The effects of COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric neurosurgery practice and training in a developing country.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 pandemic has influenced all aspects of societies, with the healthcare being the most affected field. All specialties including neurosurgery are involved, and due to resource limitations, the number of elective surgeries in subspecialized filed has substantially decreased. Herein, we report our practice experience in pediatric neurosurgery in a tertiary hospital during pandemic, and the effects of pandemic on educational issues. METHODS: All the patients on whom any kind of neurosurgical operation was performed from March to June 2020 were retrospectively collected, and also from the same period in the previous year. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients underwent surgery in this period. This figure was 159 patients during the same period in 2019. The total number of surgical cases reduced by 31% compared to the last year. While ventriculoperitoneal shunts and supratentorial tumor were more frequent, there was a considerable reduction in subspecialized educational surgeries like neural tube defects and craniosynostoses. CONCLUSION: CVID-19 pandemic changed all scopes of medical practice and training. Considering the limitation in the available resources, the number of educational cases may decrease in subspecialized disciplines like pediatric neurosurgery. If pandemic continues, alternative measures should be taken to compensate for the shortcoming in technical and practical training.

Research activity amongst DCM research priorities.

INTRODUCTION: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder. DCM is common (estimated prevalence, 2% of adults) and significantly impacts quality of life. The AO Spine RECODE-DCM (Research Objectives and Common Data Elements in DCM) project has recently established the top research priorities for DCM. This article examines the extent to which existing research activity aligns with the established research priorities. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE and Embase for "Cervical" AND "Myelopathy" was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Full-text papers in English, exclusively studying DCM, published between January 1, 1995 and August 08, 2020 were considered eligible. Extracted data for each study included authors, journal, year of publication, location, sample size and study design. Each study was then analysed for alignment to the established research priorities. RESULTS: In total, 2261 papers with a total of 1,323,979 patients were included. Japan published more papers (625) than any other country. Moreover, 2005 (89%) of 2261 papers were aligned to at least one research priority. The alignment of papers to the different research priorities was unequal, with 1060 papers on the most researched priority alone (#15, predictors of outcome after treatment), but only 64 total papers on the least-researched 10 priorities. The comparative growth of research in the different priorities was also unequal, with some priorities growing and others plateauing over the past 5 years. DISCUSSION: Research activity in DCM continues to grow, and the focus of this research remains on surgery. The established research priorities therefore represent a new direction for the field.

Nationwide Analysis of Endovascular Thrombectomy Provider Specialization for Acute Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Determine the extent of cerebrovascular expertise among the specialties of proceduralists providing endovascular thrombectomy (ET) for emergent large vessel occlusion stroke in the modern era of acute stroke among Medicare beneficiaries Methods: Retrospective cohort study using validated International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify admissions with acute ischemic stroke and treatment with ET. We identified proceduralist specialty by linking the National Provider Identifier provided by Medicare to the specialty listed in the National Provider Identifier database, grouping into radiology, neurology, neurosurgery, other surgical, and internal medicine. We calculated the number of proceduralists and hospitals who performed ET, ET team specialty composition by hospital, and number of proceduralists who performed ET at multiple hospitals. RESULTS: Forty-two percent (n=5612) of ET were performed by radiology-background proceduralists, with unclear knowledge of how many were cerebrovascular specialists. Neurosurgery- and neurology-background interventionalists performed fewer but substantial numbers of cases, accounting for 24% (n=3217) and 23% (n=3124) of total cases, respectively. ET teams included a neurology- or neurosurgery-background proceduralist at 65% (n=407) of hospitals that performed ET and included both in 26% (n=160) of teams. CONCLUSIONS: Almost two-thirds of ET teams nationwide include a neurology- or neurosurgery-background proceduralist and higher volume centers in urban areas were more likely to have neurology- or neurosurgery-background proceduralists with cerebrovascular expertise on their team. It is unclear how many radiology-background interventionalists are cerebrovascular specialists versus generalists. Significant work remains to be done to understand the impact of proceduralist specialty, training, and cerebrovascular expertise on ET outcomes.

Trends in pediatric epilepsy surgery in Europe between 2008 and 2015: Country-, center-, and age-specific variation.

