Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantifying brain volumes for Multiple Sclerosis patients follow-up in clinical practice - comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.
Lysandropoulos, Andreas P; Absil, Julie; Metens, Thierry; Mavroudakis, Nicolas; Guisset, François; Van Vlierberghe, Eline; Smeets, Dirk; David, Philippe; Maertens, Anke; Van Hecke, Wim.
  • Lysandropoulos AP; Department of Neurology Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Anderlecht Belgium.
  • Absil J; Department of Radiology Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Anderlecht Belgium.
  • Metens T; Department of Radiology Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Anderlecht Belgium.
  • Mavroudakis N; Department of Neurology Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Anderlecht Belgium.
  • Guisset F; Department of Neurology Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Anderlecht Belgium.
  • Van Vlierberghe E; Icometrix Leuven Belgium.
  • Smeets D; Icometrix Leuven Belgium.
  • David P; Department of Radiology Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Anderlecht Belgium.
  • Maertens A; Icometrix Leuven Belgium.
  • Van Hecke W; Icometrix Leuven Belgium.
Brain Behav ; 6(2): e00422, 2016 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27110445
INTRODUCTION: There is emerging evidence that brain atrophy is a part of the pathophysiology of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and correlates with several clinical outcomes of the disease, both physical and cognitive. Consequently, brain atrophy is becoming an important parameter in patients' follow-up. Since in clinical practice both 1.5Tesla (T) and 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems are used for MS patients follow-up, questions arise regarding compatibility and a possible need for standardization. METHODS: Therefore, in this study 18 MS patients were scanned on the same day on a 1.5T and a 3T scanner. For each scanner, a 3D T1 and a 3D FLAIR were acquired. As no atrophy is expected within 1 day, these datasets can be used to evaluate the median percentage error of the brain volume measurement for gray matter (GM) volume and parenchymal volume (PV) between 1.5T and 3T scanners. The results are obtained with MSmetrix, which is developed especially for use in the MS clinical care path, and compared to Siena (FSL), a widely used software for research purposes. RESULTS: The MSmetrix median percentage error of the brain volume measurement between a 1.5T and a 3T scanner is 0.52% for GM and 0.35% for PV. For Siena this error equals 2.99%. When data of the same scanner are compared, the error is in the order of 0.06-0.08% for both MSmetrix and Siena. CONCLUSIONS: MSmetrix appears robust on both the 1.5T and 3T systems and the measurement error becomes an order of magnitude higher between scanners with different field strength.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Esclerosis Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Esclerosis Múltiple Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article