The current state of the platelet supply in the US and proposed options to decrease the risk of critical shortages.

Due to circumstances such as increased demand and an aging donor pool, the likelihood of critical platelet shortages is increasing. The platelet supply could be improved through the expansion of the donor pool, the identification and sustained utilization of high-quality donors, and changes in component processing and storage that result in a longer platelet shelf-life. Refrigerated platelets, stored at 1° to 6°C, have the potential to improve patient safety by decreasing the risk of bacterial contamination while concurrently allowing for a longer storage period (eg, 14 days) and improved hemostatic effectiveness in actively bleeding patients. An approach utilizing remuneration of apheresis platelet donors combined with pathogen reduction of the platelet components could be used as a means to increase the donor pool and identify and sustain safe, reliable, high-quality donors. Remuneration might provide an incentive for underutilized populations (eg, individuals <30 years old) to enter the apheresis platelet donor population resulting in a significant expansion of the platelet donor pool. Over time, approaches such as the use of refrigerated platelets, platelet donor remuneration, and the application of pathogen reduction technology, might serve to attract a large, reliable, and safe donor base that provides platelet collections with high yields, longer shelf-lives and, excellent hemostatic function.

Financial analysis of large-volume delayed sampling to reduce bacterial contamination of platelets.

BACKGROUND: Effective and financially viable mitigation approaches are needed to reduce bacterial contamination of platelets in the US. Expected costs of large-volume delayed sampling (LVDS), which would be performed by a blood center prior to shipment to a hospital, were compared to those of pathogen reduction (PR), point-of-release testing (PORt), and secondary bacterial culture (SBC). METHODS: Using a Markov-based decision-tree model, the financial and clinical impact of implementing all variants of LVDS, PR, PORt, and SBC described in FDA guidance were evaluated from a hospital perspective. Hospitals were assumed to acquire leukoreduced apheresis platelets, with LVDS adding $30 per unit. Monte Carlo simulations were run to estimate the direct medical costs for platelet acquisition, testing, transfusion, and possible complications associated with each approach. Input parameters, including test sensitivity and specificity, were drawn from existing literature and costs (2018US$) were based on a hospital perspective. A one-way sensitivity analysis varied the assumed additional cost of LVDS. RESULTS: Under an approach of LVDS (7-day), the total cost per transfused unit is $735.78, which falls between estimates for SBC (7-day) and PORt. Assuming 20,000 transfusions each year, LVDS would cost $14.72 million annually. Per-unit LVDS costs would need to be less than $22.32 to be cheaper per transfusion than all other strategies, less than $32.02 to be cheaper than SBC (7-day), and less than $196.19 to be cheaper than PR (5-day). CONCLUSIONS: LVDS is an effective and cost-competitive approach, assuming additional costs to blood centers and associated charges to hospitals are modest.

Cost implications of implementation of pathogen-inactivated platelets.

BACKGROUND: Pathogen inactivation (PI) is a new approach to blood safety that may introduce additional costs. This study identifies costs that could be eliminated, thereby mitigating the financial impact. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Cost information was obtained from five institutions on tests and procedures (e.g., irradiation) currently performed, that could be eliminated. The impact of increased platelet (PLT) availability due to fewer testing losses, earlier entry into inventory, and fewer outdates with a 7-day shelf life were also estimated. Additional estimates include costs associated with managing (1) special requests and (2) test results, (3) quality control and proficiency testing, (4) equipment acquisition and maintenance, (5) replacement of units lost to positive tests, (6) seasonal or geographic testing, and (7) health department interactions. RESULTS: All costs are mean values per apheresis PLT unit in USD ($/unit). The estimated test costs that could be eliminated are $71.76/unit and a decrease in transfusion reactions corresponds to $2.70/unit. Avoiding new tests (e.g., Babesia and dengue) amounts to $41.80/unit. Elimination of irradiation saves $8.50/unit, while decreased outdating with 7-day storage can be amortized to $16.89/unit. Total potential costs saved with PI is $141.65/unit. Costs are influenced by a variety of factors specific to institutions such as testing practices and the location in which such costs are incurred and careful analysis should be performed. Additional benefits, not quantified, include retention of some currently deferred donors and scheduling flexibility due to 7-day storage. CONCLUSIONS: While PI implementation will result in additional costs, there are also potential offsetting cost reductions, especially after 7-day storage licensing.

