Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pediatric illness severity measures predict delirium in a pediatric intensive care unit.
Schieveld, Jan N M; Lousberg, Richel; Berghmans, Eline; Smeets, Inge; Leroy, Piet L J M; Vos, Gijs D; Nicolai, Joost; Leentjens, Albert F G; van Os, Jim.
  • Schieveld JN; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands. jan.schieveld@mumc.nl
Crit Care Med ; 36(6): 1933-6, 2008 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18496355
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT Delirium in children is a serious but understudied neuropsychiatric disorder. So there is little to guide the clinician in terms of identifying those at risk.

OBJECTIVE:

To study, in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), the predictive power of widely used generic pediatric mortality scoring systems in relation to the occurrence of pediatric delirium (PD). DESIGN AND

METHODS:

Four-year prospective observational study, 2002-2005. Predictors used were the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) and Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM II).

SETTING:

A tertiary 8-bed PICU in The Netherlands. PATIENTS 877 critically ill children who were acutely, nonelectively, and consecutively admitted. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

Pediatric delirium. MAIN

RESULTS:

Out of 877 children with mean age 4.4 yrs, 40 were diagnosed with PD (Cumulative incidence 4.5%), 85% of whom (versus 40% with nondelirium) were mechanically ventilated. The area under the curve was 0.74 for PRISM II and 0.71 for the PIM, with optimal cut-off points at the 60th centile (PRISM sensitivity 76%; specificity 62%; PIM sensitivity 82%; specificity 62%). A PRISM II or PIM score above the 60th centile was strongly associated with later PD in terms of relative risk (PRISM II risk ratio = 4.9; 95% confidence interval 2.3-10.1; PIM RR = 6.7; 95% confidence interval 3.0-15.0). Given the low incidence of PD, values for positive predictive value were lower (PRISM II 8.3%; PIM 8.9%, rising to, respectively, 10.1% and 10.6% in mechanically ventilated patients) and values for negative predictive value were higher (PRISM II 98.3%; PIM 98.7%).

LIMITATIONS:

Given the relatively low incidence of delirium, a low detection rate biased toward the most severe cases cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSIONS:

Given the fact that PIM and PRISM II are widely used mortality scoring instruments, prospective associations with PD suggest additional value for ruling in, or out, patients at risk of PD.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad / Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico / Delirio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad / Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico / Delirio Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article