Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study Part II - Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel de novo coronary artery lesions.
Serruys, Patrick W; Ong, Andrew T L; Morice, Marie-Claude; De Bruyne, Bernard; Colombo, Antonio; Macaya, Carlos; Richardt, Gert; Fajadet, Jean; Hamm, Christian; Dawkins, Keith; O'Malley, A James; Bressers, Marco; Donohoe, Dennis.
  • Serruys PW; Department of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Thoraxcenter Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
EuroIntervention ; 1(2): 147-56, 2005 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19758896
AIM: To determine the safety and effectiveness of CYPHER(R) sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with multivessel disease; and to compare outcomes against the historical results of the two arms of the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study (ARTS I). METHODS AND RESULTS: ARTS II is a 45 center, 607 patient single arm trial; the1-year outcomes were compared to the historical controls of the ARTS I trial, using conventional and Bayesian statistical methods. Patients were stratified by clinical site to ensure that at least one-third had 3-vessel disease to achieve the number of treatable lesions per patient comparable to ARTS I. Multivessel stenting was performed with sirolimus-eluting stents according to local institutional practice with the goal of achieving complete revascularisation. The majority of patients (53.5%) had 3-vessel disease and diabetes was present in 26.2%. Mean stented length was 72.5mm, with 3.7 stents implanted per patient. The 1-year survival rate was 99.0%, the composite of death / stroke and MI-free survival was 96.9%, freedom from revascularisation was 91.5% and the composite endpoint of MACCE-free survival was 89.5% (the primary endpoint). Diabetic patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents were more likely to undergo repeat revascularisation (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.16 - 3.34) and experience a MACCE (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.16 - 2.97) than non-diabetics at 1-year. In the unadjusted comparison with the historical control arms of ARTS-I-CABG and ARTS-I-PCI, the respective relative risks (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the endpoints were: (1) freedom from repeat revascularisation RR 2.03 (1.23-3.34) and RR 0.44 (0.31-0.61) respectively; and (2) MACCE free survival RR 0.89 (0.65-1.23) and RR 0.39 (0.30-0.51) respectively. CONCLUSION: The low incidence of MACCE and repeat revascularisation in ARTS II suggests that contemporary PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents is safe and efficacious for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Compared to the historical population of ARTS I, surgery still afforded a lower need for repeat revascularisation although overall MACCE rates in ARTS II approached the surgical results and were significantly better than bare stenting in ARTS I.
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Article
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Article