Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopy for recurrent Crohn's disease: how do the results compare with the results for primary Crohn's disease?
Pinto, R A; Shawki, S; Narita, K; Weiss, E G; Wexner, S D.
  • Pinto RA; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida 33331, USA.
Colorectal Dis ; 13(3): 302-7, 2011 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19912288
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To assess the feasibility and outcomes of reoperative laparoscopic-assisted surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease compared with index laparoscopic resections.

METHOD:

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed from 2001 to 2008 on patients who had primary laparoscopy (group I) or reoperative laparoscopy for Crohn's disease (group II). Data collection included demographic and surgical data, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS:

One hundred and thirty patients were included in this study, distributed as follows group I, 80 patients with a mean age of 35 years; and group II, 50 patients with a mean age of 42 years. Preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score and body mass index were similar in both groups. Patients in group II had a longer period of disease (15.5 vs 8.9 years in groups I and II, respectively; P = 0.0002). Immunosuppressive therapy had been utilized in 66 (82.5%) and in 42 (84%) patients in groups I and II, respectively. Ileocolic resection was the most commonly performed procedure in both groups (82%), followed by subtotal colectomy. Conversion rates were 18.7 and 32% in groups I and II, respectively (P = 0.09). The mean operative time (182 vs 201 min) and mean blood loss (161 vs 202 ml) were not significantly different (P > 0.05); however, the overall incisional length was significantly longer in group II (6.7 vs 11.4 cm, P = 0.045). A stoma was created in 17 and 16% of patients in groups I and II, respectively. Overall, early postoperative complications were not statistically significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05); anastomotic leak occurred in four (5%) and one (2%) patients (P = 0.65), and abdominal abscess in three (3.75%) and four (8%) patients (P = 0.56), in groups I and II, respectively. Reoperative rates were 10 and 6% (P = 0.53), and mean hospital stay was similar in groups I and II respectively (6.7 vs 7.5 days, respectively; P = 0.3266). There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION:

The results of laparoscopic-assisted resection for recurrent Crohn's disease are similar to those for primary resection.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reoperación / Enfermedad de Crohn / Laparoscopía / Colon / Estomas Quirúrgicos / Íleon Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reoperación / Enfermedad de Crohn / Laparoscopía / Colon / Estomas Quirúrgicos / Íleon Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article