Changes in Home Births by Race and Hispanic Origin and State of Residence of Mother:United States, 2019-2020 and 2020- 2021.

Objectives-This report describes changes between 2020 and 2021 in the percentage of home births by month, race and Hispanic origin, and state of residence of the mother, and makes comparisons with changes occurring between 2019 and 2020.

Changes in attitudes to childbirth in modern times illustrated over three generations in Iraq.

OBJECTIVE: To describe changes in attitudes and expectations of labor over the previous six decades, comparing the Iraqi generation who labored at home without medical assistance with their descendants. STUDY DESIGN: We used semi-structured telephone interviews with 22 women across three generations of one extended family living and giving birth in Iraq between the 1950s and the 2010s. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using open, axial, and selective coding. RESULTS: Each generation experienced a paradigm shift in childbirth, from exclusive home births to hospital-directed maternity care, to a trend that favors planned cesarean birth, driven by generation-specific changes in outlook. Emerging themes included social influences, changing technology, and medical professionals' recommendations; all of these affected attitudes toward childbirth and pregnancy. There were generational disconnects in perceptions concerning the reasons childbirth has changed over the past 60 years, with the youngest generation citing wider pressures regarding body image and marital relationships as two of the factors affecting preferences in childbirth options. CONCLUSIONS: Societal changes and availability of healthcare services affect women's choices and experiences of childbirth. To be successful, efforts to improve women's experiences in labor, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes, must consider these wider sociocultural issues.

Cost minimisation analyses of birth care in low-risk women in Norway: a comparison between planned home birth and birth in a standard obstetric unit.

BACKGROUND: Evidence exists that planned home births for low-risk women in settings in which they have access to hospital transfer if needed are safe. The costs of planned home births, compared to low-risk births in obstetric units, are not clear. The aim of this study was to compare costs associated with hospital births versus home births under different home birth organizations. METHODS: We performed a cost minimisation analysis (CMA) based on decision-analytic modelling while assuming that health outcomes were not affected by place of birth. Estimations of resource use were mainly based on three existing Norwegian datasets: (1) women with planned home births (n = 354), (2) women with planned home births (n = 482) of which 63 were transferred to a hospital, and (3) women with planned births in a hospital (n = 1550). RESULTS: Planned home birth costs 45.9% (credibility interval [CrI] 39.1-54.2) of a low-risk birth at a hospital. For planned home birth, the birth was the costliest activity (32.1%). The costs for planned home birth were estimated to be €1872 (CrI 1694-2071) and included hospitalisations for some. Costs for only those with actual home birth was €1353 (CrI 1244-1469). Costs of a birth, including possible birth-related complications, in low-risk women in a hospital was €4077 (CrI 3575-4615). When including the costs of being on call for one woman at a time, a planned home birth costs €5,531 (CrI 5,171-5,906), which is 135.7% (CrI 117.7-156.8) of low-risk births at a hospital. When organizing midwives in the on call teams for multiple women at a time, a planned home birth costs € 2,842 (CrI 2,647-3,053), which is 69.7% (CrI 60.3-80.9) of a low-risk birth in a hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Home birth can be cost-effective if the midwives who facilitate home births are organised into larger groups, or they work for hospitals that also facilitate home births. A model in which midwives work separately or in pairs to assist with a home birth and are on call for one birth at a time may not be cost-effective.

