St John's wort for depression: a systematic review.

To address whether St John's wort is useful for the treatment of depression we attempted to retrieve all English-language articles with data on the efficacy, safety, and availability of St John's wort. Randomized, controlled, double-blind trials were selected and assessed for methodological quality using a standardized checklist, and data on pharmacology, cost, regulation, and safety were extracted. Eight studies were identified, found to be of generally good methodological quality, and determined to provide a modest amount of data to suggest that St John's wort is more effective than placebo in the treatment of mild to moderate depression. The absolute increased response rate with the use of St John's wort ranged from 23% to 55% higher than with placebo, but ranged from 6% to 18% lower compared with tricyclic antidepressants. More data are required to assess both its use in severe depression and its efficacy compared with other antidepressants. Rates of side effects were low. As a dietary supplement, St John's wort is currently largely unregulated, but the Food and Drug Administration is reviewing plans to tighten its regulatory oversight.

Pharmacokinetic interaction of digoxin with an herbal extract from St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum).

OBJECTIVE: Extracts of St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) are widely used in the treatment of depression, often as an over-the-counter drug. In contrast to its frequent use, knowledge about the pharmacokinetics of ingredients and drug interactions of St John's wort is poor. We studied the interaction between hypericum extract LI160 and digoxin. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of digoxin were investigated in a single-blind, placebo-controlled parallel study. After the achievement of steady state for digoxin on day 5, healthy volunteers received digoxin (0.25 mg/d) either with placebo (n = 12) or with 900 mg/d LI160 (n = 13) for another 10 days. Digoxin concentration profiles on day 5 were compared with day 6 (single-dose interaction) and day 15 (tenth day of co-medication). RESULTS: There was a highly significant combined-day-and-group effect for digoxin area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(0-24); P = .0001], peak concentration in plasma (Cmax; P = .0001), and plasma drug concentration at the end of a dosing interval (P = .0003) by two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant change was observed after the first dose of hypericum extract [AUC(0-24) at day 6 of 18.1+/-2.9 microg x h/L and 17.7+/-3.0 microg x h/L, mean +/- SD for placebo and hypericum group, respectively]. However, 10 days of treatment with hypericum extract resulted in a decrease of digoxin AUC(0-24) by 25% (day 15, 17.2+/-4.0 microg x h/L and 12.9+/-2.3 microg x h/L; P = .0035). Furthermore, comparison with the parallel placebo group after multiple dosing showed a reduction in trough concentrations and Cmax of 33% (P = .0023) and 26% (P = .0095), respectively. The effect became increasingly pronounced until the tenth day of co-medication. CONCLUSION: As with grapefruit juice, a food product, physicians should also be aware of potential drug-herb interactions. The interaction of St John's wort extract with digoxin kinetics was time dependent. The mechanism involved may be induction of the P-glycoprotein drug transporter.

St. John's wort has no effect on pain in polyneuropathy.

Tricyclic antidepressants are the mainstay of treatment of painful polyneuropathy but cannot be used in a substantial number of patients. St. John's wort is a herbal antidepressant, which may act via mechanisms similar to the tricyclics. The aim of this study was to test if St. John's wort would relieve painful polyneuropathy. The study design was randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and cross-over. Fifty-four patients were assigned to one of the two treatment sequences. The daily dose of St. John's wort was three tablets each containing 900 microg totalhypericin. During the two treatment periods of 5 weeks duration, patients rated constant pain, lancinating pain paroxysms, touch-evoked pain and pain on pressure by use of 0--10 point numeric rating scales. Forty-seven patients -- 18 diabetics and 29 non-diabetics -- completed the study. There was a trend of lower total pain score (sum of the individual pain scores) on St. John's wort than on placebo (median 14 vs. 15, P=0.05). None of the individual pain ratings were significantly changed by St. John's wort as compared to placebo (P=0.09--0.33). Complete, good or moderate pain relief was experienced by nine patients with St. John's wort and two with placebo (P=0.07). In conclusion, St. John's wort has no significant effect on pain in polyneuropathy.

Efficacy of newer medications for treating depression in primary care patients.

