Treatment for First Cytomegalovirus Infection Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in the AURORA Trial: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial Comparing Maribavir With Valganciclovir.

BACKGROUND: Neutropenia may limit the use of valganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). A phase 2 study indicated efficacy of maribavir with fewer treatment-limiting toxicities than valganciclovir. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients with first asymptomatic CMV infection post-HCT were stratified and randomized 1:1 to maribavir 400 mg twice daily or valganciclovir (dose-adjusted for renal clearance) for 8 weeks with 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary endpoint was confirmed CMV viremia clearance at week 8 (primary hypothesis of noninferiority margin of 7.0%). The key secondary endpoint was a composite of the primary endpoint with no findings of CMV tissue-invasive disease at week 8 through week 16. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed. RESULTS: Among patients treated (273 maribavir; 274 valganciclovir), the primary endpoint of noninferiority of maribavir was not met (maribavir, 69.6%; valganciclovir, 77.4%; adjusted difference: -7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -14.98, -.36; lower limit of 95% CI of treatment difference exceeded -7.0%). At week 16, 52.7% and 48.5% of patients treated (maribavir and valganciclovir, respectively) maintained CMV viremia clearance without tissue-invasive disease (adjusted difference: 4.4%; 95% CI: -3.91, 12.76). With maribavir (vs valganciclovir), fewer patients experienced neutropenia (16.1% and 52.9%) or discontinued due to TEAEs (27.8% and 41.2%). Discontinuations were mostly due to neutropenia (maribavir, 4.0%; valganciclovir, 17.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Although noninferiority of maribavir to valganciclovir for the primary endpoint was not achieved based on the prespecified noninferiority margin, maribavir demonstrated comparable CMV viremia clearance during post-treatment follow-up, with fewer discontinuations due to neutropenia. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02927067 [AURORA].

Incidence of valganciclovir-related leukopenia and neutropenia in solid organ transplant recipients at high risk of cytomegalovirus disease.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis is associated with an increased risk of hematologic side effects. We analyzed the impact of VGCV prophylaxis on leukopenia and neutropenia rates and explored risk factors for its occurrence. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients of either CMV-seropositive (CMV D+/R-) or CMV-seronegative (CMV D-/R-) donors between July 2005 and March 2019. CMV D+/R- SOT recipients received 3-12 months of VGCV prophylaxis whereas CMV D-/R- SOT recipients received no VGCV prophylaxis. Competing risk regression was used to calculate risk factors for significant neutropenia (neutrophil count < 1000/µL). RESULTS: A total of 430 CMV-seronegative SOT recipients (median age of 52.1 years, 76.5% males) were included, of which 203 (47.2%) were CMV D+/R- and 227 (52.8%) CMV D-/R-. The unadjusted incidence rate ratio of significant neutropenia attributable to VGCV exposure in the first year post-transplant was 13.50 (95% confidence interval 7.36-27.11). Acute rejection occurred more frequently in neutropenic patients at 32.5% compared to 19.1% in those without neutropenia (p = .033). On multivariate analysis, VGCV prophylaxis for 1-90 days and 91-180 days versus no VGCV were the strongest risk factors for significant neutropenia with a sub-distribution hazard ratio of 39.6 (95% CI, 8.57-182.6) and 13.2 (95% CI, 5.46-32.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VGCV prophylaxis is limited by high rates of neutropenia. Future prospective studies are needed to assess alternative CMV prophylactic strategies in SOT recipients.

Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in the frequent use of prophylaxis to prevent the clinical syndrome associated with CMV infection. This is an update of a review first published in 2005 and updated in 2008 and 2013. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of antiviral medications to prevent CMV disease and all-cause death in solid organ transplant recipients. SEARCH METHODS: We contacted the information specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 February 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing antiviral medications with placebo or no treatment, comparing different antiviral medications or different regimens of the same antiviral medications for CMV prophylaxis in recipients of any solid organ transplant. Studies examining pre-emptive therapy for CMV infection are studied in a separate review and were excluded from this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: This 2024 update found four new studies, bringing the total number of included studies to 41 (5054 participants). The risk of bias was high or unclear across most studies, with a low risk of bias for sequence generation (12), allocation concealment (12), blinding (11) and selective outcome reporting (9) in fewer studies. There is high-certainty evidence that prophylaxis with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment is more effective in preventing CMV disease (19 studies: RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52), all-cause death (17 studies: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92), and CMV infection (17 studies: RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77). There is moderate-certainty evidence that prophylaxis probably reduces death from CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Prophylaxis reduces the risk of herpes simplex and herpes zoster disease, bacterial and protozoal infections but probably makes little to no difference to fungal infection, acute rejection or graft loss. No apparent differences in adverse events with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment were found. There is high certainty evidence that ganciclovir, when compared with aciclovir, is more effective in preventing CMV disease (7 studies: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.60). There may be little to no difference in any outcome between valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir compared with oral ganciclovir (low certainty evidence). The efficacy and adverse effects of valganciclovir or ganciclovir were probably no different to valaciclovir in three studies (moderate certainty evidence). There is moderate certainty evidence that extended duration prophylaxis probably reduces the risk of CMV disease compared with three months of therapy (2 studies: RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.35), with probably little to no difference in rates of adverse events. Low certainty evidence suggests that 450 mg/day valganciclovir compared with 900 mg/day valganciclovir results in little to no difference in all-cause death, CMV infection, acute rejection, and graft loss (no information on adverse events). Maribavir may increase CMV infection compared with ganciclovir (1 study: RR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.65; moderate certainty evidence); however, little to no difference between the two treatments were found for CMV disease, all-cause death, acute rejection, and adverse events at six months (low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with antiviral medications reduces CMV disease and CMV-associated death, compared with placebo or no treatment, in solid organ transplant recipients. These data support the continued routine use of antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-positive recipients and CMV-negative recipients of CMV-positive organ transplants.

A Randomized Trial of Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Versus Preemptive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important factor in the pathogenesis of kidney allograft rejection, previous studies have not determined the optimal CMV prevention strategy to avoid indirect effects of the virus. In this randomized trial involving 140 kidney transplant recipients, incidence of acute rejection at 12 months was not lower with valganciclovir prophylaxis (for at least 3 months) compared with preemptive therapy initiated after detection of CMV DNA in whole blood. However, prophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of subclinical rejection at 3 months. Although both regimens were effective in preventing CMV disease, the incidence of CMV DNAemia (including episodes with higher viral loads) was significantly higher with preemptive therapy. Further research with long-term follow-up is warranted to better compare the two approaches. BACKGROUND: The optimal regimen for preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in kidney transplant recipients, primarily in reducing indirect CMV effects, has not been defined. METHODS: This open-label, single-center, randomized clinical trial of valganciclovir prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy included kidney transplant recipients recruited between June 2013 and May 2018. After excluding CMV-seronegative recipients with transplants from seronegative donors, we randomized 140 participants 1:1 to receive valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg, daily for 3 or 6 months for CMV-seronegative recipients who received a kidney from a CMV-seropositive donor) or preemptive therapy (valganciclovir, 900 mg, twice daily) that was initiated after detection of CMV DNA in whole blood (≥1000 IU/ml) and stopped after two consecutive negative tests (preemptive therapy patients received weekly CMV PCR tests for 4 months). The primary outcome was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months. Key secondary outcomes included subclinical rejection, CMV disease and DNAemia, and neutropenia. RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection was lower with valganciclovir prophylaxis than with preemptive therapy (13%, 9/70 versus 23%, 16/70), but the difference was not statistically significant. Subclinical rejection at 3 months was lower in the prophylaxis group (13% versus 29%, P = 0.027). Both regimens prevented CMV disease (in 4% of patients in both groups). Compared with prophylaxis, preemptive therapy resulted in significantly higher rates of CMV DNAemia (44% versus 75%, P < 0.001) and a higher proportion of patients experiencing episodes with higher viral load (≥2000 IU/ml), but significantly lower valganciclovir exposure and neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Among kidney transplant recipients, the use of valganciclovir prophylaxis did not result in a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection compared with the use of preemptive therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Optimizing Valganciclovir Efficacy in Renal Transplantation (OVERT Study), ACTRN12613000554763 .

