Trial of Early Minimally Invasive Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Trials of surgical evacuation of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages have generally shown no functional benefit. Whether early minimally invasive surgical removal would result in better outcomes than medical management is not known. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized trial involving patients with an acute intracerebral hemorrhage, we assessed surgical removal of the hematoma as compared with medical management. Patients who had a lobar or anterior basal ganglia hemorrhage with a hematoma volume of 30 to 80 ml were assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, within 24 hours after the time that they were last known to be well, to minimally invasive surgical removal of the hematoma plus guideline-based medical management (surgery group) or to guideline-based medical management alone (control group). The primary efficacy end point was the mean score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale (range, 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better outcomes, according to patients' assessment) at 180 days, with a prespecified threshold for posterior probability of superiority of 0.975 or higher. The trial included rules for adaptation of enrollment criteria on the basis of hemorrhage location. A primary safety end point was death within 30 days after enrollment. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were enrolled, of whom 30.7% had anterior basal ganglia hemorrhages and 69.3% had lobar hemorrhages. After 175 patients had been enrolled, an adaptation rule was triggered, and only persons with lobar hemorrhages were enrolled. The mean score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale at 180 days was 0.458 in the surgery group and 0.374 in the control group (difference, 0.084; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.005 to 0.163; posterior probability of superiority of surgery, 0.981). The mean between-group difference was 0.127 (95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.035 to 0.219) among patients with lobar hemorrhages and -0.013 (95% Bayesian credible interval, -0.147 to 0.116) among those with anterior basal ganglia hemorrhages. The percentage of patients who had died by 30 days was 9.3% in the surgery group and 18.0% in the control group. Five patients (3.3%) in the surgery group had postoperative rebleeding and neurologic deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in whom surgery could be performed within 24 hours after an acute intracerebral hemorrhage, minimally invasive hematoma evacuation resulted in better functional outcomes at 180 days than those with guideline-based medical management. The effect of surgery appeared to be attributable to intervention for lobar hemorrhages. (Funded by Nico; ENRICH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02880878.).

Treatment of post-thalamic hemorrhage hydrocephalus: ventriculoperitoneal shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy? A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) for the treatment of hydrocephalus after thalamic hemorrhage (TH) where external ventricular drainage (EVD) could not be removed after hematoma absorption, and to provide a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of hydrocephalus after TH. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with hydrocephalus after TH whose EVD could not be removed after hematoma absorption were retrospectively analyzed. According to the patients' surgical methods, the patients were divided into the VPS group and ETV group. The operative time, length of hospital stay, complications, and reoperation rates of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay between the two groups. The EVD tubes were successfully removed in all patients after surgery. There were 4 (9.5%) complications in the ETV group and 3 (6.7%) complications in the VPS group, with no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups. During the 1-year follow-up, 7 patients (16.7%) in the ETV group and 3 patients (6.7%) in the VPS group required reoperation. In the subgroup analysis of TH combined with fourth ventricular hemorrhage, 6 patients (14.3%) in the ETV group and 1 patient (2.2%) in the VPS group required reoperation, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: ETV had good efficacy in treating hydrocephalus caused by TH and TH that broke into the lateral ventricle and the third ventricle. However, if hydrocephalus was caused by TH with the fourth ventricular hematoma, VPS was a better surgical method because the recurrence rate of hydrocephalus in ETV was higher than that in VPS. Therefore, the choice of surgical method should be based on the patient's clinical features and hematoma location.

