The reasons for and mortality of patients unable to receive reimplantation after resection arthroplasty for chronic hip periprosthetic infection.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is a feasible treatment for chronic PJI (periprosthetic joint infection) of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there are large numbers of patients who are unable to ultimately receive reimplantation after resection arthroplasty owing to uncontrolled infection and multiple comorbidities. The purpose of the current study was to identify patient-related risk factors and reasons for being unable to undergo revision THA. METHODS: Individuals undergoing resection arthroplasty for chronic PJI treatment from 2013 to 2020 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. A variety of patient comorbidities, laboratory data, isolated pathogens, and follow-up status were collected for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients (46 men and 38 women) with a 2.7 ± 2.1-year follow-up were analyzed. Thirty-eight (45.2%) patients eventually underwent revision THA, while the other 46 (54.8%) did not receive reimplantation during follow-up. The patients without receiving reimplantation had higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score (3.1 ± 2.9 versus 1.2 ± 1.5; p = 0.001). Lower cumulative incidence of receiving reimplantation was observed in patients with chronic kidney disease (log-rank test, p = 0.019), anemia (p = 0.011), presence of initial fever (p = 0.030), and oxacillin-resistant strain infection (p = 0.030). The most common reasons for not receiving reimplantation were uncontrolled infection, unstable medical conditions, and death. The patients without reimplantation had a relatively higher mortality rate (log-rank test, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Chronic hip PJI with poor medical conditions or oxacillin-resistant strain infection decreased the chance of undergoing revision surgery. These patients had unfavourable outcomes and a higher mortality rate after resection arthroplasty.

Postoperative bladder dysfunction and outcomes after minimally invasive extravesical ureteric reimplantation in children using a laparoscopic and a robot-assisted approach: results of a multicentre international survey.

OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare postoperative bladder dysfunction rates and outcomes after laparoscopic and robot-assisted extravesical ureteric reimplantation in children and to identify risk factors associated with bladder dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 151 children underwent minimally invasive extravesical ureteric reimplantation in five international centres of paediatric urology over a 5-year period (January 2013-January 2018). The children were divided in two groups according to surgical approach: group 1 underwent laporoscopic reimplantation and included 116 children (92 girls and 24 boys with a median age of 4.5 years), while group 2 underwent robot-assisted reimplantation and included 35 children (29 girls and six boys with a median age of 7.5 years). The two groups were compared with regard to: procedure length; success rate; postoperative complication rate; and postoperative bladder dysfunction rate (acute urinary retention [AUR] and voiding dysfunction). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors of postoperative bladder dysfunction. Factors assessed included age, gender, laterality, duration of procedure, pre-existing bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) and pain control. RESULTS: The mean operating time was significantly longer in group 2 compared with group 1, for both unilateral (159.5 vs 109.5 min) and bilateral procedures (202 vs 132 min; P = 0.001). The success rate was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (100% vs 95.6%; P = 0.001). The overall postoperative bladder dysfunction rate was 8.6% and no significant difference was found between group 1 (6.9%) and group 2 (14.3%; P = 0.17). All AUR cases were managed with short-term bladder catheterization except for two cases (1.3%) in group 1 that required short-term suprapubic catheterization. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that bilateral pathology, pre-existing BBD and duration of procedure were predictors of postoperative bladder dysfunction (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed that short-term bladder dysfunction is a possible complication of extravesical ureteric reimplantation, with no significant difference between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches. Bladder dysfunction occurred more often after bilateral repairs, but required suprapubic catheterization in only 1.3% of cases. Bilaterality, pre-existing BBD and duration of surgery were confirmed on univariate and multivariate analyses as predictors of postoperative bladder dysfunction in this series.

Telemetry in intracranial pressure monitoring: sensor survival and drift.

