Positioning on adult echocardiographic indications - 2019

Barberato, Silvio Henrique; Romano, Minna Moreira Dias; Beck, Adenalva Lima de Souza; Rodrigues, Ana Clara Tude; Almeida, André Luiz Cerqueira de; Assunção, Bruna Morhy Borges Leal; Gripp, Eliza de Almeida; Guimarães Filho, Fabio Villaça; Abensur, Henry; Del Castillo, José Maria; Miglioranza, Marcelo Haertel; Vieira, Marcelo Luiz Campos; Barros, Márcio Vinicius Lins de; Nunes, Maria do Carmo Pereira; Otto, Maria Estefania Bosco; Hortegal, Renato de Aguiar; Barretto, Rodrigo Bellio de Mattos; Campos, Thais Harada; Siqueira, Vicente Nicoliello de; Morhy, Samira Saady.
ABC., imagem cardiovasc ; 32(4): 256-302, out.-dez. 2019. tab
Artigo Inglês, Português | LILACS, CONASS, SES-SP, SES SP - Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, SES-SP | ID: biblio-1023883

Documentos relacionados

  1. Mechanical dyssynchrony & CRT: Is it time for guideline updates?
  2. The reuse of cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators: A convoluted history in an era of global health.
  3. Early Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Accelerate Symptomatic Relief and Complete Left Ventricular Function Recovery in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.
  4. The importance of individualized multimodality imaging-guided methods for selected patients in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
  5. Emerging Technologies in Cardiac Pacing.
  6. Comparison of the relation of the ESC 2021 and ESC 2013 definitions of left bundle branch block with clinical and echocardiographic outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
  7. Improvement of electrical synchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy using dynamic atrioventricular delay programming and multipoint pacing.
  8. Clinical outcomes and predictors of delayed echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
  9. Electrocardiogram-based deep learning improves outcome prediction following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
  10. Clinical outcome of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients randomized to an active fixation bipolar left ventricular lead <i>versus</i> a passive quadripolar lead.