Phase 3 Trial of Nemolizumab in Patients with Prurigo Nodularis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis is a chronic, debilitating, and severely pruritic neuroimmunologic skin disease. Nemolizumab, an interleukin-31 receptor alpha antagonist, down-regulates key pathways in the pathogenesis of prurigo nodularis. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned adults with moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis to receive an initial 60-mg dose of nemolizumab followed by subcutaneous injections of 30 mg or 60 mg (depending on baseline weight) every 4 weeks for 16 weeks or matching placebo. The primary end points were an itch response (a reduction of ≥4 points on the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS; scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe itch]) and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response (a score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] on the IGA [scores range from 0 to 4] and a reduction from baseline to week 16 of ≥2 points). There were five key secondary end points. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients underwent randomization; 183 were assigned to the nemolizumab group, and 91 to the placebo group. Treatment efficacy was shown with respect to both primary end points at week 16; a greater percentage of patients in the nemolizumab group than in the placebo group had an itch response (56.3% vs. 20.9%; strata-adjusted difference, 37.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.3 to 48.5), and a greater percentage in the nemolizumab group had an IGA response (37.7% vs. 11.0%; strata-adjusted difference, 28.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 18.8 to 38.2) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Benefits were observed for the five key secondary end points: itch response at week 4 (41.0% vs. 7.7%), PP-NRS score of less than 2 at week 4 (19.7% vs. 2.2%) and week 16 (35.0% vs. 7.7%), and an improvement of 4 or more points on the sleep disturbance numerical rating scale (range, 0 [no sleep loss] to 10 [unable to sleep at all]) at week 4 (37.2% vs. 9.9%) and week 16 (51.9% vs. 20.9%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The most common individual adverse events were headache (6.6% vs. 4.4%) and atopic dermatitis (5.5% vs. 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Nemolizumab monotherapy significantly reduced the signs and symptoms of prurigo nodularis. (Funded by Galderma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04501679; EudraCT number, 2019-004789-17.).

Single-cell profiling of prurigo nodularis demonstrates immune-stromal crosstalk driving profibrotic responses and reversal with nemolizumab.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic neuroimmune skin disease characterized by bilaterally distributed pruritic hyperkeratotic nodules on extremities and trunk. Neuroimmune dysregulation and chronic scratching are believed to both induce and maintain the characteristic lesions. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to provide a comprehensive view of the molecular pathogenesis of PN at the single-cell level to identify and outline key pathologic processes and the cell types involved. Features that distinguish PN skin from the skin of patients with atopic dermatitis were of particular interest. We further aimed to determine the impact of the IL31RA antagonist, nemolizumab, and its specificity at the single-cell level. METHODS: Single-cell RNA-sequencing of skin from 15 healthy donors and nonlesional and lesional skin from 6 patients each with PN and atopic dermatitis, combined with spatial-sequencing using the 10x Visium platform. Integration with bulk RNA-sequencing data from patients treated with nemolizumab. RESULTS: This study demonstrates that PN is an inflammatory skin disease characterized by both keratinocyte proliferation and activation of profibrotic responses. This study also demonstrates that the COL11A1+ fibroblast subset is a major contributor to fibrosis and is predominantly found in the papillary dermis of PN skin. Activation of fibrotic responses is the main distinguishing feature between PN and atopic dermatitis skin. This study further shows the broad effect of nemolizumab on PN cell types, with a prominent effect driving COL11A1+ fibroblast and keratinocyte responses toward normal. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a high-resolution characterization of the cell types and cellular processes activated in PN skin, establishing PN as a chronic fibrotic inflammatory skin disease. It further demonstrates the broad effect of nemolizumab on pathological processes in PN skin.

Prurigo nodularis: new insights into pathogenesis and novel therapeutics.

