Endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy in patients with complete pancreas divisum and acute recurrent pancreatitis: a metanalysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pancreas divisum (PD) is a congenital variant of the pancreatic ductal system and a potential cause of acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP). Endoscopic minor papilla sphincterotomy (MiES) is the most common procedure performed in the management of PD-related ARP. The aim of this study is to perform a meta-analysis estimating the efficacy and the safety of MiES in the management of patients with PD-related ARP. METHODS: A research was performed in Pubmed, EMBASE and Web of science, the studies were reviewed and selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Evaluation of Heterogeneity and publication bias was performed, and a random effect model was used to estimate the effect size of each study. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen articles were selected and reviewed, 13 met the inclusion criteria. All the studies were retrospective with a mean follow-up duration of 45.9 months. A total of 323 patients with PD-related ARP treated with MiES were included in the meta-analysis. The overall clinical success rate of MiES (defined as no further episodes of ARP, reduction of episodes of ARP, or improvement in quality of life) was of 77% (95%CI: 72%-81%; p = 0.30). Evaluating only the studies with clinical success rate defined as "no further AP in the follow-up" the clinical success rate was of 69.8% (95%CI: 61.3%-77.2%; p = 0.57), while evaluating the studies with other definitions (reduction of episodes of ARP or improvement in quality of life) the clinical success rate was of 81.2% (95%CI: 75.2%-86.1%; p = 0.45). The common fixed effects model disclosed a 25.5% overall adverse events rate (95%CI: 19.3%-32.8%; p = 0.42): acute pancreatitis in 14.3% (95%CI: 9.7%-20.6%; p = 0.36), bleeding in 5.6% (95%CI: 2.9%-10.4%; p = 0.98), and other adverse events in 5.6% (95%CI: 2.9%-10.4%; p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: MiES is an effective and relatively safe treatment in the management of PD-related ARP. The retrospective nature of the studies selected is the main limitations of this metanalysis. Prospective trials are needed to confirm these data.

The Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of Pancreatic Divisum: A Case Series of 57 Case Reports.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic divisum (PD) is the second most common congenital abnormality of the pancreatic duct, which affects 2% to 3% of the population. Most of the population remains asymptomatic, but in people who present with symptoms, it can be a cause of anguish and should be recognized. The main goal of this article was to provide a comprehensive picture of clinical and epidemiological methods of diagnosis and treatment of PD. METHODS: A total of 57 PD case reports were considered in this descriptive analysis with 51 case reports and case series published within the last 25 years. The search strategies include systemic searches using scholarly search engines such as Medscape, Scopus, Cochrane, and PubMed. RESULTS: The 57 cases we studied have an average age of presentation of 42 years, with female sex (58%) predominance. Common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (87.72%) and radiation to the back (21.6%). Eighty-one percent of the case studies reported pancreatitis, and 63.2% had recurrent pancreatitis. At presentation, laboratory values demonstrated increased amylase, lipase, and liver enzymes. PD was diagnosed using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (28.1%), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (57.9%), endoscopic ultrasound (7%), or computed tomography (5.3%) scan of the abdomen. Of significance, biliary duct dilation was found in 70.6% of patients diagnosed as having PD. Incidental masses were found in 66.7% of the patients. The most successful treatment was sphincterotomy with or without stents (47.6%), followed by pancreatoduodenectomy (19%) and pancreaticojejunostomy (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians managing pancreatitis should add PD to their differential diagnoses because it will help improve patient outcomes and avoid unfavorable consequences.

Safety and efficacy of minor papillotomy in children and adolescents with pancreas divisum.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreas Divisum (PD) is a common pancreatic ductal variant which is twice as common in pediatric patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) relative to the general population (14% vs. 7%). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with minor papillotomy has been performed to facilitate drainage of pancreatic juice from the diminutive minor papilla to prevent pancreatitis and pancreatic damage. METHODS: We searched our prospectively-maintained endoscopy databases for patients 18 and younger who underwent ERCP with minor papillotomy between 2009 and 2019. Demographic data, indications, procedural interventions and findings, as well as available clinical outcomes data were analyzed. RESULTS: 54 ARP/PD patients underwent ERCP with minor papillotomy. Median age was 14 (range 7-18) years, and 26 (48.1%) patients were female. Post-ERCP pancreatitis developed in 10/54 patients (18.5%). 12-month post-ERCP clinical trajectory was available in 47/54 (87%) patients and most patients (38/47, 80.8%) improved clinically after minor papillotomy, with 9/47 (19.1%) experiencing resolution of pancreatitis episodes and none indicated worsening severity or frequency of pancreatitis episodes following ERCP. CONCLUSION: The majority of children and adolescents with PD and ARP who underwent ERCP with minor papillotomy experienced subjective improvement in their symptoms following the intervention. These data suggest that ERCP with minor papillotomy for pediatric patients with PD and ARP is beneficial and may be curative in a subset of patients-higher rates of improvement than have been previously reported in adults.

[Acute pancreatitis triggered by an impacted minor papillary stone in a patient with pancreas divisum improved after spontaneous evacuation of the pancreatic stone:a case report].

A 56-year-old woman with epigastric pain was admitted to our hospital. Blood tests and abdominal computed tomography (CT) suggested acute pancreatitis. Abdominal CT revealed a pancreas divisum and stone in the minor papilla. Stone impaction was the most likely cause of the acute pancreatitis. The patient's abdominal pain promptly improved after admission. The patient was treated conservatively, and the pancreatitis resolved. Abdominal CT on the 10th day confirmed spontaneous evacuation of the pancreatic stone. This is a rare case of acute pancreatitis in a patient with pancreas divisum triggered by an impacted stone in the minor papilla, which improved after spontaneous evacuation of the pancreatic stone.