Treatment of recalcitrant ulcers with allogeneic platelet gel from pooled platelets in aged hypomobile patients.

We evaluated growth factor contents and clinical efficacy of allogeneic platelet gel (PG) prepared with standard blood banking procedures from routine platelet concentrates (PCs) obtained from buffy coats. The PGs were used to treat 11 hypomobile very elderly patients unable to undergo autologous blood processing and previously ineffectively treated with expensive advanced medications for 8-275 weeks. PGs were prepared by platelet activation with human thrombin or commercial batroxobin. Median and range growth factor contents (ng/mL) were: platelet derived growth factor (PDGF-AB/-BB) 112 (31-157) and 20 (3.8-34); transforming growth factor (TGF-ß1/-ß2) 214 (48-289) and 0.087 (0.03-0.28); basic-fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF) 0.03 (0.006-0.214); vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 1.15 (0.18-2.46); epidermal growth factor (EGF) 4.50 (0.87-6.64); insulin-like growth factor (IGF-l) 116 (72-156). In the clinical study, 222 PGs were used within 2 h of activation to treat 14 chronic skin ulcers in the 11 patients. No improvement was seen in 3 patients with 24, 27 and 30 cm(3) ulcers who could be treated for no more than 4, 7 and 8 weeks due to progressively worsening clinical conditions, while 11 ulcers with 3.2 cm(3) median size (range 0.2-3.6) in the remaining 8 patients showed 91 ± 14 % reduction after a median of 12 weeks (range 1-20). Cost of PG treatment (19,976 euro) amounted to about 10% of the ineffective advanced medication hospital reimbursement fees (191,236 euro). This study supports efficacy and feasibility of allogeneic PG to treat recalcitrant ulcers in very elderly hypomobile patients for whom autologous blood processing may be difficult.

[The quality of platelet concentrates in dependence on storage time before pathogen inactivation]. / Jakosc koncentratów plytek krwi w zaleznosci od czasu ich przechowywania przed wykonaniem procedury inaktywacji patogenów.

UNLABELLED: Pathogen inactivation procedure performed just before distribution of platelet concentrates (PCs) may decrease costs caused by loss of these components due to relatively short expiry date. THE AIM OF STUDY: To evaluate the quality of PCs pathogen inactivated on the first or the fifth day of storage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PCs preparated from buffy-coats were suspended in platelet additive solution (Intersol, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Belgium). The photochemical pathogen inactivation was performed on the 1st or the 5th day of storage using amotosalen and UVA (Cerus, Europe BV). PCs were stored for 7 days. RESULTS: There were observed increased expression of CD62 and CD63, elevated activity of LDH and lower concentration of glucose in PCs pathogen inactivated on day 1 compare to the control group. PCs pathogen inactivated on day 5 showed decreased expression of CD62 and CD63 compare to the control group. There were no significant differences in platelet number, pH, lactate concentration, hypotonic shock response and release of platelet derived microparticles in both groups of pathogen inactivated PCs. CONCLUSIONS: Time of storage of PCs before pathogen inactivation has no significant impact on PCs quality. Pathogen inactivation procedure performed just after having received request for PCs is more cost effective than the routine pathogen inactivation in all PCs before storage.

Use of random versus apheresis platelet concentrates.