Assessing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and birth defects reporting in women exposed to ganciclovir or valganciclovir during pregnancy: a pharmacovigilance study.

OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the leading cause of congenital infection worldwide. Reference anti-CMV treatment is valganciclovir/ganciclovir, which is contraindicated in pregnancy given questions about teratogenicity. METHODS: We analysed reports from VigiBase, the world's largest safety database, and performed a disproportionality analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with (val)ganciclovir compared with any other drugs or with (val)aciclovir as comparators. RESULTS: Among 3 104 984 reports related to childbearing-age women or to pregnancy topics, 6186 were exposed to (val)ganciclovir or (val)aciclovir including 251 adverse pregnancy outcomes with (val)ganciclovir (n = 34) or (val)aciclovir (n = 217). We did not evidence any increased reporting of any adverse pregnancy outcome [miscarriage, stillbirth, small weight for gestational age, preterm birth (<37 weeks of gestation)] or birth defects with (val)ganciclovir compared with the use of (val)aciclovir during pregnancy. Four cases of oesophageal and anorectal atresia were identified with (val)ganciclovir, which may be related to concomitant drugs/medical conditions and require further analyses. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results require confirmation but suggest the possibility for trial evaluation of val(ganciclovir) in severe maternal or fetal CMV infections.

Maribavir for Preemptive Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation.

BACKGROUND: Maribavir is a benzimidazole riboside with activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV). The safety and efficacy of maribavir for preemptive treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients is not known. METHODS: In a phase 2, open-label, maribavir dose-blinded trial, recipients of hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplants (≥18 years of age, with CMV reactivation [1000 to 100,000 DNA copies per milliliter]) were randomly assigned to receive maribavir at a dose of 400, 800, or 1200 mg twice daily or the standard dose of valganciclovir for no more than 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a response to treatment, defined as confirmed undetectable CMV DNA in plasma, within 3 weeks and 6 weeks after the start of treatment. The primary safety end point was the incidence of adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients who underwent randomization, 159 received treatment, and 156 had postbaseline data available - 117 in the maribavir group and 39 in the valganciclovir group. The percentage of patients with postbaseline data available who had a response to treatment within 3 weeks was 62% among those who received maribavir and 56% among those who received valganciclovir. Within 6 weeks, 79% and 67% of patients, respectively, had a response (risk ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.51). The percentages of patients with a response to treatment were similar among the maribavir dose groups. Two patients who had a response to treatment had a recurrence of CMV infection within 6 weeks after starting maribavir at a dose of 800 mg twice daily; T409M resistance mutations in CMV UL97 protein kinase developed in both patients. The incidence of serious adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment was higher in the maribavir group than in the valganciclovir group (52 of 119 patients [44%] vs. 13 of 40 [32%]). A greater percentage of patients in the maribavir group discontinued the trial medication because of an adverse event (27 of 119 [23%] vs. 5 of 40 [12%]). A higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was reported with maribavir, and a higher incidence of neutropenia was reported with valganciclovir. CONCLUSIONS: Maribavir at a dose of at least 400 mg twice daily had efficacy similar to that of valganciclovir for clearing CMV viremia among recipients of hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplants. A higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events - notably dysgeusia - and a lower incidence of neutropenia were found in the maribavir group. (Funded by ViroPharma/Shire Development; EudraCT number, 2010-024247-32.).

Valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: There are two approaches for treating cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurring after kidney transplantation (KTx). One is preemptive therapy in which treatment is started after confirming positive CMV antigenemia using periodic antigenemia assay. The other approach is prophylactic therapy in which oral valganciclovir (VGCV) is started within 10 days after KTx and continued for 200 days. The Transplantation Society guidelines recommend prophylactic therapy for high-risk (donor's CMV-IgG antibody positive and recipient's negative) pediatric recipients. However, the adequate dose and side effects of VGCV are not clear in children, and there is no sufficient information about prophylaxis for Japanese pediatric recipients. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on case series of high-risk pediatric patients who underwent KTx and received oral VGCV prophylaxis at the Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, between August 2018 and March 2019. Data were collected using medical records. RESULTS: The dose of administration was 450 mg in all the study patients (n = 5). Reduction or discontinuation was required in four of five patients due to adverse events, which included neutropenia in one patient, anemia in two patients, and neutropenia and digestive symptoms in one patient. Late-onset CMV disease occurred in all patients. No seroconversion was observed during prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary study suggests that the dosage endorsed by The Transplantation Society may be an overdose for Japanese pediatric recipients. Further studies are required to examine the safety and efficacy of VGCV prophylaxis in Japanese pediatric recipients.

Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of oral valganciclovir in patients with congenital cytomegalovirus infection.

OBJECTIVES: Valganciclovir (VGCV) has been shown to improve sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and neurological outcomes in patients with neonatal symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection. However, reports on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of oral VGCV are limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of VGCV for use in the treatment of cCMV. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study conducted at Saitama Children's Medical Center in Japan between 2012 and 2017. CMV DNA copy number, maximum plasma VGCV concentration (Cmax), and adverse events (ADEs) during treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with cCMV who received VGCV were included in this study. The median age at VGCV initiation was 9.5 months (range 0-46). Twenty-one patients (81%) had SNHL at baseline. Of these, five patients (19%) presented with improved SNHL, and none experienced worsened SNHL during treatment. The mean VGCV Cmax was 3.5 µg/mL (range 2-5.3), with no significant variation among individual values, and the values were maintained during treatment. Furthermore, there were no correlations between the Cmax values and age, sex, SNHL improvement or ADEs. Neutropenia (<1000/mm3) was observed in six patients (23%); however, no serious ADEs occurred. CONCLUSIONS: VGCV prevented the progression of SNHL without serious ADEs due to its stable pharmacokinetics. This study provides safety and tolerability of VGCV for the treatment of cCMV patients.

Treating HIV-associated cytomegalovirus retinitis with oral valganciclovir and intra-ocular ganciclovir by primary HIV clinicians in southern Myanmar: a retrospective analysis of routinely collected data.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) is an opportunistic infection in HIV-infected people. Intraocular or intravenous ganciclovir was gold standard for treatment; however, oral valganciclovir replaced this in high-income countries. Low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) frequently use intraocular injection of ganciclovir (IOG) alone because of cost. METHODS: Retrospective review of all HIV-positive patients with CMVR from February 2013 to April 2017 at a Médecins Sans Frontièrs HIV clinic in Myanmar. Treatment was classified as local (IOG) or systemic (valganciclovir, or valganciclovir and IOG). The primary outcome was change in visual acuity (VA) post-treatment. Mortality was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included. Baseline VA was available for 103 (97%) patient eyes. Active CMVR was present in 72 (68%) eyes. Post-treatment, seven (13%) patients had improvement in VA, 30 (57%) had no change, and three (6%) deteriorated. Among patients receiving systemic therapy, four (12.5%) died, compared with five (24%) receiving local therapy (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Our results from the first introduction of valganciclovir for CMVR in LMIC show encouraging effectiveness and safety in patients with advanced HIV. We urge HIV programmes to include valganciclovir as an essential medicine, and to include CMVR screening and treatment in the package of advanced HIV care.

