Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Trapping of free radicals with direct in vivo EPR detection: a comparison of 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide and 5-diethoxyphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide as spin traps for HO* and SO4*-.
Timmins, G S; Liu, K J; Bechara, E J; Kotake, Y; Swartz, H M.
  • Timmins GS; EPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Free Radic Biol Med ; 27(3-4): 329-33, 1999 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10468206
ABSTRACT
To spin trap hydroxyl radical (HO*) with in vivo detection of the resultant radical adducts, the use of two spin traps, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) and 5-diethoxyphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DEPMPO) (10 mmol/kg) has been compared. In mice treatment with 5-aminolevulinic acid and Fe3+ resulted in detection of adducts of hydroxyl radicals (HO*), but only with use of DEPMPO. Similarly, 'HO* adducts' generated via nucleophilic substitution of SO4*- adducts formed in vivo could be observed only when using DEPMPO as the spin trap. The reasons for the differences observed between DEPMPO and DMPO are likely due to different in vivo lifetimes of their hydroxyl radical adducts. These results seem to be the first direct in vivo EPR detection of hydroxyl radical adducts.
Asunto(s)
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sulfatos / Radical Hidroxilo / Óxidos N-Cíclicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sulfatos / Radical Hidroxilo / Óxidos N-Cíclicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Año: 1999 Tipo del documento: Article