Predictors of planned home birth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To determine how demographic and clinical predictors of home birth have changed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. METHODS: Using National Vital Statistics birth certificate data, a retrospective population-based cohort study was performed with planned home births and hospital births among women age ≥18 years during calendar years 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2021 (pandemic-era). Birth location (planned home birth vs. hospital birth) was analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression, systematically examining the interaction of each demographic and clinical covariate with study year. RESULTS: After exclusions, a total of 6,087,768 birth records were retained for analysis, with the proportion of home births increasing from 0.82 % in 2019 to 1.24 % in 2021 (p<0.001). In the final multivariable logistic regression model of planned home birth, five demographic variables retained a statistically significant interaction with year: race and ethnicity, age, educational attainment, parity, and WIC participation. In each case, demographic differences between those having planned home births and hospital births became smaller (odds ratios closer to 1) in 2021 compared to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Planned home births increased by more than 50 % during the pandemic, with greater socioeconomic diversity in the pandemic-era home birth cohort. The presence of clinical risk factors remained a strong predictor of hospital birth, with no evidence that pandemic-era home births had a higher clinical risk profile as compared to the pre-pandemic period.

Why do women choose home births.

In recent years, the US has seen a significant rise in the rate of planned home births, with a 60 % increase from 2016 to 2023, reaching a total of 46,918. This trend positions the US as the leading developed country in terms of home birth prevalence. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) suggests stringent criteria for selecting candidates for home births, but these guidelines have not been adopted by home birth midwives leading to poor outcomes including increased rates of neonatal morbidity and mortality. This paper explores the motivations behind choosing home births in the US despite the known risks. Studies highlight factors such as the desire for a more natural birth experience, previous negative hospital experiences, and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceptions of hospital safety. We provide new insights into why women choose home births by incorporating insights from Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman's theories on decision-making, suggesting that cognitive biases may significantly influence these decisions. Kahneman's work provides a framework for understanding how biases and heuristics can lead to the underestimation of risks and overemphasis on personal birth experiences. We also provide recommendations ("nudges according to Richard Thaler") to help ensure women have access to clear, balanced information about home births. The development of this publication was assisted by OpenAI's ChatGPT-4, which facilitated the synthesis of literature, interpretation of data, and manuscript drafting. This collaboration underscores the potential of integrating advanced computational tools in academic research, enhancing the efficiency and depth of our analyses.

Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Genetic Counselors and Genetic Testing Among Certified Professional Midwives in Vermont: A Modified Grounded Theory Study.

Increasingly, pregnant people in the United States are choosing to give at birth at home, and certified professional midwives (CPMs) often attend these births. Care by midwives, including home birth midwives, has the potential to decrease unnecessary medical interventions and their associated health care costs, as well as to improve maternal satisfaction with care. However, lack of integration into the health care system affects the ability of CPMs to access standard medications and testing for their clients, including prenatal screening. Genetics and genomics are now a routine part of prenatal screening, and genetic testing can contribute to identifying candidates for planned home birth. However, research on genetics and midwifery care has not, to date, included the subset of midwives who attend the majority of planned home births, CPMs. The purpose of this study was to examine CPMs' access to, and perspectives on, one aspect of prenatal care, genetic counselors and genetic counseling services. Using semi-structured interviews and a modified grounded theory approach to narrative analysis, we identified three key themes: (1) systems-level issues with accessing information about genetic counseling and genetic testing; (2) practice-level patterns in information delivery and self-awareness about knowledge limitations; and (3) client-level concerns about the value of genetic testing relative to difficulties with access and stress caused by the information. The results of this study can be used to develop decision aids that include information about genetic testing and genetic counseling access for pregnant people intending home births in the United States.

Home Birth in the United States: An Evidence-Based Ethical Analysis.

AbstractThe assumption in current U.S. mainstream medicine is that birthing requires hospitalization. In fact, while the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports the right of every birthing person to make a medically informed decision about their delivery, they do not recommend home birth owing to data indicating greater neonatal morbidity and mortality. In this article, we examine the evidence surrounding home birth in the United States and its current limitations, as well as the ethical considerations around birth setting.

Circumstances leading to home childbirths among women living in Winterveldt, Tshwane Municipality of South Africa.

