Neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory activity of DAT inhibitor R-phenylpiracetam in experimental models of inflammation in male mice.

R-phenylpiracetam (R-PhP, (4R)-2-(4-phenyl-2-oxopyrrolidin-1-yl)acetamide) is an optical isomer of phenotropil, a clinically-used nootropic drug that improves physical condition and cognition. Recently, R-PhP was shown to bind to the dopamine transporter (DAT). Since growing evidence suggests that dysfunction of the dopaminergic system is associated with persistent neuroinflammation, the aim of this study was to determine whether R-PhP, an inhibitor of DAT, has neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects in male mice. The pharmacokinetic profiles of R-PhP in mouse plasma and its bioavailability in brain tissue were assessed. To study possible molecular mechanisms involved in the anti-inflammatory activity of R-PhP, target profiling was performed using radioligand binding and enzymatic activity assays. To clarify the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of R-PhP, we used a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced endotoxaemia model characterized by reduced body temperature and overexpression of inflammatory genes in the brain. In addition, the antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of R-PhP were tested using carrageenan-induced paw oedema and formalin-induced paw-licking tests. R-PhP (50 mg/kg) reached the brain tissue 15 min after intraperitoneal (ip) and peroral (po) injections. The maximal concentration of R-PhP in the brain tissues was 28 µg/g and 18 µg/g tissue after ip and po administration, respectively. In radioligand binding assays, DAT was the only significant molecular target found for R-PhP. A single ip injection of R-PhP significantly attenuated the LPS-induced body temperature reduction and the overexpression of inflammatory genes, such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1ß) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Seven-day po pretreatment with R-PhP dose-dependently reduced paw oedema and the antinociceptive response, as shown by the carrageenan-induced paw oedema test. In addition, R-PhP decreased the nociceptive response during the inflammatory phase in the formalin-induced paw-licking test. Our study showed that R-PhP possesses neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects, demonstrating the potential of DAT inhibitors as effective therapeutics.

Influence of Comedication on Levetiracetam Pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of concomitant antiepileptic therapy on levetiracetam (LEV) pharmacokinetics. METHODS: A 6-year retrospective observational study. Patients were grouped according to the antiepileptic drug used as concomitant medication: group A, LEV in monotherapy; group B, LEV + enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs); and group C, LEV + non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (NEIAEDs). Apparent oral levetiracetam clearance (LEV CL/F) and basal serum levetiracetam concentrations (LEV C0) were compared among the different groups by analysis of variance. RESULTS: A total of 330 LEV C0 corresponding to 205 patients (56% men) were identified. The mean (±SD) of LEV CL/F in group A (n = 180), B (n = 92), and C (n = 58) was 4.41 ± 2.06 L/h, 7.23 ± 3.72 L/h, and 4.87 ± 1.65 L/h, respectively. EIAEDs increased LEV CL/F (L/h) by 64% compared with the monotherapy group and by 48% compared with the NEIAEDs group. The greatest induction in LEV CL/F, compared with the LEV monotherapy group, was observed with carbamazepine, followed by oxcarbazepine and phenobarbital, and was increased by 81%, 64%, and 44%, respectively. LEV C0 values were significantly lower in the EIAEDs group than in the monotherapy group (17.30 ± 7.77 versus 20.08 ± 9.69 mcg/mL; P = 0.038) or indeed the NEIAEDs group (17.30 ± 7.77 versus 20.49 ± 9.46 mcg/mL; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Comedication with EIAEDs increased LEV CL/F by more than 40%, whereas carbamazepine had the greatest inducing potency with LEV CL/F being 81% higher than that of the monotherapy group. These data suggest that monitoring LEV serum concentration during polytherapy with EIAEDs is indicated.

