Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Hearing with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, HC 200) compared to a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid.
Cremers, C W; Snik, F M; Beynon, A J.
  • Cremers CW; Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci ; 17(3): 275-9, 1992 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1505098
ABSTRACT
Sixteen patients have been fitted with a standard bone-anchored hearing aid (HC 200), to replace their conventional bone-conduction aid. The average pure tone threshold at 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz varied from 35 to 75 dB HL, with a sensorineural component varying from 0 to 30 dB HL. The patients' performance with the bone-anchored aid was compared to that with the conventional bone-conduction aid in an acoustic-free field. The maximum phoneme score in quiet was 100% in most patients; in 6 patients, the score with the bone-anchored aid was better (range from 5 to 10%). The speech-in-noise ratio was significantly better in 11 patients (range from -1.4 to -8 dB). None of the patients had poorer results on either test with the bone-anchored aid. The improved speech recognition was ascribed to better performance of the hearing aid in the higher frequency range (above 2 kHz) and to relatively less distortion.
Asunto(s)
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva / Audífonos Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 1992 Tipo del documento: Article
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva / Audífonos Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 1992 Tipo del documento: Article