Childbirth complications, which may include maternal and perinatal mortality are common among women giving birth at home compared to those giving birth at health care facilities. Increasing access to childbirth in health care facilities improves the maternal and perinatal health outcomes for both the mother and child. There are however reported cases of home childbirth and decreasing numbers of health care facilities' births in developing countries. The researchers identified an increase in number of babies born before arrival in several health care facilities and therefore explored this phenomenon in order to understand circumstances leading to this practice. The findings of the study have a potential to inform interventions and strategies to strengthen community health education and engagement on maternal and child health issues. Information gathered through this study will also be important in informing decision making on prioritization of key interventions to incorporate Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) services in reproductive health care. An exploratory descriptive qualitative study was used to conduct in-depth interviews amongst women of childbearing age living in a semi urban area of the Tshwane municipality in South Africa. The sample of this study was made of 21 purposively selected women who had experienced home childbirth. Thematic content analysis was used for data analysis. Many women made a choice to give birth at home due to religious and cultural beliefs. However, some women wished to give birth in a health care facility but due to unintentional factors such as lack of transport, failure to identify labour pains, and fast labour; they ended up giving birth at home. Some of the women indicated harsh treatment in health care facilities compared to the pleasant birthing experience at home as reasons for opting for home childbirth.

Les complications de l'accouchement, qui peuvent inclure la mortalité maternelle et périnatale, sont fréquentes chez les femmes qui accouchent à domicile par rapport à celles qui accouchent dans des établissements de soins de santé. L'amélioration de l'accès à l'accouchement dans les établissements de soins de santé améliore les résultats de santé maternelle et périnatale, tant pour la mère que pour l'enfant. Des cas d'accouchements à domicile ont cependant été signalés et le nombre d'accouchements dans les établissements de santé a diminué dans les pays en développement. Les chercheurs ont identifié une augmentation du nombre de bébés nés avant leur arrivée dans plusieurs établissements de santé et ont donc exploré ce phénomène afin de comprendre les circonstances ayant conduit à cette pratique. Les résultats de l'étude ont le potentiel d'éclairer les interventions et les stratégies visant à renforcer l'éducation sanitaire communautaire et l'engagement sur les questions de santé maternelle et infantile. Les informations recueillies dans le cadre de cette étude seront également importantes pour éclairer la prise de décision sur la priorisation des interventions clés pour intégrer les services d'accoucheuses traditionnelles (AT) dans les soins de santé reproductive. Une étude qualitative descriptive exploratoire a été utilisée pour mener des entretiens approfondis auprès de femmes en âge de procréer vivant dans une zone semi-urbaine de la municipalité de Tshwane en Afrique du Sud. L'échantillon de cette étude était composé de 21 femmes sélectionnées à dessein qui avaient accouché à domicile. L'analyse du contenu thématique a été utilisée pour l'analyse des données. De nombreuses femmes ont choisi d'accoucher à la maison en raison de leurs croyances religieuses et culturelles. Cependant, certaines femmes souhaitaient accoucher dans un établissement de santé, mais en raison de facteurs involontaires tels que le manque de transport, l'incapacité d'identifier les douleurs de l'accouchement et la rapidité du travail ; elles ont fini par accoucher à la maison. Certaines femmes ont indiqué que les traitements sévères dans les établissements de santé, comparés à l'expérience agréable de l'accouchement à la maison, étaient les raisons pour lesquelles elles avaient opté pour l'accouchement à domicile.

Fluid modernities: the birthing pool in late twentieth-century Britain.

Birthing pools are a common feature of maternity units across Europe and North America, and in home birth practice. Despite their prevalence and popularity, these blue or white, often bulky plastic objects have received minimal empirical or theoretical analysis. This article attends to the emergence, design and meaning of such birthing pools, with a focus on the UK in the 1980s and 1990s. Across spheres of media, political and everyday debate, the pools characterise the paradoxes of 'modern maternity': they are 'fluidly' timeless and new, natural and medical, homely and unusual, safe and risky. Beyond exploring the contradictions of 'modern maternity', we also make two key interventions. First, we contend that modern maternity has substantially expanded in recent decades to hold and include additional ideas about comfort and experience. Second, we flag the culturally specific notions of 'modernity' at play in modern births: the popularity of the birthing pool was typically among white, middle-class women. We argue that birthing pools have had an impact at a critical moment in birthing people's care, and we map out the uneven and unjust terrains through which they have assumed cultural and medical prominence.

