Can the introduction of a 12-lead ECG help reduce mortality in those presenting with foot ulceration to multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinics? An observational evaluation of a real-world implementation pilot in England.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The risk of dying within 2 years of presentation with diabetic foot ulceration is over six times the risk of amputation, with CVD the major contributor. Using an observational evaluation of a real-world implementation pilot, we aimed to assess whether for those presenting with diabetic foot ulceration in England, introducing a 12-lead ECG into routine care followed by appropriate clinical action was associated with reduced mortality. METHODS: Between July 2014 and December 2017, ten multidisciplinary diabetic foot services in England participated in a pilot project introducing 12-lead ECGs for new attendees with foot ulceration. Inception coincided with launch of the National Diabetes Footcare Audit (NDFA), whereby all diabetic footcare services in England were invited to enter data on new attendees with foot ulceration. Poisson regression models assessed the mortality RR at 2 and 5 years following first assessment of those receiving care in a participating pilot unit vs those receiving care in any other unit in England, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, type and duration of diabetes, ulcer severity, and morbidity in the year prior to first assessment. RESULTS: Of the 3110 people recorded in the NDFA at a participating unit during the pilot, 33% (1015) were recorded as having received an ECG. A further 25,195 people recorded in the NDFA had attended another English footcare service. Unadjusted mortality in the pilot units was 16.3% (165) at 2 years and 37.4% (380) at 5 years for those who received an ECG, and 20.5% (430) and 45.2% (950), respectively, for those who did not receive an ECG. For people included in the NDFA at other units, unadjusted mortality was 20.1% (5075) and 42.6% (10,745), respectively. In the fully adjusted model, mortality was not significantly lower for those attending participating units at 2 (RR 0.93 [95% CI 0.85, 1.01]) or 5 years (RR 0.95 [95% CI 0.90, 1.01]). At participating units, mortality in those who received an ECG vs those who did not was lower at 5 years (RR 0.86 [95% CI 0.76, 0.97]), but not at 2 years (RR 0.87 [95% CI 0.72, 1.04]). Comparing just those that received an ECG with attendees at all other centres in England, mortality was lower at 5 years (RR 0.87 [95% CI 0.78, 0.96]), but not at 2 years (RR 0.86 [95% CI 0.74, 1.01]). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The evaluation confirms the high mortality seen in those presenting with diabetic foot ulceration. Overall mortality at the participating units was not significantly reduced at 2 or 5 years, with confidence intervals just crossing parity. Implementation of the 12-lead ECG into the routine care pathway proved challenging for clinical teams-overall a third of attendees had one, although some units delivered the intervention to over 60% of attendees-and the evaluation was therefore underpowered. Nonetheless, the signals of potential mortality benefit among those who had an ECG suggest that units in a position to operationalise implementation may wish to consider this. DATA AVAILABILITY: Data from the National Diabetes Audit can be requested through the National Health Service Digital Data Access Request Service process at: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/data-access-request-service-dars/dars-products-and-services/data-set-catalogue/national-diabetes-audit-nda.

Diabetic foot disease carries an intrinsic high risk of mortality and other severe outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a propensity score-matched retrospective population-based study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the association between diabetic foot disease (DFD) and the incidence of fatal and non-fatal events in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from primary-care settings. METHODS: We built a cohort of people with a first DFD episode during 2010-2015, followed up until 2018. These subjects were 1 to 1 propensity score matched to subjects with T2DM without DFD. The incidence of all-cause mortality, the occurrence of new DFD, amputations, cardiovascular diseases, or composite outcome, including all-cause mortality and/or cardiovascular events during the follow-up period, were calculated. A Cox proportional hazard analysis was conducted to evaluate the hazard ratios (HR) for different events. RESULTS: Overall, 11,117 subjects with T2DM with a first episode of DFD were compared with subjects without DFD. We observed higher incidence rates (IRs) for composite outcome (33.9 vs. 14.5 IR per 100 person-years) and a new DFD episode event (22.2 vs. 1.1 IR per 100 person-years) in the DFD group. Compared to those without DFD, those with a first episode of DFD had a higher HR for all events, with excess rates particularly for amputation and new DFD occurrence (HR: 19.4, 95% CI: 16.7-22.6, HR: 15.1, 95% CI: 13.8-16.5, respectively) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Although DFD often coexists with other risk factors, it carries an intrinsic high risk of morbidity and mortality in individuals with T2DM. DFD should be regarded as a severe complication already at its onset, as it carries a poor clinical prognosis.

