Binding of ß4γ5 by adenosine A1 and A2A receptors determined by stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture and mass spectrometry.

ABSTRACT

Characterization of G protein ßγ dimer isoform expression in different cellular contexts has been impeded by low levels of protein expression, broad isoform heterogeneity, and antibodies of limited specificity, sensitivity, or availability. As a new approach, we used quantitative mass spectrometry to characterize native ßγ dimers associated with adenosine A(1)α(i1) and adenosine A(2A)α(S) receptor fusion proteins expressed in HEK-293 cells. Cells expressing A(1)α(i1) were cultured in media containing [(13)C(6)]Arg and [(13)C(6)]Lys and ßγ labeled with heavy isotopes purified. Heavy ßγ was combined with either recombinant ßγ purified from Sf9 cells, ßγ purified from the A(2A)α(S) expressed in HEK-293 cells cultured in standard media, or an enriched ßγ fraction from HEK-293 cells. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE, protein bands containing ß and γ were excised, digested with trypsin, and separated by HPLC, and isotope ratios were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Three ß isoforms, ß(1), ß(2), and ß(4), and seven γ isoforms, γ(2), γ(4), γ(5), γ(7), γ(10), γ(11), and γ(12), were identified in the analysis. ß(1) and γ(5) were most abundant in the enriched ßγ fraction, and this ßγ profile was generally mirrored in the fusion proteins. However, both A(2A)α(S) and A(1)α(i1) bound more ß(4) and γ(5) compared to the enriched ßγ fraction; also, more ß(4) was associated with A(2A)α(S) than A(1)α(i1). Both fusion proteins also contained less γ(2), γ(10), and γ(12) than the enriched ßγ fraction. These results suggest that preferences for particular ßγ isoforms may be driven in part by structural motifs common to adenosine receptor family members.