Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of ovarian reserve by antral follicle count in ovaries with endometrioma.
Lima, M L; Martins, W P; Coelho Neto, M A; Nastri, C O; Ferriani, R A; Navarro, P A.
  • Lima ML; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
  • Martins WP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
  • Coelho Neto MA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
  • Nastri CO; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
  • Ferriani RA; School of Health Technology - Ultrasonography School of Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
  • Navarro PA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 46(2): 239-42, 2015 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25504940
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate whether the antral follicle count (AFC) is underestimated in the presence of an endometrioma.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective cohort study assessing all women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at our clinic between January 2011 and December 2012 who had both ovaries and unilateral endometrioma. The primary outcome of the study was the difference between AFC and the number of oocytes retrieved per ovary.

RESULTS:

Within the study period 787 women underwent IVF/ICSI at our clinic. Sixty of these women had at least one endometrioma, but 23 were excluded from the analysis as six had only one ovary and 17 had bilateral endometriomas. Therefore a total of 37 women were included in this study and analysis. Compared with the contralateral ovaries, ovaries with an endometrioma were significantly larger in volume (median, 10.3 (interquartile range (IQR), 4.7-18.9) cm(3) vs median, 3.6 (IQR, 2.7-6.5) cm(3); P < 0.001) and presented a significantly lower AFC (median, 3.0 (IQR, 1.0-6.0) vs median, 5.0 (IQR, 2.0-6.5); P = 0.001). However, the median number of oocytes retrieved was similar (P = 0.60) between ovaries with an endometrioma (2.0 (IQR, 0.5-5.0)) and the contralateral ovaries (2.0 (IQR, 0.0-4.0)). Accordingly, the median difference between AFC and number of oocytes retrieved was significantly smaller (P = 0.005) for ovaries with an endometrioma (0.0 (IQR, -1.0 to 1.5) than for those without (2.0 (IQR, 0.0-4.0)).

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the AFC is reduced in ovaries with an endometrioma, the number of oocytes retrieved is similar, suggesting that the AFC is underestimated in such ovaries. We believe that this is a consequence of an impaired ability to detect small follicles in the presence of an endometrioma.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Endometriosis / Reserva Ovárica / Folículo Ovárico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Endometriosis / Reserva Ovárica / Folículo Ovárico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article