Postoperative fever and clinical outcomes after endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective database study.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) is a severe stroke with high mortality and disability rates. Endoscopic surgery is an increasingly widely used minimally invasive method for the treatment of SICH. However, the impact of fever on patient outcomes remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients aged 18 years or older with supratentorial SICH confirmed by CT, who underwent endoscopic hematoma evacuation within 48 h of symptom onset. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included hospital and neurosurgical intensive care unit (NSICU) stays, and perioperative complications. We analyzed the association between postoperative fever (highest temperature within 24 h after surgery) and these outcomes using multivariate analysis, generalized additive models, and segmented regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 56 patients, 38 had favorable outcomes (mRS ≤ 3) and 18 had unfavorable outcomes (mRS > 3) at 3 months. A threshold effect at 38.2 °C was observed between postoperative body temperature and clinical outcomes. The mean age was 56 years (SD = 9) for the > 38.2 °C group and 58 years (SD = 8) for the ≤ 38.2 °C group, with a similar proportion of male patients (63% vs. 69%, P = 0.635). Patients with postoperative fever had larger hematoma volumes (65 vs. 56 mL; P = 0.008). Other characteristics were similar between the groups. Postoperative fever (> 38.2 °C) was independently associated with a 4.99-fold increased risk of unfavorable outcomes (95% CI = [1.13 to 25.90]; P = 0.040), which remained significant after excluding patients with postoperative complications (adjusted RR = 16.03, 95% CI = [1.69 to 417.24]; P = 0.033). The association was consistent across subgroups with different Glasgow Coma Scale scores, hematoma volumes, and intraventricular extension. Postoperative fever was also associated with longer NSICU stays (3.1 vs. 2.3 days; P = 0.023), longer hospital stays (17.2 vs. 13.6 days; P = 0.010), more residual hematoma, and greater edema volume. Different antipyretic therapies did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a temperature threshold (38.2 °C) associated with poor outcomes in SICH patients undergoing endoscopic surgery. Further research is needed to mitigate postoperative fever and improve patient outcomes.

Fluorophores in Endoscopic Neurosurgery.

The complexity of intracranial anatomy and pathologies warrants the optimization of multimodal techniques to ensure safe and effective surgical treatment. Endoscopy is being more widely implemented in intracranial procedures as an important visualization tool, as it can offer panoramic views of deep structures while reducing the invasiveness of approaches. Fluorophores are frequently utilized to augment the identification of intracranial anatomic landmarks and pathologies. This chapter discusses the integration of these two surgical adjuncts, highlighting the key fluorophores used in endoscopic neurosurgery and their clinical applications.

Endoscopic Cylinder Surgery for Ventricular Lesions.

Cylinder retractors have been developed to reduce the risk of brain retraction injury during surgery by dispersing retraction pressure on the brain. In recent years, various types of cylinder retractors have been developed and widely used in neurosurgery. The ventricles, being deep structures within the brain, present an effective area for cylinder retractor utilization. Endoscopy provides a bright, wide field of view in the deep surgical field, even through narrow corridors.This chapter introduces surgical techniques using an endoscope through a cylinder. Given the deep and complex shapes of the ventricles, preoperative planning is paramount. Two main surgical techniques are employed in endoscopic cylinder surgery. The wet-field technique involves the continuous irrigation of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during the procedure, maintaining ventricle shape with natural water pressure, facilitating tumor border identification, and achieving spontaneous hemostasis. Conversely, the dry-field technique involves CSF drainage, providing a clear visual field even during hemorrhage encounters. In intraventricular surgery, both techniques are used and switched as needed.Specific approaches for lateral, third, and fourth ventricular tumors are discussed, considering their locations and surrounding anatomical structures. Detailed intraoperative findings and strategies for tumor removal and hemostasis are presented.Endoscopic cylinder surgery offers a versatile and minimally invasive option for intraventricular tumors, leading to improved surgical outcomes. Overall, this technique enhances surgical precision and patient outcomes in intraventricular tumor cases.

Purely Endoscopic Treatment for Arachnoid Cysts.