Denosumab, for osteoporosis, reduces the incidence of type 2 diabetes, risk of foot ulceration and all-cause mortality in adults, compared with bisphosphonates: An analysis of real-world, cohort data, with a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the impact of denosumab on (i) the incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D), and (ii) long-term health outcomes (microvascular [neuropathy, retinopathy, nephropathy] and macrovascular [cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular accident] complications, and all-cause mortality) in patients with T2D, before (iii) combining results with prior studies using meta-analysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data in a large global federated database (TriNetX; Cambridge, MA) was conducted from 331 375 patients, without baseline T2D or cancer, prescribed either denosumab (treatment, n = 45 854) or bisphosphonates (control, n = 285 521), across 83 healthcare organizations. Propensity score matching (1:1) of confounders was undertaken that resulted in 45 851 in each cohort. Secondary analysis further evaluated the impact of denosumab on long-term health outcomes in patients with T2D. Additionally, we systematically searched prior literature that assessed the association between denosumab and T2D. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed using Cochrane-endorsed tools. RESULTS: Denosumab (vs. bisphosphonates) was associated with a lower risk of incident T2D over 5 years (hazard ratio 0.83 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.78-0.88]). Secondary analysis showed significant risk reduction in all-cause mortality (0.79 [0.72-0.87]) and foot ulceration (0.67 [0.53-0.86]). Also, pooled results from four studies (three observational, one randomized controlled trial) following meta-analysis showed a reduced relative risk (RR [95% CI]) for incident T2D in patients prescribed denosumab (0.83 [0.79-0.87]) (I2 = 10.76%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest cohort study to show that denosumab treatment is associated with a reduced RR of incident T2D, as well as an associated reduced RR of all-cause mortality and microvascular complications, findings that may influence guideline development in the treatment of osteoporosis, particularly in patients who are at a high risk of T2D.

Editor's Choice - Association of Pedal Acceleration Time With Healing and Amputation Free Survival in Patients With Ulceration and Gangrene.

OBJECTIVE: Pedal acceleration time (PAT) is a novel non-invasive perfusion measurement that may be useful in the management of patients with ulceration and gangrene. The objective of this study was to report the association between PAT and wound healing, amputation free survival (AFS), and mortality at one year. METHODS: This prospective observational study reviewed all patients who underwent PAT after presentation with ulceration or gangrene from 1 January 2020 to 30 June 2022. PAT was defined as the time (in milliseconds) from the onset of systole to the peak of systole in the mid artery. The final PAT of a limb was used to assess outcomes (presenting PAT if no revascularisation, or post-revascularisation PAT). Wound healing, major limb amputation, and death at one year were collected. Healing was assessed with Fine-Gray competing risks model, AFS via logistic regression, and survival using Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Overall, 265 patients (307 limbs) were included. The median patient age was 71 years and 74.0% (196/265) had diabetes mellitus. Patient demographics were similar among the final PAT category cohorts. Compared with a final PAT category 1, analysis of one year outcomes showed that the final PAT categories 2 - 4 had lower wound healing (category 2, hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 - 0.9, p = .012; category 3, HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08 - 0.58, p = .002; category 4, HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.34, p < .001), lower AFS (category 2, odds ratio [OR] 2.86, 95% CI 1.64 - 5.0, p < .001; category 3, OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.71 - 15.22, p = .003; category 4, OR 12.59, 95% CI 4.34 - 36.56, p < .001), and lower survival (category 2, HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.17 - 3.03, p =.009; category 3, HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.05 - 5.36, p = .039; category 4, HR 4.52, 95% CI 2.48 - 8.21, p < .001). CONCLUSION: The final PAT measurement is associated with wound healing, AFS, and death at one year. PAT may be a valuable tool to assess perfusion of the foot.

Depression as a Prognostic Factor in Lower Extremity Amputation for Diabetic Foot: Insights From a Prospective Study on Wound Healing, Infections, and Early Mortality.