PURPOSE: Several medications have recently been introduced for the treatment of depression. We reviewed the literature to summarize their efficacy in the treatment of depression in adult patients in primary care settings. METHODS: We searched the literature published from 1980 to January 1998 using the Cochrane Collaboration Depression Anxiety and Neurosis Group's specialized registry of 8,451 clinical trials, references from trials and 46 pertinent meta-analyses, and consultation with experts. We included randomized controlled trials of at least 6 weeks' duration that measured clinical outcomes and compared one of 32 newer medications with another newer antidepressant, an older antidepressant, a placebo, or a psychosocial intervention for the treatment of depressed patients in primary care settings. The primary outcome was response rate, defined as the proportion of patients experiencing a 50% or greater improvement in depressive symptoms. RESULTS: There were 28 randomized controlled trials involving 5,940 adult primary care patients with major depression, depression requiring treatment, dysthymia, or mixed anxiety depression. Newer agents, including selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, serotonin norepinephrine inhibitors, reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase, and dopamine antagonists, were usually compared with tricyclic agents. Average response rates were 63% for newer agents, 35% for placebo, and 60% for tricyclic agents. Newer agents were significantly more effective than placebo [risk ratio = 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2 to 2.1), but similar to tricyclic agents (risk ratio = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.1). Response rates were similar in the different types of depressive disorders, except that two small trials in frail older patients showed no significant effects of newer agents compared with placebo. Dropout rates as a result of adverse effects were 8% with newer agents and 13% with tricyclic agents (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In primary care settings, newer antidepressants are more effective than placebo and have similar efficacy compared with tricyclic agents in the acute treatment of depression. Dropout rates as a result of adverse effects are lower with newer compared with tricyclic agents. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of different therapies among primary care patients with less severe depression and greater medical and psychiatric comorbidity.

An open-label trial of St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Recent interest in and evidence for the efficacy of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) for the treatment of mild-to-moderate depression has led to speculation about its efficacy in other disorders. Hypericum's mechanism of action is postulated to be via inhibition of the synaptosomal uptake of serotonin. As such, there is a suggestion that Hypericum may be effective for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). METHOD: Twelve subjects were evaluated with a primary DSM-IV diagnosis of OCD of at least 12 months' duration. Treatment lasted for 12 weeks, with a fixed dose of 450 mg of 0.3% hypericin (a psychoactive compound in Hypericum) twice daily (extended-release formulation). Weekly evaluations were conducted with the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the Patient Global Impressions of Improvement Scale, and the Clinical Global Impressions of Improvement scale (CGI) and monthly evaluation with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. RESULTS: A significant change from baseline to endpoint was found, with a mean Y-BOCS change of 7.4 points (p = .001). Significant change occurred at 1 week (p = .020) and continued to increase throughout the trial. At endpoint, 5 (42%) of 12 were rated "much" or "very much improved" on the clinician-rated CGI, 6 (50%) were "minimally improved," and 1 (8%) had "no change." The most common side effects reported were diarrhea (N = 3) and restless sleep (N = 2). CONCLUSION: Significant improvement was found with Hypericum, with a drop-in Y-BOCS score similar to that found in clinical trials. The fact that a significant change was found as early as 1 week into treatment suggests a possible initial placebo response, although improvement grew larger over time. Results warrant a placebo-controlled study of Hypericum in OCD.

Adverse neuropsychiatric reactions to herbal and over-the-counter "antidepressants".

BACKGROUND: Many unregulated over-the-counter agents for the treatment of depression are now available to patients and consumers. The potential for adverse neuropsychiatric effects with these agents has not been systematically studied in most cases. DATA SOURCES: The author performed a MEDLINE search on a variety of herbal and nonherbal over-the-counter agents said to be useful in the treatment of depression. The Physicians' Desk Reference for Herbal Medicines was also consulted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Although many of the herbal agents said to have benefits in depression appear to be safe, serious neuropsychiatric side effects and interactions have been reported for several over-the-counter "antidepressants." There is reason to suspect underreporting of those adverse events. Moreover, there is very little evidence from systematic studies regarding the potential for drug-drug or herb-drug interactions with these over-the-counter agents. Vitamins and amino acids touted for the treatment of depression are also not without risk. CONCLUSION: Although some over-the-counter remedies for depression are probably safe and effective for as-yet unidentified subgroups of depressed individuals, more research is required before these agents can be recommended for routine use. Stricter U.S. Food and Drug Administration oversight of these agents is indicated.