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is an inflammatory skin condition characterized by intensely pruritic nodules on the skin. Patients with PN suffer from an intractable itch-scratch cycle leading to impaired sleep, psychosocial distress and a significant disruption in quality of life. The pathogenesis of PN is associated with immune and neural dysregulation, mediated by inflammatory cytokines [such as interleukin (IL)-4, -13, -17, -22 and -31] and neuropeptides (such as substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide). There is a role for type 2 inflammation in PN in addition to T-helper (Th)17 and Th22-mediated inflammation. The neuroimmune feedback loop in PN involves neuropeptides released from nerve fibres that cause vasodilation and further recruitment of inflammatory cells. Inflammatory cells, particularly mast cells and eosinophils, degranulate and release neurotoxins, as well as nerve growth factor, which may contribute to the neuronal hyperplasia seen in the dermis of patients with PN and neural sensitization. Recent studies have also indicated underlying genetic susceptibility to PN in addition to environmental factors, the existence of various disease endotypes centred around degrees of type 2 inflammation or underlying myelopathy or spinal disc disease, and significant race and ethnicity-based differences, with African Americans having densely fibrotic skin lesions. Dupilumab became the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapeutic for PN, and there are several other agents currently in development. The anti-IL-31 receptor A inhibitor nemolizumab is in late-stage development with positive phase III data reported. In addition, the oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitors, abrocitinib and povorcitinib, are in phase II trials while a topical JAK1/2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, is in phase III studies.

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic skin condition featuring extremely itchy nodules on the skin of the legs, arms and trunk of the body. PN affects approximately 72 per 100 000 people and the severe itch associated with the condition can negatively impact a person's sleep, work and social life. However, the cause of PN remains unclear. Current understanding of PN is based on imbalances in the immune system leading to widespread inflammation as well as dysregulation of the nerves in the skin. Immune molecules released from T cells [such as interleukin (IL)-4, -13, -31, -17, -22 and -31] increase systemic inflammation and are elevated in people with PN. Activated inflammatory cells (such as mast cells or eosinophils) may also release factors that promote inflammation, itch and neural changes within the skin. Neural dysregulation in PN features a lower density of itch-sensing nerve fibres in the epidermis (upper layer of the skin) and a higher density of itch-sensing nerve fibres in the dermis (lower layer of the skin). Because the pathogenesis of PN is not fully understood, the therapies available for PN have had limited success in reducing itch and nodules. The only drug currently approved for PN in the USA and Europe is dupilumab, an IL-4Rα inhibitor that blocks signalling through IL-4 and IL-13, which is undergoing post-marketing surveillance. Other new drugs are being assessed in various phases of clinical trials, including nemolizumab, vixarelimab, barzolvolimab, ruxolitinib, abrocitinib, povorcitinib and nalbuphine.

Prevalence, incidence and treatment patterns of prurigo nodularis in England: a retrospective database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a pruritic skin disease characterized by multiple intensely itchy skin nodules in symmetrically distributed areas of the extremities. There are limited studies on the epidemiology and treatment pathways of PN, especially moderate-to-severe PN, from England. OBJECTIVES: To assess the epidemiology and treatment pathways of mild and moderate-to-severe PN in England. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics in England. Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with a PN-specific diagnosis code allocated any time between 1 April 2007 and 1 March 2019 (patient identification period) were selected. Patients were included if their first PN diagnostic code (index diagnosis date; IDD) was recorded during the identification period, with data available 6 months before and ≥ 12 months after the IDD. Patients were classified as having moderate-to-severe PN (MSPN) or mild PN (MiPN), based on the presence or absence of a prescription record, post-IDD, for either a systemic immunosuppressant or a gabapentinoid. Patients with MSPN and MiPN were matched 1 : 1 according to age, sex and IDD. Prevalence and incidence were calculated for each year from 2007 to 2019. Drugs prescribed post-IDD were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 8933 patients (MSPN, n = 2498; MiPN, n = 6435) were included in the study; 2462 patients with MiPN and 2462 with MSPN were included for the comparative analysis. The presence of atopic dermatitis, asthma and eosinophilic oesophagitis were significantly higher (all P < 0.001) in patients with MSPN compared with those with MiPN. The overall prevalence of cases of PN increased during the study period. The incidence rate also showed a similar trend. The rates of prescription of potent and super-potent topical corticosteroids (TCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors, first- and second-generation antihistamines, oral and injectable systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate, antidepressants and tacrolimus were significantly higher (all P < 0.001) in patients with MSPN compared with those with MiPN. CONCLUSIONS: The epidemiology of PN was consistent with that found in other European studies. Patients with MSPN received a significantly higher number of prescriptions for potent TCS and systemic drugs compared with patients with MiPN.