BACKGROUND: Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring enable long-term ICP monitoring on patients during normal day activities and may accordingly be of use during evaluation and treatment of complicated ICP disorders. However, the benefits of such equipment depend strongly on the validity of the recordings and how often the telemetric sensor needs to be re-implanted. This study investigates the clinical and technical sensor survival time and drift of the telemetric ICP sensor: Raumedic Neurovent-P-tel. METHODS: Implanted telemetric ICP sensors in the period from January 2011 to December 2017 were identified, and medical records reviewed for complications, explantation reasons, and parameters relevant for determining clinical and technical sensor survival time. Explanted sensors were tested in an experimental setup to study baseline drift. RESULTS: In total, implantation of 119 sensors were identified. Five sensors (4.2%) were explanted due to skin damage, three (2.5%) due to wound infection, and two (1.7%) due to ethylene oxide allergy. No other complications were observed. The median clinical sensor survival time was 208 days (95% CI 150-382). The median technical sensor survival time was 556 days (95% CI 382-605). Explanted sensors had a median baseline drift of 2.5 mmHg (IQR 2.0-5.5). CONCLUSION: In most cases, the ICP sensor provides reliable measurements beyond the approved implantation time of 90 days. Thus, the sensor should not be routinely removed after this period, if ICP monitoring is still indicated. However, some sensors showed technical malfunction prior to the CE-approval, underlining that caution should always be taken when analyzing telemetric ICP curves.

Finger Replantation Optimization Study (FRONT): Update on National Trends.

PURPOSE: Traumatic digit amputations have an adverse impact on patients' daily living. Despite experts advocating for digit replantation, studies have shown a continued decrease in rate of replantation. We performed a national-level investigation to examine the recent trend of practice for digital replantation. METHODS: We used the National Inpatient Sample database under the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to select adult patients with traumatic digit amputation from 2001 to 2014. We calculated the rate of attempted and rate of successful digit replantation per year, subcategorizing for digit type (thumb or finger) and for hospital type (rural, urban nonteaching, or urban teaching). We also analyzed the pattern of distribution of case volume to each hospital type per year. We used 2 multivariable logistic regression models to investigate patient demographic and hospital characteristics associated with the odds of replantation attempt and success. RESULTS: Among the 14,872 adult patients with a single digit amputation from 2001 to 2014, only 1,670 (11.2%) underwent replantation. The rate of replantation attempt trended down over the years for both thumb and finger injuries at all hospital types, despite increasing proportions of cases being sent to urban teaching hospitals where they were more than twice as likely to undergo replantation. The rate of successful replantation stayed stable for the thumb at 82.9% and increased for fingers from 76.1% to 82.4% over the years. Patients were more likely to undergo replantation if they had private insurance or a higher level of income. Neither hospital case volume nor hospital type was predictive of successful replantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although more single-digit amputations were treated by urban teaching hospitals with higher likelihood to replant, the downward trend in rate of attempt regardless of hospital type demonstrates that concentration of case volume is not the solution to reverse the declining trend. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Financial aspects of digit replantation need to be considered from both the patients' and the surgeons' perspectives to improve delivery of care for digit replantation.

Incidence, Timing, and Risk Factors for Secondary Revision After Primary Revision of Traumatic Digit Amputations.

PURPOSE: Primary revision amputation is the most common treatment method for traumatic digit amputations in the United States. Few studies have reported secondary revision rates after primary revision amputation. The primary aim of our study was to identify risk factors for secondary revision within 1 year of the index procedure. Secondarily, we describe the incidence and timing of complications requiring secondary revision. METHODS: Our institution's emergency department (ED) database was reviewed for traumatic digit amputations over a 6-year period. Patients were reviewed for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, site of treatment (ED versus operating room), and complications requiring secondary revision. Conditional Cox Proportional Hazard regression was used to model hazard of revision within 1 year of index procedure relative to site of initial management, mechanism of injury, injury characteristics, and patient demographics. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-seven patients with 677 digits were managed with primary revision amputation. Five hundred and eighty-six digits (86.6%) were revised in the ED, and 91 (13.4%) in the operating room. Ninety-one digits required secondary revision, including 83 within 1 year. No increased risk of secondary revision amputation within 1 year of the index procedure was observed for patients treated in the ED compared with the operating room. Relative to crush injuries, bite and sharp laceration amputations had 4.8 times and 2.6 times increased risk of secondary revision, respectively. The index finger had a 5.3-fold increased risk of revision with the thumb as the reference digit. Work-related injuries had a 1.9-fold increased risk of secondary revision compared with non-work-related injuries. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found indicating that traumatic digit amputations primarily revised in the ED had an increased risk of secondary revision. Patients may be counseled on the risk of secondary procedures based on the mechanism of injury, injury characteristics and demographics, as well as the timing of complications. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Silver-coated endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal humerus in case of tumour-is there an increased risk of periprosthetic infection by using a trevira tube?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate if there is an increased risk of periprosthetic infection (PJI) in patients following replacement of the proximal humerus by using a modular tumour prosthesis in combination with a trevira tube. METHODS: Thirty patients were treated by using a modular tumour endoprosthesis (MUTARS®) following intra-articular resection of the proximal humerus. Fifteen patients received treatment by using a trevira tube. In 15 further cases the use of a trevira tube was not necessary. The mean follow-up time was 26 months (range: 24 months to 84 months). Both, Enneking score and range of motion (ROM), was evaluated. Further radiographs were obtained in two planes. RESULTS: The survival rate one year after surgery was 83 % and 63 % after two years. We recorded a 96 % survival of the limb two years after surgery. We also observed only one case of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the entire follow-up period in one patient who received treatment with a trevira tube. The mean Enneking score was 20 points (range 8 to 26 points). ROM was equal in both study groups. In total 20 % of the treated patients (n = 6) suffered complications. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement of the proximal humerus by using a trevira tube in combination with a modular tumour endoprosthesis is a safe and viable treatment option for both, bone tumours and metastases. There is no statistically significant increased risk of infection by using trevira tube even among immunosuppressed patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, retrospective comparative study.