Impact of the patient's body weight on the efficacy and adverse events of valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

While the dose of ganciclovir (GCV) is decided base on patients' body weight (BW), that of valganciclovir (VGCV) is fixed as 900 or 1800 mg/d regardless of the patient's BW in preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We analyzed the impact of the patient's BW on the effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of VGCV. From March 2004 to February 2017, 27 patients received VGCV as a first-line treatment for CMV reactivation. As a historical control group, we extracted 17 patients who started to receive GCV at a similar timing. We used the following definitions of outcomes: speed of reduction of CMV antigenemia (CMV-AG) as a measure of effectiveness, ratios of baseline and minimum value for white blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts, and ratio of baseline and maximum values for serum creatinine (sCr) as measures of AEs. As a result, there was no significant correlation between average daily dose of VGCV with or without adjusting for the patient's BW and speed of reduction of CMV-AG. On the other hand, the decreases in WBC and platelets and the increase in sCr were significantly correlated with the cumulative dose of VGCV. However, the absolute values of the correlation coefficients did not increase when we analyzed the correlations between the BW-adjusted cumulative dose of VGCV and factors associated with adverse events. There were no significant differences in efficacies or AE parameters between the GCV and VGCV groups. In conclusion, the patient's BW did not significantly affect the effectiveness or adverse events of VGCV.

Efficacy and Safety According to the Dose of Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Transplantation: Network Meta-analysis Using Recent Data.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir is used to prevent posttransplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection among patients undergoing kidney transplant. However, the optimal dose remains controversial because continuous use decreases kidney function and can induce leukopenia. The purpose of this study was to identify the appropriate dose of valganciclovir for preventing CMV using network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and Web of Science databases for studies published through April 15, 2017, evaluating 900-mg and 450-mg valganciclovir. We performed direct and indirect network meta-analysis using Bayesian models and generated rankings of different doses of valganciclovir by generating a mixed-treatment comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies involving 3478 participants were included. Compared with the control group, there was no difference in the incidence of CMV infection between the low-dose (450 mg) (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.40) and high-dose (900 mg) (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.61-1.60) groups. Low-dose valganciclovir had the best probability (71.1%) for decreasing CMV infection. Leukopenia was significantly more common in the high-dose group than in the control group (OR, 4.3; 95% CI, 2.69-7.10) and in the low-dose group (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.88-4.67), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of leukopenia between the low-dose and control groups (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.99-2.20). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CMV was not different based on the dose of valganciclovir, although the tendency for CMV infection was decreased at 450 mg. However, the low dose of valganciclovir significantly reduced the incidence of leukopenia.

Optimization of Ganciclovir use in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients - the role of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic infectious complication that can occur after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The mainstay of treatment and prevention of this infection is ganciclovir and its ester prodrug valganciclovir. There is conflicting evidence on the clinical utility of routine ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a means to optimize treatment.Areas covered: This review aims to describe the current knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of ganciclovir and valganciclovir, and to explore the evidence and challenges surrounding ganciclovir TDM within the allogeneic HCT cohort.Expert opinion: Ganciclovir TDM is important to optimize efficacy in selected patient groups where there are variable pharmacokinetic factors or inadequate response to treatment. However, defined pharmacokinetic exposures which correlate with treatment efficacy and toxicity remain elusive. Prospective clinical studies in specific patient groups are required to clarify this issue. Alternative TDM targets such as the intracellular ganciclovir triphosphate should be explored as they may prove to have better correlation with clinical outcomes and adverse effects. With recent advances in CMV immune monitoring, novel approaches integrating TDM with specific CMV immune phenotyping in a predictive model will be advantageous in optimizing ganciclovir dosing by combining TDM with a risk stratification approach.