OBJECTIVE: To profile European trends in pediatric epilepsy surgery (<16 years of age) between 2008 and 2015. METHODS: We collected information on volumes and types of surgery, pathology, and seizure outcome from 20 recognized epilepsy surgery reference centers in 10 European countries. RESULTS: We analyzed retrospective aggregate data on 1859 operations. The proportion of surgeries significantly increased over time (P < .0001). Engel class I outcome was achieved in 69.3% of children, with no significant improvement between 2008 and 2015. The proportion of histopathological findings consistent with glial scars significantly increased between the ages of 7 and 16 years (P for trend = .0033), whereas that of the remaining pathologies did not vary across ages. A significant increase in unilobar extratemporal surgeries (P for trend = .0047) and a significant decrease in unilobar temporal surgeries (P for trend = .0030) were observed between 2008 and 2015. Conversely, the proportion of multilobar surgeries and unrevealing magnetic resonance imaging cases remained unchanged. Invasive investigations significantly increased, especially stereo-electroencephalography. We found different trends comparing centers starting their activity in the 1990s to those whose programs were developed in the past decade. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant variability of the proportion of the different pathologies and surgical approaches across countries, centers, and age groups between 2008 and 2015. SIGNIFICANCE: Between 2008 and 2015, we observed a significant increase in the volume of pediatric epilepsy surgeries, stability in the proportion of Engel class I outcomes, and a modest increment in complexity of the procedures.

Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry.

The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), formerly known as the National Neurosurgery Quality Outcomes Database (N2QOD), was established by the NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA) in collaboration with relevant national stakeholders and experts. The overarching goal of this project was to develop a centralized, nationally coordinated effort to allow individual surgeons and practice groups to collect, measure, and analyze practice patterns and neurosurgical outcomes. Specific objectives of this registry program were as follows: "1) to establish risk-adjusted national benchmarks for both the safety and effectiveness of neurosurgical procedures, 2) to allow practice groups and hospitals to analyze their individual morbidity and clinical outcomes in real time, 3) to generate both quality and efficiency data to support claims made to public and private payers and objectively demonstrate the value of care to other stakeholders, 4) to demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of neurosurgical and spine procedures, 5) to develop sophisticated 'risk models' to determine which subpopulations of patients are most likely to benefit from specific surgical interventions, and 6) to facilitate essential multicenter trials and other cooperative clinical studies." The NPA has launched several neurosurgical specialty modules in the QOD program in the 7 years since its inception including lumbar spine, cervical spine, and spinal deformity and cerebrovascular and intracranial tumor. The QOD Spine modules, which are the primary subject of this paper, have evolved into the largest North American spine registries yet created and have resulted in unprecedented cooperative activities within our specialty and among affiliated spine care practitioners. Herein, the authors discuss the experience of QOD Spine programs to date, with a brief description of their inception, some of the key achievements and milestones, as well as the recent transition of the spine modules to the American Spine Registry (ASR), a collaboration between the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS).

Women in German Neurosurgery: Status and Representation at Annual National Meetings.

BACKGROUND: Few women have ascended the professional-academic ladder to become chairs of German neurosurgical departments. Indeed, only 2 out of 36 current departmental heads are female. This study aims to assess the current representation and role of women in German neurosurgery and to identify indicators of how these aspects will progress. METHODS: National statistics concerning the gender distribution of neurosurgery specialists over the past 20 y and the gender distribution across DGNC (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie - German Society of Neurosurgery) membership grades from 2016 to 2018 were obtained from the Federal Statistical Office and the DGNC, respectively. Additionally, the programmes of DGNC annual meetings from 2015 to 2018 were evaluated to determine the number of presentations and speaking time awarded to male and female presenters. RESULTS: In 2017, 19% of neurosurgical specialists were female. In the same year, overall 13% of the members of the DGNC were female. There were a higher proportion of females among extraordinary members. In the last 4 y, females were overall responsible for less than a third of presentations at the annual DGNC meetings. There was also a decrease of female participation from 2015 to 2018, with regard to both overall amount of presentations and speaking time. Female participation was overall higher for presentation types typically associated with lower academic and clinical positions and which cover shorter speaking times. CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, which has one of Europe's largest neurosurgical communities, female neurosurgeons remain a minority. Structured programmes to support gender equality and diversity could facilitate the rise of women to senior positions and close the gender gap.