Prurigo nodularis is an itchy skin disease that can affect a person's daily life and sleep, and is often accompanied by other diseases. Skin ointments are used to treat the disease. If these are not effective, the disease is treated with oral medicine. The severity of prurigo nodularis is not well established. People with prurigo nodularis and treated with skin ointments are generally considered to have a milder form of the disease. Patients with severe disease most often require oral medicine that target the immune system. In England, there are no estimates of how often prurigo nodularis has affected the population over the last 10 years. In this study, we looked at cases of mild and moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis in England and the treatments used by patients. We found that cases of prurigo nodularis (both mild and moderate-to-severe) increased during the study period, which was 2007 to 2019. Patients with the more severe form of the disease were more often treated with drugs that were not approved for treating it. Overall, our findings suggest that the number of patients with prurigo nodularis is increasing in England. A new and approved treatment option might be required to manage moderate-to-severe disease.

Efficacy and safety of nemolizumab and topical corticosteroids for prurigo nodularis: results from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase II/III clinical study in patients aged ≥ 13†years.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN), a chronic inflammatory skin condition, adversely affects the quality of life of affected individuals. Current treatment options for PN in Japan are limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optimal dose, efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with nemolizumab in patients with PN in Japan. METHODS: In a 16-week double-blind phase II/III study, patients aged ≥ 13 years with PN were randomly assigned (1 : 1 : 1) to nemolizumab 30-mg, 60-mg or placebo groups, with concomitant topical corticosteroids, every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in the weekly mean Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score (range 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse itching) from baseline to week 16. Secondary efficacy endpoints assessed the impact of treatment on pruritus, PN severity, sleep and quality of life. RESULTS: At week 16, the least-squares mean percentage change from baseline in the PP-NRS score was -61.1% in the nemolizumab 30-mg group (n = 77), -56.0% in the 60-mg group (n = 76), and -18.6% in the placebo group (n = 76). Differences between both nemolizumab groups and placebo were significant; the difference between the 30-mg and placebo groups was -42.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) -51.9 to -33.1; P < 0.0001], and between the 60-mg and placebo groups was -37.4% (95% CI -46.7 to -28.1; P < 0.0001). Patients treated with nemolizumab also had greater improvements in the number and severity of prurigo nodules, and in sleep and quality of life compared with the placebo group. Both nemolizumab doses were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in PN were greater following nemolizumab treatment, despite continuation of topical corticosteroids in both groups.

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a skin condition in which firm, raised bumps are seen on the arms, legs and trunk. These bumps are extremely itchy and can cause interruptions to sleep, as well as anxiety and distress. There are few available treatments for PN in Japan; and better options are needed. Nemolizumab is a new treatment which has been shown to reduce itching associated with several skin conditions, including PN. In this study, we investigated whether nemolizumab could reduce itch and nodules and improve quality of life in patients aged 13 years or older in Japan who had already tried topical steroids or antihistamines to treat their PN. We treated 229 patients with PN by injecting either nemolizumab or placebo under the skin every 4 weeks. Seventy-seven patients received a first dose of nemolizumab 60 mg, followed by 30 mg every 4 weeks, and 76 patients received nemolizumab 60 mg at every injection. Another 76 patients received placebo at each injection. All patients were allowed to continue using their topical treatments during the study. We found that both doses of nemolizumab were better than placebo at reducing itch over 16 weeks. After nemolizumab treatment, patients also had less severe PN, better sleep and better quality of life. Both doses of nemolizumab were well tolerated by patients and there were no severe side-effects associated with nemolizumab treatment. Overall, nemolizumab could be a helpful new treatment option for people with PN who do not get enough itch relief with current medication.