Changes in Home Births by Race and Hispanic Origin and State of Residence of Mother: United States, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020.

Objectives-This report describes changes between 2019 and 2020 in the percentage of U.S. home births by month, race and Hispanic origin, and state of residence of the mother and makes comparisons with changes occurring between 2018 and 2019.

The impact of birth settings on pregnancy outcomes in the United States.

In the United States, 98.3% of patients give birth in hospitals, 1.1% give birth at home, and 0.5% give birth in freestanding birth centers. This review investigated the impact of birth settings on birth outcomes in the United States. Presently, there are insufficient data to evaluate levels of maternal mortality and severe morbidity according to place of birth. Out-of-hospital births are associated with fewer interventions such as episiotomies, epidural anesthesia, operative deliveries, and cesarean deliveries. When compared with hospital births, there are increased rates of avoidable adverse perinatal outcomes in out-of-hospital births in the United States, both for those with and without risk factors. In one recent study, the neonatal mortality rates were significantly elevated for all planned home births: 13.66 per 10,000 live births (242/177,156; odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 3.62-4.84; P<.0001) vs 3.27 per 10,000 live births for in-hospital Certified Nurse-Midwife-attended births (745/2,280,044; odds ratio, 1). These differences increased further when patients were stratified by recognized risk factors such as breech presentation, multiple gestations, nulliparity, advanced maternal age, and postterm pregnancy. Causes of the increased perinatal morbidity and mortality include deliveries of patients with increased risks, absence of standardized criteria to exclude high-risk deliveries, and that most midwives attending out-of-hospital births in the United States do not meet the gold standard for midwifery regulation, the International Confederation of Midwives' Global Standards for Midwifery Education. As part of the informed consent process, pregnant patients interested in out-of-hospital births should be informed of its increased perinatal risks. Hospital births should be supported for all patients, especially those with increased risks.

Planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for pregnant women at low risk of complications.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies of increasingly better quality and in different settings suggest that planned hospital birth in many places does not reduce mortality and morbidity but increases the frequency of interventions and complications. Euro-Peristat (part of the European Union's Health Monitoring Programme) has raised concerns about iatrogenic effects of obstetric interventions, and the World Health Organization (WHO) has raised concern that the increasing medicalisation of childbirth tends to undermine women's own capability to give birth and negatively impacts their childbirth experience. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1998, and previously updated in 2012. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of planned hospital birth with planned home birth attended by a midwife or others with midwifery skills and backed up by a modern hospital system in case a transfer to hospital should turn out to be necessary. The primary focus is on women with an uncomplicated pregnancy and low risk of medical intervention during birth.  SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (which includes trials from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, WHO ICTRP, and conference proceedings), ClinicalTrials.gov (16 July 2021), and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing planned hospital birth with planned home birth in low-risk women as described in the objectives. Cluster-randomised trials, quasi-randomised trials, and trials published only as an abstract were also eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data, and checked the data for accuracy. We contacted study authors for additional information. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.  MAIN RESULTS: We included one trial involving 11 participants. This was a small feasibility study to show that well-informed women - contrary to common beliefs - were prepared to be randomised. This update did not identify any additional studies for inclusion, but excluded one study that had been awaiting assessment. The included study was at high risk of bias for three out of seven risk of bias domains. The trial did not report on five of the seven primary outcomes, and reported zero events for one primary outcome (caesarean section), and non-zero events for the remaining primary outcome (baby not breastfed). Maternal mortality, perinatal mortality (non-malformed), Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes, transfer to neonatal intensive care unit, and maternal satisfaction were not reported. The overall certainty of the evidence for the two reported primary outcomes was very low according to our GRADE assessment (downgraded two levels for high overall risk of bias (due to high risk of bias arising from lack of blinding, high risk of selective reporting and lack of ability to check for publication bias) and two levels for very serious imprecision (single study with few events)).   AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that for selected, low-risk pregnant women, the evidence from randomised trials to support that planned hospital birth reduces maternal or perinatal mortality, morbidity, or any other critical outcome is uncertain. As the quality of evidence in favour of home birth from observational studies seems to be steadily increasing, it might be just as important to prepare a regularly updated systematic review including observational studies as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions as to attempt to set up new RCTs. As women and healthcare practitioners may be aware of evidence from observational studies, and as the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and the International Confederation of Midwives collaboratively conclude that there is strong evidence that out-of-hospital birth supported by a registered midwife is safe, equipoise may no longer exist, and randomised trials may now thus be considered unethical or hardly feasible.

