Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating.
Anderson, Joseph C; Butterly, Lynn F; Robinson, Christina M; Goodrich, Martha; Weiss, Julia E.
  • Anderson JC; Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
  • Butterly LF; The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA; Section of Gastroenterology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
  • Robinson CM; Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
  • Goodrich M; Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
  • Weiss JE; Department of Community and Family Medicine, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 80(3): 463-70, 2014 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24818550
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The effect of colon preparation quality on adenoma detection rates (ADRs) is unclear, partly because of lack of uniform colon preparation ratings in prior studies. The New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry collects detailed data from colonoscopies statewide, by using a uniform preparation quality scale after the endoscopist has cleaned the mucosa.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the overall and proximal ADR and serrated polyp detection rates (SDR) in colonoscopies with differing levels of colon preparation quality.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional.

SETTING:

New Hampshire statewide registry. PATIENTS Patients undergoing colonoscopy.

INTERVENTIONS:

We examined colon preparation quality for 13,022 colonoscopies, graded by using specific descriptions provided to endoscopists. ADR and SDR are the number of colonoscopies with at least 1 adenoma or serrated polyp (excluding those in the rectum and/or sigmoid colon) detected divided by the total number of colonoscopies, for the preparation categories optimal (excellent and/or good), fair, and poor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Overall/proximal ADR/SDR.

RESULTS:

The overall detection rates in examinations with fair colon preparation quality (SDR 8.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-10.7, ADR 27.1%; 95% CI, 24.6-30.0) were similar to rates observed in colonoscopies with optimal preparation quality (SDR 8.8%; 95% CI, 8.3-9.4, ADR 26.3%; 95% CI, 25.6-27.2). This finding also was observed for rates in the proximal colon. A logistic regression model (including withdrawal time) found that proximal ADR was statistically lower in the poor preparation category (odds ratio 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.84; P < .01) than in adequately prepared colons.

LIMITATIONS:

Homogeneous population.

CONCLUSION:

In our sample, there was no significant difference in overall or proximal ADR or SDR between colonoscopies with fair versus optimal colon preparation quality. Poor colon preparation quality may reduce the proximal ADR.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Adenocarcinoma / Adenoma / Sistema de Registros / Pólipos del Colon / Colonoscopía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Adenocarcinoma / Adenoma / Sistema de Registros / Pólipos del Colon / Colonoscopía Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article