How often is a low Apgar score the result of substandard care during labour?

OBJECTIVE: To increase our knowledge of the occurrence of substandard care during labour. DESIGN: A population-based case-control study. SETTING: Stockholm County. POPULATION: Infants born in the period 2004-2006 in Stockholm County. METHODS: Cases and controls were identified from the Swedish Medical Birth Register, had a gestational age of +/-33 complete weeks, had planned for a vaginal delivery, and had a normal cardiotocographic (CTG) recording on admission. We compared 313 infants with an Apgar score of < 7 at 5 minutes of age with 313 randomly selected controls with a full Apgar score, matched for year of birth. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Substandard care during labour. RESULTS: We found that 62% of cases and 36% of controls were subject to some form of substandard care during labour. In half of the cases and in 12% of the controls, CTG was abnormal for > or = 45 minutes before birth. Fetal blood sampling was not performed in 79% of both cases and controls, when indicated.Oxytocin was provided without signs of uterine inertia in 20% of both cases and controls. Uterine contractions were hyperstimulated by oxytocin in 29% of cases and in 9% of controls, and the dose of oxytocin was increased despite abnormal CTG in 19% and 6% of cases and controls, respectively. Assuming that substandard care is a risk factor for low Apgar score, we estimate that up to 42% of the cases could be prevented by avoiding substandard care. CONCLUSIONS: There was substandard care during labour of two thirds of infants with a low Apgar score. The main reasons for substandard care were related to misinterpretation of CTG, not acting on an abnormal CTG in a timely fashion and incautious use of oxytocin.