Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
Feng, E-S; Sui, C-B; Wang, T-X; Sun, G-L.
  • Feng ES; Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. enshanfeng@126.com.
  • Sui CB; Department of Neurology, Beihai Hospital, Yantai, Shandong, China.
  • Wang TX; Department of Neurosurgery, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang, Weifang, Shandong, China.
  • Sun GL; Department of Neurosurgery, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 134(6): 442-451, 2016 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26846702
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Stereotactic radiosurgery (RS) is a potential option for some patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the pooled seizure-free rate and the time interval to seizure cessation in patients with lesions in the mesial temporal lobe, and who were eligible for either stereotactic or gamma knife RS. MATERIALS &

METHODS:

We searched the Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases using combinations of the following terms RS, stereotactic radiosurgery, gamma knife, and TLE.

RESULTS:

We screened 103 articles and selected 13 for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Significant study heterogeneity was detected; however, the included studies displayed an acceptable level of quality. We show that approximately half of the patients were seizure free over a follow-up period that ranged from 6 months to 9 years [pooled estimate 50.9% (95% confidence interval 0.381-0.636)], with an average of 14 months to seizure cessation [pooled estimate 14.08 months (95% confidence interval 11.95-12.22 months)]. Nine of 13 included studies reported data for adverse events (AEs), which included visual field deficits and headache (the two most common AEs), verbal memory impairment, psychosis, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, and dysphasia. Patients in the individual studies experienced AEs at rates that ranged from 8%, for non-epileptic seizures, to 85%, for headache.

CONCLUSION:

Our findings indicate that RS may have similar or slightly less efficacy in some patients compared with invasive surgery. Randomized controlled trials of both treatment regimens should be undertaken to generate an evidence base for patient decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiocirugia / Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos / Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiocirugia / Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos / Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article