St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum): a review of the current pharmacological, toxicological, and clinical literature.

RATIONALE: St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) has recently gained popularity as an alternative treatment for mild to moderate depression. Given the current widespread use of this herbal remedy, it is important for medical professionals to understand the potential pharmacological pathways through which Hypericum may exert an antidepressant effect. OBJECTIVES: (1) To review the current pharmacological, toxicological, and clinical literature available on Hypericum, and (2) to provide a synthesis of this information into a form that may be easily used by health care providers. METHOD: A comprehensive review of the recent scientific literature (January 1990-March 2000) was performed using the following electronic databases and reference publications: MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, HealthSTAR, Current Contents (all editions), European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy monographs, German Commission E monographs, and the Physicians' Desk Reference for Herbal Medicines, 1st edition. RESULTS: One hundred and seven (107) publications in the English language and three publications in German were included in the review. Collectively, the data suggest that therapeutic preparations of Hypericum extract appear to exert potentially significant pharmacological activity within several neurochemical systems believed to be implicated in the pathophysiology of depression. However, little information exists regarding the safety of Hypericum, including potential herb-drug interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research on the pharmacological and biochemical activity of Hypericum and its several bioactive constituents is necessary to further elucidate the mode(s) of antidepressant action. Given what is currently known and unknown about the biological properties of Hypericum, those who choose to use this herb should be closely monitored by a physician.

Efficacy of naturopathic extracts in the management of ear pain associated with acute otitis media.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and tolerance of Otikon Otic Solution (Healthy-On Ltd, Petach-Tikva, Israel), a naturopathic herbal extract (containing Allium sativum, Verbascum thapsus, Calendula flores, and Hypericum perforatum in olive oil), compared with Anaesthetic (Vitamed Pharmaceutical Ltd, Benyamina, Israel) ear drops (containing ametocaine and phenazone in glycerin) in the management of ear pain associated with acute otitis media (AOM). DESIGN: Children between the ages of 6 and 18 years who experienced ear pain (otalgia) and who were diagnosed with eardrum problems associated with AOM were randomly assigned to be treated with Otikon or Anaesthetic ear drops, which were instilled into the external canal(s) of the affected ear(s). Ear pain was assessed using 2 visual analog scales: a linear scale and a color scale. Pain assessment took place throughout the course of 3 days. The mean score of pain reduction was used to measure outcome. SETTING: Primary pediatric community ambulatory centers. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred three children aged 6 to 18 years who were diagnosed with otalgia associated with AOM. RESULTS: Each of the 2 treatment groups were comparable on the basis of age, sex, laterality of AOM, and the effectiveness of ameliorating symptoms of otalgia. The 2 groups were also comparable to each other in the initial ear pain score and in the scores at each application of Otikon or Anaesthetic drops. There was a statistically significant improvement in ear pain score throughout the course of the study period (P =.007). CONCLUSIONS: Otikon, an ear drop formulation of naturopathic origin, is as effective as Anaesthetic ear drops and was proven appropriate for the management of AOM-associated ear pain.

Comparison of an extract of hypericum (LI 160) and sertraline in the treatment of depression: a double-blind, randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Hypericum (St. John's wort) has been shown to be as efficacious and well tolerated as standard antidepressants in the treatment of depression but has not been compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). OBJECTIVE: This study compared hypericum and the SSRI sertraline in the treatment of depression. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized study conducted in a community hospital, 30 male and female outpatients (19 women, 11 men; mean age, 45.5 years) with mild to moderate depression received 600 mg/d of a standardized extract of hypericum (LI 160) or 50 mg/d sertraline for I week, followed by hypericum 900 mg/d or sertraline 75 mg/d for 6 weeks. RESULTS: The severity of symptoms, as assessed by scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impression scale, was significantly reduced in both treatment groups (P < 0.01). Clinical response (defined as a > or =50% reduction in HAM-D scores) was noted in 47% of patients receiving hypericum and 40% of those receiving sertraline. The difference was not statistically significant. Both agents were well tolerated. A post hoc power analysis indicated that failure to reach statistical significance between treatments resulted primarily from an absence of clinical differences rather than the small sample size. CONCLUSION: The hypericum extract was at least as effective as sertraline in the treatment of mild to moderate depression in a small group of outpatients.