The Detrimental Effect of Decentralization in Digital Replantation in the United States: 15 Years of Evidence From the National Inpatient Sample.

PURPOSE: Recent reports suggest a decrease in success rates in digital replantation in the United States. We hypothesize that this decrease may be associated with decentralization of replants away from high-volume hospitals. METHODS: All amputation injuries and digital replants captured by the National Inpatient Sample during 1998 to 2012 were identified. Procedures were characterized as occurring at high-volume hospitals (> 20 replants/y), and as being performed by high-volume surgeons (> 5 replants/y). A successful procedure was defined as one in which a replantation occurred without a subsequent revision amputation. Hospital and surgeon volume were tested for association with the year and the success of the procedure. RESULTS: The authors identified 101,693 amputation injuries resulting in 15,822 replants. The overall success of replants dropped from 74.5% during 2004 to 2006 to 65.7% during 2010 to 2012. The percentage of replants being performed at high-volume hospitals decreased from 15.5% during 2004 to 2006 to 8.9% during 2007 to 2009. Similarly, the percentage of replants being performed by high-volume surgeons decreased from 14.4% during 1998 to 2000 to 2.6% during 2007 to 2009. Replants performed by high-volume surgeons operating at high-volume hospitals had higher success rates than low-volume surgeons operating at low-volume hospitals (92.0% vs 72.1%). In addition, high-volume surgeons operating at high-volume hospitals attempted replantation at greater rates than low-volume surgeons operating at low-volume hospitals (21.5% vs 11.0%). Overall, an amputation injury presenting to a high-volume surgeon at a high-volume center had a 2.5 times greater likelihood of obtaining a successful replantation than an amputation injury presenting to a low-volume surgeon at a low-volume hospital. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that decreased success rates of digital replantation in the United States are correlated with the decentralization of digital replantation away from high-volume hospitals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The establishment of regional centers for replant referral may greatly increase the success of digital replantation in the United States.

What happens to the bone flap? Long-term outcome after reimplantation of cryoconserved bone flaps in a consecutive series of 92 patients.

BACKGROUND: Reimplantation of cryoconserved autologous bone flaps is a standard procedure after decompressive craniotomies. Aseptic necrosis and resorption are the most frequent complications of this procedure. At present there is no consensus regarding the definition of the relevant extent and indication for surgical revision. The objective of this retrospective analysis was to identify the incidence of bone flap resorption and the optimal duration of follow-up. METHODS: Between February 2009 and March 2012, 100 cryoconserved autologous bone flaps were reimplanted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Inselspital Bern. Three patients were not available for follow-up, and five patients died before follow-up. All patients underwent follow-up at 6 weeks and a second follow-up more than 12 months postoperatively. A clinical and CT-based score was developed for judgment of relevance and decision making for surgical revision. RESULTS: Mean follow-up period was 21.6 months postoperatively (range: 12 to 47 months); 48.9 % (45/92) of patients showed no signs of bone flap resorption, 20.7 % (19/92) showed minor resorption with no need for surgical revision, and 30.4 % (28/92) showed major resorption (in 4 % of these the bone flap was unstable or collapsed). CONCLUSIONS: Aseptic necrosis and resorption of reimplanted autologous bone flaps occurred more frequently in our series of patients than in most reports in the literature. Most cases were identified between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Clinical observation or CT scans of patients with autologous bone flaps are recommended for at least 12 months. Patient-specific implants may be preferable to autologous bone flaps.