Validation of a scoring algorithm for the clinician-reported outcome tool 'prurigo activity and severity (PAS)' based on clinical studies of dupilumab in adults with prurigo Nodularis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) also known as chronic prurigo, is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by intensely itchy nodules/lesions which occur due to intensive scratching. PN management is, in part, based on clinician evaluations of PN lesions, which can be supported by clinician-reported outcomes (ClinRO) such as the Prurigo Activity and Severity (PAS) instrument. A 5-item version of PAS was included in recent phase-3 dupilumab PN trials (PRIME [NCT04183335]/PRIME2 [NCT04202679]). The PAS score was derived using the unweighted sum of 3-items of the 5-item PAS (range, 0-11; higher score indicates worse activity and severity): Item 2 (number of lesions), Item 5a (percentage of lesions with excoriations/crusts) and Item 5b (percentage of healed lesions) for use in clinical practice and for communication of treatment benefit to physicians. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the measurement properties of PAS score and derive within-patient (responder definition) and between-group improvement thresholds for interpreting changes in PAS score in patients with PN. METHODS: The data source was the pooled treatment group, intention-to-treat (ITT) data from the phase-3 PRIME (NCT04183335) and PRIME2 (NCT04202679) studies evaluating the efficacy of dupilumab in adult patients with PN with ≥20 nodules and severe itch uncontrolled with topical therapies. PAS score reliability, validity and sensitivity to change were evaluated, and anchor- and distribution-based methods were applied to derive meaningful change thresholds. RESULTS: The pooled ITT population included 311 patients (mean age 49.5 years, 65.3% female). Adequate to good psychometric properties were demonstrated for PAS score. The within-patient meaningful improvement threshold was estimated as 3.0 points (absolute change) and 37% (per cent change). A 1.7-point (absolute change) and 20% (per cent change) improvement were estimated to reflect a between-group meaningful change in PAS score. CONCLUSIONS: PAS score is a simple, clinically relevant indicator of PN lesion activity and severity supported by suitable psychometric performance.

Responder analysis using clinically meaningful thresholds: Post hoc analyses from randomized dupilumab clinical trials in patients with prurigo nodularis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is an intensely pruritic disease characterized by itchy nodules on the trunk/extremities; it is often accompanied by skin pain and sleep disruption with negative impacts on the quality of life (QoL). The patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments, Worst Itch-Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS), Skin Pain-NRS, Sleep-NRS and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) have been psychometrically validated and the clinically meaningful within-patient improvement thresholds (responder definition) have been established through data pooled from the two Phase-3 trials (PRIME, NCT04183335 and PRIME2, NCT04202679) of dupilumab in adults with PN uncontrolled on topical therapies. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion of dupilumab-treated patients (vs. placebo) achieving clinically meaningful improvement in itch, skin pain, sleep and QoL, either alone or in combination, from the data pooled from PRIME and PRIME2 trials. METHODS: The patient-level data pooled from the two Phase-3 trials (N = 311) were used for this post hoc analysis. Thresholds of clinically meaningful within-patient improvement in PRO instrument scores from baseline at Week 24 used for defining responders were 4 (WI-NRS and Skin Pain-NRS), 2 (Sleep-NRS) and 9 points (DLQI). The proportion of dupilumab-treated patients, versus placebo, achieving the thresholds, and the time taken to achieve the thresholds were evaluated for the individual and combination of PROs. RESULTS: Responder rates were significantly higher with dupilumab, versus placebo at Week 24 for WI-NRS (58.8% vs. 19.0%, p < 0.0001), Skin Pain-NRS (49.7% vs. 20.9%, p < 0.0001), Sleep-NRS (42.5% vs. 23.4%, p < 0.0001) and DLQI (64.7% vs. 22.8%, p < 0.0001). Proportion of patients achieving simultaneous improvement in symptoms and QoL (24.8% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in dupilumab-treated patients versus placebo. The time needed for achieving clinically meaningful improvement in symptoms were significantly lower in dupilumab-treated patients, versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly greater proportion of dupilumab-treated patients with PN, versus placebo, demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in PRO measures of symptoms and QoL.

Estimating meaningful change thresholds for Skin Pain-Numeric Rating Scale, Sleep-Numeric Rating Scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index in patients with prurigo nodularis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is characterized by intensely itchy nodules/lesions and skin pain, which can have a substantial impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Treatment benefits on such symptoms and impacts are best assessed in trials using patient-reported outcome (PROs) instruments such as Skin Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Sleep-NRS and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). However, no guidance exists for interpreting meaningful changes in scores using these PROs in patients with PN. OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to derive within-patient (responder definition) and between-group improvement thresholds for interpreting Skin Pain-NRS, Sleep-NRS and DLQI total scores in patients with PN. The measurement properties of the three PROs were also evaluated. METHODS: Intention-to-treat (ITT), blinded and pooled data were used from the Phase 3 PRIME (NCT04183335) and PRIME2 (NCT04202679) studies evaluating the efficacy of dupilumab in adult patients with PN. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were applied to derive responder definition and between-group thresholds for Skin Pain-NRS, Sleep-NRS and DLQI. Data were additionally used to examine the instrument measurement properties, including reliability, validity and responsiveness. RESULTS: A total of 311 patients (mean age 49.5 years, 65.3% female) were included in the pooled ITT population. The within-patient improvement threshold for Skin Pain-NRS was estimated as 4.0 points, 2.0 points for Sleep-NRS and 9.0 points for DLQI total score. A 1.5-point improvement in Skin Pain-NRS scores, 1.0-point in Sleep-NRS and 4.0-point in DLQI indicated a between-group meaningful change. Adequate to good psychometric properties were demonstrated for all three instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study can aid interpretation of Skin Pain-NRS, Sleep-NRS and DLQI scores in patients with PN in both clinical trials and clinical practice to better understand and treat PN-related skin pain and the impact of PN on sleep quality and HRQoL.