This study addresses the challenges faced by diabetic patients undergoing lower extremity amputation due to diabetic foot, particularly focusing on the implications for wound healing and early mortality. The wounds at the amputation stump may necessitate multiple surgical interventions. The aim is to identify prognostic factors associated with these outcomes, shedding light on the complexities surrounding the postamputation phase. A prospective study was conducted on 39 diabetic patients who underwent lower extremity amputation due to diabetic foot between 2021 and 2022. Comprehensive preoperative data, encompassing parameters such as blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, hemoglobin A1c, albumin, protein, transferrin, ferritin levels, age, gender, body mass index, smoking habits, dialysis, revascularization, duration of surgery, and the use of tourniquet during the procedure were meticulously recorded. Additionally, cognitive performance and depression status were assessed preoperatively using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), respectively. A follow-up period of 3 months postsurgery allowed for the comparison of patients who developed infections at the amputation stump with those who did not, as well as the distinction between patients who survived and those who succumbed to mortality. The study revealed that the use of a tourniquet during surgery significantly increased the risk of infection (p = .027), and higher BDI scores were associated with increased risks of both infection (AUC = 0.814) and mortality (AUC = 0.769), with cut-off scores of 24.0 and 23.5 predicting these outcomes with high sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Additionally, lower MMSE scores were associated with increased short-term postoperative mortality. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in parameters such as complete blood count, ESR, CRP, procalcitonin, HbA1c, albumin, total protein, transferrin, ferritin levels, age, gender, BMI, smoking, dialysis, revascularization, and surgery duration. This investigation highlights the significance of considering tourniquet usage during amputation, preoperative depression status, and cognitive function in patients who undergo amputation due to diabetic foot. The use of a tourniquet during surgery is a significant risk factor for infection, and elevated BDI scores are strong predictors of both infection and mortality in patients undergoing amputations. The findings underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary neuropsychiatric evaluation preoperatively to enhance patient care and outcomes.

Above-ankle Reamputation and Mortality following Transmetatarsal Amputation in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Peripheral Artery Disease.

The risk of above-ankle reamputation following a transmetatarsal amputation is around 30%. Patient selection may be crucial to achieve good outcomes, and to avoid futile operations and suffering. We are aware of no previous comparison between the two largest patient groups that undergo lower extremity amputations: patients with diabetes, and patients with non-diabetic peripheral artery disease. Patients with diabetes or nondiabetic peripheral artery disease who had undergone a transmetatarsal amputation from 2004 to 2018 at our institution were included. Patient characteristics and perioperative details were analyzed retrospectively. Subjects with diabetes were compared with subjects with nondiabetic peripheral artery disease regarding above-ankle reamputation, reamputation level, and mortality. Five-hundred-and-sixty transmetatarsal amputations in 513 subjects were included. The majority of transmetatarsal amputations (86%) occurred in diabetic subjects. Subjects with non-diabetic PAD had a higher risk of above-ankle reamputation (p = .008), and death (p < .001). At the time of data collection, only multiple-ray amputation (vs. single-ray) was an independent risk factor for above-ankle reamputation. Only age, medical comorbidity in general, and chronic heart failure were independent risk factors of death. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report marked differences in above-ankle reamputation rates and mortality following transmetatarsal amputation, comparing diabetics with non-diabetic patients with peripheral artery disease. However, the differences may be attributed to non-diabetics being older, having more medical comorbidities, and having more advanced foot ulcers at the time of transmetatarsal amputation. In patients exhibiting several of these risk factors, transmetatarsal amputation may be futile.

Machine Learning Algorithm-Aided Determination of Predictors of Mortality from Diabetic Foot Sepsis at a Regional Hospital in South Africa During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background and Objectives: Diabetic foot sepsis (DFS) accounts for approximately 60% of hospital admissions in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Individuals with DM are at risk of severe COVID-19. This study investigated factors associated with major amputation and mortality in patients admitted with DFS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: Demographic information, COVID-19 and HIV status, clinical findings, laboratory results, treatment and outcome from records of patients with diabetic foot sepsis, were collected and analysed. Supervised machine learning algorithms were used to compare their ability to predict mortality due to diabetic foot sepsis. Results: Overall, 114 records were found and 57.9% (66/114) were of male patients. The mean age of the patients was 55.7 (14) years and 47.4% (54/114) and 36% (41/114) tested positive for COVID-19 and HIV, respectively. The median c-reactive protein was 168 mg/dl, urea 7.8 mmol/L and creatinine 92 µmol/L. The mean potassium level was 4.8 ± 0.9 mmol, and glycosylated haemoglobin 11.2 ± 3%. The main outcomes included major amputation in 69.3% (79/114) and mortality of 37.7% (43/114) died. AI. The levels of potassium, urea, creatinine and HbA1c were significantly higher in the deceased. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in the rate of major amputation and mortality in patients with DFS. The in-hospital mortality was higher in patients above 60 years of age who tested positive for COVID-19. The Random Forest algorithm of ML can be highly effective in predicting major amputation and death in patients with DFS.

Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review.

