Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MET amplification is not rare and predicts unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent/metastatic gastric cancer after chemotherapy.
An, Xin; Wang, Fang; Shao, Qiong; Wang, Feng-Hua; Wang, Zhi-Qiang; Wang, Zhi-Qiang; Chen, Cui; Li, Cong; Luo, Hui-Yan; Zhang, Dong-Sheng; Xu, Rui-Hua; Li, Yu-Hong.
  • An X; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China; Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou.
Cancer ; 120(5): 675-82, 2014 Mar 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24804300
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Several large studies have reported an extremely low incidence of MET gene amplification (GA) in patients with radically resected gastric cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic role of MET in patients with recurrent=metastatic gastric cancer who received chemotherapy.

METHODS:

MET GA and protein expression of recurrent=metastatic gastric cancer samples were evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively.

RESULTS:

This retrospective study included 232 patients with recurrent=metastatic gastric cancer. MET GA and strong protein expression(IHC31) were observed in 8.3% (19 of 230 samples) and 9.6% (22 of 229 samples) of samples, respectively. A significant correlation was observed between MET GA and protein expression (r = 0.378; P<.001). MET GA was correlated with poor performance status(P<.001) and poorly differentiated tumors (P=.0015). Both MET GA and IHC 31 expression were associated with a substantially shorter median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The median OS and PFS for patients with MET GA versus those without MET GA were 5.7 months versus 15.5 months (P<.001) and 3.6 months versus 6.9 months (P<.001), respectively. The median OS and PFS for patients with MET IHC 31 expression versus IHC 0 to 21 expression were 6.3 months versus 15.1 months(P<.001) and 3.6 months versus 7.0 months (P<.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with recurrent=metastatic gastric cancer,MET amplification and strong protein expression are not rare and appear to be significantly associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Amplificación de Genes / Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-met / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article
Search on Google
Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Amplificación de Genes / Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-met / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article