Automated detection of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy risk factors in electronic medical records using natural language processing.

OBJECTIVE: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is an important cause of mortality in epilepsy. However, there is a gap in how often providers counsel patients about SUDEP. One potential solution is to electronically prompt clinicians to provide counseling via automated detection of risk factors in electronic medical records (EMRs). We evaluated (1) the feasibility and generalizability of using regular expressions to identify risk factors in EMRs and (2) barriers to generalizability. METHODS: Data included physician notes for 3000 patients from one medical center (home) and 1000 from five additional centers (away). Through chart review, we identified three SUDEP risk factors: (1) generalized tonic-clonic seizures, (2) refractory epilepsy, and (3) epilepsy surgery candidacy. Regular expressions of risk factors were manually created with home training data, and performance was evaluated with home test and away test data. Performance was evaluated by sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F-measure. Generalizability was defined as an absolute decrease in performance by <0.10 for away versus home test data. To evaluate underlying barriers to generalizability, we identified causes of errors seen more often in away data than home data. To demonstrate how small revisions can improve generalizability, we removed three "boilerplate" standard text phrases from away notes and repeated performance. RESULTS: We observed high performance in home test data (F-measure range = 0.86-0.90), and low to high performance in away test data (F-measure range = 0.53-0.81). After removing three boilerplate phrases, away performance improved (F-measure range = 0.79-0.89) and generalizability was achieved for nearly all measures. The only significant barrier to generalizability was use of boilerplate phrases, causing 104 of 171 errors (61%) in away data. SIGNIFICANCE: Regular expressions are a feasible and probably a generalizable method to identify variables related to SUDEP risk. Our methods may be implemented to create large patient cohorts for research and to generate electronic prompts for SUDEP counseling.

Initial biopsy and early re-resection practices in the treatment of glioblastoma among AANS/CNS tumor section surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical management strategies for glioblastoma (GBM) may differ among neurosurgeons with initial biopsy of suspected tumors and the need for early re-resection of tumors within 30 days of initial surgery. This study was initiated by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) Tumor Section's interest in understanding the rates at which pre- and post-resection procedures, specifically biopsies prior to definitive resection and early re-resections, are performed by U.S. neurosurgeons in the management of GBM. METHODS: A ten-question survey was distributed to members of the AANS/CNS Tumor Section. RESULTS: The survey response rate among AANS/CNS Tumor Section surgeons was approximately 16%. Results showed that a majority of respondents performed surgery on 11-25 GBM cases annually. Of those cases, most neurosurgeons claimed that biopsies are rarely performed prior to tumor resection, but in the < 10% of cases for which biopsies are done, common reasons are to confirm radiological findings or improve the treatment plan. Likewise, re-resections are rare, but in the < 5 cases most neurosurgeons performed annually, common reasons included incomplete initial resections, referrals for greater resection, or unspecified reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies are needed to confirm the results of this study, which shows low rates of stereotactic and open biopsy and early re-resection procedures performed among neurosurgeons. These rates may help form guidelines in the treatment of GBM and encourage the use of surgical adjuncts that increase the extent of resection of these tumors, thereby reducing rates of early recurrence.

Pediatric neurosurgery malpractice claims in Germany.

PURPOSE: There is limited data regarding malpractice claims in pediatric neurosurgery. Aim of this study was to analyze the rate, subject, and outcome of malpractice claims faced by pediatric neurosurgeons. METHODS: We analyzed malpractice claims in pediatric neurosurgical patients assigned to the review board of North Rhine Medical Council from 2012 to 2016. Claims were categorized as "medical error" or "adverse event, no medical error." Severity was graded from negligible (grade 1) to death (grade 6). RESULTS: Of 391 pediatric malpractice claims, seven (1.8%) concerned pediatric neurosurgery. Claims were related to cranial surgery (N = 5), spinal surgery (N = 1), and a neuro-interventional procedure (N = 1). Of operative cases, three were shunt operations, two were cranioplasty procedures, and one was a spinal fusion. Complications of medical care (adverse events) had occurred in all cases. A medical error was detected in only one case. Severity of damage was grade 2 (transient minor) in three, grade 3 (transient major) in one, and grade 5 (permanent major) in three cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric neurosurgery accounted for 1.8% of all pediatric malpractice claims. In 14% of these claims, a medical error was confirmed. Malpractice claim rate thus appears to be lower than expected for a high-risk specialty. , adverse events were confirmed in all cases, a negligent medical error was rare. Adverse event rate appears to be a predictor for malpractice claim burden, highlighting the importance of surgical checklists, standard operating procedures and morbidity and mortality surveillance.