The respective use of random (RPC) and apheresis (APC) platelet concentrates is highly heterogeneous among countries, ranging from 10 to 98% RPC in countries supposed to provide a similar transfusion service to patients. Moreover, when considering each country in the past 10 years, one can observe that some have changed their policy, switching from a majority of APC to RPC or vice versa. This presentation intends to analyse which factors may impact such decisions. For many years, the only available platelet component was a RPC obtained from whole blood donation by a two centrifugation steps process, the "platelet rich plasma" or PRP method. Since the beginning of the 1970s, APCs became available, with in fact many different techniques leading to many APCs that may not be equivalent. Since the end of the 1980s, a new method of RPC preparation was developed, using the buffy-coat (BC-PC), providing a blood component with highly preserved platelet functions as compared to RPCs prepared by the PRP technique. Finally, the use of each of these components either native, or leuco-reduced, or suspended in a storage solution, or processed with a pathogen inactivation technique adds new layers of complexity to compare them. Innumerable references can be found in the literature describing in vitro functional parameters of platelet concentrates. Although it is clear that BC-RPC retain much more their in vitro functions than PRP-RPC, indicating that no one should use the latter any more, it is much more difficult to distinguish differences between other PCs. Conversely, only a very few studies have been published related to a comparison of clinical efficacy of RPC versus APC, the endpoints being mainly CCI. Similarly to the in vitro studies, although RPC prepared with the PRP method show the lowest CCIs, no clear difference exists between "modern" RPC and APC. Another factor that may impact policy decision is the occurrence of adverse reactions in recipients. When considering only comparable data, for example leuco-reduced RPC versus leuco-reduced APC, there is now evidence that the latter is more associated with adverse reactions in recipients: data from hemovigilance in France show that, although no difference is noted for febrile non haemolytic transfusion reactions, nor for bacteria contamination, the incidence of allergic adverse reactions is about four times higher with APC as compared with RPC. Other aspects may impact the decision: the fact that using APC in place of RPC reduces the total donor exposure of patients was considered critical in some countries to reduce the risk of transmission of blood transmissible disease. Finally, the cost of the components, much higher for APC may be considered.

Donor selection criteria to maximize double platelet products (DPP) by platelet apheresis.

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease brought us to perform a study to diminish donor exposure from transfusion of platelet concentrates. The current study aimed to develop donor selection criteria that maximize the likelihood of deriving single donor platelets and producing double platelet products (DPP). Donors were recruited among plasmapheresis donors and among other donors when the selected donors did not show up. Donor precount and body weight and haematocrit were examined as determinants of higher split-rates combined with procedure time. When the criterion was set on 225; 82% of the procedures (n=717) with a precount of >225 yielded DPP compared to 54% of the procedures with a precount <225 (p<.01). Body weight >65 kg gave good results in split-rate. Procedure time showed an inverse correlation with the highest correlating precount (r=-.14; p<.001). Eighty one percent of the donors reported a willingness to donate at least seven times a year and 75% accepted the mean procedure time. This confirmed logistical feasibility of the conversion to AP-PC although profits would be reduce 13% compared to platelets from pooled buffy coats.

Liver transplantation without the use of blood products.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the techniques and the outcome of liver transplantation with maximal conservation of blood products and to analyze the potential benefits or drawbacks of blood conservation and salvage techniques. DESIGN: Case series survey. SETTING: Tertiary care, major university teaching hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients with religious objections to blood transfusions who were selected on the basis of restrictive criteria that would lower their risk for fatal hemorrhage, including coagulopathy, a thrombosed splanchnic venous system requiring extensive reconstruction, active bleeding and associated medical complications. All patients were pretreated with erythropoietin to increase production of red blood cells. All operations were performed at the same institution, with a 36-month follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Orthotopic liver transplantation that used blood salvage, plateletpheresis, and autotransfusion and the withholding of the use of human blood products with the exception of albumin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival and postoperative complications, with the effectiveness of erythropoietin and plateletpheresis as secondary measures. RESULTS: All patients are alive at 36 months after orthotopic liver transplantation. One patient, a minor (13 years of age), was transfused per a state court ruling. Erythropoietin increased the production of red blood cells as shown by a mean increase in hematocrit levels of 0.08. Platelet-pheresis allowed autologous, platelet-rich plasma to be available for use after allograft reperfusion. Three major complications were resolved or corrected without sequelae. Only one patient developed postoperative hemorrhage, which was corrected surgically. The mean charge for bloodless surgery was $174,000 for the three patients with United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status 3 priority for transplantation. This result was statistically significant when these patients were compared with all the patients with UNOS status 3 priority during the same period who met the same restrictive guidelines (P < .05). Only 19 of 1009 orthotopic liver transplantations performed at our institution were similar according to the UNOS status and the fulfillment of the guidelines. The mean charge for these comparison patients was $327,000, 3.8% of which was related to transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: Orthotopic liver transplantation without the use of blood products is possible. Blood conservation techniques do not increase morbidity or mortality and can result in fewer transfusion-related, in-hospital charges.

