Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cerebral Critical Closing Pressure During Infusion Tests.
Varsos, Georgios V; Czosnyka, Marek; Smielewski, Peter; Garnett, Matthew R; Liu, Xiuyun; Adams, Hadie; Pickard, John D; Czosnyka, Zofia.
  • Varsos GV; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. georgios.varsos@cantab.net.
  • Czosnyka M; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Smielewski P; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Garnett MR; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Liu X; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Adams H; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Pickard JD; Department of Neurosurgery, St Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Czosnyka Z; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Acta Neurochir Suppl ; 122: 215-20, 2016.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27165909
We studied possible correlations between cerebral hemodynamic indices based on critical closing pressure (CrCP) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compensatory dynamics, as assessed during lumbar infusion tests. Our data consisted of 34 patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus who undertook an infusion test, in conjunction with simultaneous transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) monitoring of blood flow velocity (FV). CrCP was calculated from the monitored signals of ICP, arterial blood pressure (ABP), and FV, whereas vascular wall tension (WT) was estimated as CrCP - ICP. The closing margin (CM) expresses the difference between ABP and CrCP. ICP increased during infusion from 6.67 ± 4.61 to 24.98 ± 10.49 mmHg (mean ± SD; p < 0.001), resulting in CrCP rising by 22.93 % (p < 0.001), with WT decreasing by 11.33 % (p = 0.005) owing to vasodilatation. CM showed a tendency to decrease, albeit not significantly (p = 0.070), because of rising ABP (9.12 %; p = 0.005), and was significantly different from zero for the whole duration of the tests (52.78 ± 22.82 mmHg; p < 0.001). CM at baseline correlated inversely with brain elasticity (R = -0.358; p = 0.038). Neither CrCP nor WT correlated with CSF compensatory parameters. Overall, CrCP increases and WT decreases during infusion tests, whereas CM at baseline pressure may act as a characterizing indicator of the cerebrospinal compensatory reserve.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo / Presión Intracraneal / Circulación Cerebrovascular / Hidrocéfalo Normotenso Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo / Presión Intracraneal / Circulación Cerebrovascular / Hidrocéfalo Normotenso Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article