Impact of randomized controlled trials on neurosurgical practice in decompressive craniectomy for ischemic stroke.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are gold standard for comparing treatment modalities. Recently, RCTs transformed ischemic stroke care by first proving benefit of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and later of interventional mechanical thrombectomy. Aim of this study was to explore the impact of RCTs on neurosurgical practice. RCTs investigating DC and thrombectomy were identified. Annual numbers of DCs for ischemic stroke between 2000 and 2017 were determined and correlated with publication dates of RCTs. The initial RCTs demonstrating efficacy of DC were published in 2007, followed by an increase in DC numbers between 2008 and 2009. The first RCTs on mechanical thrombectomy were published in 2014 and 2015, with a decline in DCs observed between 2015 and 2016. There is a close temporal relationship between publication of these RCTs and changes in neurosurgical practice. Dynamics of annual DCs appear to correlate with the publication of RCTs. Significantly positive results of surgical and interventional RCTs were translated into clinical practice with a latency of 1 year, as reflected by shifts in annual DC numbers.

The path from ictus to Neurosurgery: chronology and transport logistics of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in the South-Eastern Norway Health Region.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines state that patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) require neurosurgical treatment as early as possible. Little is known about the time frame of transport from the ictus scene to Neurosurgery in large, partially remote catchment areas. We therefore analysed the chronology and transport logistics of aSAH patients in the South-Eastern Norway Health Region and related them to the frequency of aneurysm rebleed and 1-year mortality. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of aSAH patients bleeding within our region admitted to Neurosurgery during a 5-year period. Date, time and site of ictus and arrival at Neurosurgery, distance and mode of transport and admission were obtained from our institutional quality register and the emergency medical communication centre log. We scored the patients' clinical condition, rebleeds and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-four patients were included. Median time from ictus to arrival Neurosurgery was 4.5 h. Transport by road ambulance was most common at distances between the ictus scene and Neurosurgery below 50 km, whereas airborne transport became increasingly more common at larger distances. Direct admissions, frequency of intubation and airborne transport to Neurosurgery increased with the severity of haemorrhage, leading to shorter transport times. The risk of rebleed was 0.8%/hour of transport. The rebleed rate was independent of distances travelled, but increased with the severity of aSAH, reaching up to 6.54%/hour in poor-grade patients. Distance and time of transport had no impact on 1-year mortality, whereas poor-grade aSAH and rebleed were strong predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Poor-grade aSAH patients have a high risk of rebleed independent of the distance between the ictus scene and Neurosurgery. As rebleeding triples 1-year mortality, patients with Glasgow Coma Score < 9 with suspected aSAH should be admitted directly to Neurosurgery without delay after best possible cardiovascular and airway optimisation on site by competent personnel.

The top 50 most-cited articles on low-grade glioma: a bibliometric analysis.

PURPOSE: There is an abundance of articles published on low-grade glioma. The aim of this study was to identify and review the 50 most-cited articles on low-grade glioma, and to perform a bibliometric analysis. METHODS: In June 2017, we performed a basic search of the Web of Science database using "low-grade glioma management and/or treatment" as our search terms without publication date restrictions. The top 50 most-cited articles were obtained and reviewed. RESULTS: The top 50 most-cited articles received a mean 195 citations per paper, with 571 citations being the most and 81 citations being the least. Publication dates ranged from 1992 to 2013. The articles were published in 17 journals and Journal of Neurosurgery published the greatest number of articles (10 of 50), followed by Journal of Clinical Oncology (9 of 50). The most frequent study categories were natural history studies (19 of 50) and laboratory studies (13 of 50). Neurosurgery as a specialty contributed to 22 articles. The majority of the articles originated in the United States (44%). CONCLUSION: We identified the top 50 most-cited articles on low-grade glioma and the level of knowledge about this topic has been increased.

Endoscopic skull base neurosurgical practice in the United Kingdom.