Arthrodesis should be strongly considered after failed two-stage reimplantation TKA.

BACKGROUND: A two-stage reimplantation procedure is a well-accepted procedure for management of first-time infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is a lack of consensus on the treatment of subsequent reinfections. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to perform a decision analysis to determine the treatment method likely to yield the highest quality of life for a patient after a failed two-stage reimplantation. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to estimate the expected success rates of a two-stage reimplantation procedure, chronic suppression, arthrodesis, and amputation for treatment of infected TKA. To determine utility values of the various possible health states that could arise after two-stage revision, we used previously published values and methods to determine the utility and disutility tolls for each treatment option and performed a decision tree analysis using the TreeAgePro 2012 software suite (Williamstown, MA, USA). These values were subsequently varied to perform sensitivity analyses, determining thresholds at which different treatment options prevailed. RESULTS: Overall, the composite success rate for two-stage reimplantation was 79.1% (range, 33.3%-100%). The utility (successful outcome) and disutility toll (cost for treatment) for two-stage reimplantation were determined to be 0.473 and 0.20, respectively; the toll for undergoing chronic suppression was set at 0.05; the utility for arthrodesis was 0.740 and for amputation 0.423. We set the utilities for subsequent two-stage revision and other surgical procedures by subtracting the disutility toll from the utility each time another procedure was performed. The two-way sensitivity analysis varied the utility status after an additional two-stage reimplantation (0.47-0.99) and chance of a successful two-stage reimplantation (45%-95%). The model was then extended to a three-way sensitivity analysis twice: once by setting the variable arthrodesis utility at a value of 0.47 and once more by setting utility of two-stage reimplantation at 0.05 over the same range of values on both axes. Knee arthrodesis emerged as the treatment most likely to yield the highest expected utility (quality of life) after initially failing a two-stage revision. For a repeat two-stage revision to be favored, the utility of that second two-stage revision had to substantially exceed the published utility of primary TKA of 0.84 and the probability of achieving infection control had to exceed 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on best available evidence, knee arthrodesis should be strongly considered as the treatment of choice for patients who have persistent infected TKA after a failed two-stage reimplantation procedure. We recognize that particular circumstances such as severe bone loss can preclude or limit the applicability of fusion as an option and that individual clinical circumstances must always dictate the best treatment, but where arthrodesis is practical, our model supports it as the best approach.

A nationwide review of the treatment patterns of traumatic thumb amputations.

Traumatic thumb amputations are a common problem with significant associated cost to patients, hospitals, and society.The purpose of this study was to review practice patterns for traumatic thumb amputations using the National Trauma Data Bank. By using a large nationwide database, we hoped to better understand the epidemiology and predictors of attempts and successful replantation.The design was a retrospective review of the National Trauma Data Bank between the years 2007 and 2010, investigating patients with traumatic thumb amputations. Analyses of these patients based on replantation attempt, mechanism of injury, and demographics were performed. Comparisons were made between hospitals based on teaching status and on patient volume for replant attempt and success rates.There were 3341 traumatic thumb amputations with 550 (16.5%) attempts at replantation and an overall success rate of 84.9%. Nonteaching hospitals treated 1238 (37.1%) patients, and attempted 123 (9.9%) replantations with a success rate of 80.5%. Teaching hospitals treated 2103 (63.0%) patients, and attempted 427 (20.3%) replantations with a success rate of 86.2%. Being in a teaching hospital increased the odds of attempted replantation by a factor of 3.1 (P < 0.001) when compared to a nonteaching hospital. Treatment at a high-volume center increased the rate of attempted replantation by a factor of 3.4 (P < 0.001), as compared to low-volume hospitals.Practice patterns show that teaching and high-volume hospitals attempt to replant a higher percentage of amputated thumbs. Success rates are similar across practice settings.