Health professionals' perceptions of planned home birth care within the Brazilian health system.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, in its opinion of the Committee on Midwifery Practice, points out that planned home birth is a woman's and family's right to experience, but also to choose and be informed about, their baby's place of birth. The aim of this study was to understand obstetric nurses' perceptions of planned home childbirth care within the framework of the Brazilian obstetric model. METHOD: A qualitative study, with Snowball Sampling recruitment, totaling 20 obstetric nurses through semi-structured interviews between September 2022 and January 2023, remotely, using the Google Meet application and the recording feature. After the data had been collected, the material was transcribed in full and subjected to content analysis in the thematic modality with the support of ATLAS.ti 8.0 software. RESULTS: Obstetric care at home emerged as a counterpoint to hospital care and the biomedical model, providing care at home based on scientific evidence and humanization, bringing qualified information as a facilitator of access and financial costs as an obstacle to effective home birth. CONCLUSION: Understanding obstetric nurses' perceptions of planned home birth care in the context of the Brazilian obstetric model shows the need for progress as a public policy and for strategies to ensure quality and regulation.

Do disempowered childbearing women give birth at home in Sierra Leone? A secondary analysis of the 2019 Sierra Leone demographic health survey.

BACKGROUND: A nationwide assessment of the link between women's empowerment and homebirth has not been fully examined in Sierra Leone. Our study examined the association between women's empowerment and homebirth among childbearing women in Sierra Leone using the 2019 Sierra Leone Demographic Health Survey (2019 SLDHS) data. METHOD: We used the individual file (IR) of the 2019 SLDHS dataset for our analysis. A total of 7377 women aged 15-49 years who gave birth in the five years preceding the survey were included. Outcome variable was "home birth of their last child among women in the five years preceding the 2019 SLDHS. Women's empowerment parameters include women's knowledge level, economic participation, decision-making ability and power to refuse the idea of intimate partner violence. We used the complex sample command on SPSS version 28 to conduct descriptive and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Three in every 20 women had home childbirth (n = 1177; 15.3%). Women with low [aOR 2.04; 95% CI 1.43-2.92] and medium [aOR 1.44; 95%CI 1.05-1.97] levels of knowledge had higher odds of giving birth at home compared to those with high levels of knowledge. Women who did not have power to refuse the idea of intimate partner violence against women were more likely to had given birth at home [aOR 1.38; 95% CI1.09-1.74]. In addition, women with no [aOR 2.71; 95% CI1.34-5.46) and less than four antenatal care visits [aOR 2.08; 95% CI:1.51-2.88] and for whom distance to a health facility was a major problem [aOR 1.95; 95% CI1.49-2.56] were more likely to have had a homebirth. However, no statistically significant association was observed between a women's decision-making power and home birth [aOR 1.11; 95% CI 0.86-1.41]. CONCLUSION: Despite improvements in maternal health indicators, homebirth by unskilled birth attendants is still a public health concern in Sierra Leone. Women with low knowledge levels, who did not have power to refuse the idea of intimate partner violence against women, had less than four ANC visits and considered distance to a health facility as a major problem had higher odds of giving birth at home. Our findings reflect the need to empower women by improving their knowledge level through girl child and adult education, increasing media exposure, changing societal norms and unequal power relations that promote gender-based violence against women, and improving roads and transport infrastructure.