Arachnoid cysts are benign, mostly congenital lesions that are asymptomatic in most patients. In some cases, due to their location or sheer size, they produce a mass effect or hydrocephalic obstruction of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow and thus might warrant surgical treatment. The goal of the surgery is usually to reduce pressure inside the cysts, to reduce the mass effect, or to restore the CSF pathway. Surgical treatment options are resection, fenestration, or shunting of the cyst. Over the past decades, treatment under sheer endoscopic control either through a tube or via craniotomy of arachnoid cysts has been studied thoroughly and replaced open microsurgical cyst surgery in the opinion of many neurosurgeons. Endoscopic treatment has proven to be a safe and feasible technique for both patients and surgeons. In the following chapter, the authors describe their indications for surgery and pre- and postoperative workup, where precautions should be taken, and discuss the different possibilities and techniques of endoscopic cyst fenestration. The aim is to give detailed instructions and present cases for ventriculocystostomy, cystocisternostomy, ventriculocystocisternostomy, and cystoventriculostomy and point out specifics deemed to be important to avoid complications and to ensure the best possible outcome for each patient.

Endoscopic Microvascular Decompression.

Microvascular decompression is a widely accepted surgical treatment for compressive cranial nerve pathologies such as trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, glossopharyngeal neuralgia, and other craniofacial pain syndromes. Endoscopy has risen as a safe and effective minimally invasive tool to optimize microvascular decompression. Endoscopy offers improved visualization, minimizes retraction, and allows for smaller surgical openings compared to traditional microscopic approaches. There are several reports of improved neuralgia outcomes and reduced post-operative complications after endoscopic microvascular decompression. In skilled surgical hands, endoscopy is an excellent option for microvascular decompression as stand-alone tool or adjunct to the microscope. An overview of the history, operative considerations, and techniques is provided in this chapter.

Endoneurosurgical Resection of Parenchymal and Intraventricular Lesions Using Tubular Retraction System.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic surgery has emerged in the recent years as an alternative to the conventional microsurgical approaches for removal of the deep-seated brain and intraventricular tumors. Endoport has enhanced the tumor access and visualization without any significant brain retraction. In this chapter, we describe the surgical technique of the endoscopic excision of the deep-seated intra-axial brain tumors using tubular retraction system with review of the literature. METHODS: The endoscopic endoport technique that we use at our institution for the surgical management of intraventricular and intraparenchymal brain tumors has been described in details with illustrations. RESULTS: Results from the literature review of brain parenchymal and intraventricular port surgery were analyzed, and the feasibility and safety of this technique were discussed. Surgical complication avoidance and management were highlighted. The port technique offers numerous potential advantages, including: (1) reducing focal brain injury by distributing retraction forces homogenously; (2) minimizing white matter disruption and the risk of fascicles injury during cannulation; (3) ensuring stability of the surgical corridor during the procedure; (4) preventing inadvertent expansion of the corticectomy and white fiber tract dissection throughout surgery; (5) protecting the surrounding tissues against iatrogenic injuries caused by instrument entry and reentry. CONCLUSION: The endoport-assisted endoscopic technique is a safe and minimally invasive method that offers an effective alternative option for resection of intraventricular and parenchymal brain lesions. Excellent outcome comparable to other surgical approaches can be achieved with acceptable complications.

Fully Endoscopic Nontubular Retractor Approach for Intraaxial Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Fully endoscopic or endoscope-controlled approaches are essentially keyhole approaches in which rigid endoscopes are the sole visualization tools used during the whole procedure. At the early attempts of endoscope-assisted cranial surgery, it was noted that rigid endoscopes enabled overcoming the problem of suboptimal visualization when small exposures are used. The technical specifications and design of the currently available rigid endoscopes are associated with a group of unique features that define the endoscopic view and lay the basis for its superiority over the microscopic view during brain surgery. Fully endoscopic resection of intraparenchymal brain tumors is a minimally invasive approach that is not routinely practiced by neurosurgeons, with a few major series published so far. Unfamiliarity with the technique, steep learning curve, and concerns about inadequate exposure and decreased visibility may explain this fact. The majority of the purely endoscopic resections for intraparenchymal brain lesions are performed nowadays through tubular retractor systems. In very limited instances, however, the fully endoscopic technique is performed without tubular retractors. In this chapter, we elaborate on the surgical technique and nuances of the fully endoscopic nontubular retractor approach for intraaxial tumors. METHODS: From a prospective database of endoscopic procedures maintained by the senior author, clinical data, imaging studies, and operative charts and videos of cases undergoing fully endoscopic excision for intraaxial brain tumors were retrieved and analyzed. The pertinent literature was also reviewed. RESULTS: The surgical technique of the fully endoscopic nontubular retractor approach for intraaxial tumors was formulated. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic technique has many advantages over the conventional procedures. In our hands, the technique has proven to be feasible, efficient, and minimally invasive with excellent results.