Importance: Approximately 18.6 million people worldwide are affected by a diabetic foot ulcer each year, including 1.6 million people in the United States. These ulcers precede 80% of lower extremity amputations among people diagnosed with diabetes and are associated with an increased risk of death. Observations: Neurological, vascular, and biomechanical factors contribute to diabetic foot ulceration. Approximately 50% to 60% of ulcers become infected, and about 20% of moderate to severe infections lead to lower extremity amputations. The 5-year mortality rate for individuals with a diabetic foot ulcer is approximately 30%, exceeding 70% for those with a major amputation. The mortality rate for people with diabetic foot ulcers is 231 deaths per 1000 person-years, compared with 182 deaths per 1000 person-years in people with diabetes without foot ulcers. People who are Black, Hispanic, or Native American and people with low socioeconomic status have higher rates of diabetic foot ulcer and subsequent amputation compared with White people. Classifying ulcers based on the degree of tissue loss, ischemia, and infection can help identify risk of limb-threatening disease. Several interventions reduce risk of ulcers compared with usual care, such as pressure-relieving footwear (13.3% vs 25.4%; relative risk, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.84), foot skin measurements with off-loading when hot spots (ie, greater than 2 °C difference between the affected foot and the unaffected foot) are found (18.7% vs 30.8%; relative risk, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.84), and treatment of preulcer signs. Surgical debridement, reducing pressure from weight bearing on the ulcer, and treating lower extremity ischemia and foot infection are first-line therapies for diabetic foot ulcers. Randomized clinical trials support treatments to accelerate wound healing and culture-directed oral antibiotics for localized osteomyelitis. Multidisciplinary care, typically consisting of podiatrists, infectious disease specialists, and vascular surgeons, in close collaboration with primary care clinicians, is associated with lower major amputation rates relative to usual care (3.2% vs 4.4%; odds ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32-0.51). Approximately 30% to 40% of diabetic foot ulcers heal at 12 weeks, and recurrence after healing is estimated to be 42% at 1 year and 65% at 5 years. Conclusions and Relevance: Diabetic foot ulcers affect approximately 18.6 million people worldwide each year and are associated with increased rates of amputation and death. Surgical debridement, reducing pressure from weight bearing, treating lower extremity ischemia and foot infection, and early referral for multidisciplinary care are first-line therapies for diabetic foot ulcers.

A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Risk Prediction Tools Used to Estimate Mortality, Morbidity, and Other Outcomes Following Major Lower Limb Amputation.

OBJECTIVE: The decision to undertake a major lower limb amputation can be complex. This review evaluates the performance of risk prediction tools in estimating mortality, morbidity, and other outcomes following amputation. METHODS: A systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies reporting on risk prediction tools that predict outcomes following amputation. Outcome measures included the accuracy of the risk tool in predicting a range of post-operative complications, including mortality (both short and long term), peri-operative morbidity, need for re-amputation, and ambulation success. A narrative synthesis was performed in accordance with the Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis In Systematic Reviews. RESULTS: The search identified 518 database records. Twelve observational studies, evaluating 13 risk prediction tools in a total cohort of 61 099 amputations, were included. One study performed external validation of an existing risk prediction tool, while all other studies developed novel tools or modified pre-existing generic calculators. Two studies conducted external validation of the novel/modified tools. Nine tools provided risk estimations for mortality, two tools provided predictions for post-operative morbidity, two for likelihood of ambulation, and one for re-amputation to the same or higher level. Most mortality prediction tools demonstrated acceptable discrimination performance with C statistic values ranging from 0.65 to 0.81. Tools estimating the risk of post-operative complications (0.65 - 0.74) and necessity for re-amputation (0.72) also performed acceptably. The Blatchford Allman Russell tool demonstrated outstanding discrimination for predicting functional mobility outcomes post-amputation (0.94). Overall, most studies were at high risk of bias with poor external validity. CONCLUSION: This review identified several risk prediction tools that demonstrate acceptable to outstanding discrimination for objectively predicting an array of important post-operative outcomes. However, the methodological quality of some studies was poor, external validation studies are generally lacking, and there are no tools predicting other important outcomes, especially quality of life.

Diabetic foot ulcer management in a multidisciplinary foot centre: one-year healing, amputation and mortality rate.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rates of healing, major amputation and mortality after 12 months in patients with a new diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and their care in a French diabetic foot service (DFS). METHOD: A prospective single-centre study including patients from March 2009 to December 2010. The length of time to healing, minor amputation, major amputation and mortality rate after inclusion were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Some 347 patients were included (3% lost to follow-up), with a median follow-up (IQR) of 19 (12-24) months. The mean (SD) age was 65±12 years, 68% were male, and the median duration of the ulcer was 49 (19-120) days. Complications of the DFU were ischaemia (70%), infection (55%) and osteomyelitis (47%). Of the patients, 50% were inpatients in the DFS at inclusion (median duration of hospitalisation 26 (15-41) days). The rate of healing at one year was 67% (95% confidence interval (CI): 61-72); of major amputation 10% (95% CI: 7-17); of minor amputation 19% (95% CI: 14-25), and the death rate was 9% (95% CI: 7-13). Using an adjusted hazard ratio, the predictive factors of healing were perfusion and the area of the wound. The risk factors for a major amputation were active smoking and osteomyelitis. The risk factors for mortality were perfusion and age. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the need to treat DFUs rapidly, in a multidisciplinary DFS.