Hypericum for depression. An update of the clinical evidence.

This review is aimed at providing an updated evaluation of the clinical evidence regarding Hypericum perforatum (St. John's wort) as an antidepressant, based on recently published randomised controlled trials. Computerised literature searches revealed six trials published since the metaanalysis by Linde et al. (1996) [Linde, K., Ramirez, G., Mulrow, C.D., Pauls, A., Weidenhammer, W., Melchart, D., 1996. St. John's wort for depression--an overview and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Br. Med. J. 313, 253-258]. The results of these studies provide further evidence that hypericum is superior to placebo in treating mild or moderate depression. However, there is still insufficient evidence to assess the efficacy of hypericum in comparison with conventional, particularly modern, antidepressants. Furthermore, there remains a lack of trials assessing long-term effects, other types of depression and different preparations and doses. It is concluded that recent clinical trials strengthen the case for hypericum as an antidepressant, but more work needs to be done to answer the remaining questions.

Comparison of hypericum extracts with imipramine and fluoxetine in animal models of depression and alcoholism.

Clinical evidence suggests that hypericum extracts (Hypericum perforatum L., St. John's wort) have antidepressive properties and may offer an interesting alternative for the treatment of mood disorders. In addition, hypericum extracts, as well as standard antidepressants such as the tricyclic, impramine, and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, have been reported to be of therapeutic benefit in the treatment of alcoholism, as these compounds may reduce alcohol craving and/or intake in particular subgroups of patients. It was the aim of the present study to compare the effects of hypericum extracts with those of imipramine and fluoxetine in the rat forced swimming test (RFST), a model of depression, as well as in cAA rats, a genetic model of alcoholism. In the RFST, triple i.p. administration of imipramine (3-30 mg/kg) and fluoxetine (3-30 mg/kg) induced a dose-dependent reduction in immobility: the minimal effective dose (MED) being 30 and 10 mg/kg, and the maximal effect being 50% and 57% immobility reduction, for imipramine and fluoxetine, respectively. In this test, the hypericum extracts Ze 117 (Remotiv) and LI 160 (Jarsin) also induced a statistically significant reduction of immobility when administered under the same application schedule (5-40 mg/kg, i.p., triple application). In the case of the hypericum extracts the dose-response relationship was inverted U-shaped with a MED value of 20 mg/kg and a maximal effect of 41% and 32% immobility reduction, for Ze 117 and LI 160, respectively. Interestingly, the anti-immobility effects tended to be more pronounced after subacute (1 week, B.I.D.) treatment with 10 mg/kg of imipramine, fluoxetine, or Ze 117, as compared with acute treatment. This phenomenon is in accordance with clinical experience and suggests that repeated treatment is required for full development of antidepressive effects. In the alcohol-preferring cAA rats, acute i.p. administration of imipramine (3-30 mg/kg), fluoxetine (1-10 mg/kg) and Ze 117 (10-40 mg/kg) dose-dependently reduced alcohol intake in a 12-h limited access two-bottle [ethanol 10% (v/v) versus water] choice procedure: with MED values of 30, 5 and 20 mg/kg, respectively. The anti-alcohol effects of fluoxetine and Ze 1-17 appeared to be specific, as reductions in alcohol intake coincided with reductions in alcohol preference. The present study suggests that hypericum extracts have antidepressant-like properties which resemble those of clinically established antidepressants, and that Remotiv may be an interesting adjunct for the treatment of alcoholism.

Consumer use of St. John's wort: a survey on effectiveness, safety, and tolerability.

Despite its poorly described pharmacology, effectiveness, and safety, use of St. John's wort (SJW) is largely unsupervised and unexplored, and can potentially lead to adverse outcomes. We conducted a telephone survey of 43 subjects who had taken SJW to assess demographics, psychiatric and medical conditions, dosage, duration of use, reason for use, side effects, concomitant drugs, professional consultation, effectiveness, relapse, and withdrawal effects. Most subjects reported taking SJW for depression, and 74% did not seek medical advice. Mean dosage was 475.6+/-360 mg/day (range 300-1200 mg/day) and mean duration of therapy was 7.3+/-10.1 weeks (range 1 day-5 yrs). Among 36 (84%) reporting improvement, 18 (50%) had a psychiatric diagnosis. Twenty (47%) reported side effects, resulting in discontinuation in five (12%) and one emergency room visit. Two consumers experienced symptoms of serotonin syndrome and three reported food-drug interactions. Thirteen consumers experienced withdrawal symptoms and two had a depressive relapse. These data suggest the need for greater consumer and provider awareness of the potential risks of SJW in self-care of depression and related syndromes.