Background: Endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) is a new subspecialty area that has become more popular over the past 20 years. It is fast evolving and the indications are getting increasingly diverse. The skill-sets also continue to significantly improve, hence, we, the authors aim to assess the current status of this unique sub-specialty within the United Kingdom. Objective: Our objectives included identifying the proportion of neurosurgeons within the United Kingdom who utilize endoscopic skull base approaches, the background training involved and how much of the overall neurosurgical workload is constituted by endoscopic skull base neurosurgery. There was also a focus on the technical nuances involved with ESBS. Materials and methods: 45 neurosurgeons were included in this study, and a 47% response rate (n = 21) was obtained. Results: 7 (33%) had training in ESBS during residency and 8 (38%) had some fellowship exposure to ESBS. Each respondent did an average of 1.9 endoscopic skull base courses prior to commencing their practice. The length of practice ranged from 3 to 15 years (mean - 7.2 years). Although most of the surgeons had mixed sub-specialty interests, the most commonly associated sub-specialty with ESBS was lateral skull base surgery (38%). Conclusion: In the United Kingdom, ESBS appears to be commonly combined with a lateral/open skull base neurosurgical practice. Most of the surgeons had their ESBS training after formal residency. Collaboration with ENT occurs more commonly for extended transphenoidal procedures.

Benefits of the epilepsy specialist nurses (ESN) role, standardized practices and education around the world.

Epilepsy, often considered as a stigmatizing disease, affects 65 million people worldwide and is frequently associated with comorbidities that increase both direct and indirect costs. The degree of impact on quality of life and the cost of care differs depending on the social and health care organizations in place, political, medico-economic and/or socio-cultural contexts. Across the globe, healthcare is provided by nurses in primary care, urgent or emergency care, and within specialized domains of practice. In Epilepsy the global care could be enhanced by developing standardized nursing education in close collaboration with other caregivers. The impact of epilepsy nursing care has been documented in some developed countries, but the diversity of nursing practices and professional education of nurses raise difficulties in generalizing these findings. Specialized education in epilepsy will improve access, treatment and ultimately the quality of life of patients.

International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: factors influencing the frequency, completion and accuracy of documentation of neurology for patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries.

INTRODUCTION: We aim to evaluate the effects of injury-related factors and clinician training grades on the frequency, completion and accuracy of International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) charts in a tertiary care neurosurgery unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 96 ISNCSCI charts of 24 traumatic spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients and 26 controls (vertebral fracture but neurologically intact), written by 50 clinicians. Seven components of each ISNCSCI charts (motor scores, sensory scores, sensory levels, motor levels, neurological level of injury, SCI severity and AIS) were reviewed to evaluate the effect of injury factors and clinician grade on the completion and accuracy of the ISNCSCI components. RESULTS: The ISNCSCI chart was used 1.9 times on average during admission. The number of ISNCSCI assessments was significant in those with isolated spinal injuries (p = 0.03). The overall completion and accuracy rates of the assessed ISNCSCI chart components were 39% and 78.1%, respectively. Motor levels and AIS had the lowest completion rates. Motor levels and sensory levels had the lowest accuracy rates. The completion rate was higher in the charts of male patients, tetraplegic patients, and in patients with isolated spinal injuries. The junior clinicians had a significantly greater ISNCSCI chart completion rate than their seniors. However, the senior clinicians were more accurate in completing the ISNCSCI chart components. CONCLUSION: The quality of ISNCSCI documentation remained poor regardless of the clinician training grade and injury factors. Clinicians should be educated on the ISNCSCI protocol and the importance of adequate documentation.