The impact of residency and fellowship training on the practice of microsurgery by members of the american society for surgery of the hand.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the microsurgical training background of current members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) and then determine the impact that prior training had on current microsurgical practice. METHODS: A 174-item anonymous Web-based survey was sent to all active ASSH members. Items addressed prior residency and fellowship training, practice setting, and training, comfort, and practice of specific microsurgical procedures. Data were analyzed using frequency tables, cross-tabulations, χ tests, and other established statistical methods. RESULTS: Surveys were received from 377 of 2019 ASSH members (18.7% response rate). Residency training was in orthopedics (n=249, 66.9%), plastic surgery (n=56, 15.1%), or general surgery (n=55, 14.8%). Fellowship training was in orthopedic (n=242, 65.1%), combined (n=65, 17.5%), and plastic surgery (n=15, 4%) programs. Microsurgical procedures involving nerves were performed by 96.6% of surgeons (n=337), with no significant differences between surgeons trained in plastic surgery versus orthopedic surgery residencies, and no differences between those who had completed orthopedic versus combined fellowships. Of the surgeons completing the survey, 56.1% (n=208) performed general microvascular procedures, 50% (n=179) performed replantations, and 30.6% (n=113) performed free flaps. Hand surgeons who completed plastic surgery residencies were more likely to perform general microvascular procedures, replantations, and free flaps than surgeons trained in orthopedic residencies. When comparing training in orthopedic and combined fellowships, there was no difference in performance of replantations, free flaps, general microvascular surgery, or microsurgical procedures involving nerves. CONCLUSIONS: Training backgrounds have a substantial impact on current microsurgical practice, with residency having the most significant effect. Specifically, hand surgeons trained in plastic surgery residency programs are more likely to perform replantations, free tissue transfer, and general microvascular surgery than those who completed orthopedic residencies. Fellowship training background does not significantly affect microsurgical practice.

Epidemiology of upper extremity replantation surgery in the United States.

PURPOSE: Replantation remains an important technique in the management of hand trauma. Given the resources necessary for a successful replantation program, regionalization of replantation care may ultimately be required. The purposes of this study were to analyze the geographic distribution of upper extremity replant procedures, analyze factors of patients undergoing replantation, and characterize the facilities performing these procedures. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from 2001, 2004, and 2007. Patients with an upper extremity amputation were defined, and a subgroup of patients undergoing replantation was delineated. We analyzed patient demographics and injury characteristics and characteristics of treating facilities. RESULTS: A total of 9,407 patients were treated for upper extremity amputation, 1,361 of whom underwent replantation. Mean age of patients undergoing replantation was 36 years (range, 0-86 y), compared with 44 years (range, 0-104 y) in patients not undergoing replantation. Hospital charges (P < .001) and length of stay (P < .001) were significantly higher for patients with replantations versus those without replantations. Patients treated at teaching facilities were more likely to undergo replantation than those at a non-teaching facility (19% replantation rate at teaching hospitals vs 7% at non-teaching). Large hospitals and urban hospitals were more likely to perform replantation. Self-pay, Medicare, and Medicaid patients all had lower replantation rates than patients with other payer status. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo replantation are younger, incur higher hospital charges, and have longer hospital stays compared with patients who do not undergo replantation. Treatment at large, urban, and teaching facilities is associated with higher replantation rates. Payer status appears to have some bearing on replantation rates. Further studies are needed to better elucidate the relationship between patient and injury characteristics, treatment location, and outcomes, to adequately distribute the finite resources for replantation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis IV.

A 17-Year Experience in Hand and Digit Replantation at an Academic Center.

