[Concept of budget-based remuneration system for the fields of psychiatry and psychotherapy, psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy, child and adolescent psychiatry and psychotherapy]. / Konzept eines budgetbasierten Entgeltsystems für die Fachgebiete Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und -psychotherapie.

A new remuneration system is currently being developed for the hospital care of people with mental disorders. Last year, because of sharp criticism the option phase of the planned Flat-rate Charges in Psychiatry and Psychosomatics (Pauschalierende Entgelte Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik, PEPP) was extended by 2 years. During this time the Federal Ministry of Health wants to look for alternatives and possible starting points for the further development of care. Now, 16 scientific professional associations and organisations have presented a joint concept for a sustainable solution: the budget-based remuneration system. The system is suitable for ensuring that people with mental disorders are treated according to their particular needs and for promoting the appropriate further development of regional care in all treatment settings. It corresponds with the objectives as formulated in Section 17d of the Hospital Finance Act (Krankenhausfinanzierungsgesetz, KHG) and translates the PEPP system, which is currently being developed and focusses on average prices, into a performance-oriented, transparent budgetary system. The fundamental principle is the separation of the individual hospitals' budgeting on the basis of evidence-based, feature- and performance-related modules and billing in the form of advance payments from the agreed budget.

[Hometreatment- an effective alternative to inpatient treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry?]. / Hometreatment -Eine effektive Alternative zu konventionellen Behandlungsformen? .

In many countries hometreatment (HT) offers a cost-effective alternative to hospitalization for children and adolescents with mental health problems requiring intensive mental healthcare. However, the database on HT varies as HT may refer to different models and settings of intensive outpatient treatment. In Germany HT is not used routinely in mental healthcare in child and adolescent psychiatry, therefore the data on HT in Germany, especially in child and adolescent psychiatry, are scarce although funding for studies investigating the effectiveness of HT is available. This review represents a comprehensive search in electronic databases (1980-2014) of literature on HT. It provides as well an overview of the underlying concepts of and the present evidence for HT. In addition, the evidence base on HT for specific child and adolescent mental health disorders is reviewed. Future prospects for the development of HT in Germany facing the upcoming change in health service commissioning (PEPP = «pauschalierendes Entgeltsystem in Psychiatric und Psychosomatik>>) are discussed, as HT in child and adolescent psychiatry, when accurately indicated, can be a valid alternative to inpatient treatment.

[Nonnative guidelines for allocating human resources in child and adolescent psychiatry using average values under convergence conditions instead of price determination - analysis of the data of university hospitals in Germany concerning the costs of calculating day and minute values according to Psych-PV and PEPP-System]. / Normative Vorgaben zum Personaleinsatz in der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie statt Preisfindung anhand von Mittelwerten unter Konvergenzbedingungen.

OBJECTIVE: Despite substantial opposition in the practical field, based on an amendment to the Hospital Financing Act (KHG). the so-called PEPP-System was introduced in child and adolescent psychiatry as a new calculation model. The 2-year moratorium, combined with the rescheduling of the repeal of the psychiatry personnel regulation (Psych-PV) and a convergence phase, provided the German Federal Ministry of Health with additional time to enter a structured dialogue with professional associations. Especially the perspective concerning the regulatory framework is presently unclear. METHOD: In light of this debate, this article provides calculations to illustrate the transformation of the previous personnel regulation into the PEPP-System by means of the data of §21 KHEntgG stemming from the 22 university hospitals of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychotherapy in Germany. In 2013 there was a total of 7,712 cases and 263,694 calculation days. In order to identify a necessary basic reimbursement value th1\t would guarantee a constant quality of patient care, the authors utilize outcomes, cost structures, calculation days, and minute values for individual professional groups according to both systems (Psych-PV and PEPP) based on data from 2013 and the InEK' s analysis of the calculation datasets. CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose a normative agreement on the basic reimbursement value between 270 and 285 EUR. This takes into account the concentration phenomenon and the expansion of services that has occurred since the introduction of the Psych-PV system. Such a normative agreement on structural quality could provide a verifiable framework for the allocation of human resources corresponding to the previous regulations of Psych-PV.