St John's wort: a potential therapy for elderly depressed patients?

St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) has a 2000-year history of use as a medicinal herb. Its modern application as a plant extract for treating depression has undergone scientific investigation over the last decade, and its effectiveness has been shown in studies comparing it with placebo and reference antidepressants. Our own work supports the contention that LI 160, the best-documented St John's wort medication, is effective at a high dosage even in patients with severe depression. Since the new Berlin Aging Study revealed significant treatment deficiencies among elderly depressive patients, St John's wort extracts may be a useful alternative to benzodiazepines to avoid nontreatment of early depression. Because St John's wort preparations have better tolerability than tricyclic antidepressants, elderly people in particular, can benefit from their use.

Hypericum perforatum (St John's Wort): a non-selective reuptake inhibitor? A review of the recent advances in its pharmacology.

Hypericum possesses a unique pharmacology in that it displays the pharmacology of many classes of antidepressants and new mechanisms not typical of standard antidepressants. The most potent of all its action is the moderate to high potency for inhibition of the reuptake of monoamines, serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline and the amino-acid neurotransmitters GABA and glutamate. Unlike standard reuptake inhibitors, hypericum exerts this reuptake inhibition non-competitively by enhancing intracellular Na+ ion concentrations. At a receptor level, chronic treatment with hypericum downregulates beta1-adrenoceptor, upregulates post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptors and 5-HT2 receptors. Although the major constituent responsible for the antidepressant effect is thought to be hyperforin, other constituents such as hypericin, pseudohypericin, flavonoids and oligomeric procyanidines may also play a direct or indirect role. While reuptake inhibition may more than likely be responsible for most of the antidepressant effect, other mechanisms may also contribute alone or in combination to exert the overall antidepressant action.

Equivalence of St John's wort extract (Ze 117) and fluoxetine: a randomized, controlled study in mild-moderate depression.

Treatment with St John's wort extract tablets (hypericum Ze 117) and the commonly used slow serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine was compared in patients with mild-moderate depression with entry Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) (21-item) in the range 16-24, in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparison in 240 subjects; fluoxetine: 114 (48%), hypericum: 126 (52%). After 6 weeks' treatment, mean HAM-D at endpoint decreased to 11.54 on hypericum and to 12.20 on fluoxetine (P < 0.09), while mean Clinical Global Impression (CGI) item I (severity) was significantly (P < 0.03) superior on hypericum, as was the responder rate (P = 0.005). Hypericum safety was substantially superior to fluoxetine, with the incidence of adverse events being 23% on fluoxetine and 8% on hypericum. The commonest events on fluoxetine were agitation (8%), GI disturbances (6%), retching (4%), dizziness (4%), tiredness, anxiety/nervousness and erectile dysfunction (3% each), while on hypericum only GI disturbances (5%) had an incidence greater than 2%. We concluded that hypericum and fluoxetine are equipotent with respect to all main parameters used to investigate antidepressants in this population. Although hypericum may be superior in improving the responder rate, the main difference between the two treatments is safety. Hypericum was superior to fluoxetine in overall incidence of side-effects, number of patients with side-effects and the type of side-effect reported.

Use of St. John's Wort by adolescents with a psychiatric disorder.

Herbal remedies are commonly used for psychiatric problems, but there is virtually no data about the use of these substances by young persons or by patients in treatment. Four adolescents who used St. John's Wort while under psychiatric care are described. Three of the patients had been reluctant to reveal this to their psychiatrist, believing the doctor had no interest in alternative medicine or would disapprove. Patient beliefs that prescribed medication has limitations and that natural products are safe contributed to the use of herbal remedies. The cases raise a number of issues, including the need for clinicians to routinely ask patients about alternative medicine use, to learn more about these treatments, and to discuss these approaches objectively with patients.

