe events was similar between the trial arms. At month 7, all naïve participants were seroprotected; moreover, 92% in the HBAI20 group had protective antibodies 10 days after the second vaccination vs 58% in the HBVaxPro©-10 µg group, P = .16. In the open-label study, no serious adverse events were noted. The HBAI20 vaccine was able to elicit protective anti-HBs titres in 90% of nonresponders, 1 month after the third vaccination. According to these results, the new HBAI20 vaccine seems safe, well-tolerated and may promote more rapid protection against hepatitis B infection.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Feminino , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Interleucina-2/administração & dosagem , Interleucina-2/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
13.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 275(10): 2515-2521, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30062580

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Management of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) typically comprises alginates and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) alone or in combination, yet evidence to support any particular treatment regimen is lacking. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of Gaviscon® Advance alone versus co-prescription with a PPI in treating LPR. METHODS: One hundred consecutive LPR patients with a reflux symptom index (RSI) score > 10 attending our joint voice clinic (JVC) were studied prospectively. All were treated with Gaviscon® Advance four times daily. If patients had been started on a PPI prior to their JVC attendance, this was optimised to a twice-daily dosing regimen and continued. RSI scores were recorded at first attendance and 3 months post-treatment via postal questionnaire. Scores were analysed using t tests and Levene's test for equality of variances. RESULTS: Follow-up RSI scores were returned by 72 patients, 39 of whom were treated with Gaviscon® Advance only (group A) and 33 with Gaviscon® Advance + PPI (group B). Mean pre-treatment RSI scores were similar between groups [group A: 19.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) ± 2.4; group B: 21.3, 95% CI ± 3.2 (p = 0.65)]. No significant differences were observed with respect to 3-month post-treatment RSI scores [group A: 9.9, 95% CI ± 2.8; group B: 12.6, 95% CI ± 4.2 (p = 0.82)] and change in RSI scores [group A: 9.3, 95% CI ± 3.0; group B: 8.7, 95% CI ± 2.9 [p = 0.75]). CONCLUSIONS: Gaviscon® Advance alone is effective in treating symptoms of LPR, while co-prescription with a high-dose PPI offers no additional benefit.


Assuntos
Alginatos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Silícico/administração & dosagem , Bicarbonato de Sódio/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antiácidos/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Voz/efeitos dos fármacos
16.
Microbiol Immunol ; 61(2): 64-74, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28370521

RESUMO

Vaccination against the type III secretion system of P. aeruginosa is a potential prophylactic strategy for reducing the incidence and improving the poor prognosis of P. aeruginosa pneumonia. In this study, the efficacies of three different adjuvants, Freund's adjuvant (FA), aluminum hydroxide (alum) and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN), were examined from the viewpoint of inducing PcrV-specific immunity against virulent P. aeruginosa. Mice that had been immunized intraperitoneally with recombinant PcrV formulated with one of the above adjuvants were challenged intratracheally with a lethal dose of P. aeruginosa. The PcrV-FA immunized group attained a survival rate of 91%, whereas the survival rates of the PcrV-alum and PcrV-CpG groups were 73% and 64%, respectively. In terms of hypothermia recovery after bacterial instillation, PcrV-alum was the most protective, followed by PcrV-FA and PcrV-CpG. The lung edema index was lower in the PcrV-CpG vaccination group than in the other groups. PcrV-alum immunization was associated with the greatest decrease in myeloperoxidase in infected lungs, and also decreased the number of lung bacteria to a similar number as in the PcrV-FA group. There was less neutrophil recruitment in the lungs of mice vaccinated with PcrV-alum or PcrV-CpG than in those of mice vaccinated with PcrV-FA or PcrV alone. Overall, in terms of mouse survival the PcrV-CpG vaccine, which could be a relatively safe next-generation vaccine, showed a comparable effect to the PcrV-alum vaccine.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Toxinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/prevenção & controle , Proteínas Citotóxicas Formadoras de Poros/imunologia , Infecções por Pseudomonas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Pseudomonas/imunologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/imunologia , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Animais , Carga Bacteriana , Adjuvante de Freund/administração & dosagem , Pulmão/microbiologia , Pulmão/patologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos ICR , Oligodesoxirribonucleotídeos/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Pseudomonas/administração & dosagem , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 232, 2017 03 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28347293

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against seasonal influenza strains is recommended for "high risk" patient groups such as infants, elderly and those with respiratory or circulatory diseases. However, efficacy of the trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) is poor in many cases and in the event of an influenza pandemic, mono-valent vaccines have been rapidly developed and deployed. One of the main issues with use of vaccine in pandemic situations is the lack of a suitable quantity of vaccine early enough during the pandemic to exert a major influence on the transmission of virus and disease outcome. One approach is to use a dose-sparing regimen which inevitably involves enhancing the efficacy using adjuvants. METHODS: In this study we compare the use of a novel microcrystalline tyrosine (MCT) adjuvant, which is currently used in a niche area of allergy immunotherapy, for its ability to enhance the efficacy of a seasonal TIV preparation. The efficacy of the MCT adjuvant formulation was compared to alum adjuvanted TIV and to TIV administered without adjuvant using a ferret challenge model to determine vaccine efficacy. RESULTS: The MCT was found to possess high protein-binding capacity. In the two groups where TIV was formulated with adjuvant, the immune response was found to be higher (as determined by HAI titre) than vaccine administered without adjuvant and especially so after challenge with a live influenza virus. Vaccinated animals exhibited lower viral loads (as determined using RT-PCR) than control animals where no vaccine was administered. CONCLUSIONS: The attributes of each adjuvant in stimulating single-dose protection against a poorly immunogenic vaccine was demonstrated. The properties of MCT that lead to the reported effectiveness warrants further exploration in this and other vaccine targets - particularly where appropriate immunogenic, biodegradable and stable alternative adjuvants are sought.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/prevenção & controle , Tirosina/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/métodos , Animais , Cristalização , Cães , Composição de Medicamentos , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Furões , Humanos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Células Madin Darby de Rim Canino , Microesferas , Estações do Ano , Tirosina/química
18.
J Appl Toxicol ; 37(2): 222-230, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27241723