BACKGROUND RESULTS: of replantation surgery following upper extremity traumatic amputation are extensively described in the literature, with success rates varying from 57 to 100 percent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate replantation success rate at a Level I trauma center over a 17-year period and to assess definable factors contributing to these results. METHODS: A retrospective review of all digit and hand replantations at a Level I trauma center was performed using CPT codes from 2001 through 2018. Descriptive analyses, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regressions were used. Significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Analysis consisted of 76 patients with 101 amputated parts (93 digits and eight hands). Fifty-six single digit amputations (30 percent success rate), 37 multidigit injuries (22 percent digit success rate), and eight hand amputations (50 percent success rate) were attempted. The overall success rate was 25 of 76 patients (33 percent) and 29 of 101 parts (29 percent). The most common mechanism of injury was laceration (n = 56), followed by crush (n = 30), and avulsion (n = 11), with repair of laceration-type injuries having the greatest success rate (36 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The authors report a lower success rate of hand and digit replantation than previously described in the literature. Whole hand and thumb replantations resulted in the highest survival rate in our series. Laceration mechanism showed a higher success rate than crush or avulsion-type injuries. The authors' modest results highlight the importance of effective internal auditing of low-volume replantation centers such as their own. Quality improvement measures are proposed for higher future success in replantation surgery at the authors' institution. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Rodeo Thumb: To Replant or Not.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of rodeo thumb amputation to guide clinical decision-making. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for rodeo thumb amputations from 2009 to 2019. Patient-reported outcomes were collected and compared by injury level, age, and treatment. Two-sided t test was used to compare continuous variables, and Pearson chi-square test was used to compare categorical data. RESULTS: The study included 37 patients. Patients with interphalangeal injuries treated with replantation had Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores similar to those treated with amputation (1 versus 8; p = 0.07). There was no significant difference in percentage of patients with similar or better roping ability after treatment (40 percent versus 79 percent; p = 0.26), and similar percentages were satisfied (80 percent versus 71 percent; p = 1.00). Patients with metacarpophalangeal injuries treated with replantation and those treated with amputation had similar questionnaire scores (7 versus 10; p = 0.47). Both groups had similar roping ability after treatment (67 percent versus 56 percent; p = 1.00), and there was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction (79 percent versus 44 percent; p = 0.34). Pediatric patients had questionnaire scores similar to those of adults (6 versus 8; p = 0.42). A significantly higher percentage of pediatric patients had similar roping ability following injury than adults (100 percent versus 54 percent; p = 0.02). Most patients in both groups were satisfied (89 percent versus 61 percent; p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: For both interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal injuries, patient-reported outcomes were similar regardless of treatment. Children were able to return to roping and perform at a similar or higher level at a greater rate than adults, but had similar questionnaire scores and satisfaction.

Variation in Surgeon Proficiency Scores and Association With Digit Replantation Outcomes.

Importance: Risk-adjusted variation in surgeon outcomes has been traditionally explained by surgeon volume and hospital infrastructure, yet it is unclear how a surgeon's operative proficiency directly contributes to their patients' outcomes. Objective: To assess the variation of surgeons' operative proficiency and investigate its association with surgical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series was a retrospective analysis of all digit replantations and revascularizations at a single US university medical center between January 2000 and August 2020. Surgeons were assigned a proficiency score based on the expected procedure difficulty and outcomes from a sample of their cases. Surgeon proficiency scores were then used to determine associations with outcomes from subsequent cases. The expected difficulty of each case was calculated using a novel scoring system that applied pooled relative risks from a meta-analysis of risk factors for replantation and revascularization failure. Exposures: Digit replantation and revascularization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Digit survival at 1-month follow up (case success) and number of complications. Results: A total of 145 patients and 226 digits were treated by 11 surgeons with training in hand or microsurgery (mean [SD] age, 41.9 [15.2] years; 204 [90%] men); there were 116 replantations and 110 revascularizations. Surgeon proficiency scores ranged from 1.3 to 5.7, with a mean (SD) of 3.4 (1.4). Case success rates among surgeons varied from 20.0% to 90.5%, with a mean (SD) of 64.9%. Higher proficiency scores were associated with fewer case failures: each point increase was associated with 40% decreased odds of failure (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94). Every 3-point increase in proficiency score was associated with 1 less complication (effect estimate, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.56 to 0.02). Surgeon proficiency score had a greater association with case failure than surgeon volume (16.7% vs 12.0%). The final model's association with case failure had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.93. Conclusions and Relevance: Operative proficiency varied widely among practicing surgeons and accounted for 17% of estimative ability for success of digit replantation and revascularization. Greater surgeon proficiency was associated with better outcomes, indicating that the value of surgical care may be optimized by improving surgeon proficiency.