Endoscopic Anatomy of the Skull Base.

Presently, endoscopic skull base surgery has undergone significant advancements since its inception over two decades ago. Nevertheless, it is imperative to underscore that the fundamental basis of all surgical procedures lies in the meticulous understanding of anatomy, with particular emphasis on the ventral anatomy. This facet has recently garnered increased attention.Following the advancements in endoscopic skull base surgery techniques, this chapter will concentrate on the pertinent anatomical considerations that serve as key foundations for successful procedures. These considerations are categorized into two planes: the sagittal plane and the coronal plane.The sagittal plane is further subdivided into five distinct approaches, namely,(1) the transcribriform approach, (2) the transplanum approach, (3) the transsellar approach, (4) the transclival approach, and (5) the transodontoid approach.On the other hand, the coronal plane is delineated into seven specific zones to facilitate comprehension and potential applications: (1) the petrous apex approach, (2) the intrapetrous approach, (3) the suprapetrous approach, (4) the cavernous sinus approach, (5) the infratemporal approach, (6) the medial condyle approach, and (7) the jugular foramen approach.By organizing the anatomical aspects in this systematic manner, the information provided becomes more accessible, fostering a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter for potential future application.

Anatomical Features of the Ventricular System Relevant to Endoscopic Surgery for Hydrocephalus.

In endoscopic surgery for hydrocephalus and associated intraventricular lesions, a thorough understanding of the required microsurgical anatomy is paramount. Endoscopic procedures in hydrocephalus treatment typically fall into two categories: ventriculocisternostomy and ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. In the former, precise knowledge of intraventricular structures, such as the configuration of the ventricles and the path of internal vessels within them, is essential. In the latter, a comprehensive grasp of neural pathways, neural nuclei, and especially venous pathways beneath the ventricular wall is crucial for surgical success. Given that many cases exhibit deviations from normal anatomy, careful examination of preoperative images and a solid understanding of anatomical landmarks during surgery are indispensable. This is particularly critical in endoscopic procedures, which may lack stereoscopic vision, underscoring the importance of acquiring visual cues during the surgical intervention.

Endoscopic Supraorbital Translaminar Approach.

Surgical selection for third ventricle tumors demands meticulous planning, given the complex anatomic milieu. Traditional open microsurgical approaches may be limited in their access to certain tumors, prompting the exploration of alternative techniques. The endoscopic supraorbital translaminar approach (ESOTLA) has emerged as a promising alternative for managing these tumors. By combining a minimally invasive keyhole approach with endoscopic visualization, the ESOTLA provides enhanced illumination and a wider angle of view within the third ventricle. This unique advantage allows for improved access to retrochiasmatic tumors and reduces the need for frontal lobe and optic chiasm retraction required of microscopic techniques, decreasing the risk of neurocognitive and visual deficits. Complications related to the ESOTLA are rare and primarily pertain to cosmetic issues and potential compromise of the hypothalamus or optic apparatus, which can be minimized through careful subarachnoid dissection. This chapter offers a comprehensive description of the technical aspects of the ESOTLA, providing insights into its application, advantages, and potential limitations. Additionally, a case description highlights the successful surgical extirpation of an intraventricular papillary craniopharyngioma via the ESOTLA followed by targeted therapy. To better illustrate the stepwise dissection through this novel approach, a series of cadaveric and intraoperative photographs are included.

