Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Attempted underwater en bloc resection for large (2-4 cm) colorectal laterally spreading tumors (with video).
Binmoeller, Kenneth F; Hamerski, Christopher M; Shah, Janak N; Bhat, Yasser M; Kane, Steven D; Garcia-Kennedy, Richard.
  • Binmoeller KF; Paul May and Frank Stein Interventional Endoscopy Center, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Hamerski CM; Paul May and Frank Stein Interventional Endoscopy Center, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Shah JN; Paul May and Frank Stein Interventional Endoscopy Center, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Bhat YM; Paul May and Frank Stein Interventional Endoscopy Center, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Kane SD; Paul May and Frank Stein Interventional Endoscopy Center, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Garcia-Kennedy R; Department of Pathology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 81(3): 713-8, 2015 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25708759
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of attempted underwater en bloc resection (UEBR) of large colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs).

DESIGN:

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING:

Tertiary academic referral center. PATIENTS Fifty patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

INTERVENTIONS:

Standardized UEBR technique involving attempted en bloc resection without submucosal injection by using a large 33-mm snare. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Complete endoscopic en bloc resection, histologic complete resection, procedure time, adverse events, and follow-up data.

RESULTS:

Over 13 months, UEBR was attempted in 50 patients (median age, 68 years) with 53 LSTs 2 to 4 cm in size. The median LST size was 30 mm (range 20-40 mm). The median procedure and resection times were 38 minutes (range 17-87 minutes) and 3 minutes (range 1-32 minutes), respectively. Complete endoscopic en bloc resection with the 33-mm snare was successful in 29 of 53 lesions (55%). Of these, histology showed neoplasia-free margins in 79%. Final histology was tubular adenoma (n = 26), sessile serrated adenoma (n = 10), tubulovillous adenoma (n = 14), villous adenoma (n = 2), and intramucosal carcinoma (n = 1). Adverse events (4%) were delayed bleeding in 1 and abdominal pain in 1 patient each. There were no perforations. Forty patients with a total of 43 adenomas had follow-up colonoscopy with biopsies of the resection site after a median of 31 weeks (range 7-71 weeks) after resection. Residual adenoma was found in 2 of 43 (5%).

LIMITATIONS:

Single-center, limited follow-up.

CONCLUSION:

On an intention-to-treat basis, complete endoscopic en bloc resection was achieved in 55% of lesions with complete histologic resection verified in 79% of the en bloc specimens. UEBR without submucosal injection appears safe. Refinements are needed to improve UEBR success rates.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Adenoma / Colonoscopía / Mucosa Intestinal Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Adenoma / Colonoscopía / Mucosa Intestinal Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article