Post-vaccine nodules with prurigo in a child successfully treated by dupilumab.

We report the case of a 7-year-old girl with severe generalized prurigo associated with diffuse persistent pruritic nodules due to sensitization to aluminum-adsorbed vaccines. Treatment with dupilumab resulted in an excellent therapeutic response.

Prurigo-like atopic dermatitis in a child with CARD11-associated severe combined immunodeficiency successfully treated with dupilumab.

A 12-year-old boy affected by severe combined immunodeficiency due to a heterozygous variant in the CARD domain of CARD11, c.169G>A; p.Glu57Lys, developed severe atopic dermatitis and alopecia areata. After failure of conventional systemic therapy, dupilumab was administered at a dose of 400 mg subcutaneously, followed by 200 mg every 14 days. The patient had an excellent clinical response after 1 month and complete remission after a year, with the absence of side effects, demonstrating good efficacy and safety profile.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Prurigo Nodularis: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a complex chronic skin disease characterized by severe pruritic nodules. PN is often associated with mental health disorders and chronic medical comorbidities. Until recently, PN treatment has been challenging and difficult. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the demographic, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities associated with PN. Also, we aim to describe the effectiveness of systemic therapies, including methotrexate, cyclosporine, and narrow band ultraviolet (NB-UVB) in adult patients with PN. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of adult patients diagnosed with PN at Hamilton Health Science Center and/or McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, between 2015 and 2023. RESULTS: The study included 81 patients (57% female). The mean age was 52.8 years, and the mean age of PN diagnosis was 50 years. Reported symptoms included: itching (100%), dry skin (53%), pain (17%), and burning sensation (5%). Lower and upper extremities were the most common areas involved in 93% and 69%, respectively. Mental health disorders were present in 79% of patients, with depression (58%) and anxiety (52%) being the most common. Atopic dermatitis was the most common skin comorbidity noted. Treatments used included cyclosporine, and NB-UVB, and MTX, which resulted in significant improvement of pruritus in 38%, 35%, and 31% of patients, respectively, at week 16. CONCLUSIONS: PN is associated with increased risk of mental health disorders and other medical comorbidities. Cyclosporine, methotrexate, and NB-UVB therapy may be effective treatment options, however clinicians must consider the potential short- and long-term adverse effects of these treatments.

Non-Systemic Medication for the Treatment of Prurigo Nodularis: A Systematic Review.

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a skin disease characterized by firm, itchy, erythematous lesions. Treatment consists of systemic and non-systemic modes of therapy. Non-systemic forms of treatment are first-line and include topical corticosteroids, topical steroid-sparing agents, and phototherapy. The objective was to review the efficacy of non-systemic treatment used to treat PN. A systematic search was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023412012). The search consisted of keywords and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and translated to Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus. Google Scholar was also searched for the first 200 articles. Article quality of evidence was scored using GRADE criteria. The search yielded 1151 results; 37 met criteria for inclusion. There were 14 studies on phototherapy, and 11 studies on topical corticosteroids, most of which were also combined with topical antihistamines, antipruritics, and/or phototherapy. There were 2 studies each on topical antipruritics used in isolation, vitamin D analogues, and intralesional triamcinolone acetonide. There was 1 study each on topical pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, 2% dinitrochlorobenzene, cryotherapy, acupuncture, and the Paul Gerson Unna boot. Most were case reports and case series, although 2 randomized controlled trials on phototherapy and topical pimecrolimus were included. Corticosteroids had varying levels of positive response in patients and appeared more effective when used in combination or under occlusive dressing. Phototherapy is likely effective, but the risk of relapse is high. Cryotherapy may also be a lesion-directed agent to circumvent challenges to adherence and avoidance of systemic medication.

