Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rescreening for genetic mutations using multi-gene panel testing in patients who previously underwent non-informative genetic screening.
Frey, Melissa K; Kim, Sarah H; Bassett, Rebecca Yee; Martineau, Jessica; Dalton, Emily; Chern, Jing-Yi; Blank, Stephanie V.
  • Frey MK; New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, US. Electronic address: melissa.frey@nyumc.org.
  • Kim SH; New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, US.
  • Bassett RY; New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, US.
  • Martineau J; New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, US.
  • Dalton E; Ambry Genetics, US.
  • Chern JY; New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, US.
  • Blank SV; New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, US.
Gynecol Oncol ; 139(2): 211-5, 2015 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26296696
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The availability of next-generation sequencing and identification of multiple cancer-related genes has caused a shift away from single gene testing towards multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer syndromes. However, the utility of panels in individuals who previously underwent non-informative genetic screening has yet to be evaluated. We aim to evaluate the use of rescreening and results of multi-gene panels in this rescreened population.

METHODS:

We reviewed the medical records for patients who had previously undergone genetic testing and then underwent multi-gene panel testing at a single institution between 9/2013 and 11/2014.

RESULTS:

One hundred and twenty-seven patients with prior genetic testing underwent multi-gene panels. One hundred and four patients (82%) had a history of cancer and 118 (93%) had at least one family member with cancer. On primary testing, no pathogenic mutations were detected and 10 patients (8%) were found to have variants of uncertain significance (VUS). On repeat multi-gene panel testing, nine patients (7%) were found to have a pathogenic mutation and 53 patients (42%) were VUS not identified on prior testing.

CONCLUSIONS:

Seven percent of patients with non-informative primary testing were found to have a pathogenic mutation with multi-gene panels, suggesting that there is a potential benefit to be gained from rescreening. However, 42% of patients were found to have new VUS with panels, a result that can cause patients anxiety without clear clinical implications.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas Genéticas / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas Genéticas / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article