Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment.
Guo, Yimeng; Kopec, Jacek A; Cibere, Jolanda; Li, Linda C; Goldsmith, Charles H.
  • Guo Y; At the time of the study, Yimeng (Jimmy) Guo was with the University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC. Jacek A. Kopec is with the Arthritis Research Canada and the Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health Practice, School of Population and Public Hea
  • Kopec JA; At the time of the study, Yimeng (Jimmy) Guo was with the University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC. Jacek A. Kopec is with the Arthritis Research Canada and the Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health Practice, School of Population and Public Hea
  • Cibere J; At the time of the study, Yimeng (Jimmy) Guo was with the University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC. Jacek A. Kopec is with the Arthritis Research Canada and the Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health Practice, School of Population and Public Hea
  • Li LC; At the time of the study, Yimeng (Jimmy) Guo was with the University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC. Jacek A. Kopec is with the Arthritis Research Canada and the Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health Practice, School of Population and Public Hea
  • Goldsmith CH; At the time of the study, Yimeng (Jimmy) Guo was with the University of British Columbia and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC. Jacek A. Kopec is with the Arthritis Research Canada and the Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Public Health Practice, School of Population and Public Hea
Am J Public Health ; 106(8): 1422-6, 2016 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27196650
OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of several survey features on response rates in a general population health survey. METHODS: In 2012 and 2013, 8000 households in British Columbia, Canada, were randomly allocated to 1 of 7 survey variants, each containing a different combination of survey features. Features compared included administration modes (paper vs online), prepaid incentive ($2 coin vs none), lottery incentive (instant vs end-of-study), questionnaire length (10 minutes vs 30 minutes), and sampling frame (InfoCanada vs Canada Post). RESULTS: The overall response rate across the 7 groups was 27.9% (range = 17.1-43.4). All survey features except the sampling frame were associated with statistically significant differences in response rates. The survey mode elicited the largest effect on the odds of response (odds ratio [OR] = 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.61, 2.59), whereas the sampling frame showed the least effect (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.98, 1.34). The highest response was achieved by mailing a short paper survey with a prepaid incentive. CONCLUSIONS: In a mailed general population health survey in Canada, a 40% to 50% response rate can be expected. Questionnaire administration mode, survey length, and type of incentive affect response rates.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Encuestas Epidemiológicas / Motivación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación / Encuestas Epidemiológicas / Motivación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article