Pharmacokinetics of rectal levetiracetam as add-on treatment in dogs affected by cluster seizures or status epilepticus.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam can be used for seizure control alone or in combination with other antiepileptic medications. A previous study achieved the minimum targeted serum drug concentration after rectal administration of levetiracetam in healthy dogs. The purpose of the present study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of rectal LEV in dogs presented for cluster seizures or status epilepticus and potentially in treatment with other anti-epileptic drugs. Furthermore, preliminary information on response to this treatment as add-on to the standard treatment protocol is reported. RESULTS: Eight client-owned dogs were enrolled. Plasma levetiracetam concentrations (measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, 720, and 1440 min after drug administration) reached the minimum target concentration (5 µg/ml) at 30 min in all but one patient. At T1 (30 min) the mean concentration was 28.2 ± 15.5 µg/ml. Plasma concentrations remained above the targeted minimum concentration in all patients until 240 min and in 7/8 until 360 min. Six out of eight patients experienced no seizures in the 24-h period after hospitalization and were classified as "responders". CONCLUSIONS: Minimum plasma levetiracetam concentration can be reached after rectal administration of 40 mg/kg in dogs affected by cluster seizures and status epilepticus and concurrently receiving other antiepileptic drugs. These preliminary results may encourage the evaluation of rectal levetiracetam as an additional treatment option for cluster seizures and status epilepticus in a larger number of dogs.

Population pharmacokinetic model of levetiracetam in Korean neonates with seizures
.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of levetiracetam in Korean neonates with seizures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from a retrospective study of 18 neonates with seizures admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Severance Children's Hospital for the period of from 2013 to 2015. Sampling and dosing times were recorded by clinical research coordinators on case report forms. Demographic factors and laboratory results were tested as potential covariates for PK parameters. Model development was performed within a mixed-effect modeling framework using NONMEM. RESULTS: With a one-compartment model with first-order elimination chosen as a basic PK model based on theory-based allometric relationships, postmenstrual age and serum creatinine were found to have significant influences on clearance (CL). Typical parameter estimates of the final PK model obtained, evaluated at covariate medians, were 1.08 L/kg for volume of distribution (V) and 0.073 L/h/kg (= 1.23 mL/min/kg) for CL, illustrating that V in Korean neonates is a little larger than in Western population while CL is similar. CONCLUSION: A population PK model of levetiracetam for Korean neonates with seizures was developed in this study. The result of this study can be used as a basis to develop an optimal dosage regimen in Korean neonates with seizures.
.

Population pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in neonates with seizures.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: This study developed a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of levetiracetam (LEV) for treating neonatal seizures (NS) and determined the influence of clinically relevant covariates to explain the interindividual variability and residual error. METHODS: Twenty newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the Hospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto" were included. LEV doses were administered by intermittent infusion. Blood samples were drawn 3 times post-infusion. Levetiracetam was quantified by a chromatographic technique. NONMEM software was used to determine the population PK model of LEV in neonates and the influence of clinical covariates on drug disposition. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The LEV PK in neonates is described by a one-compartment open model with first-order elimination. The influence of creatinine clearance (CRCL) and body weight (BW) on clearance (CL[L/h] = 0.47*CRCL), as well as the volume of the distribution (Vd[L] = 0.65*BW) of LEV, were confirmed, considering interindividual variabilities of 36% and 22%, respectively, and a residual error of 13%. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Based on the PK of LEV in neonates and the influence of the final PK model, a priori dosing guidelines are proposed considering CRCL, BW and LEV plasma concentrations between 6 and 20 mg/L for NS treatment.

Development and validation of a HPLC-UV assay for quantification of levetiracetam concentrations in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Limited clinical data exists on the effects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on drug pharmacokinetics. A high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection method was developed and validated to determine levetiracetam concentrations in human plasma and CRRT effluent samples. Five hundred microliters of human plasma and 250 µL effluent samples were used to quantify levetiracetam. Plasma samples were purified by protein precipitation, evaporated under nitrogen gas at room temperature and reconstituted in 50 mm potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (pH of 4.5). Reverse-phase chromatographic separation was achieved within 20 min using a mobile phase eluting gradient of 50 mm potassium dihydrogen phosphate and acetonitrile. UV detection was set at 195 nm. The calibration curve was found to be linear over the range of 2-80µg/mL. Inter- and intra-day precisions were < 8% for both plasma and effluent samples. The accuracy was determined to be within -12-10% of nominal concentrations. The method was selective and sensitive with a lower limit of quantification of 2 µg/mL. Overall recovery of levetiracetam from plasma was ~100%. The validated assay was successfully applied in a pharmacokinetic study to determine potential dose adjustments in patients undergoing CRRT and receiving levetiracetam.

