Analyzing and predicting the LNM rate and prognosis of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Current the surveillance and management are controversial for patients with IPMN. We aimed to develop an alternative nomogram to individualize IPMN prognosis and LNM. METHODS: Based on the data from SEER database of patients diagnosed with IPMN between 2004 and 2015, a nomogram predicting the survival and LNM of IPMN based on univariate and multivariate and Lasso regression analysis was performed, internally and externally validated, and measured by C-index, and decision curve analysis (DCA), and compared to the 7th TNM stage. RESULTS: A total of 941 patients were included. Age, T stage examined nodes, tumor size, and pathology grade were identified as an independent factor for predicting LNM. The nomogram we established to predict LNM had a high predicting value with a C-index value of 0.735 and an AUC value of 0.753. Interestingly, including T1 stage, we found an inverse correlation was between age and LNM. In addition, nomogram for predicting CSS also performed better than TNM stage both in the internal validation group (1-year AUC:0.753 vs. 0.693, 3-year AUC: 0.801 vs. 0.731, 5-year AUC: 0.803 vs. 0.733) and external validation group (1-year AUC: 0.761 vs. 0.701, 3-year AUC: 0.772 vs. 0.713, 5-year AUC:0.811 vs. 0.735). DCA analysis showed the nomogram showed a greater benefit across the period of follow-up compared to 7th TNM stage. CONCLUSION: A nomogram based on multivariate and Lasso regression analysis showed great clinical usability compared with current criteria. Also, for LNM of IPMN, younger age patients with IPMN should be attached more importance.

Intratumoral Heterogeneity of SMAD4 Immunohistochemical Expression and Its Role in Prediction of Recurrence Pattern in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate consistency of SMAD4 expression in different tumor areas and its correlation with recurrence pattern in patients after resection for pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: Records of patients who underwent resection for nonmetastatic PC between 2001 and 2015 were analyzed. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from different areas of primary tumor and lymph node metastases were analyzed immunohistochemically (IHC) for SMAD4 expression using TMA technology. RESULTS: SMAD4 expression was assessed in 356 tissue sections obtained from 91 patients. SMAD4 expression was positive in all assessed tumor slides only in 7 of 26 patients (26.9%). There were 54 recurrences (9 locoregional, 41 distant, and 4 both local and distant) with median follow-up of 21.7 months. There was no correlation between SMAD4 expression and locoregional recurrence pattern (p = 0.30). SMAD4 status influenced neither distant recurrence-free survival (p = 0.99) nor overall survival (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Different areas inside primary tumor and lymph node metastases express SMAD4 heterogeneously. SMAD4 IHC expression is not a biomarker of the recurrence pattern after surgical resection for PC.