"It is not by choice that I gave birth at home": the social determinants of home births during COVID-19 in peri-urban and urban Kenya, a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the provision of global maternal health services, with an increase in home births. However, there are little data on women's decision-making and experiences leading up to home births during the pandemic. The objective of this study is to examine the economic, social, and health system factors associated with home births in Kenya. METHODS: Community health volunteers (CHVs) and village leaders helped identify potential participants for an in-depth, one-on-one, qualitative telephone interview in Nairobi and Kiambu County in Kenya. In total, the study interviewed 28 mothers who had home births. RESULTS: This study identified a number of economic, social, neighborhood, and health system factors that were associated with birthing at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Only one woman had planned on birthing at home, while all other participants described various reasons they had to birth at home. Themes related to home births during the pandemic included: (1) unmet preferences related to location of birth; (2) burdens and fear of contracting COVID-19 leading to delayed or missed care; (3) lack of perceived community safety and fear of encounters with law enforcement; and (4) healthcare system changes and uncertainty that led to home births. CONCLUSION: Addressing and recognizing women's social determinants of health is critical to ensuring that preferences on location of birth are met.

Disparities and barriers of health facility delivery following optimal and suboptimal pregnancy care in Nigeria: evidence of home births from cross-sectional surveys.

BACKGROUND: Despite uptake of antenatal care (ANC), 70% of global burden of maternal and child mortality is prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly Nigeria, due to persistent home delivery. Thus, this study investigated the disparity and barriers to health facility delivery and the predictors of home delivery following optimal and suboptimal uptake of ANC in Nigeria. METHODOLOGY: A secondary analysis of 34882 data from 3 waves of cross-sectional surveys (2008-2018 NDHS). Home delivery is the outcome while explanatory variables were classified as socio-demographics, obstetrics, and autonomous factors. Descriptive statistics (bar chart) reported frequencies and percentages of categorical data, median (interquartile range) summarized the non-normal count data. Bivariate chi-square test assessed relationship at 10% cutoff point (p < 0.10) and median test examined differences in medians of the non-normal data in two groups. Multivariable logistic regression (Coeff plot) evaluated the likelihood and significance of the predictors at p < 0.05. RESULTS: 46.2% of women had home delivery after ANC. Only 5.8% of women with suboptimal ANC compared to the 48.0% with optimal ANC had facility delivery and the disparity was significant (p < 0.001). Older maternal age, SBA use, joint health decision making and ANC in a health facility are associated with facility delivery. About 75% of health facility barriers are due to high cost, long distance, poor service, and misconceptions. Women with any form of obstacle utilizing health facility are less likely to receive ANC in a health facility. Problem getting permission to seek for medical help (aOR = 1.84, 95%CI = 1.20-2.59) and religion (aOR = 1.43, 95%CI = 1.05-1.93) positively influence home delivery after suboptimal ANC while undesired pregnancy (aOR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.01-1.60) positively influence home delivery after optimal ANC. Delayed initiation of ANC (aOR = 1.19, 95%CI = 1.02-1.39) is associated with home delivery after any ANC. CONCLUSIONS: About half of women had home delivery after ANC. Hence disparity exist between suboptimal and optimal ANC attendees in institutional delivery. Religion, unwanted pregnancy, and women autonomy problem raise the likelihood of home delivery. Four-fifth of health facility barriers can be eradicated by optimizing maternity package with health education and improved quality service that expand focus ANC to capture women with limited access to health facility.

Effects of an educational intervention on Nigerian midwives' intention to provide planned home birth care.