Plateletpheresis before redo CABG diminishes excessive blood transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Blood conservation remains an important element for patients undergoing cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. Preoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) harvest is an autologous blood conservation method. The efficacy of preoperative PRP harvest and post-cardiopulmonary bypass reinfusion on postoperative bleeding and need for postoperative blood transfusion was evaluated in patients undergoing redo coronary artery bypass grafting in a prospective, randomized manner. METHODS: All adult patients admitted for redo coronary artery bypass grafting entered into the study. The PRP harvest aim was 20% or more of the total estimated circulating platelets. Immediately preoperatively three sequestration cycles were performed. The PRP was reinfused after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. One hundred seven parameters/patient were recorded. There were 20 patients in the RPR group and 20 controls (without PRP harvest). RESULTS: Patient characteristics, operative data, and preoperative hematologic parameters did not differ between the groups. In the PRP group, the mean platelet count in the PRP was 864 +/- 139 x 10(3)/microL, and the platelet yield was 27% +/- 5% (range, 20% to 37%). The average total chest tube blood loss was 423 mL (PRP) compared with 1,462 mL (controls; p < 0.001). Fourteen patients in the control group required blood transfusions postoperatively compared with only 1 patient in the PRP group (p < 0.001). Postoperative fluid requirements were also significantly greater in the control group (p < 0.001). Postextubation gas exchange was significantly better in the PRP group compared with controls (p < 0.01). Postoperative ventilation time and intensive care stay were significantly shorter in patients in the PRP group. CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative PRP harvest of 20% or more of the total platelets and reinfusion of the PRP after cardiopulmonary bypass resulted in significantly less postoperative blood loss and decreased fluid and blood transfusion requirements compared with controls. Postextubation gas exchange, ventilation time, and time required in the intensive care unit were also better, and the method was found cost-effective.

Autologous platelet sequestration in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVES: Blood conservation remains an important issue for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Platelet sequestration (PSQ) is an aggressive autologous blood conservation method, whose effectiveness is still debated. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate whether PSQ reduces postoperative blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to determine if PSQ is a cost-effective blood conservation method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All adult patients admitted for CABG entered the study. Exclusion criteria were: recent blood transfusion (<7 days), a platelet count of 150x10(3)/microl or less, hematocrit less than 35% and body weight 50 kg or less. The sequestration was aim 20% or more of the total platelet plasma volume. The sequestration protocol was three sequestration cycles performed just prior to surgery. The concentrated platelet portion was reinfused after weaning from the cardiopulmonary bypass. Hundred seven parameters/patients were recorded. Sixty patients entered the study; 30 in the PSQ group and 30 controls (CTR). RESULTS: Patient characteristics, operation data, preoperative hematology and coagulation parameters did not differ between the groups. In the PSQ group a mean of 433+/-34 ml concentrated platelet portion was collected. The mean platelet count in the concentrated platelet portion was 749+/-157x10(3)/microl, resulting in a platelet yield of 28+/-6% (2040%). The average total chest tube blood loss was 423 ml (PSQ) compared to 858 ml (CTR), p<0.001. A greater number of CTR patients required blood transfusion postoperatively (23) compared to PSQ (3), P<0.001, and fluid requirements were also significantly increased in the control group, P<0.001. No statistical differences in hematology and coagulation parameters between the groups were observed. The hospital mortality was low and the incidence of postoperative complications was few and without group differences. Post-extubation gas exchange was better in PSQ patients compared to CTR. CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative PSQ of a minimum 20% of the total platelet plasma volume resulted in significantly lower postoperative blood loss and fluid and blood transfusion requirements compared to controls. Post-extubation gas exchange was also better after PSQ. Only one patient did not tolerate the sequestration. No other adverse effects of the procedure were observed.

Progress of quality-associated costing: extension to platelet transfusion practice and the manufacturing scope for plasma proteins.

