Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The comparison of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid and polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymers in endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux.
Karakus, Suleyman Cuneyt; User, Idil Rana; Kilic, Beltinge Demircioglu; Akçaer, Vedat; Ceylan, Haluk; Ozokutan, Bulent Hayri.
  • Karakus SC; University of Gaziantep, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Gaziantep, Turkey. Electronic address: sckarakus@yahoo.com.
  • User IR; University of Gaziantep, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Gaziantep, Turkey.
  • Kilic BD; University of Gaziantep, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Gaziantep, Turkey.
  • Akçaer V; University of Gaziantep, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Gaziantep, Turkey.
  • Ceylan H; University of Gaziantep, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Gaziantep, Turkey.
  • Ozokutan BH; University of Gaziantep, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Gaziantep, Turkey.
J Pediatr Surg ; 51(9): 1496-500, 2016 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27061353
BACKGROUND: Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/Ha;Dexell®) and polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (PPC;Vantris®) are the popular tissue-augmenting substances using for the endoscopic injections of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare Dx/Ha and PPC in terms of effectiveness, injection techniques and complications with special emphasis on vesicoureteral junction obstruction (VUJO). METHODS: A total of 95 patients who underwent endoscopic VUR treatment between 2009 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1: Patients underwent endoscopic treatment with PPC (n=50 patients, 70 renal refluxing units) group 2: Patients underwent endoscopic treatment with Dx/Ha (n=45 patients, 74 renal refluxing units). RESULTS: The overall resolution rates based on the number of renal refluxing units studied was 88.6% and 70.3% in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Resolution rates were significantly better in group 1 compared to group 2. VUJO requiring ureteral reimplantation or stent insertion developed in 7 patients in group 1. No VUJO was observed in group 2. VUJO in group 1 was markedly higher than that in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of VUR with PPC promises better resolution rates but higher VUJO rates compared to Dx/Ha.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reflujo Vesicoureteral / Resinas Acrílicas / Dextranos / Endoscopía / Ácido Hialurónico Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reflujo Vesicoureteral / Resinas Acrílicas / Dextranos / Endoscopía / Ácido Hialurónico Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article