Disposition of levetiracetam in healthy adult horses.

Nine horses received 20 mg/kg of intravenous (LEVIV ); 30 mg/kg of intragastric, crushed immediate release (LEVCIR ); and 30 mg/kg of intragastric, crushed extended release (LEVCER ) levetiracetam, in a three-way randomized crossover design. Crushed tablets were dissolved in water and administered by nasogastric tube. Serum samples were collected over 48 hr, and levetiracetam concentrations were determined by immunoassay. Mean ± SD peak concentrations for LEVCIR and LEVCER were 50.72 ± 10.60 and 53.58 ± 15.94 µg/ml, respectively. The y-intercept for IV administration was 64.54 ± 24.99 µg/ml. The terminal half-life was 6.38 ± 1.97, 7.07 ± 1.93 and 6.22 ± 1.35 hr for LEVCIR , LEVCER, and LEVIV , respectively. Volume of distribution at steady-state was 630 ± 73.4 ml/kg. Total body clearance after IV administration was 74.40 ± 19.20 ml kg-1  hr-1 . Bioavailability was 96 ± 10, and 98 ± 13% for LEVCIR and LEVCER , respectively. A single dose of Levetiracetam (LEV) was well tolerated. Based on this study, a recommended dosing regimen of intravenous or oral LEV of 32 mg/kg every 12 hr is likely to achieve and maintain plasma concentrations within the therapeutic range suggested for humans, with optimal kinetics throughout the dosing interval in healthy adult horses. Repeated dosing and pharmacodynamic studies are warranted.

Evidence for a differential interaction of brivaracetam and levetiracetam with the synaptic vesicle 2A protein.

OBJECTIVE: Brivaracetam (BRV) and levetiracetam (LEV) are effective antiepileptic drugs that bind selectively to the synaptic vesicle 2A (SV2A) protein. However, BRV differs from LEV in that it exhibits more potent and complete seizure suppression in animal models including in amygdala-kindled mice, where BRV afforded nearly complete seizure suppression. This raises the possibility that aside from potency differences, BRV and LEV may interact differently with the SV2A protein, which is not apparent in radioligand-binding competition studies. In this study, we used a recently identified SV2A allosteric modulator, UCB1244283, that appears to induce conformational changes in SV2A, to probe the binding properties of labeled BRV and LEV. METHODS: Radioligand binding studies were carried out using [3 H]BRV and [3 H]LEV. Studies were performed in membranes from both recombinant cells expressing human SV2A protein and human brain tissue. RESULTS: The modulator increased the binding of both radioligands but by different mechanisms. For [3 H]BRV, the increase was driven mainly by an increase in affinity, whereas for [3 H]LEV, the increase was due to an increase in the number of apparent binding sites. Kinetic studies confirmed this differential effect. SIGNIFICANCE: These studies suggest that LEV and BRV may act at different binding sites or interact with different conformational states of the SV2A protein. It is possible that some of the pharmacologic differences between BRV and LEV could be due to different interactions with the SV2A protein.