BACKGROUND: The majority of women in Sokoto, Nigeria prefer homebirths, but midwives are reluctant to provide care in the home setting. As such, many women continue to give birth at home alone or assisted by untrained attendants, which is associated with an increased risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted among 226 midwives from 10 health care facilities. The intervention group received an educational program on home birth. A validated questionnaire that evaluated knowledge, attitudes, norms, perceived control, and intention to provide planned home birth care was given at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at three-months follow-up. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effect model statistics. RESULTS: Following the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated higher knowledge and more positive attitudes, norms, perceived control, and intention to provide planned home birth care compared with the control group (P < 0.05). No significant changes in the scores of the control group were observed during the study duration (P > 0.05). DISCUSSION: Educating midwives on planned home birth increases their willingness to provide planned home birth care. Health system administrators, policymakers, and researchers may use similar interventions to promote skilled home birth attendance by midwives. Increasing the number of midwives who are willing to attend planned home births provides women at low risk for medical complications with safer options for labor, delivery, and postpartum care.

Factors associated with choice of home birth as place of delivery among women of reproductive age in South Africa.

A growing prevalence of home births has been reported, yet factors predicting this prevalence have not been adequately investigated in South Africa. Using the 2016 South Africa Demographic and Health Survey dataset, this study aimed to examine the factors associated with the choice of birth at home as the place of delivery among women of reproductive age in South Africa. A total of 2862 women (aged 15-49 years) who gave birth within five years preceding the survey were included in the analysis. Both univariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine the predictors for the choice of home birth. The prevalence of births in health facilities and home childbirths were 96.0% and 4.0%, with the majority in non-urban areas, and in Limpopo, KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape Provinces (≥ 11.4%). After adjusting for confounders, the factors associated with the choice of place of delivery were: primary education [AOR = 1.97; p < 0.001], secondary/higher education [AOR = 3.51; p > 0.05]); cohabitation [AOR = 1.88; p < 0.01]; and parity 4-6 [COR = 2.59; p < 0.001], parity 7+ [AOR = 5.41; p < 0.001]. Predictors for choice of home birth as a place of delivery included increased educational attainment, cohabitation, higher parity and non-urban place of residence. Innovative strategies reinforcing polices or behaviours aimed at women of reproductive age with the aforementioned demographic indicators are needed to increase the use of healthcare facilities for childbirth, thereby reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, especially in non-urban provinces of South Africa.

Home births as a "right" of female patients in the context of medicine, legislation and court jurisprudence.

Currently, in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, more and more women prefer a planned home birth to a hospital birth, despite the fact that the hospital provides a safe environment for laboring women, thanks to the possibility to intervene at any time in case of complications. These women consider childbirth a natural process, while obstetric care is often considered unnecessary. According to the World Health Organization, birth can only be defined as physiological after birth. Even though women can give birth without medical assistance, it is not possible to identify in advance the mothers and newborns who will need some kind of intervention during childbirth. Although a planned home birth is associated with fewer maternal interventions and the probability of a spontaneous vaginal birth, compared to a planned hospital birth, the risk of neonatal death is two- to three-times higher.

"In All Circumstances": Home Births and Collaborative Health Care in Ireland, 1900-1950.

This article examines the development of a collaborative model of home-based reproductive caregiving in Ireland from 1900 to 1950, focusing on the interactions of different practitioners in childbirth cases in the domestic sphere. In Ireland the move to obstetrics and trained nursing and midwifery was gradual, complicated by the needs and wants of ordinary women, who were reluctant to give up their trusted care givers and who actively sought to maintain long-standing domestic health care traditions. The result was a hybrid and collaborative model of domestic reproductive health care, requiring the attention of different practitioners, placing them in the same space, and necessitating that they work together. This dynamic and evolving system provided most pregnant, laboring, and postparturient women with essential reproductive care, but it would be overtaken by hospital-based reproductive medicine by around 1950, remaining only in folklore and memory by the late twentieth century.