Prurigo Nodularis: Pathogenesis and the Horizon of Potential Therapeutics.

Chronic pruritus that lasts for over 6 weeks can present in various forms, like papules, nodules, and plaque types, with prurigo nodularis (PN) being the most prevalent. The pathogenesis of PN involves the dysregulation of immune cell-neural circuits and is associated with peripheral neuropathies, possibly due to chronic scratching. PN is a persistent and challenging condition, involving complex interactions among the skin, immune system, and nervous system. Lesional skin in PN exhibits the infiltration of diverse immune cells like T cells, eosinophils, macrophages, and mast cells, leading to the release of inflammatory cytokines and itch-inducing substances. Activated sensory nerve fibers aggravate pruritus by releasing neurotransmitters, perpetuating a vicious cycle of itching and scratching. Traditional treatments often fail, but recent advancements in understanding the inflammatory and itch transmission mechanisms of PN have paved the way for innovative therapeutic approaches, which are explored in this review.

A systematic review of interleukin-31 inhibitors in the treatment of prurigo nodularis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a neuroimmunological skin disease. Severe itching is the most challenging symptom which affects patients' quality of life. T helper 2-derived cytokines, such as interleukin-31 and oncostatin M (OSM), play a crucial role in PN pathogenesis. Nemolizumab and vixarelimab are two biologics acting as IL-31 inhibitors. Vixarelimab also suppresses the OSM activity. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab and vixarelimab in PN management. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science up to September 17th, 2023. Clinical trials and cohort studies published in English were included. RESULTS: Among a total of 96 relevant records, five were included. The results of four studies with 452 patients using nemolizumab showed that a significantly higher percentage of patients treated with nemolizumab demonstrated a reduction in peak pruritus numerical rating scale (PP-NRS) and investigator's global assessment along with improved sleep disturbance (SD) and quality of life than the placebo group. Moreover, one study administered vixarelimab to 49 PN patients, and their finding illustrated a higher rate of subjects who received vixarelimab experienced ≥ 4-point diminution in worst itch NRS, visual analog scale, healing of representative lesions, and SD quality compared to the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: IL-31 inhibitors suggest distinct advantages in improving pruritus, sleep quality, and overall quality of life in subjects with moderate-to-severe PN. Further clinical studies are recommended to compare the effectiveness of these biologics to other therapeutic choices.

Chronic Prurigo.

Chronic prurigo (CPG) is a neuroinflammatory dermatosis characterized by prolonged pruritus lasting more than 6 weeks, pruriginous skin lesions, and repeated scratching. Patients with CPG suffer significantly from psychological distress and a marked impairment in their quality of life. The most common subtype of CPG is chronic nodular prurigo (CNPG, also called prurigo nodularis). In addition to the clinical features of CPG and the burden of disease, this CME article provides an overview of the significant advances in understanding the pathophysiology, including the associated therapeutic options for CPG. Dupilumab is the first approved therapy for moderate and severe CNPG to date from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). It also highlights other agents currently being studied in Phase II and Phase III clinical, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. These include biologics such as nemolizumab (anti-IL-31-RA-mAb), vixarelimab/KPL-716 (anti-Oncostatin-M receptor ß-mAb), and barzolvolimab/CDX-0159 (anti-KIT-mAb), as well as Janus kinase inhibitors such as povorcitinib/INCB054707 and abrocitinib, and opioid modulators such as nalbuphine.