Brivaracetam, a selective high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A) ligand with preclinical evidence of high brain permeability and fast onset of action.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid distribution to the brain is a prerequisite for antiepileptic drugs used for treatment of acute seizures. The preclinical studies described here investigated the high-affinity synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) antiepileptic drug brivara-cetam (BRV) for its rate of brain penetration and its onset of action. BRV was compared with levetiracetam (LEV). METHODS: In vitro permeation studies were performed using Caco-2 cells. Plasma and brain levels were measured over time after single oral dosing to audiogenic mice and were correlated with anticonvulsant activity. Tissue distribution was investigated after single dosing to rat (BRV and LEV) and dog (LEV only). Positron emission tomography (PET) displacement studies were performed in rhesus monkeys using the SV2A PET tracer [11C]UCB-J. The time course of PET tracer displacement was measured following single intravenous (IV) dosing with LEV or BRV. Rodent distribution data and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling were used to compute blood-brain barrier permeability (permeability surface area product, PS) values and then predict brain kinetics in man. RESULTS: In rodents, BRV consistently showed a faster entry into the brain than LEV; this correlated with a faster onset of action against seizures in audiogenic susceptible mice. The higher permeability of BRV was also demonstrated in human cells in vitro. PBPK modeling predicted that, following IV dosing to human subjects, BRV might distribute to the brain within a few minutes compared with approximately 1 h for LEV (PS of 0.315 and 0.015 ml/min/g for BRV and LEV, respectively). These data were supported by a nonhuman primate PET study showing faster SV2A occupancy by BRV compared with LEV. SIGNIFICANCE: These preclinical data demonstrate that BRV has rapid brain entry and fast brain SV2A occupancy, consistent with the fast onset of action in the audiogenic seizure mice assay. The potential benefit of BRV for treatment of acute seizures remains to be confirmed in clinical studies.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Levetiracetam in Pediatric and Adult Patients With Epilepsy by Using Routinely Monitored Data.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam, a second-generation antiepileptic drug, is frequently used for managing partial-onset seizures. About 70% of the administered dose is excreted in urine unchanged, and dosage adjustment is recommended based on the individual's renal function. In this study, a population pharmacokinetic model of levetiracetam was developed using routinely monitored serum concentration data for individualized levetiracetam therapy. METHODS: Patients whose serum concentrations of levetiracetam at steady-state were routinely monitored at Kyoto University Hospital from April 2012 to March 2013 were enrolled. The influence of patient characteristics on levetiracetam pharmacokinetics was evaluated using the nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) program. RESULTS: A total of 583 steady-state concentrations from 225 patients were used for the analysis. The median patient age and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 38 (range: 1-89) years and 98 (15-189) mL·min·1.73 m, respectively. Serum concentration-time data of levetiracetam were well described by a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption. Oral clearance was allometrically related to the individual body weight and eGFR. An increase in the dose significantly increased oral clearance. No improvement in model fit was observed by including the covariate of any concomitant antiepileptic drugs. The population mean clearance for an adult weighing 70 kg and with a normal renal function was 4.8 and 5.9 L/h for 500 mg bis in die (bid) and 1500 mg bid, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oral clearance allometrically related with body weight and eGFR can well predict the routine therapeutic drug monitoring data from pediatric to aged patients with varying renal function. Dosage adjustments based on renal function are effective in controlling the trough and peak concentrations in similar ranges.

Antiepileptic drugs in patients with malignant brain tumor: beyond seizures and pharmacokinetics.

In neurological malignancies, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are frequently used to control the seizure activity that accompanies the disorder. There is a growing body of evidence on the importance of AED selection for reasons other than pharmacokinetics (PK) properties. Epigenetic modifications may occur in glioblastomas, such as changes in gene methylation and histone acetylation states. Secondary mechanisms of AED drug action which impact these epigenetic modifications could play a significant role in patient survival outcomes. Both valproic acid (VPA) and carbamazepine have histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitory activities, and levetiracetam and VPA reduce the activity of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), a DNA-repair molecule implicated in resistance to alkylating agents used for chemotherapy. The use of AEDs for purposes other than seizure prophylaxis and their selection based on non-PK properties present a potential paradigm shift in the field of neuro-oncology.