Endoport-Guided Endoscopic Excision of Intraaxial Brain Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Transcortical approaches using a spatula-based retraction system have traditionally been used for the microsurgical resection of deep-seated intraventricular and parenchymal brain tumors. Recently, transparent cylindrical or tubular retractors have been developed to provide a stable corridor to access deeper brain lesions and perform bimanual microsurgical resection. The flexible endoports minimize brain retraction injury during surgery and, along with the superior vision of endoscopes, offer several advantages over standard microsurgery. In this chapter, we describe the surgical technique of the endoport-guided endoscopic excision of deep-seated intraaxial brain tumors. METHODS: The endoscopic endoport technique that we use at our institution for the surgical management of intraventricular and intraparenchymal brain tumors has been described in detail with illustrative cases. RESULTS: Results from the literature review of intraventricular and intraparenchymal port surgery were analyzed, and the feasibility and safety of this technique were discussed. Surgical complication avoidance and management were highlighted. The port technique offers numerous potential advantages, including (1) reducing focal brain injury by distributing retraction forces homogenously, (2) minimizing white matter disruption and the risk of fascicle injury during cannulation, (3) ensuring the stability of the surgical corridor during the procedure, (4) preventing inadvertent expansion of the corticectomy and white fiber tract dissection throughout surgery, and (5) protecting the surrounding tissues against iatrogenic injuries caused by instrument entry and reentry. CONCLUSION: The endoport-assisted endoscopic technique is safe and offers an effective alternative option for the resection of intraventricular and intraparenchymal lesions.

Purely Endoscopic Evacuation of Intracranial Hematomas.

Cerebral hemorrhage is a frequent disease and one of the main causes of disabilities. Even in the case of cerebral hemorrhage, if there were a treatment that would improve the functional prognosis, the benefits would be immeasurable. Although there are limited reports with a high level of evidence in past studies, it has been found that surgery can be effective if a large amount of hematoma can be removed in a minimally invasive manner. Also, it has become clear that the control of bleeding becomes a problem when surgery is performed within 2 days after the onset of stroke and that the therapeutic time window might be longer. In Japan, since the introduction of the transparent sheath by Nishihara et al., endoscopic hematoma removal has been widely performed and has become the standard surgical procedure. The three basic equipment needed for this surgery are a rigid scope, a suction coagulator, and a transparent sheath. The key point of the surgery is to search for hematomas and bleeding points through a transparent sheath and coagulate the bleeding vessels. In this chapter, we will introduce surgical techniques using these devices, but it is important to carefully decide on surgical options by considering your own technique, the condition of each patient, and the devices available in the area.

Endoscopic Eyebrow Approach for Aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Considerable effort has been made to reduce surgical invasiveness, since Axel Perneczky introduced the supraorbital eyebrow approach as a core part of his keyhole concept in neurosurgery. But a limited approach does not facilitate an already serious and demanding task as aneurysm surgery. In this regard, the enhancement of the visual field before, during, and after microsurgical aneurysm occlusion is a safe and effective method to increase the quality of treatment. Indications/Contraindications: Based on the individual anatomical findings, the supraorbital keyhole approach provides access to most aneurysms of the anterior circulation. The approach is not recommended in large complex aneurysms, giant aneurysms, BA aneurysms located beneath the dorsum sellae, as well as cases of severe subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and expected brain edema. COMPLICATIONS: Experience with endoscopic procedures in aneurysm surgery is limited to several clinical retrospective articles, and no major complications in conjunction with the endoscope were observed. Outcome and Prognosis: The supraorbital eyebrow approach has a low rate of complications and provides highly favorable cosmetic results. Endoscopic inspection prior to clipping might reduce overexposure and mobilization of the aneurysm. It was found that the rate of intraoperative rupture was decreased. The endoscopic post-clipping control helped significantly to reduce aneurysm remnants and unattended parent, branch, or perforator occlusion. CONCLUSION: The supraorbital eyebrow approach is a safe, effective and elegant approach in the treatment of most aneurysms of the anterior circulation. The additional enhancement of the visual field provided by the endoscope before, during, and after microsurgical aneurysm clipping might decrease the rate of intraoperative aneurysm ruptures and unexpected findings concerning aneurysm remnant occlusion and compromise of involved parent, branching, and perforating vessels.

