Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit to Improve the Quality of Patient Materials.
Brega, Angela G; Freedman, Megan A G; LeBlanc, William G; Barnard, Juliana; Mabachi, Natabhona M; Cifuentes, Maribel; Albright, Karen; Weiss, Barry D; Brach, Cindy; West, David R.
  • Brega AG; a Department of Community and Behavioral Health , Colorado School of Public Health , Aurora , Colorado , USA.
  • Freedman MA; b Department of Family Medicine , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA.
  • LeBlanc WG; a Department of Community and Behavioral Health , Colorado School of Public Health , Aurora , Colorado , USA.
  • Barnard J; b Department of Family Medicine , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA.
  • Mabachi NM; c Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA.
  • Cifuentes M; d American Academy of Family Physicians , Kansas City , Kansas , USA.
  • Albright K; e Department of Family Medicine , University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City , Kansas , USA.
  • Weiss BD; b Department of Family Medicine , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA.
  • Brach C; a Department of Community and Behavioral Health , Colorado School of Public Health , Aurora , Colorado , USA.
  • West DR; c Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science , University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora , Colorado , USA.
J Health Commun ; 20 Suppl 2: 69-76, 2015.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26513033
ABSTRACT
Patient materials are often written above the reading level of most adults. Tool 11 of the Health Literacy Universal Precautions Toolkit ("Design Easy-to-Read Material") provides guidance on ensuring that written patient materials are easy to understand. As part of a pragmatic demonstration of the Toolkit, we examined how four primary care practices implemented Tool 11 and whether written materials improved as a result. We conducted interviews to learn about practices' implementation activities and assessed the readability, understandability, and actionability of patient education materials collected during pre- and postimplementation site visits. Interview data indicated that practices followed many action steps recommended in Tool 11, including training staff, assessing readability, and developing or revising materials, typically focusing on brief documents such as patient letters and information sheets. Many of the revised and newly developed documents had reading levels appropriate for most patients and--in the case of revised documents--better readability than the original materials. In contrast, the readability, understandability, and actionability of lengthier patient education materials were poor and did not improve over the 6-month implementation period. Findings guided revisions to Tool 11 and highlighted the importance of engaging multiple stakeholders in improving the quality of patient materials.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Materiales de Enseñanza / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Gestión de la Calidad Total / Alfabetización en Salud Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Materiales de Enseñanza / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Gestión de la Calidad Total / Alfabetización en Salud Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article