Influence of different materials and techniques to transfer molding in multiple implants.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare different materials and techniques used in transfer molding of multiple implants, by evaluating the space between implants and superstructure. Four external hexagon implants were fixed in a master template and the same on a superstructure. Transfer molding of implants were done using the direct and indirect techniques, with transfers united or not, using the union chemically activated acrylic resin (QA) and other groups polymerized acrylic resin (FT), and sectioned and not split. The casts were made with polyether and models divided into 8 groups (n = 5). The space between the superstructure and the master implants was measured with a microscope and the data was analyzed statistically by Student's t test (p < 0.05). For the material of union there was no significant difference, except when the groups were compared with the resin Duralay QA (G4) and the resin Duolay FT (G8) and groups using resins Duolay QA (G5) and Duolay FT (G7) for the union of the transfers. When comparing the groups who had the union between the transfers and sectioned again united with those in which the union was not severed there was no statistically significant difference. QA resin was superior to the FT with respect to the union of transfers. Techniques with united transfers or not were similar.