Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of a new platelet function analyzer in cardiac surgery: a comparison of modified thromboelastography and whole-blood aggregometry.
Mengistu, Andinet M; Wolf, Michael W; Boldt, Joachim; Röhm, Kerstin D; Lang, Johannes; Piper, Swen N.
  • Mengistu AM; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany. a.mengistu@gmx.de
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 22(1): 40-6, 2008 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18249329
OBJECTIVES: Impaired hemostasis of multiple etiologies are often present in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. Platelet dysfunction is considered to be important in the early postoperative period. Therefore, a new whole-blood platelet function analyzer was compared with thromboelastography in predicting postoperative hemostatic outcomes as measured by blood loss and blood product use. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study enrolled 54 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass surgery with CPB. INTERVENTIONS: Coagulation and platelet function were assessed preoperatively, after CPB, at 3 hours, and at 24 hours after surgery by using thromboelastography and impedance aggregometry. Patients were divided into a transfused and nontransfused group on the basis of postoperative transfusion requirements. Postoperative blood loss and requirements of blood transfusions were documented until 24 hours postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (46%) received postoperative blood transfusions. Impaired hemostasis occurred after CPB detected by thromboelastography (p < 0.01) and impedance aggregometry (p < 0.01). In contrast to thromboelastography, preoperative adenosine diphosphate-mediated aggregometry correlated with postoperative requirements for blood transfusion (Spearman r = -0.302, p < 0.05) and was significantly lower in patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion compared with nontransfused patients (p < 0.05). Neither aggregometry nor thromboelastography was correlated with postoperative blood loss. CONCLUSION: Impedance aggregometry as well as thromboelastography are able to detect impaired hemostasis after CPB. In contrast to thromboelastography, aggregometry using a new whole-blood aggregometer identified patients with a reduced risk for postoperative transfusion requirements.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas de Función Plaquetaria / Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea / Agregación Plaquetaria / Puente de Arteria Coronaria Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas de Función Plaquetaria / Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea / Agregación Plaquetaria / Puente de Arteria Coronaria Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article