National Population Study of the Effect of Structure and Process on Outcomes of Digit Replantation.

BACKGROUND: Surgeon experience, hospital volume, and teaching hospital status may play a role in the success of digit replantation. This study aims to analyze factors that influence digit replantation success rates. STUDY DESIGN: We examined patients with traumatic digit amputations, between 2000 and 2015, from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan, which comprises data of more than 99% of its population. We measured the number of traumatic digit amputations and success rate of replantation. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used for descriptive statistics. Regression models were built to analyze the association among patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, and replant success. RESULTS: We identified 13,416 digit replantation patients using the eligibility criteria. The overall replantation failure rate was significantly higher in medium- and high-volume hospitals (low-volume: 11%, medium-volume: 17%, and high-volume: 15%, p < 0.001). Teaching hospitals had significantly higher replantation failure rates [(15.5% vs 7.6%), odds ratio (OR) 2.0; confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.7]. Lower surgeon case volume resulted in a significantly higher failure rate in the thumb replantation (OR 0.89; CI 0.85-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Teaching hospitals had greater odds of replantation failure, owing to being high volume centers and attempting more replantations. However, the effect of residents performing the replantation during their training should be considered. Teaching units are mandatory for resident training; however, a balance should be established to provide training, but with sufficient supervision to achieve optimal replant success. A national protocol to triage digit amputation cases to high volume centers with experienced microsurgeons will help improve the replantation success rate.

Patterns of finger amputation and replantation in the setting of a rapidly growing immigrant population.

To determine the incidence of finger amputation and replantation in North Carolina (NC) and to identify patterns of injury by race and immigration status. Finger amputation injury data were obtained from the NC hospital discharge database. Hospital discharge data were linked to 2000 US Census data by zip code of residence to estimate median income, the percentage of Hispanics, and the percent foreign-born. A total of 556 admissions for finger amputations (86% male, 14% female) occurred in NC during 2004-2006. The most common mechanism was industrial machinery (36%). Eighty-nine replantations were performed (16%). Finger amputation is a common work-related injury in NC. The rate of replantation appeared to be higher in zip codes with a higher density of Hispanics and with a higher density of immigrants. More data on injury that includes racial/ethnic, social, and economic information will be critical to understand the true burden of injury on immigrants.

Replantation versus revision of amputated fingers in patients air-transported to a level 1 trauma center.

PURPOSE: To assess the rate of replantation versus revision of amputated fingers in patients air-transported to a tertiary care hand trauma center. METHODS: We included 40 consecutive subjects (70 digits) who were transported via air after digit(s) amputation distal to the metacarpophalangeal joint. The primary outcome measure was type of surgery (attempted replantation vs revision of the amputation). Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: We identified 3 groups of patients. In group 1 (15 patients, 23 digits), replantation of one or more digits was attempted. In group 2 (6 patients, 8 digits), replantation was not elected. In group 3 (19 patients, 39 digits), no digits were suitable for replantation. The mean age was 36.2 years (range, 5-69 years) and mean time of transport was 5.15 hours (range, 1-24 hours). Mechanisms of finger injury were crush (n = 34), followed by clean cut (n = 15), avulsion/crush (n = 15), and gunshot (n = 6). No significant differences were found between groups for age or time elapsed from injury to hospital arrival. Most patients (n = 25; 65%) transported via air did not undergo replantation surgery. Injury characteristics (n = 18 patients, 72%) were the main reason not to replant. The most common reason for the refusal of replantation was inability to return to work immediately. The most common reasons for surgeon's decision to not to replant were single digit amputations proximal to flexor digitorum superficialis attachment (7 patients), and crush/avulsion type injuries (7 patients), followed by health status and age (5 patients). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a considerable portion of patients transported via air do not undergo replantation surgery. Further studies are needed to establish whether this is an overused service.

Acute Distal Femoral Replacement for Fractures About the Knee in the Elderly.

Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is a reasonable treatment option when used for select indications. In the setting of comminuted intra-articular distal femoral fractures, distal femoral arthroplasty should be considered in low-demand patients with poor bone quality. This article summarizes the existing literature plus the authors' personal experience with DFR use for distal femoral fractures of the native knee.