RESUMO

A recombinant vaccine composed of a fusion protein formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant is under development for protection against diseases caused by Streptococcus pyogenes. The safety and local reactogenicity of the vaccine was assessed by a comprehensive series of clinical, pathologic and immunologic tests in preclinical experiments. Outbred mice received three intramuscular injections of 1/5th of the human dose (0.1 ml) and rabbits received two injections of the full human dose. Control groups received adjuvant or protein antigen. The vaccine did not cause clinical evidence of systemic toxicity in mice or rabbits. There was a transient increase of peripheral blood neutrophils after the third vaccination of mice. In addition, the concentration of acute phase proteins serum amyloid A and haptoglobin was significantly increased 1 day after injection of the vaccine in mice. There was mild transient swelling and erythema of the injection site in both mice and rabbits. Treatment-related pathology was limited to inflammation at the injection site and accumulation of adjuvant-containing macrophages in the draining lymph nodes. In conclusion, the absence of clinical toxicity in two animal species suggest that the vaccine is safe for use in a phase I human clinical trial. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Exotoxinas/imunologia , Vacinas Estreptocócicas/efeitos adversos , Streptococcus pyogenes/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/imunologia , Animais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Feminino , Reação no Local da Injeção , Masculino , Camundongos Endogâmicos , Coelhos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Vacinas Estreptocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Estreptocócicas/imunologia
19.
J Infect Dis ; 214(4): 525-36, 2016 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26908726

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This randomized, open trial compared regimens including 2 doses (2D) of human papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years with one including 3 doses (3D) in women aged 15-25 years. METHODS: Girls aged 9-14 years were randomized to receive 2D at months 0 and 6 (M0,6; (n = 550) or months 0 and 12 (M0,12; n = 415), and women aged 15-25 years received 3D at months 0, 1, and 6 (n = 482). End points included noninferiority of HPV-16/18 antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for 2D (M0,6) versus 3D (primary), 2D (M0,12) versus 3D, and 2D (M0,6) versus 2D (M0,12); neutralizing antibodies; cell-mediated immunity; reactogenicity; and safety. Limits of noninferiority were predefined as <5% difference in seroconversion rate and <2-fold difference in geometric mean antibody titer ratio. RESULTS: One month after the last dose, both 2D regimens in girls aged 9-14 years were noninferior to 3D in women aged 15-25 years and 2D (M0,12) was noninferior to 2D (M0,6). Geometric mean antibody titer ratios (3D/2D) for HPV-16 and HPV-18 were 1.09 (95% confidence interval, .97-1.22) and 0.85 (.76-.95) for 2D (M0,6) versus 3D and 0.89 (.79-1.01) and 0.75 (.67-.85) for 2D (M0,12) versus 3D. The safety profile was clinically acceptable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 2D regimens for the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years (M0,6 or M0,12) elicited HPV-16/18 immune responses that were noninferior to 3D in women aged 15-25 years. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01381575.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Papillomavirus Humano 16/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 18/imunologia , Esquemas de Imunização , Lipídeo A/análogos & derivados , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Lipídeo A/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
20.
Malar J ; 15(1): 279, 2016 05 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27188716

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The high incidence and mortality rate of malaria remains a serious burden for many developing countries, and a vaccine that induces durable and highly effective immune responses is, therefore, desirable. An earlier analysis of the stage-specific in vitro efficacy of a malaria vaccine candidate cocktail (VAMAX) considered the general properties of complex multi-component, multi-stage combination vaccines in rabbit immunization experiments using a hyper-immunization protocol featuring six consecutive boosts and a strong, lipopolysaccharide-based adjuvant. This follow-up study investigates the effect of antigen dose on the in vitro efficacy of the malaria vaccine cocktail using a conventional vaccination scheme (one prime and two boosts) and a human-compatible adjuvant (Alhydrogel(®)). RESULTS: IgG purified from rabbits immunized with 0.1, 1, 10 or 50 µg doses of the VAMAX vaccine candidate cocktail was analysed for total IgG and antigen-cocktail-specific titers. An increase in cocktail-specific titers was observed between 0.1 and 1 µg and between 10 and 50 µg, whereas no significant difference in titers was observed between 1 and 10 µg. Antigen component-specific antibody titers and stage-specific in vitro efficacy assays were performed with pooled IgG from animals immunized with 1 and 50 µg of the VAMAX cocktail. Here, the component-specific antibody levels showed clear dose dependency whereas the determined stage-specific in vitro IC50 values (as a correlate of efficacy) were only dependent on the titer amounts of stage-specific antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: The stage-specific in vitro efficacy of the VAMAX cocktail strongly correlates with the corresponding antigen-specific titers, which for their part depend on the antigen dose, but there is no indication that the dose has an effect on the in vitro efficacy of the induced antibodies. A comparison of these results with those obtained in the previous hyper-immunization study (where higher levels of antigen-specific IgG were observed) suggests that there is a significant need to induce an immune response matching efficacy requirements, especially for a PfAMA1-based blood stage vaccine, by using higher doses, better adjuvants and/or better formulations.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/sangue , Esquemas de Imunização , Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Animais , Relação Dose-Resposta Imunológica , Seguimentos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Vacinas Antimaláricas/administração & dosagem , Coelhos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa