Revision surgery is overestimated in hip replacement.
Bone Joint Res
; 1(10): 258-62, 2012 Oct.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-23610656
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
The Kaplan-Meier estimation is widely used in orthopedics to calculate the probability of revision surgery. Using data from a long-term follow-up study, we aimed to assess the amount of bias introduced by the Kaplan-Meier estimator in a competing risk setting.METHODS:
We describe both the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the competing risk model, and explain why the competing risk model is a more appropriate approach to estimate the probability of revision surgery when patients die in a hip revision surgery cohort. In our study, a total of 62 acetabular revisions were performed. After a mean of 25 years, no patients were lost to follow-up, 13 patients had undergone revision surgery and 33 patients died of causes unrelated to their hip.RESULTS:
The Kaplan-Meier estimator overestimates the probability of revision surgery in our example by 3%, 11%, 28%, 32% and 60% at five, ten, 15, 20 and 25 years, respectively. As the cumulative incidence of the competing event increases over time, as does the amount of bias.CONCLUSIONS:
Ignoring competing risks leads to biased estimations of the probability of revision surgery. In order to guide choosing the appropriate statistical analysis in future clinical studies, we propose a flowchart.
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Idioma:
En
Año:
2012
Tipo del documento:
Article