Isolated low toe-brachial index is associated with increased mortality and morbidity: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the prognostic impact of perfusion assessments including ankle-brachial Index (ABI) and toe-brachial Index (TBI) on survival of patients who present with diabetic foot ulceration and to analyse clinical outcomes when patients are categorised into three levels of limb ischaemia. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients presenting with foot ulceration. Patients continued with their standard of care, after having baseline assessments of limb perfusion. Patients were retrospectively categorised into three groups according to baseline ABI and TBI: Group 1 (n=31) non-ischaemic (TBI≥0.75, ABI≥0.9), Group 2 (n=67) isolated low TBI with foot ischaemia (TBI<0.75, ABI≥0.90) and Group 3 (n=30) foot-leg ischaemia (TBI<0.75, ABI<0.90). RESULTS: A total of 128 patients took part in the study. Low TBI was associated with a significant decrease in patient survival (42±20 versus 51±16 months, p=0.011). There was a progressive and significant decline in mean patient survival time (51±16 versus 44±20 versus 39±22 months, respectively, for ANOVA across the three groups, p=0.04). Patients with isolated low TBI had angioplasty and bypass at a rate similar to that of patients in Group 3 (low ABI and low TBI). The proportion of angioplasties was significantly higher in the isolated low TBI (19.4% (13/67) versus the non-ischaemic 3.2% (1/31), p=0.033). Such revascularisation resulted in ulcer healing within the foot ischaemic group that was similar to the non-ischaemic group (68% versus 60% over 12 months, p=0.454). CONCLUSION: Regardless of ABI level, measurement of TBI identifies patients with isolated low TBI who require specialised care pathways and revascularisation to achieve ulcer healing that is similar to non-ischaemic patients.

A meta-analysis of mortality after minor amputation among patients with diabetes and/or peripheral vascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: Foot complications in patients with diabetes or peripheral artery disease (PAD) are serious events in the life of these patients that often lead to amputations and mortality. No evidence synthesis has been reported on the mortality rates after minor lower extremity amputation; thus, a quantitative evidence synthesis was needed. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies that had reported the survival or mortality rates after a minor LEA. The studies were required to include one or more of the following primary outcomes: mortality rate at 30 days, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, 6 to 7 years, or 8 to 9 years. The secondary outcomes were the mortality rates according to the anatomic location of the amputation in the foot and the independent risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies with 17,325 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The meta-analytical results of the mortality rates were as follows: 3.5% at 1 month, 20% at 1 year, 28% at 3 years, 44.1% at 5 years, 51.3% at 6 to 7 years, and 58.5% at 8 to 9 years. From these studies of diabetic patients, age was the most consistent independent risk factor, followed by chronic kidney disease, PAD, and coronary artery disease. One study of patients with PAD had reported diabetes as an independent risk factor for mortality. The subgroup analysis of the four studies reporting the outcomes of patients with PAD showed greater 3- and 5-year mortality rates compared with the overall and "diabetic" results. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after minor amputation for patients with diabetes and/or PAD was found to be very high. Compared with the reported cancer data, survival was worse than that for many cancers. Just as in the case of major amputations, minor amputations should be considered a pivotal event in the life of these patients.

Short-term contemporary outcomes for staged versus primary lower limb amputation in diabetic foot disease.