Levetiracetam Pharmacokinetics During Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration and Acute Liver Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam clearance is dependent on renal (major) and hepatic (minor) elimination pathways. In the setting of organ dysfunction, dose reductions are recommended to prevent accumulation. Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) has been shown to eliminate levetiracetam, but the preferred dosing regimen when a patient is on CVVH and has concomitant acute liver dysfunction is unknown. The objective of this case is to describe levetiracetam dosing and pharmacokinetics in the setting of CVVH and acute liver dysfunction. METHODS: This is a case report of a single patient. RESULTS: A 59-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit for acute onset multiorgan dysfunction associated with a hematologic disorder. His hospital course was complicated by persistent liver dysfunction with a model for end-stage liver disease score of 47 and renal failure which necessitated initiation of CVVH. On hospital day two, the patient developed new-onset focal seizures secondary to metabolic abnormalities that resulted in the initiation of levetiracetam 1000 mg intravenously twice daily. The peak concentration at steady state was 32.2 mcg/mL, and the trough concentration was 16.1 mcg/mL (goal 12-46 mcg/mL). The volume of distribution was 0.65 L/kg, and the elimination half-life was 11.4 h. CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam pharmacokinetics observed in this case approximated those seen in a normal healthy patient and a regimen of 1000 mg twice daily achieved serum trough concentrations at the lower limit of the target range. This case indicates that in a patient with acute liver dysfunction on CVVH, 1000 mg twice daily may be considered as an empiric levetiracetam regimen.

The human synaptic vesicle protein, SV2A, functions as a galactose transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

SV2A is a synaptic vesicle membrane protein expressed in neurons and endocrine cells and involved in the regulation of neurotransmitter release. Although the exact function of SV2A still remains elusive, it was identified as the specific binding site for levetiracetam, a second generation antiepileptic drug. Our sequence analysis demonstrates that SV2A has significant homology with several yeast transport proteins belonging to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS). Many of these transporters are involved in sugar transport into yeast cells. Here we present evidence showing, for the first time, that SV2A is a galactose transporter. We expressed human SV2A in hexose transport-deficient EBY.VW4000 yeast cells and demonstrated that these cells are able to grow on galactose-containing medium but not on other fermentable carbon sources. Furthermore, the addition of the SV2A-binding antiepileptic drug levetiracetam to the medium inhibited the galactose-dependent growth of hexose transport-deficient EBY.VW4000 yeast cells expressing human SV2A. Most importantly, direct measurement of galactose uptake in the same strain verified that SV2A is able to transport extracellular galactose inside the cells. The newly identified galactose transport capability of SV2A may have an important role in regulating/modulating synaptic function.

Increased levetiracetam clearance and breakthrough seizure in a pregnant patient successfully handled by intensive therapeutic drug monitoring.

We report a 36-year-old pregnant patient with subtherapeutic trough plasma levels of levetiracetam (LVT) and a breakthrough nocturnal seizure while assuming 3 times a day dosing of the drug. An intensive pharmacokinetic study was performed from immediately before to 11 hours after the morning LVT dose administration and suggested that the patient was not adequately exposed to the drug during the night. After changing the dosing of LVT to 4 times a day, the patient experienced no seizures and delivered a healthy newborn without complications. Afterward, trough plasma levels of LVT remained always within the therapeutic range until delivery, and no major increase of the drug daily dose was required.

Synergistic Interaction of Retigabine with Levetiracetam in the Mouse Maximal Electroshock-Induced Seizure Model: A Type II Isobolographic Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess interactions between retigabine and levetiracetam in suppressing maximal electroshock-induced tonic seizures in Albino Swiss mice, type II isobolographic analysis was used. Total brain antiepileptic drug concentrations were measured with high pressure liquid chromatography. RESULTS: The combinations of retigabine with levetiracetam at the fixed-ratios of 1:5 and 1:10 were supra-additive (synergistic; p < 0.05) in terms of seizure suppression, while the combinations at the fixed-ratios of 1:1 and 1:2 were additive. No pharmacokinetic changes in total brain concentrations of levetiracetam and retigabine were documented, indicating the pharmacodynamic nature of interaction between these antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced tonic seizure model. CONCLUSION: The combination of retigabine with levetiracetam at the fixed-ratios of 1:5 and 1:10 appears to be particularly beneficial combination exerting supra-additive interaction in suppressing maximal electroshock-induced tonic seizures.