Choledochal Cyst and Pancreas Divisum: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND A choledochal cyst (CC), or biliary cyst, is a congenital or acquired anomaly of the biliary tree. Pancreas divisum (PD) is a rare congenital anomaly due to incomplete fusion of pancreatic ducts, which can complicate the clinical course of choledochal cysts. This rare combination is a surgical management challenge. This report presents the diagnosis and management of a 23-year-old woman with a combined choledochal cyst and pancreas divisum treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy. CASE REPORT This article presents the case of a 23-year-old woman who presented with severe, stabbing abdominal pain radiating to the back and epigastric tenderness and was diagnosed with pancreatitis. Initial imaging revealed a choledochal cyst, prompting further investigation with ERCP that showed concomitant PD. She was treated via pancreaticoduodenectomy. During the following 9 years, she was hospitalized over 2 dozen times for recurrent pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS This report presents a complex case of a combined choledochal cyst and pancreas divisum, which was surgically managed by pancreaticoduodenectomy. The association of CC with PD should be suspected in patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis and/or cholangitis with no identifiable cause. Surgical treatment of CC with PD depends on the classification of the CC, and complications can include recurrent pancreatitis, though prognosis is often favorable. The purpose of this manuscript is to emphasize that pancreaticoduodenectomy is unlikely to provide favorable outcomes for CC with PD, especially considering there is evidence that less extensive surgical interventions produce better outcomes.

Refractory postoperative pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer caused by incomplete pancreas divisum: a case report.

Pancreas divisum (PD) represents a prevalent congenital pancreatic variant, typically arising from the failure of fusion between the ventral and dorsal pancreatic ducts. This condition is frequently associated with recurrent pancreatitis. We herein present a case involving an incomplete PD diagnosis following the identification of a refractory postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (DP) for pancreatic cancer. A 74-year-old female patient, who had undergone laparoscopic DP for pancreatic cancer, developed a POPF accompanied by intraabdominal bleeding, necessitating urgent intervention radiology to avert life-threatening complications. Following this, intraabdominal drainage was performed through an intraoperative drainage root. Subsequent fistulography and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography unveiled the presence of an incomplete PD for the first time. Consequently, a stent was placed in the Santorini duct. However, the volume of pancreatic juice from the intraabdominal drainage tube exhibited no reduction. Despite repeated attempts to access the pancreatic duct via a guidewire through the drainage tube, these endeavors proved futile. Paradoxically, the removal of the external drainage tube led to a recurrence of intraabdominal abscess formation. Consequently, reinsertion of the drainage tube became imperative. Consideration was given to draining the abscess under endoscopic ultrasonography and performing pancreatic duct drainage. However, due to the diminution of the abscess cavity through the external fistula drainage procedure, coupled with the absence of pancreatic duct dilation and its tortuous course, it was deemed a formidable challenge. the patient necessitated a lifestyle adaptation with a permanently placed percutaneous drainage tube.

Endotherapy for Pancreas Divisum.

Pancreas divisum (PD) is a common anatomic variant of the pancreatic duct. Causal association between PD and pancreatitis has been debated for many years. Minor papilla sphincterotomy (miES) is offered in clinical practice to patients with idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis (iRAP) and PD. However, available data originate mainly from observational studies with many limitations. An ongoing international, multicenter, sham-controlled trial is evaluating the efficacy of miES in iRAP and PD. Endoscopic therapy for pain relief has limited to no benefit in patients with chronic abdominal pain or chronic pancreatitis who have PD and is not recommended.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the minor papilla with pancreas divisum: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine tumors of the minor papilla are very rare, and only 20 cases have been reported in the literature. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the minor papilla with pancreas divisum has not been reported previously, making this the first reported case. Neuroendocrine tumors of the minor papilla have been reported in association with pancreas divisum in about 50% of cases reported in the literature. We herein present our case of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the minor papilla with pancreas divisum in a 75-year-old male with a systematic literature review of the previous 20 reports of neuroendocrine tumors of the minor papilla. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old Asian man was referred to our hospital for evaluation of dilation of the main pancreatic duct noted on abdominal ultrasonography. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed a dilated dorsal pancreatic duct, which was not connected to the ventral pancreatic duct; however, it opened to the minor papilla, indicating pancreas divisum. The common bile duct had no communication with the pancreatic main duct and opened to the ampulla of Vater. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan showed a 12-mm hypervascular mass near the ampulla of Vater. Endoscopic ultrasonography showed a defined hypoechoic mass in the minor papilla with no invasion. The biopsies performed at the previous hospital found adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent a subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. The pathological diagnosis was neuroendocrine carcinoma. At the 15-year follow-up visit, the patient was doing well with no evidence of tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: In our case, because the tumor was discovered during a medical check-up relatively early in the course of disease, the patient was doing well at the 15-year follow-up visit, with no evidence of tumor recurrence. Diagnosing a tumor of the minor papilla is very difficult because of the relatively small size and submucosal location. Carcinoids and endocrine cell micronests in the minor papilla occur more frequently than generally thought. It is very important to include neuroendocrine tumors of the minor papilla in the differential diagnosis of patients with recurrent pancreatitis or pancreatitis of unknown cause, especially for patients with pancreas divisum.