One Year of Preemptive Valganciclovir Administration in Children After Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Valganciclovir (VGCV) is used as prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of 1 year of preemptive VGCV administration compared with a shorter administration after pediatric LDLT. METHODS: VGCV was administered to 56 children who underwent LDLT. CMV and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody status, pp65 antigenemia, and other laboratory data were assessed at 1 year after LDLT. Patients were divided into the 1-year group (n = 32) (patients who had 1 year of VGCV administration) and the <1-year group (n = 24) (patients who had less than 1 year of VGCV administration). RESULTS: Study participants consisted of 34 females and 22 males, with a mean age of 4.2 years at transplant. Regarding pretransplant donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV antibody status, 13 were D positive (+)/R negative (-), 27 were D+/R+, 8 were D-/R+, and 8 were D-/R-. For EBV, 22 were D+/R+, 32 were D+/R-, and 2 were D-/R-. In the 1-year group, only 2 patients (6.5%) developed CMV infection, whereas 8 patients (33.3%) developed CMV infection in the <1-year group. The CMV pp65 antigenemia assay was positive in 2 patients. CMV IgM was positive in 7 patients. One year of preemptive VGCV administration was associated with a lower incidence of CMV infection (P = .008), but not EBV infection. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: One year of preemptive VGCV administration after LDLT is safe and suppresses CMV infection. It was useful after pediatric LDLT.

Valganciclovir as Add-on to Standard Therapy in Glioblastoma Patients.

PURPOSE: Several groups have reported a prevalence of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) in glioblastoma close to 100%. Previously, we reported that treatment with the antiviral drug valganciclovir as an add-on to standard therapy significantly prolonged survival in 50 patients with glioblastoma. Here, we present an updated retrospective analysis that includes an additional 52 patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From December 2006 to November 2019, 102 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma received valganciclovir as an add-on to standard therapy. No additional toxicity was observed. Contemporary controls were 231 patients with glioblastoma who received similar baseline therapy. RESULTS: Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving valganciclovir had longer median overall survival (OS 24.1 vs. 13.3 months, P < 0.0001) and a 2-year survival rate (49.8% vs. 17.3%) than controls. Median time-to-tumor progression was also longer than in controls; 9.9 (0.7-67.5 months) versus 7.3 (1.2-49 months), P = 0.0003. Valganciclovir improved survival in patients with radical or partial resection and an unmethylated or methylated MGMT promoter gene. CONCLUSIONS: Valganciclovir prolonged median OS of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (with methylated or unmethylated MGMT promoter gene) and was safe to use.

Acquired Pelger-Huët anomaly in a patient treated with valganciclovir.

A follow-up blood count was performed on a 74-year-old woman diagnosed with colitis due to cytomegalovirus and under treatment with valganciclovir. The automated complete blood count revealed an abnormal white blood cells (WBC) scattergram together with WBC alert flags. The peripheral blood smear showed neutrophils with markedly hyposegmented nuclei or bilobed nuclei and very condensed chromatin or clumping chromatin all consistent with Pelger-Huët anomaly (PHA). We checked previous blood counts, ruling out an inherited PHA. We assessed the haematological, infectious and iatrogenic aetiologies for an acquired PHA. Once the valganciclovir treatment was completed and the drug was withdrawn, without changing the rest of the treatment, the morphological abnormalities of neutrophils were completely resolved. We conclude therefore that the acquired PHA presented by our patient is probably related to valganciclovir treatment.

Hematologic Adverse Events Associated With Prolonged Valganciclovir Treatment in Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir (2/d) therapy for 6 months in neonates with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection improves hearing and neurodevelopmental outcome. The only reported adverse event was neutropenia. Since 2009, our protocol for symptomatic cCMV infection was a 1-year treatment of 2/d for the first 3 months followed by 9 months of 1/d. METHODS: A retrospective study. Infants with cCMV treated with valganciclovir for 1 year were recruited. Data of drug-related hematologic adverse events were collected. RESULTS: One hundred sixty infants were eligible; 46 (28.8%) had experienced at least 1 episode of neutropenia (58 episodes), the majority (39/46, 84.8%) during the first 3 months of treatment and 7 (15.2%) during the last 9 months of treatment. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 9 (5.6%) children, almost exclusively during the first 3 months of treatment. Anemia (hemoglobin <9 g/dL) was recorded in 12 (7.5%) children during the first 3 months of 2/d treatment. Four children presented with hemoglobin levels <7 g/dL and needed a blood transfusion. One child was diagnosed with transient pure red cell aplasia. No long-term adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Although prolonged valganciclovir treatment for cCMV is safe, a close monitoring of the white blood cell count and hemoglobin levels is warranted. Much lower rates of grades 3 and 4 neutropenia were observed than previously reported, probably owing to our unique treatment protocol. Nevertheless, drug-induced anemia should be of primary concern. The optimal protocol assessing clinical outcome, concurrently with potential side effects, has not yet been determined.