A missed opportunity - consequences of unknown levetiracepam pharmacokinetics in a peritoneal dialysis patient.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam is a frequently used drug in the therapy of partial onset, myoclonic and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The main route of elimination is via the kidneys, which eliminate 66% of the unchanged drug as well as 24% as inactive metabolite that stems from enzymatic hydrolysis. Therefore dose adjustments are needed in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 D, i.e. patients undergoing dialysis treatment. In this patient population a dose reduction by 50% is recommended, so that patients receive 250-750 mg every 12 hours. However "dialysis" can be performed in using different modalities and treatment intensities. For most of the drugs pharmacokinetic data and dosing recommendations for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis are not available. This is the first report on levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in a peritoneal dialysis patient. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-y-old Caucasian male (height: 160 cm, weight 93 kg, BMI 36.3 kg/m2) was admitted with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 10. Due to diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy he was undergoing peritoneal dialysis for two years. Eight weeks prior he was put on levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily for suspected partial seizures with secondary generalization. According to the patient's wife, levetiracetam lead to fatigue and somnolence leading to trauma with fracture of the metatarsal bone. Indeed, even 24 hours after discontinuation of levetiracetam blood level was still 29.8 mg/l (therapeutic range: 12 - 46 mg/l). Fatigue and stupor had disappeared five days after discontinuation of the levetiracepam. A single dose pharamockinetic after re-exposure showed an increased half life of 18.4 hours (normal half life 7 hours) and levetiracetam content in the peritoneal dialysate. Both half-life and dialysate content might help to guide dosing in this patient population. CONCLUSION: If levetiracetam is used in peritoneal dialysis patients it should be regularly monitored to avoid supratherapeutic levels that could lead to severe sequelae.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Levetiracetam in Different Trimesters of Pregnant Women with Epilepsy in a Tertiary Care Center: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam is the most commonly used antiepileptic drug in pregnant women due to its low teratogenic risk profile, favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, and safety profile. Serum levels of levetiracetam vary in epilepsy during pregnancy. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the serum levels of levetiracetam during different trimesters of pregnancy by using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective study. Pregnant women with epilepsy on levetiracetam were enrolled after getting written informed consent from them. Serum trough levels of levetiracetam were estimated at all trimesters by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: The study included 16 participants with mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 27.75 ± 4 years. There were nine (56.2%) participants with generalized seizure disorder and seven (43.8%) participants of focal seizure disorder. Among 16 patients, 10 (62.5%) participants were on levetiracetam alone and six (37.5%) participants were on levetiracetam combined with other antiepileptic drugs. In a total of 48 trough samples, 45 sample concentrations were below the therapeutic range of 12-46 mg/l and three sample concentrations were within the therapeutic range. There was a statistically significant difference in the concentration-dose ratio (CDR) of levetiracetam between the third and first trimesters (P-value 0.018). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in serum levetiracetam concentration between the third and first trimesters. A well-conducted, intensive pharmacokinetic sampling study in PWWE with a control group is needed in future to evaluate the whole pharmacokinetic profile of levetiracetam and to correlate the clinical outcome.

Monitoring levetiracetam concentration in saliva during pregnancy is stable and feasible.

