Patient assessment of diabetes care in a pay-for-performance program.
Int J Qual Health Care
; 28(2): 183-90, 2016 Apr.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-26819445
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
Few studies address quality of care in pay-for-performance (P4P) programs from the perspective of patients' perceptions. This study aimed to examine and compare the patient assessment of diabetes chronic care as perceived by diabetic patients enrolled and not enrolled in a P4P program from the patients' self-reported perspectives.DESIGN:
A cross-sectional study with case and comparison group design.SETTING:
A large-scale survey was conducted from February to November 2013 in 18 healthcare institutions in Taiwan.PARTICIPANTS:
A total of 1458 P4P (n = 1037) and non-P4P (n = 421) diabetic patients participated in this large survey. The Chinese version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) instrument was used and patients' clinical outcome data (e.g. HbA1c, LDL) were collected. INTERVENTION None. MAIN OUTCOMEMEASURES:
Five subscales from the PACIC were measured, including patient activation, delivery system design/system support, goal setting/tailoring, problem solving/contextual and follow-up/coordination. Patient clinical outcomes were also measured. Multiple linear regression and logistic regression models were used and controlled for patient demographic and health institution characteristics statistically.RESULTS:
After adjusting for covariates, P4P patients had higher overall scores on the PACIC and five subscales than non-P4P patients. P4P patients also had better clinical processes of care (e.g. HbA1c test) and intermediate outcomes.CONCLUSIONS:
Patients who participated in the program likely received better patient-centered care given the original Chronic Care Model. Better perceptions of diabetic care assessment also better clinical outcomes. The PACIC instrument can be used for the patient assessment of chronic care in a P4P program.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud
/
Reembolso de Incentivo
/
Satisfacción del Paciente
/
Diabetes Mellitus
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
/
Prevalence_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
País como asunto:
Asia
Idioma:
En
Año:
2016
Tipo del documento:
Article