Attitudes and practices of physicians and naturopaths toward herbal products, including use during pregnancy and lactation.

BACKGROUND: The popularity of complementary therapies continues to grow, and physicians are asked increasingly by their patients for information regarding these modalities. PURPOSE: To assess the impact of these trends on physicians and medical students, and compare their attitudes and practices with those of the naturopaths and their students, with particular interest in the use of herbal products during pregnancy and breastfeeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A detailed questionnaire was distributed by a medical student and a naturopathic student to a randomly selected group of physicians, medical students, naturopaths and naturopathic students. They were asked a variety of questions about their background, attitudes and practices concerning herbal products. RESULTS: Thirty-eight per cent of the questionnaires were returned, with a total of 242 respondents. Fifty-four per cent of physicians discussed complementary therapies with their patients, whereas 100% of naturopaths discussed conventional medicines with their patients. The most popular product recommended by both medical doctors and naturopaths was echinacea, followed by St John's Wort. Eighty-six per cent of physicians, 74% of medical students, 66% of naturopaths and 50% of naturopathic students think that complementary medical education should be incorporated into the standard medical curriculum. Only one physician actually recommended a herbal product to a pregnant patient compared with 49% of the naturopaths who felt comfortable doing so. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary medicine has become a reality, and physicians are recommending herbal products to their patients, although on a smaller scale than are naturopaths. However, the two most popular herbal products are the same in each group. Physicians are less likely to recommend herbal products to pregnant and breastfeeding women than are naturopaths.

Summary from the 153rd meeting of the American Psychiatric Association. 13-18 May 2000, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

The annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association focuses on a variety of topics, including those on psychopharmacology. The latest developments are typically those found in the New Research sections, which is where this summary will focus.

St John's wort for depression.

BACKGROUND: Extracts of the plant Hypericum perforatum L. (popularly called St. John's wort) have been used in folk medicine for a long time for a range of indications including depressive disorders. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether extracts of Hypericum are more effective than placebo and as effective as standard antidepressants in the treatment of depressive disorders in adults; and whether they have have less side effects than standard antidepressant drugs. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were searched in computerized general (Medline, Embase, Psychlit, Psychindex) and specialized databases (Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, Cochrane Depression & Neurosis CRG, Phytodok); by checking bibliographies of pertinent articles; and by contacting manufacturers and researchers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were included if they: (1) were randomized; (2) included patients with depressive disorders; (3) compared preparations of St. John's wort (alone or in combination with other plant extracts) with placebo or other antidepressants; and (4) included clinical outcomes such as scales assessing depressive symptoms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information on patients, interventions, outcomes and results was extracted by at least two independent reviewers using a standard form. The main outcome measure for comparing the effectiveness of Hypericum with placebo and standard antidepressants was the responder rate ratio (responder rate in treatment group/responder rate in control group). The main outcome measure for side effects was the number of patients reporting side effects. MAIN RESULTS: 27 trials including a total of 2291 patients met inclusion criteria. 17 trials with 1168 patients were placebo-controlled (16 addressed single preparations, one a combination with four other plant extracts). Ten trials (eight single preparations, two combinations of hypericum and valeriana) with 1123 patients compared hypericum with other antidepressant or sedative drugs. Most trials were four to six weeks long. Participants usually had "neurotic depression" or "mild to moderate severe depressive disorders." Hypericum preparations were significantly superior to placebo (rate ratio 2.47; 95% confidence interval 1.69 to 3.61) and similarly effective as standard antidepressants (single preparations 1.01; 0.87 to 1.16, combinations 1.52; 0.78 to 2.94). The proportions of patients reporting side effects were 26.3% for hypericum single preparations vs. 44.7% for standard antidepressants (0.57; 0.47 to 0.69), and 14. 6% for combinations vs. 26.5% with amitriptyline or desipramine (0. 49; 0.23 to 1.04). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that extracts of hypericum are more effective than placebo for the short-term treatment of mild to moderately severe depressive disorders. The current evidence is inadequate to establish whether hypericum is as effective as other antidepressants. Further studies comparing hypericum with standard antidepressants in well defined groups of patients over longer observations periods, investigating long term side effects, and comparing different extracts and doses are needed.