[The new hospital reimbursement system: a chance and a challenge to child and adolescent psychiatry or «much ado about nothing¼?]. / Das neue Entgeltsystem.

New legislation in the financing of psychiatric hospitals in Germany stipulates the introduction of a new reimbursement system for psychiatric child and adolescent psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals in Germany by 2013. In several steps norms are to be empirically defined and services to be documented, and the current per diem system of hospital charges has to be replaced by a more specific system reflecting differences in the level of distinct patient groups. This discussion paper gives an overview of the legal framework as well as the risks and chances of the new system. An increased effort in documentation will be one of the clear consequences of the new system («much ado¼ ...). Psychiatric inpatient treatment will be much more transparent in detail, though it is not yet clear whether there will be a real improvement for patients (... «about nothing¼). The new system also offers the chance to introduce modern treatment concepts like home treatment. Such chances for innovation should be implemented to the benefit of patients.

A doubtful guest: managed care and mental health.

This article examines the ways in which mental health services have been affected by managed care and describes how to address some of the ethical conflicts that have always existed, but have been transformed immeasurably. It outlines the ethical dilemmas between the competing values of mental health providers and managed care, as well as the practical ethical considerations related to confidentiality, billing, and coding. It suggests that there can be no real improvement for mental health providers in the ethical minefield of managed care until they stop focusing on how distressed they are about it and start dealing with the larger, systemic issues in psychiatry and American health care. The article concludes by noting that the only way to effect meaningful change in the health care system is to combine knowledge with advocacy and to proactively define the standards needed to make the necessary choices.

[Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Acceptance of a New Ambulatory Care System]. / Kinder- und jugendpsychiatrische Versorgung: Akzeptanz eines neuen ambulanten Versorgungsmodells.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new ambulatory care system in outpatient child and adolescent psychiatry based on the web-based Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA). METHODS: We analyzed patient paths (flows), acceptance, satisfaction, and staff costs in the newly implemented care model. RESULTS: The new model was very well accepted by the respondents (DAWBA response rate: 92 %). A third of the patients registered with the psychiatric service in 2012 were not in need of psychiatric treatment and were therefore referred to other psycho-social services. The additional staff costs of $ 200 per case might be low compared to the saved costs due to the avoidance of inappropriate medical care. CONCLUSION: The new ambulatory care model proved to be effective, efficient and broadly accepted when resources are strictly limited.

Quality of publicly-funded outpatient specialty mental health care for common childhood psychiatric disorders in California.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the documented adherence to quality indicators for the outpatient care of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, and major depression for children in public mental health clinics and to explore how adherence varies by child and clinic characteristics. METHOD: A statewide, longitudinal cohort study of 813 children ages 6.0-16.9 years with at least 3 months of outpatient care, drawn from 4,958 patients in 62 mental health clinics in California from August 1, 1998, through May 31, 1999. The main outcome was documented adherence to quality indicators based on scientific evidence and clinical judgment, assessed by explicit medical record review. RESULTS: Relatively high adherence was recorded for clinical assessment (78%-95%), but documented adherence to quality indicators related to service linkage, parental involvement, use of evidence-based psychosocial treatment, and patient protection were moderate to poor (74.1%-8.0%). For children prescribed psychotropic medication, 28.3% of the records documented monitoring of at least one clinically indicated vital sign or laboratory study. Documented adherence to quality indicators varied little by child demographics or clinic factors. CONCLUSION: Efforts to improve care should be directed broadly across clinics, with documentation of safe practices, particularly for children prescribed psychotropic medication, being of highest priority.

Effect of Medicaid eligibility category on racial disparities in the use of psychotropic medications among youths.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine the degree to which Medicaid eligibility categories modify disparities between black and white youths in the prevalence of psychotropic medication. METHODS: Computerized claims for 189,486 youths aged two to 19 years who were continuously enrolled in a mid-Atlantic state Medicaid program for the year 2000 were analyzed to determine population-based annual prevalence of psychotropic medication by race or ethnicity and by whether the youths were eligible for Medicaid for reasons of family income, disability, or foster care placement. Logistic regression was used to assess the interaction of eligibility category and race. RESULTS: The mean annual prevalence of psychotropic medication for the population was 9.9 percent. The prevalence was 2.17 times higher for white youths than for black youths (16.5 percent compared with 7.6 percent). However, within eligibility categories, the white-to-black disparity was 3.8 among youths who were eligible for Medicaid because their family income was below the federal poverty level and 3.2 for youths enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid eligibility categories had a profound impact on the racial disparity associated with the prevalence of psychotropic medications for youths. Eligibility category should be taken into account when ascertaining the role of access, undertreatment, and culture in disparities in mental health treatment.