Trial of Nemolizumab in Moderate-to-Severe Prurigo Nodularis.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis is a chronic pruritic skin disease with multiple nodular skin lesions. Nemolizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-31 receptor, which is involved in the pathogenesis of prurigo nodularis. METHODS: We conducted a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial of nemolizumab (at a dose of 0.5 mg per kilogram of body weight) administered subcutaneously at baseline, week 4, and week 8, as compared with placebo, in patients with moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis and severe pruritus. Moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis was defined as 20 or more nodules, and severe pruritus was defined as a mean score of at least 7 for the worst daily intensity of pruritus on the numerical rating scale (scores range from 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst itch imaginable]). The primary outcome was the percent change from baseline in the mean peak score for pruritus on the numerical rating scale at week 4. Secondary outcomes included additional measures of itching and disease severity. Safety assessments were performed through week 18. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive nemolizumab (34 patients) or placebo (36). The initial pruritus score on the numerical rating scale was 8.4 in each group. At week 4, the peak pruritus score on the numerical rating scale was reduced from baseline by 4.5 points (change, -53.0%) in the nemolizumab group, as compared with a reduction of 1.7 points (change, -20.2%) in the placebo group (difference, -32.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -46.8 to -18.8; P<0.001). Results for secondary outcomes were in the same direction as for the primary outcome. Nemolizumab was associated with gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain and diarrhea) and musculoskeletal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Nemolizumab resulted in a greater reduction in pruritus and severity of skin lesions than placebo in patients with prurigo nodularis but was associated with adverse events. Larger and longer trials are needed to determine the durability and safety of nemolizumab for the treatment of prurigo nodularis. (Funded by Galderma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03181503.).

A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model evaluating efficacy of nalbuphine extended-release in patients with prurigo nodularis.

AIMS: Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models were used to describe the exposure-response (E-R) relationship between nalbuphine exposure and two widely used rating scales for itch: the Numerical Rating Scale for the subject's 'average'; itch experience (NRS-AV) and the Worst Itch (WI-NRS), with 24-h recall. Simulations based on the model E-R relationship were used to support dose selection for Phase 3 clinical trials and were evaluated with a target of reducing the 7-day average of the 24-h WI-NRS by at least 30% from baseline in most of the analysis population. METHODS: Data from two clinical trials (NCT02373215: 9 healthy subjects; NCT02174419: 62 subjects with PN), in patients with prurigo nodularis (PN) with moderate to severe itch who received treatment with either of two doses of nalbuphine extended release (ER) or placebo, were used for the analysis. A two-compartment PK model with serial zero and first-order oral absorption was used to describe drug exposure. A maximum effect ( E max ) model with a placebo effect was used to model the itch response endpoints (NRS-AV, WI-NRS). RESULTS: The PK-PD model predicted the exposure-related reduction in both NRS-AV and WI-NRS over time with approximately 63% and 27% of E max , respectively. Exposures associated with 80% of E max were achieved in about 78% of the patients at 162 mg, twice daily (BID), compared to 35% at 81 mg BID. CONCLUSION: Simulated dose response indicated that 108 and 162 mg BID doses result in the highest proportion of patients achieving at least a 30% reduction in NRS-AV and WI-NRS, respectively.

Zinc Oxide Patches Are a Highly Effective Treatment for Chronic Prurigo: A Randomized Split-Body Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic prurigo (CPG) presents with pruriginous lesions and reduced quality of life (QoL). Established treatment options are often unsatisfying. Little is known about the efficacy of topical occlusive treatments. Patients often report rapid relief of symptoms when using topical occlusive zinc oxide patches (ZOP). We, therefore, aimed to assess the efficacy of ZOP. METHODS: In this randomized controlled split-body crossover study, 22 participants were analyzed, receiving three treatments sequentially: ZOP, topical betamethasone 17-valerate (topical glucocorticosteroids [TGCs]), and both ZOP and TGC combined (ZOP + TGC). Each intervention was applied to either the right or left side of the body for seven consecutive days. Outcomes were a count of active excoriated pruriginous lesions (APLs), itch, recurrence of APL, QoL, and treatment comfort. They were assessed through photographs and questionnaires: modified Prurigo Activity and Severity Score, modified Itchy Quality of Life Questionnaire, and Therapy Comfort Score. RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction of 46% in APL count for ZOP (95% CI from 30% to 58%, p value: <0.0001). Similar reduction was seen for ZOP + TGC, and a lower reduction was seen for TGC alone (48% [95% CI from 33% to 60%, p value: <0.0001] vs. 26% [95% CI from 4% to 43%, p value: 0.02]). APL counts on the non-treated side remained stable. Significant reduction in itch was observed after all treatments, with the largest improvement for ZOP + TGC, followed by TGC and, lastly, ZOP alone (-2.3 units [95% CI from -3.5 to -1.1, p value: 0.00015] vs. -1.5 units [95% CI from -2.8 to -0.3, p value: 0.01 vs. -1.4 units [95% CI from -2.6 to -0.2, p value: 0.02]). QoL increased significantly after ZOP + TGC as well as after TGC (-8.3 units [95% CI from -13.6 to -3.1, p value: 0.0018] vs. -5.7 units [95% CI from -10.9 to -0.5, p value: 0.03]). A good subjective response concerning treatment comfort was observed. CONCLUSION: ZOP are effective in reducing APL after 1 week of treatment. Adding TGC to ZOP did not add considerable benefit in reducing APL. All three treatments reduced itch and improved QoL, with the largest improvement shown by ZOP combined with TGC. Patients tolerated ZOP well and reported no adverse events. We therefore suggest ZOP combined with TGC as an effective, fast-acting, low-cost treatment for reducing APL and itch in patients with CPG.