AIMS: This multicenter prospective cohort study (registration no. ChiCTR2000032089) aimed to investigate the relationship between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations to determine whether saliva could be used for routine monitoring of levetiracetam during pregnancy. METHODS: The slot concentrations of levetiracetam in simultaneously obtained saliva and plasma samples were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. The correlations between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations and the dose-normalized concentrations were compared among pregnant women in different stages and nonpregnant control participants with epilepsy. RESULTS: In total, 231 patients with 407 plasma and saliva sample pairs were enrolled from 39 centers. Linear relationships between salivary and plasma levetiracetam concentrations were reported in the enrolled population (r = 0.898, p < 0.001), including pregnant (r = 0.935, p < 0.001) and nonpregnant participants (r = 0.882, p < 0.001). Plasma concentrations were moderately higher than saliva concentrations, with ratios of saliva to plasma concentrations of 0.98 for nonpregnant women, 0.98, 1, and 1.12 for pregnant women during the first trimester, the second trimester, the and third trimester, respectively. The effective range of saliva levetiracetam concentration was found to be 9.98 µg/mL (lower limit) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence intervals, 0.915-0.959), sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 86.8%, and p < 0.001, to 24.05 µg/mL (upper limit) with an AUC of 0.952 (0.914-0.99), sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.3%, and p = 0.007. CONCLUSION: The saliva/plasma concentration ratio of levetiracetam remains constant during pregnancy and is similar to that in non-pregnant individuals. Monitoring levetiracetam concentration in saliva during pregnancy should be widely promoted.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from the NEOLEV1 and NEOLEV2 studies.

OBJECTIVES: To confirm that levetiracetam (LEV) demonstrates predictable pharmacokinetics(PK) at higher doses and to study the pharmacodynamics(PD) of LEV. DESIGN: Pharmacokinetic data from the NEOLEV1 and NEOLEV2 trials were analysed using a non-linear mixed effects modelling approach. A post hoc analysis of the effect of LEV on seizure burden was conducted. SETTING: Neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Term neonates with electrographically confirmed seizures. INTERVENTIONS: In NEOLEV1, neonates with seizures persisting following phenobarbital (PHB) received LEV 20 or 40 mg/kg bolus followed by 5 or 10 mg/kg maintenance dose(MD) daily. In NEOLEV2, patients received a 40 mg/kg intravenous LEV load, followed by 10 mg/kg doses 8 hourly. If seizures persisted, a further 20 mg/kg intravenous load was given. If seizures persisted, PHB was given. PK data were collected from 16 NEOLEV1 patients and 33 NEOLEV2 patients. cEEG data from 48 NEOLEV2 patients were analysed to investigate onset of action and seizure burden reduction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) were determined. Covariates that significantly affected LEV disposition were identified. RESULTS: Primary outcome: The median initial LEV level was 57 µg/mL (range 19-107) after the first loading dose and at least 12 µg/mL at 48 hours in all infants. CL and Vd were estimated to be 0.0538 L/hour and 0.832 L, respectively. A direct relationship between postnatal age and CL was observed. The final population pharmacokinetic(PopPK) model described the observed data well without significant biases. CL and Vd were described as CL (L/hour)=0.0538×(weight in kg/3.34)0.75×(postnatal age in days/5.5) 0.402 and Vd (L)=0.832×(weight in kg/3.34).Seizure burden reduced within 30 min of LEV administration. 28% of patients were completely seizure free after LEV. In an additional 25% of patients, seizure burden reduced by 50%. CONCLUSIONS: LEV pharmacokinetics remained predictable at higher doses. Very high-dose LEV can now be studied in neonates. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01720667.

Augmented renal clearance of vancomycin and levetiracetam in a traumatic brain injury patient.

BACKGROUND: Increased creatinine clearance and subsequent elevated antimicrobial clearance is evident in many traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients due to augmented renal clearance (ARC). Little is known about the effects of ARC on other renally-eliminated medications, such as the anti-epileptic drug levetiracetam. METHODS: This is a case report of serum monitoring of vancomycin and levetiracetam in a 22 year old female with ARC after severe TBI. RESULTS: The patient exhibited ARC of vancomycin as evidenced by her low serum concentrations with standard vancomycin dosing. Her estimated creatinine clearance based on vancomycin clearance was 243.9 ml/min. Serum concentrations also suggested ARC of levetiracetam. No toxicities for either medication were noted, even after dose adjustment to account for possible ARC. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin and levetiracetam both appear to be subject to ARC after TBI. Clinicians should be mindful that standard dosing of these agents may not achieve typical target concentrations in this clinical scenario.