Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reasons for non-attendance to cervical screening and preferences for HPV self-sampling in Dutch women.
Bosgraaf, Remko P; Ketelaars, Pleun J W; Verhoef, Viola M J; Massuger, Leon F A G; Meijer, Chris J L M; Melchers, Willem J G; Bekkers, Ruud L M.
  • Bosgraaf RP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Ketelaars PJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: Pleun.Ketelaars@radboudumc.nl.
  • Verhoef VM; Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Massuger LF; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Meijer CJ; Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Melchers WJ; Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Bekkers RL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Prev Med ; 64: 108-13, 2014 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24736093
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

High attendance rates in cervical screening are essential for effective cancer prevention. Offering HPV self-sampling to non-responders increases participation rates. The objectives of this study were to determine why non-responders do not attend regular screening, and why they do or do not participate when offered a self-sampling device.

METHODS:

A questionnaire study was conducted in the Netherlands from October 2011 to December 2012. A total of 35,477 non-responders were invited to participate in an HPV self-sampling study; 5347 women did opt out. Finally, 30,130 women received a questionnaire and self-sampling device.

RESULTS:

The analysis was based on 9484 returned questionnaires (31.5%) with a self-sample specimen, and 682 (2.3%) without. Among women who returned both, the main reason for non-attendance to cervical screening was that they forgot to schedule an appointment (3068; 32.3%). The most important reason to use the self-sampling device was the opportunity to take a sample in their own time-setting (4763; 50.2%). A total of 30.9% of the women who did not use the self-sampling device preferred after all to have a cervical smear taken instead.

CONCLUSIONS:

Organisational barriers are the main reason for non-attendance in regular cervical screening. Important reasons for non-responders to the regular screening to use a self-sampling device are convenience and self-control.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Frotis Vaginal / Aceptación de la Atención de Salud / Salud de la Mujer / Infecciones por Papillomavirus / Prueba de Papanicolaou Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Frotis Vaginal / Aceptación de la Atención de Salud / Salud de la Mujer / Infecciones por Papillomavirus / Prueba de Papanicolaou Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article