BACKGROUND: Major lower extremity amputations remain among the most common procedures performed by vascular surgeons in patients with diabetes and its associated peripheral vascular disease. After major amputation, this population commonly suffers from high readmission rates, increased wound complications, and conversion to more proximal major amputations. These events impact quality in terms of cost, resources, and subjective quality of life. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes between primary lower extremity above-ankle amputations (primary amputation [PA]) and staged ankle guillotine amputations followed by interval formalization to an above-ankle amputation (staged amputation [SA]) for nonsalvageable infected diabetic foot disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of all de novo major lower extremity amputations performed by the vascular surgery service at a single institution between January 2014 and March 2017 was performed. Inclusion criteria were diabetic patients with foot gangrene who underwent a major de novo above- or below-knee amputation. Amputations for trauma, acute limb ischemia, or malignancy were excluded. Per institutional practice, SA was performed for uncontrolled infection and/or infection with uncontrolled diabetes, and PA was performed in the absence of active infection and in stable diabetes. The primary outcome measure was 30-day freedom from conversion to a higher level amputation. Secondary outcome measures were 30-day stump complications, 30-day readmissions, 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-eight percent were male, 18% were active smokers, 30% had end-stage renal disease, and 22% had congestive heart failure. Sixty-one patients underwent SA, and 55 patients underwent PA. The two cohorts were well-matched by demographics and comorbidities. Consistent with the institutional practice, 57% of SA patients met two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria at presentation compared with 24% of PA patients (P = .0003). There were no 30-day mortalities. There was no significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events between the groups (2% vs 4%; SA vs PA, respectively; P = .6). The average length of stay did not significantly differ between SA and PA (mean of 14 ± 8 days vs 11 ± 11 days; P = .1). SA patients had a lower rate of 30-day readmission (7% vs 27%; P = .005) and 30-day unplanned conversion to higher level amputation (2% vs 13%; P = .026) compared with PA patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of infected diabetic foot disease, a staged lower extremity amputation achieves quality outcomes superior to a one-stage amputation, despite the former cohort's greater illness acuity level. SA should be considered in all diabetic patients presenting with active foot infection.

Predictors of intra-hospital mortality in patients with diabetic foot ulcers in Nigeria: data from the MEDFUN study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are associated with high morbidity and mortality globally. Mortality in patients hospitalized for DFU in Nigeria is unacceptably high. This study was undertaken to determine factors that predict mortality in patients hospitalized for DFU in Nigeria. METHODS: The current study was part of Multi-centre Evaluation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer in Nigeria (MEDFUN), an observational study conducted in six tertiary healthcare institutions across the 6 geopolitical zones of Nigeria. Consecutive type 1 or 2 diabetic patients hospitalized for DFU who consented to participate were recruited and subjected to relevant clinical, biochemical, and radiological assessments and multidisciplinary care until discharge or death. Data for type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients were expunged from current mortality analysis due to their small number. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-three type 2 DM subjects with mean age and mean duration of DM of 57.2 ± 11.4 years and 8.7 ± 5.8 years respectively participated in this study. The median duration of ulcers was 39 days with a range of 28 to 54 days and the majority (79.9%) presented with advanced ulcers of at least Wagner grade 3. Mortality of 21.4% was recorded in the study, with the highest mortality observed among subjects with Wagner grade 5. Variables significantly associated with mortality with their respective p values were DM duration more than 120 months (p 0.005), ulcer duration > 1 month (p 0.020), ulcer severity of Wagner grade 3 and above (p 0.001), peripheral arterial disease (p 0.005), proteinuria (p < 0.001), positive blood cultures (p < 0.001), low HDL (p < 0.001), shock at presentation (p < 0.001), cardiac failure (p 0.027), and renal impairment (p < 0.001). On Multivariate regression analysis, presence of bacteraemia (OR 5.053; 95% CI 2.572-9.428) and renal impairment (OR 2.838; 95% CI 1.349-5.971) were significantly predictive of mortality independent of other variables. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed high intra-hospital mortality among patients with DFU, with the majority of deaths occurring among those with advanced ulcers, bacteraemia, cardiac failure, and renal impairment. Prompt attention to these factors might help improve survival from DFU in Nigeria.

The economic burden of inpatient diabetic foot ulcers in Toronto, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic foot ulcer, which often leads to lower limb amputation, is a devastating complication of diabetes that is a major burden on patients and the healthcare system. The main objective of this study is to determine the economic burden of diabetic foot ulcer-related care. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study of all diabetic foot ulcer patients admitted to general internal medicine wards at seven hospitals in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada from 2010 to 2015, using the GEMINI database. We compared the mean costs of care per patient for diabetic foot ulcer-related admissions, admissions for other diabetes-related complications, and admissions for the top five most costly general internal medicine conditions, using the Ontario Case Costing Initiative. Regression models were used to determine adjusted estimates of cost per patient. Propensity-score matched analyses were performed as sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Our study cohort comprised of 557 diabetic foot ulcer patients; 2939 non-diabetic foot ulcer diabetes patients; and 23,656 patients with the top 5 most costly general internal medicine conditions. Diabetic foot ulcer admissions incurred the highest mean cost per patient ($22,754) when compared to admissions with non-diabetic foot ulcer diabetes ($8,350) and the top five most costly conditions ($10,169). Using adjusted linear regression, diabetic foot ulcer admissions demonstrated a 49.6% greater mean cost of care than non-diabetic foot ulcer-related diabetes admissions (95% CI 1.14-1.58), and a 25.6% greater mean cost than the top five most costly conditions (95% CI 1.17-1.34). Propensity-scored matched analyses confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: Diabetic foot ulcer patients incur significantly higher costs of care when compared to admissions with non-diabetic foot ulcer-related diabetes patients, and the top five most costly general internal medicine conditions.