Transorbital Route to Intracranial Space.

The endoscopic superior eyelid transorbital approach has emerged as a notable and increasingly utilized surgical technique in recent years. This chapter presents an overview of the approach, tracing its historical development and highlighting its growing acceptance within the skull base community.Beginning with an introduction and historical perspective, the chapter outlines the evolution of the transorbital approach, shedding light on its origins and the factors driving its adoption. Subsequently, a comprehensive exploration of the anatomic bone pillars and intracranial spaces accessible via this approach is provided. Hence, five bone pillars of the transorbital approach were identified, namely the lesser sphenoid wing, the anterior clinoid, the sagittal crest, the middle cranial fossa, and the petrous apex. A detailed correlation of those bone targets with respective intracranial areas has been reported.Furthermore, the chapter delves into the practical application of the technique through a case example, offering insights into its clinical utility, indications, and limitations.

Full Endoscopic Transcranial Resection of Meningiomas.

OBJECTIVE: Tumors of the skull base can be accessed through different routes. Recent advantages in minimally invasive techniques have shown that very different routes can be applied for optimal tumor resection depending on the technical equipment, the surgeon's preference, and the individual anatomy of the pathology. Here, the authors present their technique for pure endoscopic transcranial tumor resection in meningiomas. METHODS: Out of the cases of the Department of Neurosurgery, Homburg Saar Germany of the last 10 years, all endoscopic procedures for meningiomas were analyzed. Particular attention was given to evaluating the peculiarities of those meningiomas that were treated purely endoscopically. RESULTS: While the endoscope was used in a large number of skull base meningiomas in endonasal approaches or for endoscopic inspection in transcranial skull base surgery, only a small number of meningiomas was selected for a purely endoscopically performed resection. The characteristics of these cases were rather a small lesion, straight access, and a keyhole position of the craniotomy. A complete resection of the tumor was achieved in all cases. Conversion to the microscope was not necessary in any case. There were no technical issues or complications associated with a fully endoscopic resection. DISCUSSION: The endoscope is a valuable tool for visualization in meningioma surgery. In most cases, it is applied for an endonasal route or for endoscopic inspection in transcranial microsurgical cases. However, small to medium-sized meningiomas that can be accessed through the keyhole approach are good candidates for pure endoscopic resection. Because of the very high magnification and the minimally invasive nature of this approach, it should be considered more frequently in suitable lesions.

Fully Endoscopic Supraorbital Approach for Anterior Cranial Base Meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cranial base meningiomas include those meningiomas originating from the tuberculum sellae, the planum sphenoidale, or the olfactory groove, with surgical excision being the main treatment modality for these tumors. Conventional microscopic and endoscope-assisted versions of the supraorbital keyhole approach via an eyebrow incision emerged into minimally invasive options that are frequently utilized nowadays for treating these tumors. At the early attempts of endoscope-assisted cranial surgery, it was noted that rigid endoscopes enabled overcoming the problem of suboptimal visualization when small exposures are used. The technical specifications and design of the currently available rigid endoscopes are associated with a group of unique features that define the endoscopic view and lay the basis for its superiority over the microscopic view during brain surgery. Notwithstanding, the fully endoscopic or endoscope-controlled version of the supraorbital keyhole approach is not routinely practiced by neurosurgeons, with few series published so far. In this chapter we elaborate on the surgical technique and nuances of the fully endoscopic supraorbital approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas. METHODS: From a prospective database of endoscopic procedures maintained by the senior author, clinical data, imaging studies, operative charts, and videos of cases undergoing fully endoscopic excision of anterior cranial base meningiomas via supraorbital approach were retrieved and analyzed. The pertinent literature was also reviewed. RESULTS: The surgical technique of the fully endoscopic supraorbital approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas was formulated. CONCLUSION: The fully endoscopic supraorbital approach for anterior cranial base meningiomas has many advantages over the conventional procedures. In our hands, the technique has proven to be feasible, efficient, and minimally invasive with excellent results.