Realistic estimates about the potential misallocation of health service resources, in relation to the cost-beneficial use of blood products, is enabled by tracing manufacturing costs, through product specification elements to corresponding post-transfusion outcomes. This quality-associated costing (QAC) philosophy is completed in this article by understanding the issues that surround the manufacture of platelets, and by its comparison with the generally used but arbitrary methods for blood product costing. Without QAC, cost-beneficial platelet therapy will not be realized, due to an estimated Western underfunding of approximately one quarter of a billion pounds per annum by arbitrary methods. A reciprocal consequence of such platelet QAC is a significant reduction in the currently perceived cost of source plasma. Western estimates, based upon this, demonstrate that the not-for-profit fractionation of source plasma into purified proteins is probably underfunded by approximately one fifth of a billion pounds per annum through the use of arbitrary costing methods.

[Platelet concentrates from whole-blood donations (buffy-coat) or apheresis: which one to use?]. / Concentrados de plaquetas procedentes de sangre total (buffy coat) u obtenidos por aféresis; ¿qué producto emplear?

Platelet concentrates (PCs) prepared either from whole-blood donations by the buffy-coat method (BC), or by plateletpheresis are indicated to prevent or treat acute hemorrhage secondary to thrombocytopenia, and there is an ongoing debate about which platelet product should be used. Usage of each of these two products is highly heterogeneous among countries and individual institutions, ranging from 10 to 90%, with a 50:50 ratio in Europe. In comparison of pooled platelets prepared by the BC method and apheresis PCs, data suggest similar efficacy of the products. Regarding recipients' adverse reactions, there is no advantage for apheresis concentrates. From the donor's point of view, evidence favours using the abundance of platelets available from whole-blood donation. As residual viral transmission risk continues to fall, the advantage of apheresis products related to the decrease to donor exposure lessens. While the cost-effectiveness of apheresis products is comparable to that of other accepted blood safety interventions, in case of emerging pathogens, probably pathogen inactivation of pooled BC PCs would be a more desirable strategy.

Acute plateletpheresis and aprotinin reduces the need for blood transfusion following Ross operation.

The effect of acute intraoperative plateletpheresis (25% platelet yield) in combination with intraoperative low-dose aprotinin (2 million units) on blood conservation was investigated in 18 young adult patients undergoing elective Ross operation. The results were compared with a group of 19 similar patients without plateletpheresis (control group). The hematological and coagulation parameters at admission and discharge were statistically similar in both groups. The total blood product transfusion requirements were significantly reduced in the plateletpheresis group compared with the control group (3.2 units and 5.1 units, respectively, P=0.036). The total blood donor exposure was also reduced significantly in the plateletpheresis group compared with the control group (3.2 and 6.9 donors/patient, respectively, P<0.001). The direct costs for the hospital for the plateletpheresis procedure, including costs for all blood products, were similar to those for blood products alone in the control group. In summary, acute plateletpheresis in combination with low-dose aprotinin significantly reduces the blood product transfusions and blood donor exposures following the Ross operation; the treatment is cost-effective.

Evaluation of concurrent collection of in-line filtered platelets and packed red blood cells by multicomponent apheresis with three last-generation apparatuses.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multicomponent apheresis enables the collection and procession of different blood products in a single donation. Different apparatuses vary in terms of principle and efficiency. Knowledge of them is essential to analyse cost effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 donors, well matched for baseline parameters, were randomly assigned to the concurrent collection of red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets (PLTs) with the Baxter Amicus (AM), the Haemonetics MCS plus (MCS+), and the Gambro Trima Accel (TA). The procedures were prospectively evaluated, focusing on yield, time, efficiency, citrate donor load and in vitro quality. RESULTS: PLT yield (x 10(11)/unit; mean +/- standard deviation) was 3.09 +/- 0.34 (AM), 2.53 +/- 0.35 (MCS+), 2.51 +/- 0.32 (TA). Absolute RBC mass (ml/unit; mean +/- standard deviation) was 177.4 +/- 2.7 (AM), 161.5 +/- 0.7 (MCS+), and 163.7 +/- 5.4 (TA). The programmed RBC collection target of 160-180 ml was reached by all instruments, whereas the programmed PLT yield of 3.0 x 10(11) was met satisfactorily by AM only. All units contained < 1 x 10(6) WBCs. In vitro RBC quality was equivalent among the systems. No significant differences were noted with collection efficiency, processed whole blood or citrate donor load. Owing to high collection and draw rates, the TA was the fastest of all the systems. The MCS+ had the longest donation/needle time and the highest PLT activation, but compensated with significantly lower draw and citrate infusion rates. The overall processing time was longest with the AM, as a result of manual procedures from donor disconnection to the final products. CONCLUSIONS: Multicomponent apheresis was performed safely and efficiently with all three instruments. There was no 'magic apparatus' as each system combined advantages and pitfalls for the diverse parameters evaluated.