Diabetic foot ulcer management in a multidisciplinary foot centre: one-year healing, amputation and mortality rate.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rates of healing, major amputation and mortality after 12 months in patients with a new diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) and their care in a French diabetic foot service (DFS). METHOD: A prospective single-centre study including patients from March 2009 to December 2010. The length of time to healing, minor amputation, major amputation and mortality rate after inclusion were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Some 347 patients were included (3% lost to follow-up), with a median follow-up (IQR) of 19 (12-24) months. The mean (SD) age was 65±12 years, 68% were male, and the median duration of the ulcer was 49 (19-120) days. Complications of the DFU were ischaemia (70%), infection (55%) and osteomyelitis (47%). Of the patients, 50% were inpatients in the DFS at inclusion (median duration of hospitalisation 26 (15-41) days). The rate of healing at one year was 67% (95% confidence interval (CI): 61-72); of major amputation 10% (95% CI: 7-17); of minor amputation 19% (95% CI: 14-25), and the death rate was 9% (95% CI: 7-13). Using an adjusted hazard ratio, the predictive factors of healing were perfusion and the area of the wound. The risk factors for a major amputation were active smoking and osteomyelitis. The risk factors for mortality were perfusion and age. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the need to treat DFUs rapidly, in a multidisciplinary DFS.

Evaluation of mortality risk factors in diabetic foot infections.

Identifying risk factors for mortality is crucial in the management of diabetic foot syndrome. We aimed to evaluate risk factors for mortality in patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI). A retrospective chart review was conducted on 401 patients from 2010 through 2019. Our primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Patients were divided into two groups according to the outcome (survival or death). Clinical data were compared between the two groups statistically. A total of 401 patients were enrolled in the study, 280 (69.8%) of them were male and the mean age was 59.6 ± 11.1 years. The mean follow-up period was 23.7 ± 22.9 months. In-hospital mortality rate was 3%. Univariate analysis indicated that ischaemic wound (P = .023), hindfoot infection (P = .038), whole foot infection (P = .010), peripheral arterial disease (P = .024), high leucocyte levels (>12 040 K/µL) (P = .001), high thrombocyte levels (>378 000 K/µL) (P < 0.001), high C-reactive protein levels (>8.81 mg/dL) (P = .022), and polymicrobial growth in deep tissue culture (P = .041) were significant parameters in predicting mortality. In multivariate analysis, peripheral arterial disease (odds ratio [OR]: 13.430, 95% confidence interval [Cl]: 1.129-59.692; P = .040), high thrombocyte levels (OR: 1.000, 95% Cl: 1.000-1.000; P = .022), and polymicrobial growth in deep tissue culture (OR: 7.790, 95% Cl: 1.592-38.118; P = .011) were independent risk factors for mortality. In conclusion, peripheral arterial disease, high thrombocyte levels, and polymicrobial growth in deep tissue culture were independent risk factors for mortality in DFI.

Multidisciplinary clinics reduce treatment costs and improve patient outcomes in diabetic foot disease.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetic foot disease poses a significant and rising financial burden on health care systems worldwide. This study investigated the effect of a new multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic (MDDFC) in a large tertiary hospital on patient outcomes and treatment cost. METHODS: Patients' records were retrospectively reviewed to identify all patients who had been managed in a new MDDFC between July 2014 and July 2017. The wound episode-the period from initial presentation to the achievement of a final wound outcome-was identified, and all relevant inpatient and outpatient costs were extracted using a fully absorbed activity-based costing methodology. Risk factor, treatment, outcome, and costing data for this cohort were compared with a group of patients with diabetic foot wounds who had been managed in the same hospital before the advent of the MDDFC using a generalized linear mixed model. RESULTS: The MDDFC and pre-MDDFC cohorts included 73 patients with 80 wound episodes and 225 patients with 265 wound episodes, respectively. Compared with the pre-MDDFC cohort, the MDDFC group had fewer inpatient admissions (1.56 vs 2.64; P ≤ .001). MDDFC patients had a lower major amputation rate (3.8% vs 27.5%; P ≤ .001), a lower mortality rate (7.5% vs 19.2%; P ≤ .05), and a higher rate of minor amputation (53.8% vs 31.7%; P ≤ .01). No statistically significant difference was noted in the rate of excisional débridement, skin graft, and open or endovascular revascularization. In the MDDFC cohort, the median total cost, inpatient cost, and outpatient cost per wound episode was New Zealand dollars (NZD) 22,407.465 (U.S. dollars [USD] 17,253.74), NZD 21,638.93 (USD 16,661.97), and NZD 691.915 (USD 532.77), respectively. The MDDFC to pre-MDDFC wound episode total cost ratio was 0.7586 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to compare the cost and treatment outcomes of diabetic foot patients treated in a large tertiary hospital before and after the introduction of an MDDFC. The results show that an MDDFC improves patient outcomes and reduces the cost of treatment. MDDFCs should be adopted as the standard of care for diabetic foot patients.