Fully Endoscopic Retrosigmoid Approach for Cerebellopontine Angle Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Fully endoscopic or endoscope-controlled approaches are essentially keyhole approaches in which rigid endoscopes are the sole visualization tools used during the whole procedure. At the early attempts of endoscope-assisted cranial surgery, it was noted that rigid endoscopes enabled overcoming the problem of suboptimal visualization when small exposures are used. The technical specifications and design of the currently available rigid endoscopes are associated with a group of unique features that define the endoscopic view and lay the basis for its superiority over the microscopic view during brain surgery. Fully endoscopic retrosigmoid approach for cerebellopontine angle tumors is a minimally invasive approach that is not routinely practiced by neurosurgeons, with few series published so far. Unfamiliarity with the technique, steep learning curve, and concerns about inadequate exposure, neurovascular injury, and decreased visibility may explain this fact. In this chapter we elaborate on the surgical technique and nuances of the fully endoscopic retrosigmoid approach and present an overview of the published series. METHODS: From a prospective database of endoscopic procedures maintained by the senior author, clinical data, imaging studies, operative charts, and videos of cases undergoing fully endoscopic retrosigmoid approach for cerebellopontine angle tumors were retrieved and analyzed. The pertinent literature was also reviewed. RESULTS: The surgical technique of the fully endoscopic retrosigmoid approach was formulated. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic technique has many advantages over the conventional procedures. In our hands, the technique has proven to be feasible, efficient, and minimally invasive with excellent results.

Purely Endoscopic Supracerebellar Infratentorial Approach to the Pineal Region in Pediatric Population.

Pineal lesions represent less than 1% of all brain tumors (Villani et al., Clin Neurol Neurosurg 109:1-6, 2007). The abysmal location and critical neurovascular structures remain a surgical challenge, despite the advent of microneurosurgery. The classical wide surgical suboccipital craniotomy with the supracerebellar infratentorial approach, described by Sir Victor Horsley (Victor, Proc R Soc Med 3:77-78, 1910), is infamous for its considerable surgical morbidity and mortality. This was later upgraded microneurosurgically by Stein to improve surgical outcomes (Stein, J Neurosurg 35:197-202, 1971).Ruge et al. reported the first purely endoscopic fenestration of quadrigeminal arachnoid cysts via this corridor (Ruge et al., Neurosurgery 38:830-7, 1996). A cadaver-based anatomical study by Cardia et al. demonstrated the viability for endoscope-assisted techniques (Cardia et al., J Neurosurg 2006;104(6 Suppl):409-14). However, the first purely endoscopic supracerebellar infratentorial (eSCIT) approach to a pineal cyst was performed in 2008 by Gore et al. (Gore PA et al., Neurosurgery 62:108-9, 2008).Unlike transventricular endoscopy, eSCIT approach poses no mechanical risk to the fornices and can be utilized irrespective of ventricular size. More vascular control and resultant reduction in uncontrolled hemorrhage improve the feasibility of attaining complete resection, especially around corners (Zaidi et al,, World Neurosurg 84, 2015). Gravity-dependent positioning and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion aid cerebellar relaxation, creating the ideal anatomical pathway. Also, angle of the straight sinus, tentorium, and tectal adherence can often influence the choice of approach; thus direct endoscopic visualization not only counteracts access to the engorged Galenic complex but also encourages sharp dissection of the arachnoid (Cardia et al., J Neurosurg 104:409-14, 2006). These tactics help provide excellent illumination with magnification, making it less fatiguing for the surgeon (Broggi et al., Neurosurgery 67:159-65, 2010).The purely endoscopic approach thwarts the dreaded risk of air embolisms, via simple copious irrigation from a small burr hole (Shahinian and Ra, J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 74:114-7, 2013). The tiny opening and closure are rapid to create, and the smaller wound decreases postoperative pain and morbidity. Recent literature supports its numerous advantages and favorable outcomes, making it a tough contender to traditional open methods.