Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Case Report: Prune perineum syndrome: a rare case with an unfavourable outcome.
Lopes, Roberto I; Dénes, Francisco T; Messi, Gustavo B; Machado, Marcos G.
  • Lopes RI; Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
  • Dénes FT; Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Messi GB; Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Machado MG; Division of Urology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
F1000Res ; 5: 363, 2016.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27303628
Prune perineum syndrome (PPS) is a rare anomaly, with only two previous case reports, both dying in the perinatal period. We report the first case of PPS that reached childhood. The patient presented with a hypoplastic genitalia and bilateral cryptorchidism. There was no evidence of an anal orifice. A significant prune-like mass was observed, extending from the perineum to both gluteal regions and to a cephalic mid-line bony prominence, with a 1cm central orifice that discharged urine. MRI confirmed the previous findings and revealed a right crossed ectopic kidney, intestinal malrotation, a hypoplastic infrarenal inferior vena cava and a hypoplastic right iliac artery. Endoscopic evaluation through the orifice revealed a cavity lined by urothelial mucosa, with a small communication to the anterior urethra in its anterior wall. A staged reconstruction was planned, with a first-step urinary diversion through a continent abdominal reservoir associated to bilateral orchiopexy. He was discharged from the hospital three weeks later under intermittent catheterization. The next surgical step would be the resection of the perineal mass and its cavity associated to the removal of the prominent sacrococcygeal bones. Unfortunately, four months after the first surgery the patient developed an acute abdomen and was submitted to a laparotomy that revealed a necrotic ileal segment secondary to obstructive adherences. He developed severe malabsorption followed by septic shock, dying five weeks after the procedure. Due to the lack of literature, there is no consensus for the management of these cases. The wish of the family for a better quality of life and social acceptance, compelled us to perform a urinary diversion, to be followed by a plastic and orthopedic reconstruction. Despite the successful initial result, the patient developed a late abdominal obstruction that was misdiagnosed, precipitating his untimely death five months after the first procedure.
Palabras clave