Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
First eye prediction error improves second eye refractive outcome results in 2129 patients after bilateral sequential cataract surgery.
Aristodemou, Petros; Knox Cartwright, Nathaniel E; Sparrow, John M; Johnston, Robert L.
  • Aristodemou P; Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, University of Bristol, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol, United Kingdom. topetros@yahoo.com
Ophthalmology ; 118(9): 1701-9, 2011 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21762991
OBJECTIVE: To define theoretical correction factors for second-eye intraocular lens (IOL) power adjustment based on first eye refractive prediction error (PE). DESIGN: Database study. PARTICIPANTS: We included 2129 patients who underwent bilateral sequential phacoemulsification cataract surgery with the same IOL model. METHODS: Retrospectively calculated PEs (Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T) were analyzed for association between paired eyes, examining the effect of interocular differences in axial length (AL) and corneal power. A range of correction factors (CF) derived from the first eye PE were applied to the second eye PE using optimized and non-optimized IOL constants (IOLCs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Second eye mean absolute error (MAE). RESULTS: Prediction errors of paired eyes were correlated. Interocular corneal power differences exceeding 0.60 diopters (D) were associated with a weaker correlation but interocular AL differences did not affect the correlation. When a 50% CF was applied to second eyes of patients with a first eye PE between ±0.50 and ±1.50 D, it improved refractive outcomes from 30%, 56%, and 92% to 42%, 75%, and 96% within ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D, respectively, and reduced the MAE from 0.49 to 0.37 D (P<0.0001). For first eye PE below ±0.50 D, a 50% CF reduced the MAE from 0.32 to 0.30 D (P<0.00001). A 50% CF also reduces second eye MAE for eyes with nonoptimized IOLCs. CONCLUSIONS: A 50% CF reduces second eye PE when either first eye optimized PE is within ±1.50 D or when nonoptimized IOLCs are used. The correlation is weaker when interocular corneal power differences are >0.60 D.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Errores de Refracción / Agudeza Visual / Facoemulsificación / Errores Diagnósticos / Lateralidad Funcional / Lentes Intraoculares Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Errores de Refracción / Agudeza Visual / Facoemulsificación / Errores Diagnósticos / Lateralidad Funcional / Lentes Intraoculares Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article