Prediction of poor neurological development in patients with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus diseases after oral valganciclovir treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus (SCCMV) disease after antiviral treatment and investigate the symptoms at birth associated with a developmental quotient (DQ) < 70. METHODS: In this prospective study conducted from 2009 to 2018, infants with SCCMV disease who received oral valganciclovir (VGCV; 32 mg/kg/day) for 6 weeks (November 2009 to June 2015) or 6 months (July 2015 to March 2018) were evaluated for their neurodevelopmental outcomes at around 18 months of corrected age. Sequelae were categorized as follows: no impairment with a DQ ≥ 80 and no hearing dysfunction; mild sequelae including unilateral hearing dysfunction or a DQ of 70-79; and severe sequelae with a DQ < 70, bilateral hearing dysfunction requiring hearing aids, blindness or epilepsy requiring anti-epileptic drugs. DQ was assessed using the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development. Symptoms at birth associated with a DQ < 70 were determined using univariate and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS: Of the 24 treated infants, 21 reached > 18 months of corrected age. Six (29%) were no impairment, 4 (19%) had mild sequelae, and 11 (52%) developed severe sequelae. The symptoms at birth associated with a DQ < 70 were microcephaly and/or small for gestational age. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of infants with SCCMV disease after VGCV treatment, the incidence of severe sequelae at 18 months of corrected age was around 50%. When microcephaly and/or small for gestational age are seen at birth, a low DQ may appear even after oral VGCV treatment.

A double masked randomised 4-week, placebo-controlled study in the USA, Thailand and Taiwan to compare the efficacy of oral valganciclovir and topical 2% ganciclovir in the treatment of cytomegalovirus anterior uveitis: study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) anterior uveitis is a recognised cause of anterior uveitis in immunocompetent patients and is preventable cause of vision loss. Ocular sequelae include corneal endothelial damage which can cause corneal oedema and failure, as well as glaucoma. Recurrences of inflammation are common and therefore patients are often exposed to long-term therapy. Oral therapy is available in the form of valganciclovir, although with the caveat of systemic side effects such as bone marrow suppression and renal failure necessitating regular interval laboratory monitoring. Recent reports have demonstrated that topical 2% ganciclovir solution may offer promising treatment outcomes in patients with CMV anterior uveitis with superior safety, cost-effectiveness and convenience profiles. An investigation into the relative equipoise of these therapies is warranted for these reasons. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Systemic and Topical Control of Cytomegalovirus Anterior uveitis: Treatment Outcomes (STACCATO) trial is designed as a multicentre, block randomised by site, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing the efficacy of oral valganciclovir, 2% topical ganciclovir and placebo in treating PCR-proven CMV anterior uveitis. Participant clinical evaluation will occur at three study time points by a masked study ophthalmologist over a 28-day period to assess resolution of ocular inflammation (secondary outcome). A control group will provide additional information about the possible impact that the infected host's immune response may play in controlling local viral replication. The primary analysis is an analysis of covariance (three arms) correcting for baseline to compare quantitative CMV viral load in the anterior chamber (AC) aqueous fluid before and 7 days after treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of California San Francisco Committee on Human Research and the Khon Kaen University Institutional Review Board have given ethical approval. The results of this trial will be presented at local and international meetings and submitted for peer-reviewed journals for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03576898.