The impact of stereotactic laser ablation at a typical epilepsy center.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic laser ablation (SLA) is a novel form of epilepsy surgery for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. We evaluated one hundred consecutive surgeries performed for patients with epilepsy to address the impact of SLA on our therapeutic approach, as well as patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective, single center analysis of the last one hundred neurosurgeries for epilepsy was performed from 2013 to 2015. Demographics, surgical procedures, and postoperative measures were assessed up to 5years to compare the effect of SLA on outcome. Confidence intervals (CI) and comparative tests of proportions compared outcomes for SLA and resective surgery. Procedural categorical comparison used Chi-square and Kaplan-Meier curves. Student t-test was utilized for single variables such as age at procedure and seizure onset. RESULTS: One hundred surgeries for epilepsy yielded thirty-three SLAs and twenty-one resections with a mean of 21.7-month and 21.3-month follow-up, respectively. The temporal lobe was the most common target for SLA (92.6%) and resection (75%). A discrete lesion was present on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 27/32 (84.4%) of SLA patients compared with 7/20 (35%) of resection patients with a normal MRI. Overall, 55-60% of patients became seizure-free (SF). Four of five patients with initial failure to SLA became SF with subsequent resection surgery. Complications were more frequent with resection although SF outcomes did not differ (Chi square; p=0.79). Stereotactic laser ablation patients were older than those with resections (47.0years vs. 35.4years, p=0.001). The mean length of hospitalization prior to discharge was shorter for SLA (1.18days) compared with open resection (3.43days; SD: 3.16 days) (p=0.0002). CONCLUSION: We now use SLA as a first line therapy at our center in patients with lesional temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) before resection. Seizure-free outcome with SLA and resection was similar but with a shorter length of stay. Long-term follow-up is recommended to determine sustained SF status from SLA.

The impact of the reserve military neurosurgeon: practice, community, and service.

OBJECTIVEPapers from 2002 to 2017 have highlighted consistent unique socioeconomic challenges and opportunities facing military neurosurgeons. Here, the authors focus on the reserve military neurosurgeon who carries the dual mission of both civilian and military responsibilities.METHODSSurvey solicitation of current active duty and reserve military neurosurgeons was performed in conjunction with the AANS/CNS Joint Committee of Military Neurosurgeons and the Council of State Neurosurgical Societies. Demographic, qualitative, and quantitative data points were compared between reserve and active duty military neurosurgeons. Civilian neurosurgical provider data were taken from the 2016 NERVES (Neurosurgery Executives Resource Value and Education Society) Socio-Economic Survey. Economic modeling was done to forecast the impact of deployment or mobilization on the reserve neurosurgeon, neurosurgery practice, and the community.RESULTSSeventy-five percent (12/16) of current reserve neurosurgeons reported that they are satisfied with their military service. Reserve neurosurgeons make significant contributions to the military's neurosurgical capabilities, with 75% (12/16) having been deployed during their career. No statistically significant demographic differences were found between those serving on active duty and those in the reserve service. However, those who served in the reserves were more likely to desire opportunities for improvement in the military workflow requirements compared with their active duty counterparts (p = 0.04); 92.9% (13/14) of current reserve neurosurgeons desired more flexible military drill programs specific to the needs of practicing physicians. The risk of reserve deployment is also borne by the practices, hospitals, and communities in which the neurosurgeon serves in civilian practice. This can result in fewer new patient encounters, decreased collections, decreased work relative value unit generation, increased operating costs per neurosurgeon, and intangible limitations on practice development. However, through modeling, the authors have illustrated that reserve physicians joining a larger group practice can significantly mitigate this risk. What remains astonishing is that 91.7% of those reserve neurosurgeons who were deployed noted the experience to be rewarding despite seeing a 20% reduction in income, on average, during the fiscal year of a 6-month deployment.CONCLUSIONSReserve neurosurgeons are satisfied with their military service while making substantial contributions to the military's neurosurgical capabilities, with the overwhelming majority of current military reservists having been deployed or mobilized during their reserve commitments. Through the authors' modeling, the impact of deployment on the military neurosurgeon, neurosurgeon's practice, and the local community can be significantly mitigated by a larger practice environment.

Impact of medical academic genealogy on publication patterns: An analysis of the literature for surgical resection in brain tumor patients.

"Academic genealogy" refers to the linking of scientists and scholars based on their dissertation supervisors. We propose that this concept can be applied to medical training and that this "medical academic genealogy" may influence the landscape of the peer-reviewed literature. We performed a comprehensive PubMed search to identify US authors who have contributed peer-reviewed articles on a neurosurgery topic that remains controversial: the value of maximal resection for high-grade gliomas (HGGs). Training information for each key author (defined as the first or last author of an article) was collected (eg, author's medical school, residency, and fellowship training). Authors were recursively linked to faculty mentors to form genealogies. Correlations between genealogy and publication result were examined. Our search identified 108 articles with 160 unique key authors. Authors who were members of 2 genealogies (14% of key authors) contributed to 38% of all articles. If an article contained an authorship contribution from the first genealogy, its results were more likely to support maximal resection (log odds ratio = 2.74, p < 0.028) relative to articles without such contribution. In contrast, if an article contained an authorship contribution from the second genealogy, it was less likely to support maximal resection (log odds ratio = -1.74, p < 0.026). We conclude that the literature on surgical resection for HGGs is influenced by medical academic genealogies, and that articles contributed by authors of select genealogies share common results. These findings have important implications for the interpretation of scientific literature, design of medical training, and health care policy.

