Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lifestyle risk factors for pressure ulcers in community-based patients with spinal cord injuries in Japan.
Morita, T; Yamada, T; Watanabe, T; Nagahori, E.
  • Morita T; 1] Department of Physical Therapy, Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Atsugi, Japan [2] Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa, Japan.
  • Yamada T; Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Arakawa, Japan.
  • Watanabe T; Department of Orthopedics, Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Atsugi, Japan.
  • Nagahori E; Department of Nursing, Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Atsugi, Japan.
Spinal Cord ; 53(6): 476-81, 2015 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25665536
ABSTRACT
STUDY

DESIGN:

Case-control study.

OBJECTIVES:

To identify daily living-related risk factors for pressure ulcer (PU) occurrence in community-living patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). To determine whether seat pressure influences PU occurrence, and how often patients with SCI perform pressure relief activities while living in the community.

SETTING:

Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

METHODS:

Thirty-one patients admitted to this hospital for PU treatment were included in the case (PU) group. Thirty outpatients who did not have PUs at the time of the study, and had lived without PUs for at least a year, were included in the control (No PU) group. Patients were interviewed about lifestyle-related PU risk factors and a pressure-mapping system was used to measure interface pressure (IP) on their wheelchair seat. The No PU group patients recorded their daily activities and pressure relief maneuvers for 1 week.

RESULTS:

Eight lifestyle factors and one risk assessment scale significantly differed between groups. Three factors showed significant odds ratios by logistic regression. IP did not significantly differ between groups. The self-counted number of pressure relief maneuvers (median (25th-75th percentile)) performed per hour in the No PU group was 2.5 (0.7-4.3) and including transfer and urination was 3.5 (2.0-5.3).

CONCLUSION:

We identified potential PU risk factors related to lifestyle. The scores of one risk assessment scale were also associated with PU risk. Our results did not suggest an IP damage threshold. Patients in the No PU group performed pressure relief maneuvers, including related activities, approximately once every 17 min.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal / Úlcera por Presión / Estilo de Vida Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal / Úlcera por Presión / Estilo de Vida Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article