Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network.
Merkel, Peter A; Manion, Michele; Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi; Groft, Stephen; Jinnah, H A; Robertson, David; Krischer, Jeffrey P.
  • Merkel PA; Division of Rheumatology and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Manion M; PCD Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  • Gopal-Srivastava R; Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Groft S; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Jinnah HA; Departments of Neurology, Human Genetics and Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Robertson D; Departments of Medicine, Pharmacology, and Neurology, Clinical Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Krischer JP; Health Informatics Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida, 3650 Spectrum Boulevard, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA. Jeffrey.Krischer@epi.usf.edu.
Orphanet J Rare Dis ; 11(1): 66, 2016 05 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27194034
BACKGROUND: Among the unique features of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Program is the requirement for each Consortium to include patient advocacy groups (PAGs) as research partners. This development has transformed the work of the RDCRN and is a model for collaborative research. This article outlines the roles patients and PAGs play in the RDCRN and reports on the PAGs' impact on the Network's success. METHODS: Principal Investigators from the 17 RDCRN Consortia and 28 representatives from 76 PAGs affiliated with these Consortia were contacted by email to provide feedback via an online RDCRN survey. Impact was measured in the key areas of 1) Research logistics; 2) Outreach and communication; and 3) Funding and in-kind support. Rating choices were: 1-very negative, 2-somewhat negative, 3-no impact, 4-somewhat positive, and 5-very positive. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the PAGs (96 %) disseminate information about the RDCRN within the patient community. The Consortium Principal Investigators also reported high levels of PAG involvement. Sixteen (94 %) Consortium Principal Investigators and 25 PAGs (89 %) reported PAGs participation in protocol review, study design, Consortium conference calls, attending Consortium meetings, or helping with patient recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: PAGs are actively involved in shaping Consortia's research agendas, help ensure the feasibility and success of research protocols by assisting with study design and patient recruitment, and support training programs. This extensive PAG-Investigator partnership in the RDCRN has had a strongly positive impact on the success of the Network.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Ejes tematicos: Pesquisa_clinica Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Defensa del Paciente / Proyectos de Investigación / Sistema de Registros / Conducta Cooperativa / Enfermedades Raras Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Ejes tematicos: Pesquisa_clinica Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Defensa del Paciente / Proyectos de Investigación / Sistema de Registros / Conducta Cooperativa / Enfermedades Raras Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article