Successful Treatment of Prurigo Nodularis by Dupilumab: Report of 24 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic pruritic skin disease which is difficult to treat. Current treatment options often lead to limited clinical benefit or severe side effects. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of PN in adults. METHOD: This study is a retrospective cohort study. Twenty-four adult patients with PN were included and treated with dupilumab. The primary outcomes were the mean reduction in the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score and pruritus numeric rating scale (p-NRS) score. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, week 4, week 16, and week 36. RESULTS: The study included 24 patients, of whom 9 (37.5%) were male, and the mean (SD) age of the enrolled patients was 49.88 ± 16.71 years. At the end of the 16-week treatment, the mean p-NRS score decreased from 7.50 ± 2.21 to 1.41 ± 0.91 (p < 0.001), sleeplessness numeric rating scale (s-NRS) score declined from 5.33 ± 3.29 to 0.18 ± 0.59 (p < 0.001), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score decreased from 13.32 ± 4.88 to 0.91 ± 0.81 (p < 0.001). Fourteen (63.6%) of 22 patients achieved IGA 0/1 and 21 (95.5%) patients achieved IGA activity 0/1. Among 14 patients who achieved IGA 0/1, 10 had an elevated serum IgE level, and patients with a high serum IgE level showed a more remarkable reduction in IGA (r = 0.52, p = 0.03). Patients with AD responded faster than those without AD (3.76 ± 1.71 weeks vs. 6.40 ± 1.67 weeks, p = 0.01). Adverse events were recorded in 4/24 (16.6%) patients, with conjunctivitis being the most frequent. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that dupilumab is effective and safe for PN and could be a potential therapeutic option.

Dupilumab for Chronic Prurigo: Case Series on Effectiveness, Safety, and Quality of Life.

BACKGROUND: Chronic prurigo (CPG) is a pruritic skin disease, characterized by an itch-scratch cycle and scarring. It reduces patients' quality of life (QoL). Dupilumab is a monoclonal human IgG antibody that inhibits signaling of the interleukin 4 (IL-4) and interleukin 13 (IL-13) pathways through blockade of the IL-4 receptor. Patients with CPG who receive dupilumab often report great improvement in itch and overall QoL. We therefore reviewed our experience in order to follow up on QoL, safety, and treatment response in patients with CPG who received dupilumab. METHODS: We conducted a real-world retrospective single-center case series. Outcomes were assessed by phone interviews and photographs using validated questionnaires and scores. Demographic data were obtained from the hospital files. Follow-up was up to 2 years. We assessed QoL with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Itchy quality of life questionnaire (ItchyQoL). Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was used to assess itch. Prurigo lesions were documented with the Prurigo activity and severity score (PAS). RESULTS: Ten patients were included in this study. Results were reported up to 2 years after treatment with dupilumab. The response variables for DLQI, ItchyQoL, NRS, and PAS analyses showed a statistically significant decrease over time (DLQI: p ≤ 0.0001 [-0.84; -1.27], ItchyQoL: p ≤ 0.0001 [-9.89; -18.69], NRS maximum and average: p ≤ 0.0001 [-0.52; -0.86] and p ≤ 0.0001 [-0.55; -0.94], and PAS number of lesions: p = 0.0005 [-1.70; -5.28]). The percent decrease after 1 year of treatment (this estimate is based on model estimates) ranges from -42% to -82%. Four (40%) patients reported mild side effects. No serious side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab treatment of CGP for up to 2 years is associated with improved QoL and less itching.