Utility of skin perfusion pressure values with the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification system.

OBJECTIVE: The addition of skin perfusion pressure (SPP) might enhance the predictive value of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the SPP for each WIfI classification stage among patients with foot wounds by cross-referencing the results of prospectively monitored limb outcomes and to derive the SPP criteria that could be combined with other measurements to grade ischemia for the WIfI classification. METHODS: From July 2015 to June 2017, patients with foot wounds that met the WIfI classification criteria were prospectively enrolled. We assessed the limbs using the WIfI ischemia grade without measuring the transcutaneous oxygen pressure but measured the SPP. After monitoring for 1 year, the predictability of the WIfI stages was analyzed according to whether the limbs had not healed (unchanged or worsened wounds, minor or major amputation, all-cause death) or had healed (improved or healed wounds) by comparing stages 1 and 2 with stages 3 and 4. We also statistically analyzed the SPP values that could be the boundary values between each ischemia grade and reevaluated the predictability of the WIfI stages with the boundary SPP values. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 91 limbs for 76 patients (mean age, 70.5 ± 12.0 years). The mean SPP values stratified by ischemia grade 0 to 3 were 52.1, 41.1, 27.1, and 18.8 mm Hg, respectively (an SPP of <30 mm Hg indicates severe ischemia). After monitoring for 1 year, 19 of 48 limbs in stage 1 and 2 and 35 of 43 in stage 3 and 4 were in the nonhealed group and 29 limbs in stage 1 and 2 and 8 limbs in stage 3 and 4 were in the healed group. The SPP boundary values between each ischemia (I) grade were calculated as 45 mm Hg for I-0/I-1, 35 for I-1/I-2, and 25 for I-2/I-3. When jointly using the boundary SPP values, the ischemia grade changed for 23 limbs, altering the distribution of the WIfI stages and limb outcomes: 11 of 38 limbs in stage 1 and 2 and 43 of 53 in stage 3 and 4 were transferred to the nonhealed group. The sensitivity, efficiency, and negative predictive value of WIfI staging improved when staging with SPP: from 65% to 80%, 70% to 77%, and 60% to 71%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SPP boundary values that could be used with ischemia grade in the WIfI classification were identified as 45, 35, and 25 mm Hg. The addition of SPP could improve the accuracy of the evaluation.

Mortality prediction following non-traumatic amputation of the lower extremity.

BACKGROUND: Patients who undergo lower extremity amputation secondary to the complications of diabetes or peripheral artery disease have poor long-term survival. Providing patients and surgeons with individual-patient, rather than population, survival estimates provides them with important information to make individualized treatment decisions. METHODS: Patients with peripheral artery disease and/or diabetes undergoing their first unilateral transmetatarsal, transtibial or transfemoral amputation were identified in the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database. Stepdown logistic regression was used to develop a 1-year mortality risk prediction model from a list of 33 candidate predictors using data from three of five Department of Veterans Affairs national geographical regions. External geographical validation was performed using data from the remaining two regions. Calibration and discrimination were assessed in the development and validation samples. RESULTS: The development sample included 5028 patients and the validation sample 2140. The final mortality prediction model (AMPREDICT-Mortality) included amputation level, age, BMI, race, functional status, congestive heart failure, dialysis, blood urea nitrogen level, and white blood cell and platelet counts. The model fit in the validation sample was good. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the validation sample was 0·76 and Cox calibration regression indicated excellent calibration (slope 0·96, 95 per cent c.i. 0·85 to 1·06; intercept 0·02, 95 per cent c.i. -0·12 to 0·17). Given the external validation characteristics, the development and validation samples were combined, giving a total sample of 7168. CONCLUSION: The AMPREDICT-Mortality prediction model is a validated parsimonious model that can be used to inform the 1-year mortality risk following non-traumatic lower extremity amputation of patients with peripheral artery disease or diabetes.