Cervical Spine Clearance in Pediatric Trauma Centers: The Need for Standardization and an Evidence-based Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine clearance in the pediatric trauma patient represents a particularly challenging task. Unfortunately, standardized clearance protocols for pediatric cervical clearance are poorly reported in the literature and imaging recommendations demonstrate considerable variability. With the use of a web-based survey, this study aims to define the methods utilized by pediatric trauma centers throughout North America. Specific attention was given to the identification of personnel responsible for cervical spine care, diagnostic imaging modalities used, and the presence or absence of a written pediatric cervical spine clearance protocol. METHODS: A 10-question electronic survey was given to members of the newly formed Pediatric Cervical Spine Study Group, all of whom are active POSNA members. The survey was submitted via the online service SurveyMonkey (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/7NVVQZR). The survey assessed the respondent's institution demographics, such as trauma level and services primarily responsible for consultation and operative management of cervical spine injuries. In addition, respondents were asked to identify the protocols and primary imaging modality used for cervical spine clearance. Finally, respondents were asked if their institution had a documented cervical spine clearance protocol. RESULTS: Of the 25 separate institutions evaluated, 21 were designated as level 1 trauma centers. Considerable variation was reported with regards to the primary service responsible for cervical spine clearance. General Surgery/Trauma (44%) is most commonly the primary service, followed by a rotating schedule (33%), Neurosugery (11%), and Orthopaedic Surgery (8%). Spine consults tend to be seen most commonly by a rotating schedule of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery. The majority of responding institutions utilize computed tomographic imaging (46%) as the primary imaging modality, whereas 42% of hospitals used x-ray primarily. The remaining institutions reported using a combination of x-ray and computed tomographic imaging. Only 46% of institutions utilize a written, standardized pediatric cervical spine clearance protocol. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a striking variability in the use of personnel, imaging modalities and, most importantly, standardized protocol in the evaluation of the pediatric trauma patient with a potential cervical spine injury. Cervical spine clearance protocols have been shown to decrease the incidence of missed injuries, minimize excessive radiation exposure, decrease the time to collar removal, and lower overall associated costs. It is our opinion that development of a task force or multicenter research protocol that incorporates existing evidence-based literature is the next best step in improving the care of children with cervical spine injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4-economic and decision analyses.

Routine radiographs one day after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion are neither necessary nor cost-effective.

OBJECTIVES: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common operative treatment of compressive pathology of the cervical spinal cord, when caused by one or more degenerated intervertebral discs or related osteophytes. In addition to intra-operative radiographs to confirm spinal level before discectomy and implant position after insertion, traditional practice is to obtain post-operative antero-posterior and lateral plain radiographs (XR) before hospital discharge, despite a paucity of evidence supporting their benefit to patient care. Minimising unnecessary radiation to radiosensitive neck structures is desirable, and furthermore, with increasing financial pressure on healthcare resources, routine investigations should be clinically justified and evidence-based. We aim to compare the utility of routine post-operative cervical spine X-rays following ACDF. METHODS: We compare two groups of consecutive patients undergoing ACDF in a single UK neurosurgical centre. The first group (n = 109) received routine post-operative XR imaging, and the second group (n = 113) received radiographs only when clinically indicated. RESULTS: There were no differences in post-operative complication rates (4.6% vs. 5.3%), or requirement for further imaging or of further operative intervention (1.8% vs. 0.9%). The group that did not have routine post-operative radiographs had a significantly shorter stay in hospital (median two days vs. three days). There were no patients in either group where post-operative XR changed clinical management and mandated revision surgery or further imaging. All cases requiring surgery or further imaging were identified by clinical deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the practice of obtaining routine radiographs of the cervical spine following ACDF should be abandoned, unless there is a clear clinical indication.