Supporting child psychiatric services using current managed care approaches: you can't get there from here.

For-profit behavioral health care companies have transformed the way mental health services are provided for children. Using marketplace approaches, companies have "carved out" mental health services for many patients receiving care from pediatricians. This report details specific approaches used by these firms to maximize profits, minimize the role of child and adolescent psychiatrists, and limit clinical services. Understanding for-profit carveouts will help primary care pediatricians appreciate the likely consequences of such reimbursement incentives for the care of children and their families.

Children are left out.

The author suggests that large numbers of children and adolescents in America are being left out of mental health and mental health care. He discusses areas, such as poverty, teenage pregnancy, and violence, in which public policy has failed. He calls for interdisciplinary collaboration in work with children and emphasizes the need for psychiatrists and allied health professionals to take major public health and government policy roles to ensure that child and adolescent health and mental health are taken seriously.

Child and adolescent psychiatry. A state administrator's view.

In the course of the nation's evolution toward managed-care service delivery and financing models, state administration of Medicaid and other public-sector health care services has become increasingly complex. This article reviews and comments on key policy issues that state administrators face in the organization and financing of Medicaid-managed behavioral health care services. The author offers recommendations for states that are considering additional reforms.

Substitution in a Medicaid mental health carve-out: services and costs.

The objective is to empirically test the incentives associated with a Medicaid capitated mental health carve-out contract, whether outpatient services (less expensive, inside the contract) and residential treatment center care (costly care, outside of the contract) were substituted for inpatient psychiatric hospitalization used by children and adolescents. Data sources include Medicaid fee-for-service (FFS) claims for the non-capitated comparison sites and for residential treatment center use, and "shadow billing" encounter data for the experimental capitated managed care sites that provided public mental health services for children and adolescents with Medicaid insurance statewide in Colorado from September 1994 to June 1997. Two part least squares regression models are used to decompose services. Managed care sites are compared to sites that remained under FFS financing, before and in two post-periods after the carve-out. Principal findings show that children and adolescents who received mental health services from a capitated managed care provider were significantly less likely to receive inpatient care, and significantly more likely to receive residential treatment center care. In addition, insurance contract design contains financial incentives that affect the amount and mix of clinical care provided to clients by risk-bearing provider agencies. Findings provide evidence of cost substitution from inpatient care both inside the specialty system and outside the carve-out to other child-serving systems.

[When should inpatient child and adolescent psychiatric treatment be terminated?]. / Wann sollen stationäre kinder- und jugendpsychiatrische Behandlungen beendet werden?

OBJECTIVES: As up to now no thorough empirical investigation of the length of stay during inpatient treatment exists, the criteria for the decision to terminate inpatient treatment were studied. METHODS: The opinions of experts in child psychiatry were collected by means of a three-part questionnaire that included a general section together with questions concerning the respective profession group of each expert, a structured section, and a section with open questions. 200 questionnaires were mailed to members of different professional groups at all hospitals for child and adolescent psychiatry in Lower Saxony and Bremen. 112 questionnaires were returned. Data were evaluated descriptively and by means of analyses of variance to determine whether the assessment patterns differ among the various groups. RESULTS: Complex criteria were found by attributing answers to both the structural and the open questions, which included patient-related aspects (particularly the course of symptoms and the child's/adolescent's development of competence), conditions in the family, administrative influences (aftercare and post-discharge placement), problems in the therapeutic setting, aspects of group dynamics between patients and staff, as well as problems involving motivation and compliance. The decision patterns in the professional groups did not differ. CONCLUSION: To reduce the length of inpatient treatment to criteria in accordance with DRGs would be to overlook essential professional aspects of a qualified decision process and thus constitute a misleading strategy with regard to effectiveness and efficiency. The use of the criteria found here as components of a quality management process might be a better way to achieve this goal.