Blood collection and transfusion in the United States in 1999.

BACKGROUND: Collection, processing, and transfusion of blood and blood components in the US in 1999 were measured and compared with prior years. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Questionnaires were completed by 2040 blood centers and hospitals. Statistical procedures were used to verify the representativeness of the sample and to estimate national totals. RESULTS: The total US blood supply in 1999 was 13,876,000 units (before testing), 10.1 percent greater than in 1997. It included 13,109,000 allogeneic units, 651,000 autologous units, and 116,000 red cell (RBC) units collected by apheresis. Transfusion of whole blood and RBCs increased by 7.6 percent to 12,389,000 units. Platelet (PLT) transfusions totaled 9,052,000 PLT concentrate equivalent units, of which 66.5 percent were PLTs from apheresis. In comparison with 1997, the total number of PLT units transfused was unchanged, whereas single-donor PLT units transfused increased by 6.7 percent and the transfusion of PLTs from whole blood (PLT concentrates) declined by 10.6 percent (a difference of approximately 400,000 units in each case). CONCLUSIONS: The margin between transfusion demand and the total allogeneic supply in 1999 was 1,203,000 units, 9.1 percent of the supply. By comparison, the margin in 1997 was 7.2 percent, whereas in 1989 it was 13.8 percent. Similarly, the rate of blood collection in 1999 per 1000 population was 11.9 percent higher than the 1997 rate. During the same period, however, the rate of transfusion per 1000 population increased by 5.8 percent. Risk in the future lies primarily in the increasing demand for RBCs and further shrinkage of the supply-and-demand margin.

Pooled platelet concentrates: maybe not fancy, but fiscally sound and effective.

For almost two decades, two types of platelet products have been available: pooled random donor platelets (RDP), manufactured from whole blood donations and single donor platelets (SDP), manufactured on apheresis devices. During this period, two trends have occurred--an overall increase in demand for platelets and a preference for the use of SDP. The reasons for the disproportionate increase in the use of SDP relates in all likelihood to supply logistics, perceptions of quality, lack of price sensitivity on the part of prescribing physicians, and minimizing donor exposures in an era of uncertainty and litigation surrounding the allogeneic blood supply. In the cost-conscious 1990s, it is essential to reappraise the situation and perform a critical analysis of the relative value of these products. Such an analysis leads to an inescapable conclusion that preferential use of RDP is the more logical strategy.

Apheresis platelets: emerging issues related to donor platelet count, apheresis platelet yield, and platelet transfusion dose.

Emerging issues in stimulating apheresis platelet donors with platelet growth factors, the relative costs of apheresis and random donor platelet concentrates, optimal platelet transfusion dose, and leucoreduction of platelet products have caused renewed debate regarding apheresis products vs. random, pooled concentrates. The future role of apheresis products in platelet transfusion therapy will in large part be determined by costs, which are increasingly recognized to be influenced by donor platelet count, apheresis yield, and platelet transfusion dose.

Plateletapheresis using single vein access: a comparison of Haemonetics V-50 and Fenwal CS-3000 blood cell separators.

Donors were randomly selected for plateletapheresis using either the Haemonetics V-50 surge procedure or the Fenwal CS-3000 with special modifications. Six procedures using the V-50 were performed with 6 collection cycles. Platelet yields averaged 3.9 X 10(11) with an average white cell contamination of 3.8 X 10(8). Ten procedures were performed with 8 collection cycles. Platelet yields averaged 4.5 X 10(11) with an average white cell contamination of 1.2 X 10(8). CS-3000 procedures were performed using either 4,000 or 4,800 ml whole blood processed as the endpoint. Concentrates obtained using 4,000 ml (n = 10) as the endpoint contained 3.9 X 10(11) platelets with a white cell contamination of 9.2 X 10(8). A 4,800 ml (n = 5) endpoint produced concentrates with a yield of 4.5 X 10(11) and white cell contamination of 10.4 X 10(8).